|
|
Return-Path: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 03:50:21 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #198 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Friday, October 31 1997 Volume 01 : Number 198 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE:RE: Ranger HP [greg.medert Re: Spam? [Bill Funk ] Re: 86 Ranger 2.3 Header [Don Vanco ] Re: ghost flames [Don Vanco ] Green Liquid in Exhaust ["Leo O'Neill" ] exhaust (fwd) [Philippe Gravelle ] Re: Green Liquid in Exhaust ["David J. Baldwin" ] Re:green exhaust juice [Don Vanco ] 93'STX 4x4 [CASSIS Mail "Subject Line" in General ["Gene E. Utterback, EA, ATA, ATP" Re: 93'STX 4x4 ["David J. Baldwin" ] 2.3L Turbo.... Cheap! [BiggRanger Recall [hunter Splash inquiry: ["S. HALL" ] $1700 for a transfer case?!? '95 F150 [Steve ] Ford sets recall of 1.1 million vehicles [Mitch Biarsky Re: Mail "Subject Line" in General [Ken Payne ] ADMIN: Static cling window stickers [Ken Payne ] 300I6 mileage [Croth2 ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 30 Oct 97 07:51:00 (-0500) From: greg.medert Subject: RE:RE: Ranger HP - --UNS_gsauns2_2730357189 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Josh, I feel that I getting around 200 HP in my 91 4.0 with all the mods I have done. That may not seem like a lot with all the mods but you have to realize that in 91 the 5 speed 4.0 only had 145 HP stock and the auto's had 160. In 92 Ford changed both 5 spd and auto's to 160. 91 Ford specs are as follows 145 HP the 5 spd, 160 HP needs a cam bad. Mine runs out around 4400 rpm. I will send some pics to you directly. Take care. greg.medert Atlanta, Ga - --UNS_gsauns2_2730357189-- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 07:11:04 -0700 From: Bill Funk Subject: Re: Spam? > From: fwise > Subject: Re: Spam? > > ... > Ken (Payne, not the spammer), has this guy been lifting addresses off > of > the list? I know that you don't give out list member's addresses, so > that > is my assumption. Has anyone else been the victim of this guys stuff? > ... > > Fred Wise I got the impression that, since the message was addressed to "Dear Ford Enthusiast", it definitely came from someone who gleaned this list. Bill Funk ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:32:54 -0500 From: Don Vanco Subject: Re: 86 Ranger 2.3 Header At 08:33 PM 10/29/97 -0800, you wrote: >I need to locate a header for my 86 Ranger 4x4 with the 2.3 motor. Try Summit Racing in Akron, Ohio - great prices & huge inventory. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://summitracing.com/ Or JBA in CA (J. Bittle - sorry, no URL) J. Bittle Performance 7149 Mission Gorge Rd. San Diego, CA 92120 (619) 229-7799 >What >other mods have you guys performed on the motor. I also need stereo >advice on a speaker box behind the seat, any sugestions? need info on >good door speakers to, pref. 6.5" Try Crutchfield. Not the best prices, but not the worst - and they give you all the correct connectors & wiring harness adapters you need. A full Ford Stereo swap can be done in about a half an hour (OK - maybe not the first one you do....) YMMV Don ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:48:00 -0500 From: Don Vanco Subject: Re: ghost flames At 08:16 PM 10/29/97 -0500, Melanie Curry wrote: >Help, >I recently purchased a 1997 Ford F-150 in sapphire blue. I would like to >paint ghost flames on the hood and front fenders, but I'm not sure how to >go about doing this. If anyone has any information on how to paint ghost >flames, please let me know or if anyone knows of any publications >explaining this please also let me know of these. If anyone can tell you it Joe http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.houseofkolor.com/ Awesome product - but a premium price. But is your truck worth it? I'd suggest a light white pearl slowly tinted to orange & red.... Or not..... >Also, I have a 1976 Ford F-100 XLT which is a show truck. I am constantly >looking for parts information and new ways to improve the appearance of >this truck. Tow a Lamborghini! Just kidding - do a WEB search & you'll find a few dozen sources... Don ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 08:04:26 -0500 From: "Leo O'Neill" Subject: Green Liquid in Exhaust I have a 1994 F-150 5.0L with 60,000 miles on it. Last July, while helping a friend, he noticed that there was green liquid pooled at the end on my exhaust pipe. I wetted my fingers with the liquid to test it's consistancy and smelled it to see if it resembled antifreeze. It didn't but after passing through the engine, I figured most of those traites might be lost. I ran the engine for a while to see if there was any steam coming out of the exhaust...nothing. Puzzled but not wanting to face the truth, I challanged my friends to come up with an explaination that DIDN'T involve the heads or head gaskets...they couldn't. I even quizzed my 4 year old to see if he had put a lime popcycle in the pipe...he didn't. So, I resigned myself to having a head problem. I dutifully performed a compression test...all 8 cylinders were 140-150 psi. I put a mark on my antifreeze reservoir and after 3500 miles, the level has dropped about 1/2". I've been monitor the exhaust pipe and occassionally find this pool of green liquid at the end of the tail pipe and I am stumpted. This is the only anomoly I've observed. Could I have a micro-crack in the heads/head gasket that releases only small quantities of antifreeze into the exhaust stream? Is there something goofy with my gas and/or catalytic converter? I'm taking a wait and see attitude at this point but am curious if any of you have had a similar experience. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 10:28:05 -0500 (EST) From: Philippe Gravelle Subject: exhaust (fwd) - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 12:44:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Philippe Gravelle To: fordtrucks80up Subject: exhaust (fwd) - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 10:46:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Philippe Gravelle To: fordtrucks80up Subject: exhaust Hi!! I had the same with my 1995 300,4.9l,I always have a bit of water at the end of my tail pipe and it's a light green just like antifreeze. I brought it in for a check-up at my local Ford dealer and they said the water part was normal due to condensation,but the green colour was a reaction of the water and the cadmium in the muffler(just like copper when it oxide it goes green)So the TSB fix for that was one small 1/8" hole a the very bottom of the muffler.I still get green water at the tail pipe but it's much less than before. I hope this help! I can get the # of the TSB if you want. Cheers!!! Philippe 1995,300,4.9l 4X4 Still working on the very intermittent rough idle problem. New:plug wire,distributor cap,spark plugs,idler valve,air and gas filter ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:39:41 -0600 From: "David J. Baldwin" Subject: Re: Green Liquid in Exhaust Leo O'Neill wrote: > > I have a 1994 F-150 5.0L with 60,000 miles on it. > > Last July, while helping a friend, he noticed that there was > green liquid pooled at the end on my exhaust pipe. I wetted > my fingers with the liquid to test it's consistancy and smelled it to > see if it resembled antifreeze. It didn't but after passing through > the engine, I figured most of those traites might be lost. I ran the > engine for a while to see if there was any steam coming out of the > exhaust...nothing. > > So, I resigned myself to having a head problem. I dutifully > performed a compression test...all 8 cylinders were 140-150 psi. > > I put a mark on my antifreeze reservoir and after 3500 miles, the > level has dropped about 1/2". I wouldn't freak-out just yet. You did a compression test, and that was OK. You marked the coolant level some time ago, but did you make sure that you checked it with the truck parked in the same location? If not, slope of the terrain may have you fooled. You didn't mention pressure testing the cooling system. You might want to check the oil for coolant, too. I'd do this to make sure, and keep an eye on things. I have a '95 F-150, and have noticed this as well. Corrosion due to water vapor in the exhaust system (which is normal, and a by-product of the combustion process) can cause a greenish tint in the water condensing at the end of the exhaust system. I am not losing coolant, and there have been others on this list who have experienced the same. I have had two vehicles with head gasket problems, and they did NOT drip green from the exhaust. By the time the coolant goes through the combustion process, it is likely to lose its green color. I suppose there may be some exceptions, but unless you losing quarts of coolant in a short period of time, the likelihood of coolant coming out the exhaust green is slim. Good luck. - -- Best Regards, Dave Baldwin Dallas, TX - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:21:34 -0500 From: Don Vanco Subject: Re:green exhaust juice At 10:28 AM 10/30/97 -0500, Philippe Gravelle wrote: > the TSB fix for that was one small 1/8" >hole a the very bottom of the muffler. This is stanard on every Ford muffler I've looked at in the last coupla years - sounds goofy but perhaps it is the truth.... My Cobra has obvious streaks from this hole not green.. Don ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 97 10:19 From: CASSIS Subject: 93'STX 4x4 So how do you come up with a formula to get back to stock gear ratio? Or do you jut try to locate 4:10's? That seems like a real big jump in gearing to me? It realy does'nt seem like it would be real hard to do though. Just swap out the center chunk. The front could be a little dificult though. Also I am assuming the front and rear a geared the same, is this correct? Or is there difrent gearing and it is matched up right in the t-case. I am asking because a friend is insisting that is how it is. This is my second 4x4 and as far as I new the gearing had to be the same or you would blow the t-case all to hell. Could someone explain to me what a kat back system is? I've herd of them but how does it work? What exactly does it do? And most of all how expensive is it? Thanks, John Cassis ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 12:46:56 -0800 From: "Gene E. Utterback, EA, ATA, ATP" Subject: Mail "Subject Line" in General Greetings All, I have been following this list for a little while now. Also, I am relatively new to this type of forum, so please cut me a little slack if my comment/observation is something that has been gone over. I looked for an FAQ, but didn't see one. Again, maybe in my newness I missed it. The computer program I use (Netscape Navigator) threads mail and news messages according to the subject line. This seems to make it easy to keep all the related "Subjects" together. I find this helpful when I'm looking for an answer to a question. However, I have noticed that a lot of the people posting to this group change the subject when the post a reply. Do these folks realize that doing this makes it harder for the person who posted the original question to find responses to those questions? Not to mention little insignificant me, who justs wants to follow along. Or am I way off base with this observation? Just a thought, I don't get many, but when I do I feel an irrepressable urge to share them. Devient Gene ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:49:54 -0600 From: "David J. Baldwin" Subject: Re: 93'STX 4x4 Cassis, John wrote: > > So how do you come up with a formula to get back to stock gear ratio? Or > do you jut try to locate 4:10's? That seems like a real big jump in > gearing to me? It realy does'nt seem like it would be real hard to do John, I agree with those who advise you to re-gear your truck. I don't know the height of the stock tires and don't remember what they were on your new ones, but I am assuming that you can find out. If you can, you need to compensate for the increase in size of your tires with a corresponding change in gearing. So: New gear ratio = old gear ratio * (new tire height / old tire height) For example, if you have 3.73:1 rear end gears now, you old tire was 28" tall, and the new ones are 32" tall, you need a gear ratio of: New ratio = (3.73)*(32"/28") = 4.26:1 Some will make the argument that you should measure the distance from the road surface to axle centerline, and this is correct, but since there are limited choices on gear sets anyway, I don't think you need to sweat it. Like in the above calculation, could you find a set of 4.26 gears? Probably not. You will have to make the choice to go up or down to the nearest available. Since you are towing in hilly terrain and have a 3.0L, I'd recommend up (numerically--gets you more torque multiplication). > is. This is my second 4x4 and as far as I new the gearing had to be the > same or you would blow the t-case all to hell. If you change the rear, you've got to change the front. > Could someone explain to me what a kat back system is? I've herd of them > but how does it work? What exactly does it do? And most of all how > expensive is it? Cat-back means replacement of the exhaust system from the output of the catalytic converter out with a more free-flowing system. How much will this get you? Good question. The catalyst is one of the more restrictive things in the system, so replacing everything after it may not have as much effect as just removing the cat and leaving everything else! Of course, this is illegal. I believe that there are more free-flowing catalysts on the market (I haven't found any on the web--anyone else know of a website), but I believe that the stock system must be in need of replacement before you can legally change the catalyst. I think the common "need of replacement" guideline is 50K miles. It might be different in different states, so check it out first--before you have emissions testing problems. There are also emissions-legal headers available for some engines. I don't know if there are any available for your truck. Borla makes a cat-back for your truck. Check out this page. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.racenet.net/exh/borla6.htm - -- Best Regards, Dave Baldwin Dallas, TX - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:11:51 -0500 (EST) From: BiggRanger Subject: 2.3L Turbo.... Cheap! I saw you letter and I had the same problem.. My resulution was to turbo charge my 2.3 using a turbo from a '88 Merkur XR4Ti There's a pic of it in my web page http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://members.aol.com/biggranger/index.html Ford SVO also makes a nice cam for the 2.3 If you have any questions contact me at BiggRanger ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:02:08 -0500 From: hunter Subject: Recall There is a recall out for the automatic transmission cable on some if not all '97 F-150's, it is recall # 97586. I just happened to stop by my dealer to have them sign off on the pre-delivery checklist and when the service rep put my VIN into the computer it popped up with the recall info. I don't know what build dates it covers but mine is 4/97 and I have the 4R70W transmission. Also I would like any info on where I can order a set of nerf bars. I'm leaning towards Westins because they say they are bolt ons using existing holes and I like the look. I know some of you out there have Westins so if you let me know what I can expect doing the install I would appreciate it. As always any and all feedback is appreciated. Michael ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:56:21 -0700 From: "S. HALL" Subject: Splash inquiry: Hello, -I mailed about 2 weeks ago about a "knocking" coming from the engine of my 87 ranger. It turned out to need an engine! I opted to upgrade to a newer truck and found a 94 splash I like. I wondered if anyone could give me any good/bad info on this truck? Its a supercab 4X4 with 39,000 miles (and from my test drive it seemed to have really low rearend!) The axle code is R6 and the serial number is: 1FTCR15X6RPB 52769 It has the 4 liter with the 5-speed and I guess what I REALLY wanna know is: Is this 5-speed the infamous light-duty Mazda known for early failures? I'm hoping someone can tell me this from the vin. I also wanted to know what people thought I should pay for this truck -it's going for 13,900 and as near as the book tells me its worth 15,300. Is this a reasonable price? Any input about this would be greatly appreciated -I'm fixing to sell my soul if I buy it (13,900 is HARD for me to cover!) I can say it was a BLAST to drive and I really was surprised to feel how much more fun it was then my 87 truck. Thanks in advance, -Sam H. (87 Ranger supercab 4X4) shall ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:37:17 -0600 From: Steve Subject: $1700 for a transfer case?!? '95 F150 My friendly (?) Ford dealer is quoting me a price of $1700 for a rebuilt Borg Warner 13-56 transfer case for my '95 F150. That doesn't include labor for taking it off or putting it back on. This seems pretty outrageous, doesn't it, or is it just the way it is? Anyway, I've started looking at some other shops to compare prices..... Anybody have a line on where I could get one more reasonably? I could get an automatic transmission rebuilt for that kind of money... Thanks for letting me rant... Steve Currently incredibly upset Ford owner... ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:41:07 -0500 From: Mitch Biarsky Subject: Ford sets recall of 1.1 million vehicles Ford sets recall of 1.1 million vehicles October 30, 1997 2:59 PM EST DETROIT (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co. said Thursday it is recalling 1.1 million vehicles in the United States and Canada for safety reasons, including 973,000 F-Series full-size pickup trucks, Expeditions and Navigators. Ford said a transmission shift cable in some of its F-150 and F-250 pickup trucks, as well as Expedition and Navigator full-size sport/utility vehicles, may detach from the steering column bracket fitting and cause problems shifting gears. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:11:54 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: Mail "Subject Line" in General At 12:46 PM 10/30/97 -0800, you wrote: >Greetings All, > >I have been following this list for a little while now. Also, I am >relatively new to this type of forum, so please cut me a little slack if >my comment/observation is something that has been gone over. I looked >for an FAQ, but didn't see one. Again, maybe in my newness I missed it. http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Its out of date and is undergoing a major re-write (subject lines will be covered in the new one). The web site is going to blow everyone away when the changes come on line. Its going to take another 3-4 weeks before its uploaded. Ken Admin ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 23:03:52 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Static cling window stickers My wife, Peggy, will be mailing out the final batch of Ford Truck Enthusiasts static cling window stickers tomorrow afternoon. Tomorrow evening, there will be a posting of all names of who should receive stickers and how many. All those who have donated to keep our services going will be included on this list. If you do not see your name on it or the order amount is incorrect please email me and I'll get it straightened out ASAP. For those who don't know what I'm talking about please point your web browser to: http://www.ford-trucks.com/sticker.html for full details. Sorry for the major delays. If anyone slips through the cracks let me know. Additionally, as some of you may already know: my wife Peggy is now handling about 50% of the behind the scenes administration chores and will soon handle 95%. This will allow me to participate fully in the discussion groups and chat more often with the friends I've made here. It will also let me develop the site so it has more resources for us. (Live IRC/web chat will soon be a once a week feature!) Also, from now on, Peggy (who is far more organized.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|