|
|
Return-Path: Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 13:50:11 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #130 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Wednesday, September 24 1997 Volume 01 : Number 130 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #128 ["Jim Bielecki" Re: Three questions for the Welders in the group. [Will Wood Drop Kits for Explorer [Mike Krause ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #127 ["C. E. White" ] Re: All lists back up. Please read [BigDogF250 Limited slip rear for 2WD F-250 [Andrew T Vincitore Overheating Problems [bigguy ] Re: '98 Ranger-what do ya think? [KNBD87D Re: Overheating Problems [Don Lewoniuk ] radio [William Holmes ] RE: Overheating Problems [Ron Madurski ] re:radio [KNBD87D Re: Overheating Problems [bigguy ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #127 [droberts Re: Overheating Problems [Don Lewoniuk ] Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #127 [Don Lewoniuk ] re:radio [John Doe ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 06:33:39 -0500 From: "Jim Bielecki" Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #128 > Congratulations! > > As far as the new looks go, I think they did a great job updating it > without making it radical looking (I personal don't like the new Dodge > Dakota). > > Mechanically, I opted for my '97 because the '98 4X4 WASN'T the TTB. My > personal doubt centered on a new system and it's long term ruggedness. > IMHO, the TTB is a better off-road suspension than an IFS system is. I > totally agree that for 2wd (and 4wd that see little dirt), the IFS should > have much better handling and probably won't wear out tires as quick. > > Other than that, I understand that new 4.0L is an SOHC, which if that is > true would be awesome, particularly in the 2wd, short cab like yours. The > rack and pinion steering has to help the Ranger feel tighter and less vague > on-center. Ford overall did a good job keeping the Ranger up-to-date. > Enjoy! The 4.0L SOHC is NOT available in the '98 Ranger. All of these engines are earmarked for the Explorer and Mountaineer. Interestingly, the reason I opted for a '98 Ranger over an '97 was BECAUSE of the SLA front suspension. TTB may be rugged, but the chronic front tire > alignment problems finally got to me. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 05:30:55 -0600 From: Will Wood Subject: Re: Three questions for the Welders in the group. Filip wrote: >Greetings. I was in a similar situation and was told by reliable sources > >(ie. friend who runs a body-repair shop) that gas welding introduces >"seeds" of oxidation to the weld itself. Unless you can guarantee some >sprt of moisture-proof environment (which in a car body, with all its >stress points and weaknesses and hitting rocks you can NOT), your weld >will often rust from the INSIDE out. This is bad. I was advised that the >only way was a MIG welder... and that's what I am [borrowing and] using. I think the point here is that stick welding using consumable rods without shielding gas does introduce the issue of contamination. However typically when using this type of welding the material is often mild steel. For most home uses, this is very adequate for 12 gauge or heavier material. MIG introduces the notion of a shielding gas which essentially purges the ambient atmosphere away from the welding puddle. This makes for a stronger weld. It's important to have a good technique with MIG welders as well as TIG welders to insure that the shielding gas is effective. MIG has the advantage of autofeed which allows the welder to concentrate on the job at hand rather than feeding welding stock, similar to stick welding. It can also be dialed in to work on very thin or very thick materials based upon current and feed speeds. You can also use self-shielding or flux core wire which allows you to work on mild grade steel without the shielding gas (don't breath the fumes!). The flux core is great for repairs where appearance isn't important, however I wouldn't use it on anything lighter than 15 gauge steel. TIG requires the hand feeding of the welding stock, however TIG allows extremely strong and precise welds. Heat control is much more precise so the welder can control all aspects of penetration. It's better for Aluminum and Stainless Steel, although both of these can be welded using MIG. If you're a home hobbyist, I'd suggest a good MIG unit that allows for shielding gas to be used. I say this since there are units out there that are intended to use flux core exclusively. Be prepared to pay for a bottle down the road as well. I just bought a new Oxy setup, It was $375 for the first Oxygen and Aceteylene bottles. We already have one other, but the same goes for shielding gas. BTW, the bigger the bottle, the less expensive it is for the gas. Your local welding supply shop can explain it to you. However if you're only doing a small amount, a smaller bottle is probably the better bet. But most small bottles give you from one to two hours max of welding time. The thing is that it costs roughly the same to fill them as the big ones do.. Go figure. Another point is the wire that the MIG welder uses, only buy enough wire that you figure your going to use for the project or for future use. Why? Corrosion. If you invest in a MIG unit with shielding gas and use corroded wire - guess what - brittle welds ahead. Most Small MIG units don't use a wire wiper as well, your local supply shop can provide you with one. This wipes the wire off before it goes into the cablehose and helps reduce corrosion getting to the weld. Sorry, but with three MIG units and a recently purchased TIG unit I thought I'd share this with you. Will Wood KdF Service and Supply 801 731 3360 801 732 1250 Fax. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 08:51:19 -0500 From: Mike Krause Subject: Drop Kits for Explorer Hi all, I was just wondering if anyone can give me some info on where to get suspension kits for a '91 Explorer(spindles, shocks, I-beams, leaf springs, etc.). I want to drop it about 4" in the front and 5" in the back. If anyone can lend some advise I'd greatly appreciate it. Also, I was thinking of putting the new Cobra R rims on my car but I'm not sure how to tell if the rims will fit. Does anyone know if they'll fit or how to find out??? Thanks. Mike ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 12:06:42 -0400 From: "C. E. White" Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #127 Rinerjm > > '88 F-150 4x4 w/5.0 3spd at > I am having problems with hard cold starting. Be it first thing in the > morning or anytime the truck has set for an extended period. Could this be > linked to the coolant temperature sensor or throttle positioning sensor. Any > hints would be greatly appreciated. > Thanks, JM A common problem with fuel injected vehicles is a build-up of deposits on the intake valves. The deposits are porus and when "dry" they will absorb much of the fuel your injectors squirt at them. When the deposits become saturated things return to "normal" and the vehicle starts. After an extended period of sitting, the gas in the deposits evaporates and the problem reappears. Chevron sells a fuel treatment ("Clean-Up" I think) that might remove these deposits. There are also more extreme treatments for really bad cases. Bigger shops should have a machine that allows them to go in trough the intake ports (after removing the intake manifold) and literally blast the deposits away. I am familiar with an Oldsmobile that frequently develops hard cold starting. As soon as the trouble develops, the owners runs a bottle of the clean-up through it and it seems to clear the problem up. I have never personally had this problem, but I stick to brand name gas. My friend with the Oldsmobile prefers "Happy Gas" ( a local discount place with a smiley face logo). Ed > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 13:10:14 -0400 (EDT) From: BigDogF250 Subject: Re: All lists back up. Please read Ken, I am a member of the 80 up list as well as the the 79 -61. am i a member of the 60 and below as well? Matt, 92 f250 5.8 4x4 6" lift 38" super swampers ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 13:24:12 -0400 From: Andrew T Vincitore Subject: Limited slip rear for 2WD F-250 I have a 1992 2WD supercab F-250. I would like to have a limited slip rea= r. Is there a retrofit or should I find a used unit to install? Obviously I want it to be cost effective. I have seen units advertised in Summitt racing's cataloge that say it can be an easy retrofit. My mechanic scoffs= at this though. Any suggestions, part #s, info is appreciated. Thanks, Andrew ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 13:29:20 -0400 From: bigguy Subject: Overheating Problems I have an 85' E350 van with a 351W engine. I have had overheating problems everytime it is idle for more than a minute or so. When the van is moving at a good speed the temp stays relatively cool. I just.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |