|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 16:18:58 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #213 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Monday, November 10 1997 Volume 01 : Number 213 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: 4WD Lubrication [David Hertzberg ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #212 [Bill Funk ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #209 [alanh Re: Please help decode VIN # [William Martin (Temp) ] PowerStroke Lope nerf bars [jsruss 1999 Super duty [Tony Rio ] RE: Leaky Bronco II [Tony Rio ] Re: 84 Bronco Ignition Problem ["David J. Baldwin" ] '94 F150 Tranny and gas gauge questions [Tony Rio ] Re: Ranger Shift snick 1st to 2nd [Thom Cheney ] Re: Conversion vans [Thom Cheney ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #209 [Nathan Heid ] Conversion vans [KNBD87D Re: Mystery suspension part? [Joe Maleski ] RE: Mystery suspension part [greg.medert RE: Mass air conversion... [greg.medert RE: Mystery suspension part? Part II [Michael Wray Bed Liners ["Judy Thill (MG MSMAIL)" ] fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #212 [Andrew T Vincitore Re: 99 Big-uns - More Pictures [john yee ] 2.3L Ranger Power [SNOOP22222 300 Distributor problem ["s" ] Re: nerf bars ["Lare/Eric" ] Re: nerf bars [jsruss Re: nerf bars ["Lare/Eric" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 97 06:01:13 PST From: David Hertzberg Subject: Re: 4WD Lubrication yes, i was referring to the two differentials. on my little toyota we have a transaxle. sorry for the confusion. > >>From: David Hertzberg >>Subject: Re: 4WD Lubrication >>dave r: excellent--just the information i was looking for. >>one last question: i read somewhere in an earlier post >>(perhaps one of yours) that using synthetic gear oil in the >>rear transaxle was adviseable--what about the front >>transaxle?? any thoughts?? thanks, david > >Yo David: > >The term "transaxle" usually refers to a combined (in a single case) >transmission and differential gear (axle) assembly. Perhaps you are >referring to differentials? > >Here's what I know: Eaton, Dana/Spicer, Fuller, and other manufacturers of >heavy truck application gearboxes (transmissions, differentials, etc.) >almost unanimously recommend synthetic lubricants in gearboxes to reduce >operating friction and improve fuel economy in large trucks. > >I would speculate that in a pickup truck, operating friction would account >for a lot less power loss (inefficiency) than in the gearboxes on a large >truck, but there might still be some efficiency to be gained w/ synthetic >lubes. Since gear lube is changed a lot less often than engine oil, the >additional cost of the synthetic gear lube would be spread over a lot more >miles and the (probably minimal) improvement in fuel efficiency would be >easier to justify than any improvements you could attribute to synthetic >engine oil. > >Additionally, I would look carefully at the service literature supplied by >the manufacturer of your truck's gearboxes (Ford, Warner, ZF, New >Process/New Venture, whoever) to find out what they recommend. I would >probably not risk using a synthetic lube if the manufacturer specifically >recommended against it in a particular application. > >Except for the special lubrication requirements of some traction aid device >(such as a limited slip or locking differential), if the front and rear >differentials are of the same type, I can think of no reason that the same >gear lube couldn't be used in both front and rear differentials. > >In general, I would go for synthetic gear lube before I would go for >synthetic engine oil, but either way, I would only buy products with the >appropriate API certification for their intended purpose. > >Dave R. (M-block devotee) > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ David and Leila Hertzberg Greystoke Farm Gaithersburg, Maryland 301-482-0016 ACdhertz ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 08:52:51 -0700 From: Bill Funk Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #212 > From: "Gene E. Utterback, EA, ATA, ATP" > Subject: 84 Bronco Ignition Problem > > HELP!! ... > > > Someone in PEPBOYS (not an emoployee - a customer who overhead me > talking with my mechanic) suggested that perhaps the ignition switch > module actuating rod, actuated by the ignition key, needs adjustment. > Neither my wrench not I have ever heard of this. Is this legitimate? > > Also, if anyone out there has any suggestions I'd gladly appreciate > whatever help is given. > > Thanks for listening, > > Devient Gene That rod does exist. It's pushed on by a lever turned by the key when you put it in the START position. The rod goes down the steering collumn, and presses on a switch that activates the starting solonoid. Over the years, it can shorten a small amount by being pressed so often (NOT one of Ford's better ideas!); replacement requires removal of the steering wheel and associated hardware.However, this is only for the starting sequence - it won't have anything to do with your described problem of the ignition cutting out. That's probably a bad connection somewhere, or even a broken wire. Good luck. Bill Funk ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 08:07:46 -0800 From: alanh Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #209 Ian sez: > Bill, all diesels foundin ford pickups are made by international. you might want to qualify that; I personally know of a Ford pickup that contains an Isuzu diesel...of course it didn't come from the factory that way! Let's just say that all diesels found in Ford pickups as they leave the factory are made by International! - --- Alan Hepburn | | National Semiconductor | DON'T TREAD ON ME | Santa Clara, Ca | | alanh ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 08:10:22 -0800 (PST) From: William Martin (Temp) Subject: Re: Please help decode VIN # > > In a message dated 97-11-07 07:41:59 EST, you write: > > > Where can you get information like this? How do you know? > > Craig > >> > > Craig, > I looked it up in my Ford Light Truck Shop Manual for Body / Chassis/ > Electrical, It breaks down all the codes in detail. > > Phil > About the axle codes for these trucks...I have some more info now that I have this monster home. It has an axle code of "31", which I suspect is 3.xx:1 . Also, much to my delight, it is NOT equipped with a catatonic, errrr, catalytic converter! There may be a nice set of headers & duals in its future. A couple of questions have come up since I got to drive it some distance at hiway speeds. The oil pressure is great when cold at all speeds, ok at 30mph & up when hot, but just about dissapears at idle when hot. I'm suspecting it needs a new oil pump...there are no obnoxious noises from the engine even when the pressure goes away. Not even a ticking lifter! Anyone experienced these symptoms? thanks, Bill martin ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 97 10:22:25 -0600 From: Jay Chlebowski Subject: PowerStroke Lope Howdy All: I've got a small concern that I think might have been addressed previously. It seems that once my 97 PowerStroke gets up to normal operating temps, it falls into a slight lope at idle. It doesn't do this when cold, but lately seems to be getting a bit more noticeable. Now, it's not a very large fluctuation -- it sits around 650rpm normally, but seems to rythymically fall to 625rpm, then up to 675rpm and then 650rpm in a constant cycle. Since the fuel rate is computer controlled, I suspect a sensor is feeding the PCM some bad info, but I'd like to offer a clue to the dealer when I take it in & I need any suggestions. The dealer is none too bright and is still trying to trace down a small oil leak that I'm geting after three trips in. Oh well, I guess since it's under warranty I'll just let them keep fiddling with it as long as the thing keeps running good. On the subject of the new F-SuperDuty's, the link at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.f150 online. com/articles/1999f250.html provides the best pictures I've seen, and from what I can tell, they appear more handsome than I thought they might. I like the fact that they kept the Alcoa's -- very classy. I can't wait to see what axles they stick under the 4x4 versions of the F450 & F550. A Dana 60 would seem to have too small of a GAWR for the GVWR's that Ford is touting on those trucks -- anyone have any clues? Thanx & Best Regards, Jay ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:18:07 +0000 From: jsruss Subject: nerf bars Does anyone know of some nerf bars that mount close to the body of a 96 Ranger Supercab ? I need to protect the rocker panels !! Jimmy ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 11:30:48 -0600 From: Tony Rio Subject: 1999 Super duty ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 11:38:42 -0600 From: Tony Rio Subject: RE: Leaky Bronco II Lou... My aunt had a problem with water leaking into her Chevy full size. The truck always smelled very musty inside, and it turned out that water was seeping in through the openings by the windshield wipers. It was running in and soaking the backside of the dash and such, and would make the truck stink. If I remember correctly, a little dab of silicone took care of it. Not sure if this helps, but you may wish to investigate. Tony ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 11:52:19 -0600 From: "David J. Baldwin" Subject: Re: 84 Bronco Ignition Problem Gene E. Utterback, EA, ATA, ATP wrote: > > HELP!! > > I have a 1984 Full Size Bronco with a 351M, 4bbl Holly Carb and > Electronic Iginition. > > I know I have a carbuerator problem. The floats are sticking and the > carb loads up and floods easliy. If the truck doesn't start on the > first or second try, it won't start till the carb dries out. If the floats are sticking or sunk (leaked and filled with fuel, then sunk) you will probably notice fuel hosing out of the air horns that vent the float bowls. The ones I've worked on were about 1/4 inch tubes that stick up vertically in front of--and between--the venturii. This is usually cut off at a 45 degree angle. Another way to tell is to remove the fuel level adjustment sight (if yours has one) on the float bowls and see if fuel comes draining out. If it does, there are three problems that I can think of causing it: (1) Sunk float, (2) bad needle/seat assembly, and (3), fuel level adjusted too high. It could be as simple as (3), and all you need to do is adjust the fuel height. This is accomplished by releasing the jam nut on the large slotted screw head on the top of the float bowl. When the nut is released, turn the screw head with a screwdriver until fuel is level with the bottom of the adjustment sight. The engine must be running to do this, of course. If fuel comes hosing out the sight even with the adjustment tightened down all the way, you've got (1) or (2); fix the problem first--don't cause a fire! I've seen some Holleys without fuel level sights (cost reduction). For a quick check in this case, remove one of the top float bowl attachment bolts. Under no circumstances should any fuel come out of here when the vehicle is stationary. If you've got LOTS of black smoke coming out the back, it could be a ruptured power valve diaphragm. The power valve is the achilles-heel of the Holley 4bbl. This apparatus richens the mixture when you accelerate heavily by sensing a drop in manifold vaccuum. If you evey have a backfire, you have a good chance of rupturing the diaphragm, which allows the float bowl to drain directly into the plenum. The engine hardly runs when this happens, and belches loads of black smoke. If this is your problem, it will NEVER run right. If you have intermittent running problems, this probably isn't it. One thing I forgot: with emissions design, the float bowls may vent into a carbon canister. They might be allowing this thing to fill with fuel. I don't have a manual on your truck, so I can't be certain. If you have a canister, it shouldn't fill with liquid fuel--it is to contain vapors only. If it fills with fuel (either through the carb or some other way) the carb may not be able to vent properly, which would cause erratic running. > > Since I've started putting the truck back together, it has developed a > nasty ignition problem. Sometimes it starts and sometimes it doesn't. I remember Ford ignition modules having problems in the mid '80s. Don't know if yours could be affected, but it probably would've been replaced by now anyway. Don't overlook the simple stuff, too. Like plug wires--after 14 years, they probably need to go. Rotor cap? Other stuff like that. Good luck. Keep us posted. - -- Best Regards, Dave Baldwin Dallas, TX - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:07:57 -0600 From: Tony Rio Subject: '94 F150 Tranny and gas gauge questions Question... I have noticed that when I am on the expressway and speed up from about 50, when the F150 automatic tranny shifts, I get a vibration and a rumbling noise. Sometimes it is hardly noticable, other times it is big. I asked my mechanic if it could be transmission fluid, but he said the last time he changed the oil (1 month and 2700 miles ago) he checked the fluid, and it seemed fine. Any other suggestions? Also, the gas gauge will not register the front tank. It will show either half full or totally empty at any given time, no matter how much gas is in the tank. It works fine with the rear tank. Thanks!!! Tony - --------------------------------------------------- Tony Rio Allstate Insurance Enterprise Help Center Integration Owner - PRC Analyst Groupwise ID: TRIO1 X 28686 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:25:02 -0500 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Ranger Shift snick 1st to 2nd srramona > > I have a 96 Mazda B2300 4 banger/5 speed, 7K at 15 months. > Delighted with the truck except for one irritating thing; There is a > pronounced "snick" when shifting from 1st to 2nd gear. No meshing problems > with the other transitions. I have had this with another vehicle....not really a "bind" or a "grind"...just a "snick", as you describe. I drove it like that for well over 100,000 miles with no problems. Not sure what caused it, but it never broke! - -- Thom Cheney Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:30:28 -0500 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Conversion vans STATX5 > > Hi Group > > I've owned ford pu trucks for many years now and I'm completly satisfied. A > stange thing is happening, my three little ones are getting bigger and are > complaining about lack of elbow room in the back seat of my extended > cab,especially on those long trips! Well any way they almost have me > convinced to buy a conversion van, just wondering if anyone has any words of > advise on Ford models!! (Never owned a van ) > STILL KEEPING THE 89 F250 4X4 EXTENDED CAB!!!! If you can live with the new mirrors, you ought to wait for the crew cab truck, due out any time... 4 real doors & a truck bed. - -- Thom Cheney Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 13:19:35 -0500 From: Nathan Heid Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #209 >you might want to qualify that; I personally know of a Ford pickup >that contains an Isuzu diesel...of course it didn't come from the >factory that way! Let's just say that all diesels found in Ford >pickups as they leave the factory are made by International! Who made the diesel used in the Ranger in the mid '80s??? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 13:23:17, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: Conversion vans My dad is on his third Ford Conversion Van. The Ford is only the drivetrain and dash layout. That will be good forever. The conversion is the difficult decision There are many companies out there, so you should shop around. Josh ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 10:06:50 -0800 From: Joe Maleski Subject: Re: Mystery suspension part? That little piece of plastic is there to keep the tie down chains from chafeing on the leaf spring while the truck is in transit from the factory to the dealer. Normally it is supposed to be removed during the pre-delivery inspection but more often than not I see them still there. I've never seen it taped in place, though. Joe >My truck: 1997, F-250, 4X4, Powerstroke. > >On both sides there is a black plastic spacer inserted between the front >leaf springs. The spacer is taped in place with black duct tape and is >marked "discard". Any ideas what they are there for. And the obvious >question, should they be discarded? ************************************ Joe Maleski Santa Clara, CA 1994 F-250HD SuperCab 4X4, 460/5-spd mailto:jmaleski ------------------------------ Date: 10 Nov 97 10:35:00 (-0500) From: greg.medert Subject: RE: Mystery suspension part - --UNS_gsauns2_2735892728 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 08 Nov 1997 12:59:13 -0600 From: ccbg054 Subject: Mystery suspension part? My truck: 1997, F-250, 4X4, Powerstroke. On both sides there is a black plastic spacer inserted between the front leaf springs. The spacer is taped in place with black duct tape and is marked "discard". Any ideas what they are there for. And the obvious question, should they be discarded? Thanks, Bill ------------------------------ Bill this is a part that should have been removed by the dealer when they prepped the car upon delivery from the factory. These are parts used by automakers to keep the suspensions from bottomming out and bouncing while being transported on car carriers or train. greg.medert - --UNS_gsauns2_2735892728-- ------------------------------ Date: 10 Nov 97 10:54:00 (-0500) From: greg.medert Subject: RE: Mass air conversion... - --UNS_gsauns2_2735892731 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 08:19:10 -0600 From: "Lopez, Raoul" Subject: One More Try, I Need Help Converting a 1985 F-150 4X4 5.0 EFI to M ass Air Metering Does anyone have any technical expertise in this area? I have a 1985 F-150 4X4 with a 5.0 EFI. I spoke with someone on the Ford Motorsport SVO Tech Line about converting my '85 to mass air. Their reply was Ford makes a conversion kit for '87 and newer 5.0's but 85's and 86's were excluded for some reason and they couldn't help me. If I can convert I believe it makes the addition of cams, headers, superchargers, etc. easier. Does anyone have any info on converting an '85 from speed density engine management to mass air metering? Thanks, Raoul Lopez Rlopez ------------------------------ Raoul, It is my understanding that the '85 is not a true fuel injected 5.0 but rather a throttle body injected 5.0. The mass air conversion kits are only available for the fuel injected 5.0 (has 8 fuel injectors in intake). I think the '86 was a fuel injected 5.0 so I don't understand SVO saying 87 and newer. Take a look to find out for certain which you have. If you truely have the fuel injected 5.0 then the 87 and newer conversion can be made to work. Contact Ford Performance Specialists at 770-577-3005 Douglasville, GA. They can sell you the parts or install it for you. Hope this helps. greg.medert Atlanta, Ga - --UNS_gsauns2_2735892731-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 11:03:07 -0800 From: Michael Wray Subject: RE: Mystery suspension part? Part II I also have this little piece of suspension part that I do know have any idea what it is. It is located on the back axle (on the drivers side). It's kind of a loop looking thingy. I was told that it helps keep the backend brakes from locking up. Kind of strange tho' This is on a '86 F250 Supercab 4X4 Also, I was told the is a SD truck. How can I tell? Thanx for all the responses and help. :) Michael ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 14:36:50 -0600 From: "Judy Thill (MG MSMAIL)" Subject: Bed Liners Has anyone ever used, heard of, know any thing about Side Liners? This is a 3 piece liner for the truck bed that covers the two sides and front. It is designed to be used with a bed mat and a tail gate protector. It is supposedly made out of the same plastic as a normal one-piece bed liner and there is no drilling or use of screws to install. It just fits up under the side rails and the bed mat helps hold the bottom of the pieces in place. I like the thought of being able to take the liner out once in a while (and be able to do it myself). I also like the storage potential for three smaller pieces instead of one big one. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks! Judy Thill Fire Operations Officer Maple Grove Fire Department ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 14:52:28 -0500 From: Andrew T Vincitore Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #212 Message text written by INTERNET:fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: Golf Games If I wanted entertainment I would not have linked up with the Ford Enthusiasts! Put your funnies where the sun does not shine. B. Carothers You know, it was a funny joke and this list can get a bit dry sometimes. = I think it is part of the friendly informality of this list. = So I say, laugh a little! Peace Andrew ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:58:28 -0800 From: john yee Subject: Re: 99 Big-uns - More Pictures Mitch Biarsky wrote: > > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.f150 online. com/articles/1999f250.html > > Mitch > Picked this off of Jason's site - http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.abol.com/users/jlester/ 1999 preview link: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.boyerford.com/ - -john ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 16:07:07 -0500 (EST) From: SNOOP22222 Subject: 2.3L Ranger Power What's the best way to increase the power on a Ranger with a 2.3L engine? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 17:12:22 -0500 From: "s" Subject: 300 Distributor problem This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BCEDFB.CEDD11E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have an 84 full size bronco with a 300 motor, auto, 4x4. I had some problems with the stock carb a few years ago. It would run = rich than lean it drove me nuts so I took it to my mechanic. He rebuilt = the carb and still no luck.So the next thing to try was a non-circuit = carb.It worked. he also took all of the emission crap off to. Now the = only thing the computer is running is the=20 distributer.. So he says...He suggested looking for a aftermarket = electronic or stock points distributer for it..Now I am having problems = with the distributer not advancing so I am going to replace it.. Anyone = have any suggestions on what=20 distributer to run on it. I havent had any luck finding any aftermarket = distributers. Also I will be putting on headers and a Clifford intake.Am not sure what = carb I will use?? Any input would be helpful. - ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BCEDFB.CEDD11E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http-equiv=3DContent-Type> I have an 84 full size bronco with a = 300 motor,=20 auto, 4x4. I had some problems with the stock = carb a few=20 years ago. It would run rich than lean it drove me nuts so I took it to = my=20 mechanic. He rebuilt the carb and still no luck.So the next thing to try = was a=20 non-circuit carb.It worked. he also took all of the emission crap off = to. Now=20 the only thing the computer is running is the distributer.. So he says...He = suggested looking=20 for a aftermarket electronic or stock points distributer for it..Now I = am having=20 problems with the distributer not advancing so I am going to replace = it.. Anyone=20 have any suggestions on what distributer to run on it. I havent = had any luck=20 finding any aftermarket distributers. Also I will be putting on headers = and a Clifford=20 intake.Am not sure what carb I will use?? Any input would be = helpful. - ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BCEDFB.CEDD11E0-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 18:02:49 -0500 From: "Lare/Eric" Subject: Re: nerf bars I've got Smittybilt on my '94 Splash Ext. Cab. They were the only ones that I could find that went from wheel to wheel (it seems most extend just the length of the cab - not beyond to the bed & rear wheel). I wanted mine for protection as well (among other things - I'm only 5'-4" tall and my truck has a 4" suspension lift with 32" tires) - two years and they're holding up very well - just a few nicks in the black powdercoat. These bars hang about 1.5" from the bottom of the body (rocker panel?) - I'm not real bright when it comes to autobody talk - I'm more into the mechanics (BSME). Hope this helps, Eric S. - '94 Splash Ext. Cab 4x4, Slightly Modified - ---------- > From: jsruss > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: nerf bars > Date: Monday, November 10, 1997 7:18 AM > > Does anyone know of some nerf bars that mount close to the body of a > 96 Ranger Supercab ? I need to protect the rocker panels !! > > Jimmy > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 19:04:47 +0000 From: jsruss Subject: Re: nerf bars Eric Thanks for the info : What was the cost of your bars ? This sounds like the ones I want . From: "Lare/Eric" To: Reply-to: fordtrucks80up Subject: Re: nerf bars Date: Mon, 10 Nov 97 23:02:49 +0000 I've got Smittybilt on my '94 Splash Ext. Cab. They were the only ones that I could find that went from wheel to wheel (it seems most extend just the length of the cab - not beyond to the bed & rear wheel). I wanted mine for protection as well (among other things - I'm only 5'-4" tall and my truck has a 4" suspension lift with 32" tires) - two years and they're holding up very well - just a few nicks in the black powdercoat. These bars hang about 1.5" from the bottom of the body (rocker panel?) - I'm not real bright when it comes to autobody talk - I'm more into the mechanics (BSME). Hope this helps, Eric S. - '94 Splash Ext. Cab 4x4, Slightly Modified - ---------- > From: jsruss > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: nerf bars > Date: Monday, November 10, 1997 7:18 AM > > Does anyone know of some nerf bars that mount close to the body of a > 96 Ranger Supercab ? I need to protect the rocker panels !! > > Jimmy > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks80up | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 18:19:36 -0500 From: "Lare/Eric" Subject: Re: nerf bars Most of the retail and warehouse/catalog places wanted around $170 for them; I ended up waiting for A&A (retail outlet in PA) to have them on sale (I lived right beside them, so I kept checking every few days - only took about three weeks) for $134. If you have the patience, I think it's worth it - spent the difference on new extra coverage mud flaps. These were a breeze to put in, too. I only had to drill one hole in the frame by the front cross-member on each side - the other five bolts (3 front & rear) lined up with existing holes (make sure you load up on Rustoleum/Sealer/Rust Protectant/Etc. where you drill - I had a Toyota in my youngin days and didn't perform this crucial step - about a year and a half later the rusted out frame said farewell to my nerf bars - at 55 mph!). - ---------- > From: jsruss > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: nerf bars > Date: Monday, November 10, 1997 2:04 PM > > Eric > Thanks for the info : What was the cost of your bars ? This sounds > like the ones I want . > > > > From: "Lare/Eric" > To: > Reply-to: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: nerf bars > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 97 23:02:49 +0000 > > I've got Smittybilt on my '94 Splash Ext. Cab. They were the only ones > that I could find that went from wheel to wheel (it seems most extend just > the length of the cab - not beyond to the bed & rear wheel). I wanted mine > for protection as well (among other things - I'm only 5'-4" tall and my > truck has a 4" suspension lift with 32" tires) - two years and they're > holding up very well - just a few nicks in the black powdercoat. > > These bars hang about 1.5" from the bottom of the body (rocker panel?) - > I'm not real bright when it comes to autobody talk - I'm more into the > mechanics (BSME). > > Hope this helps, > > Eric S. - '94 Splash Ext. Cab 4x4, Slightly Modified > > > ---------- > > From: jsruss > > To: fordtrucks80up > > Subject: nerf bars > > Date: Monday, November 10, 1997 7:18 AM > > > > Does anyone know of some nerf bars that mount close to the body of a > > 96 Ranger Supercab ? I need to protect the rocker panels !!.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|