|
|
Return-Path: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 03:50:20 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #178 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Tuesday, October 21 1997 Volume 01 : Number 178 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Dual tank question ["Bruce A. Ramirez" ] Re: F-250/F-350 XLT bench seat [FOMOCONUT Re: Re: TIRES ["Lare/Eric" ] Re: Rough idle in 4.0 ["Lare/Eric" ] 98 3.0 [fwise F350 w/ two batteries [Steve Field ] Tornado [Mitch Biarsky ] Re: TIRES [James Forrest ] Re: 6.9/7.3 Questions [Ken Miller ] Gas mileage... [LarryAll ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 19:35:35 -0400 From: "Bruce A. Ramirez" Subject: Re: Dual tank question FOMOCONUT > > sorry no help.. but a question.. Why do you feel it so important to > only > switch the tanks when the truck is not running? I do it all the time > and have > never had any problems...IMHO though I think you just expierienced > some type > of relay logic failure in getting the tanks to switch. Maybe never > happen > again. > > John L. Miller > 96 F-350 4x4 > 68 F-250 4x4 > 92 Mustang > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer > --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request > | > +----------------- Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com > -----------------+ There is no relay logic or computer control involved in switching tanks. Just standard relays turning off one pump and turning on the other pump. Bruce Ramirez Germantown MD. 1991 F-150 4x4 4.9L 1994 E-250 4.9L ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 18:31:09 -0400 (EDT) From: FOMOCONUT Subject: Re: F-250/F-350 XLT bench seat I am replying to the list on this subject as well as personally to the originator... I too am expieriencing problems with this seat. I have a 96 F-350, 4x4 and have only 23,000 very gentle miles on it. I mean "gentle" to the point that I get geers from my buddies at work. I really take care of this truck. On with the point, I am seeing a severe degradation of the seats original firmness and seem to be sitting lower in the seat than I was just a few short monthes ago. Now I only weight about 190 Lbs. and I do hoist myself in and out of the truck correctly. One other point which I had presented to the list members and did not receive much response, my truck is equiped with the 460 and the block was never painted from the factory. Please if anyone out there has a '96 with a 460 look at it and tell me if they have the same. I really want to go at Ford about this, but if all are like this... What can I do? I am a U.S Marine and it was no small thing for me or anybody in my opinion to purchase an F-350, these two items are really discouraging. John L. Miller 96 F-350 4x4 68 F-250 4x4 92 Mustang John Miller ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 20:12:06 -0400 From: "Lare/Eric" Subject: Re: Re: TIRES > - ---------- > From: Geoffrey Hoffman > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: Re: TIRES > > Date: Sunday, October 19, 1997 10:10 PM > > At 5:34 PM -0400 10/19/97, jsruss > >Geoffrey , > >How do you know what ratio he has ? Most 4.0L 4x4 Rangers have the > >3:73 gears which is perfect for 32's . I know this for a fact because > >I have them ! Hell I know guys with explorers that run 3:73 that > >have 35's . > > hey, i was just saying it is something to look at when you are getting > bigger tires. most explorers come with the 3.27. the 3.73 is good for > tires in the 32 range. and explorers with 35's are alright, it just would > probably be a bit better to go with something a little higher. i am not > saying it is not possible, just 35 inches is a lot of tire. > > i did not know that rangers have the 3.73 stock. i apologize, and like i > said, i know explorers better than i know rangers. > > see ya... > > -- > Geoffrey Hoffman gch2 > Cornell University http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pobox.com/~hoffy > My '94 Splash Ext. Cab (5 spd man. trans.) came with 3.27's with 235/75R15's stock. My first tire upgrade was to 31x10.5's with the stock gearing; the truck seemed to lose a little gas mileage and performance (always downshifting on western PA hills). I just put a 4" lift, 32x11.5's and 4.10 r&p in the truck; IMHO, this seems to be the perfect combination as far as final gear ratio goes - better mileage and performance than even the stock combination and still doesn't rev all that high at hiway cruising speeds (about 2,200 rpm at just shy of 65 - plenty fast enough when dodging all these crazy deer). Eric S. '94 Splash ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 20:16:51 -0400 From: "Lare/Eric" Subject: Re: Rough idle in 4.0 - ---------- > From: greg.medert > To: fordtrucks80up > Subject: RE: Rough idle in 4.0 > Date: Monday, October 20, 1997 4:34 AM > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 10:00:33 -0400 > From: "Lare/Eric" > Subject: Rough Idle - Ranger 4.0L > > About 8,000 miles ago (59,000 on the truck currently), I noticed that > the > idle on my '94 Splash 4.0L was beginning to get a bit rough. At the > exhaust outlet it almost sounds like a miss of sorts - every two to > four > seconds it will sort of 'puff'. At about the same time, the > temperature > gauge begin to cycle from midway to very near the bottom of the gauge. > > I took it to the dealership and they told me that this was pretty > typical > for a truck with this many miles on it that was almost four years old > - > which I expected them to say. > > Does anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing the rough idle > problem, and, could the fluctuating temperature be related, or is it > just a > coincidence? > > I haven't gotten into this (or these) problems much yet, since they > don't > seem to affect the performance or mileage of the truck, although both > problems seem to be getting more pronounced. Figured it high time to > diagnose this one before I have a serious problem on my hands. > > Recently, I replaced (as general maintenance) the O2 sensors, PCV, > plugs, > plug wires, & air filter. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Eric S. - '94 Splash 4x4 4.0L > > ------------------------------ > > Eric, > had a similar problem with my 91 4.0 except that the rough idle and > temperature readings did not occur at the same time. The temperature > reading was a bad temp sensor. The rough idle was clogged or dirty > injectors. I had the injectors professional cleaned where they > disconnect the fuel line from the fuel rail and run it off a > pressurized tank with injector cleaner. Cost was around $70. You can > now hardly hear it idling it so smooth. Hope this helps. > > greg.medert > Atlanta, GA > Thanks. I'm gonna find somewhere that performs this method of injector cleaning this weekend. I'll let y'all know if it clears up the idle. Figure I'll try the temperature sensor, also. Eric S. - smithj797 '94 Splash ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 18:17:02 -0500.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |