|
|
Return-Path: Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:59:14 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #186 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Thursday, October 23 1997 Volume 01 : Number 186 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Switching Between Dual Tanks ["David J. Baldwin" ] Re: Switching Between Dual Tanks [Thom Cheney ] Bearings and vacation [Michael Wray ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #185 ["Alan Heaberlin" ] Bronco ["Josh Armstrong" ] Re: 93' Ranger STX 4x4 3.0 [James Forrest ] Re: TIRES [James Forrest ] Re: 1997 Ford Ranger ["Bryce T. Beyler" ] Cavitation [rsmall Re: 93' Ranger STX 4x4 3.0 ["Bryce T. Beyler" ] Re:Aluminum Wheels - Recommendations? ["Mike Wiatt" ] Re: TIRES [jsruss Re: Switching Between Dual Tanks [Joe Maleski ] Re: Switching Between Dual Tanks [Joe Maleski ] RE: Update - Bad Bearings, etc..... [john.doe Tire Diameter Calculation ["Bruce A. Ramirez" ] Re: Front Automatic Hubs [jsruss Re: LOWERING TO LEVEL [jsruss RE: Cleaning alluminum wheels ["Charles A. Biggs" ] [none] [Gary Snook ] Re: 1998 F150 Lightning [Chris Kelly ] Re: Aluminum Wheels - Recommendations? [Michael Ruth ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 15:05:19 -0500 From: "David J. Baldwin" Subject: Re: Switching Between Dual Tanks Joe Maleski wrote: > > Thom, > > I invite you to come with me on my next long trip. This problem is *very* > reproducable. The bottom of the fuel tank is usually so hot you cannot put > your hand on it. > > The ford fuel pumps only pump at 45 psi - not enough pressure to overcome > the vapor lock, whick is exactly what is happening. I believe you. There is a solution, I just don't know if anyone has made an aftermarket adapter. The trick is to modulate the supply to the fuel pump to make it only work as hard as it needs to in order to pressurize the fuel rail to the desired point. Ford was working on this a few years ago, and the new controller should be available on vehicles soon, if not already. Problem is knowing which vehicles are getting this when. Sounds like the 460 has a bad problem with this. This solution saves power, saves the pump, and reduces unburned hydrocarbon emissions. A winner all the way around, only drawback being the added complexity of driving the pump. There may be an aftermarket fuel pump controller that works this way. I don't know of one. If anyone does, please let us know. - -- Best Regards, Dave Baldwin Dallas, TX - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:10:28 -0500 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Switching Between Dual Tanks Joe Maleski wrote: > > Thom, > > I invite you to come with me on my next long trip. This problem is *very* > reproducable. The bottom of the fuel tank is usually so hot you cannot put > your hand on it. Hmmm... not being there, I bow to your expertise. I still find it difficult to believe that your fuel is actually boiling. > > As for Dodge Trucks - well I've heard that they suffer from poor brakes. > That to me is a bigger problem than having to alter my trip schedule when > the weather gets hot. Add vapor lock to the list, because it is another known fault. My cousin-in-law never leaves town during summer in his Dodge van. - -- Thom Cheney Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:35:15 -0700 From: Michael Wray Subject: Bearings and vacation Yeah I hope to have it hang on until I can get the funds together and have it done right. I'll let ya'll know when I get back from vacation. Michael (crossed fingers) W. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:59:02 -0700 From: "Alan Heaberlin" Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #185 This is a multi- part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01BCDFC4.32ECE020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - ---------- > From: fordtrucks80up-digest > To: fordtrucks80up-digest > Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #185 > Date: Thursday, October 23, 1997 12:11 PM > > > fordtrucks80up-digest Thursday, October 23 1997 Volume 01 : Number 185 > > > > ======================================================================= > Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest > Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To unsubscribe, send email to: > fordtrucks80up-digest-request > with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send > email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the > message. >snip > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:42:19 EDT > From: silent.bob > Subject: Re: 97 Ranger cutting out 100+ mph > > On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 10:02:47 -0500 "David J. Baldwin" > writes: > >Mike Wiatt wrote: > > >You might try looking in to the presence of a vehicle speed limiter. > >The EEC also knows what vehicle speed is, and it is possible that they > >limit the Ranger top speed because of stability concerns. > > > This is true. A Ranger will start to "float" at 100mph. > I doubt that the EEC knows anything more than engine rpm--speedwise. As an automotive test driver working daily at speeds in excess of 110mph (650 miles per day usually) what I do know is that the air conditioning will cut out in high gear at WOT to reserve engine power for the drive wheels. I would suspect fuel flow or pressure or perhaps air intake restriction (dirty air cleaner). Let us know what you find out! Buffalo Al - ------=_NextPart_000_01BCDFC4.32ECE020 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial">----------> From: = fordtrucks80up-digest < color=3D"#0000FF">owner-fordtrucks80up-digest color=3D"#000000">>> To: color=3D"#0000FF">fordtrucks80up-digest color=3D"#000000">> Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 = #185> Date: Thursday, October 23, 1997 12:11 PM> > = > fordtrucks80up-digest Thursday, October 23 = 1997 Volume 01 : Number 185> > > = > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> = Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest> Visit our = web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com color=3D"#000000">> - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - = -> To unsubscribe, send email to:> color=3D"#0000FF">fordtrucks80up-digest-request nt color=3D"#000000">> with the word "unsubscribe" in = the body of the message. For help, send> email to the same = address with the word "help" in the body of the> = message.>snip < > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:42:19 = EDT> From: color=3D"#0000FF">silent.bob (Silent . Bob)> Subject: Re: 97 Ranger cutting out 100+ = mph> > On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 10:02:47 -0500 "David J. = Baldwin" color=3D"#000000">>> writes:> >Mike Wiatt = wrote:> > >You might try looking in to the presence of = a vehicle speed limiter. > >The EEC also knows what vehicle = speed is, and it is possible that they> >limit the Ranger top = speed because of stability concerns.> > > This is = true. A Ranger will start to "float" at 100mph.> = I doubt that the EEC knows anything more than engine rpm--speedwise. = As an automotive test driver working daily at speeds in excess of 110mph = (650 miles per day usually) what I do know is that the air conditioning = will cut out in high gear at WOT to reserve engine power for the drive = wheels. I would suspect fuel flow or pressure or perhaps air intake = restriction (dirty air cleaner). Let us know what you find = out!Buffalo Al ont> - ------=_NextPart_000_01BCDFC4.32ECE020-- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 97 15:10:34 PDT From: "Josh Armstrong" Subject: Bronco > Hi, Dose Anyone here have a 86-92 Bronco Full size that is running 4.11 gears in the rear end? I am thinking about replaceing the stock gears with this. The truck is running 33" muds with a 302 and an AOD. Any comment would be helpful. Also would\did it help the mpg or did it kill it? Thanks Josh Armstong 89 Bronco > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:23:04 -0500 From: James Forrest Subject: Re: 93' Ranger STX 4x4 3.0 Question I'm kind of new to this, been listening for a few days and I have a few questions for you guys. I own a 93 Ranger STX 4x4 with a 3.0. I have a 2 1/2" Rancho kit in the front so the truck sits level with the back. I have 8" chrome wagon wheels with BFG 31x10.5 Radial All Terain TA's. Also I have a Raven truck top. Here are my questions: 1. My gas milage has gone to sh**t. I am getting 15mpg city or highway. I did a complete tune up - plugs, cap, rotor, & wires. Also I ran a pint of tolune with a full tank of gas to clean the injectors. (If you look at the ingredince of injector cleaners one of the main ones is tolune) But anyway the tune up did absolutly zero for my gas milage. I know I was getting between 17 and 20 at best befor. Any ideas on this. 2. Since I installed the lift kit and went to the larger tires I am having some problems when I am towing. One the check- engine light comes on after about two hours of towing. Comes on and off. Once I get back home and unhook the boat thats it. Let the truck sit overnight and the check engine light wont come on again untill I am towing again. My boat and trailer are only about 1400lbs. The other problem when towing is when I get into the hill country I have a real hard time. Befor with the stock wheels and tires I did not have any problems. Would you suggest re-gearing the truck or going with a performance chip, K & N air filter, and a better exhaust? If so wich chip and exhaust are best. 3. Last question. My four wheel drive quit working. When you push the button to engage it you here the clicking noises but nothing happens. How do I trouble shoot this problem? Is it the module on the trany???? I am realy stumped with this one. Dont realy know how or what to check, any ideas? Thanks, John Cassis Houston, Texas cassis First of all, I have a 96 Ranger 4x4 3 liter with the 2 1/2 inch Rancho kit. I was also getting horrible mileage, about 12 to 13 miles to the gallon. I have 4 kc lights on the roof, which does reduce my mileage. I installed a kn filter and have increased my mileage to 15. I am running 31 inchers also. I can't figure out my mileage problems either. As for the four wheel drive, I had the same thing happen to me and i took it to ford and they replaced it under the warranty. Without the warranty it would have cost about 350 dollars. you could probably get the new module thing and do it yourself, it really isn't that difficult to replace. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:31:35 -0500 From: James Forrest Subject: Re: TIRES > This is not true ! I had 32's on a 96 4x4 with no lift of any kind . I tested 32's on my ranger with no lift and they severly rubbed the front valance when the wheel was turned as well as the fenderwells at full tuck From: James Forrest To: fordtrucks80up Reply-to: fordtrucks80up Subject: Re: TIRES > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 97 03:40:10 +0000 i have a 96 ranger 4x4, and i had 31x10.50 goodyear tires mounted on American Racing type 39 15x7 wheels, with normal backspacing. I had no problems with tires rubbing, etc. I don't think i would go any higher. I am assuming you have the 3.73 gears, which are good for turning them. You could go up to a 32 but you would need a body or suspension lift if you didn't want to tear apart your fenders. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:28:53 -0400 From: "Bryce T. Beyler" Subject: Re: 1997 Ford Ranger How can you tell what the red line is on this truck? My owner manual doesn't say what that might be and my tach has no indication of where the red line might be at...From what I understood, the red line is above what the rev-limiter would allow so there is no chance of red lining this engine > (except for forcing it by downshifting at high RPM's) BTW I'll take the truck off you hands if you're just going to blow up the engine anyway... Bryce '97 Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab - ---------- > From: Bitting, Greg > To: 'fordtrucks80up > Subject: RE: 1997 Ford Ranger > Date: Tuesday, October 21, 1997 5:35 PM > > I don't think it is the rev limiter, because I can take the truck beyond > redline in every gear other that first, and the only problem I notice > there is it is rough shifting at such a high RPM. The truck would rather > I skip a gear. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: bigguy [SMTP:bigguy > >Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 1997 2:15 PM > >To: fordtrucks80up > >Subject: Re: 1997 Ford Ranger > > > >It is the rev limiter I think . > > > >Bitting, Greg wrote: > > > >> Hello out there, > >> I own a 1997 Ford Ranger pick-up truck. It has in it a five > >> speed > >> manual transmission attached to a 4.0L engine. I have a problem with > >> the > >> truck shutting down at around 103 mph. What can I do to alleviate this > >> > >> problem? Also, I would like to bolt on a little extra horsepower, > >> where > >> would anyone recommend I start? > >> Thank you for your help. > >> +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer > >> --------------+ > >> | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > >> | > >> | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > >> | > >> +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > >> -----------------+ > > > > > > > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > >| Send posts to fordtrucks80up > >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > >+----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com -----------------+ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:39:21 -0500 From: rsmall Subject: Cavitation FYI-Did some maintenance on my 1995 F-250 Powerstroke E4Od truck( 55,000 miles) this weekend and learned a few things- NAPA Auto parts carries some items useful for Powerstroke upkeep- 1-Coolant test kit- part # 4107- for checking PH, Freeze protection, and nitrite levels. (nitrites help reduce cavitation and impingement, which can damage your block) Does 50 checks, contains syringe, bottle, and 50 3 pad check sticks. $24.99 2-Coolant additive- part #4058-64 oz of treatment similar to Ford's FW-15. 4 oz treats same as Ford's 8 oz. Fw-15 is $10.95 for 16 oz bottle, Napa's $13.95 for 64 oz. Bought a transmission filter/gasket kit 23.99 and 16 quarts (book calls.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |