|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 04:00:44 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #112 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Monday, September 15 1997 Volume 01 : Number 112 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: F-250 [meadjr 83 Ranger Tranny Woes ["Tom L." ] Subject: Re: 84 Ranger, 2.3 L and HP? ["Lou Guerriero" Bronco II Leakage problems.... ["Lou Guerriero" ] Re: 83 Ranger Tranny Woes [PhilDyson 1997 vs 1999 F350 CrewCab7.3L powerstroke [Claude King Re: Bronco II Leakage problems.... [Filip M Gieszczykiewicz Good News! ["Charles A. Biggs" ] Ranger Winter Tires ?????????? ["Chris" ] PCV Filter ["Lou Guerriero" ] ADMIN: Vote results ["Payne, Kenneth" ] Re: PCV Filter [mrkrispy Re: UNDERDRIVE PULLEYS FOR NEWER 2.3's [silent.bob Re: PCV Filter [Charles Cohn ] WINMAIL.DAT attachment ["Erik J. O'Daniel" ] Re: F-250 [BILLPEGZ Re: New F-250 [Ducks4jim Re: New F-250 [Ducks4jim Re: Good News! ["Ryan Penner" ] Re: Good News! [Charles Cohn ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 06:57:30 PDT From: meadjr Subject: F-250 We have decieded to order the 1997 F-250. Are there any other options that we might want, or somthing that we have but might not want? F250 HD 4x4 Supercab XLT shortbox power stroke 5 speed 4.10 gears Camper/trailer tow package Heavy duty front & Rear suspension High Altitude use Manual locking hubs Block Heater Sliding rear window Electric Mirrors privacy glass auxilary idle control Rear Step Bumper License Plate Bracket Thanks Much JJ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 11:23:15 -0400 From: "Tom L." Subject: 83 Ranger Tranny Woes Hi Folks, Wondering if any of you can help me with the following problem: (83 Ranger, 2x, 2.3L, C5 Auto Tranny) Just installed a new flywheel and starter, and am now having shifting problems. It shifts from 1st to 2nd at very high revs (sorry, no tach) at about 30 MPH. It shifts from 2nd to 3rd (also at high rev) around 45 MPH. Prior to removing the tranny to access the flywheel, there were no tranny problems at all. I did the shift lever adjustment per my Hayes manual, and did the kickdown rod adjustment although the Haynes instruction were rather ambiguous. There are no fluid leaks, and I put in fresh Mototmaster type H ATF as stated in the Haynes manual. If anyone has had similar problems, or can shed any light on where I screwed up. PLEASE reply! Thanks, Tom (A hard workin' Canadian Guy) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 12:27:00 -0400 From: "Lou Guerriero" Subject: Subject: Re: 84 Ranger, 2.3 L and HP? Hi, The Super Chip sounds good. But you do realize that in any other country than the U.S.A, Premium fuel is pretty much only for the super rich? I have seen super at over 70¢ a litre. Translation: $3.00 a gallon! (roughly). Even unleaded has been climbing like crazy here in Canada. The Oil companies (Mostly American) blame taxes (which aren't changing) while prices creep up. Anyway, what I'm saying is, if there's an upgrade that makes me use premium, I ain't buying it! Even with exchange, our regular fuel is about $2.00 U.S./gal! >Also, for Rangers with EECIV engine management, Superchips has a >performance chip. They claim 5-15% midrange torque increase along with >5-15 HP increase. Side effect: must run premium gasoline. (Not a downside >in my book.) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 12:53:14 -0400 From: "Lou Guerriero" Subject: Bronco II Leakage problems.... Hi, I have an 88' Bronco II and I'm getting water on the floor both sides. It's not the floor that I can see, as I have had the carpets up, and sealed any suspicious spots. The winshield was recently (yr ago) replaced, but that job was redone 3 times due to leaks (morons). Here's the clincher: under the hood, by the driverside fender/firewall area, is a hollow area... I can't see inside, but I noticed what looked like garbage bag. I pulled it out, and a triangular piece of "stuff" came out. It was some sort of absorbent material, covered in garbage bag type black plastic. The plastic was torn, and the stuff inside was soaked. Needless to say, I think this may be the problem. Is this possible that water is running down the winshield through there into my floor? I did notice a small amount from the door seal, but I pulled them and silconed them. Nothing from there so far. Any ideas? I'm thinking of using some spray can rubberized paint to seal up in there, since it's hard to reach. I don't know how else to approach this, unless I'm missing something. Thanks, Lou. ][=====================================][ ][ No Matter Where you go, there you are! ][ ][=====================================][ WWW: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.easyinternet.net/louisg/ E-mail: loug ICQ UIN: 1235438 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 12:51:58 -0400 (EDT) From: PhilDyson Subject: Re: 83 Ranger Tranny Woes Tom, You forgot to hook your vacuum line back up to the modulator valve, or your modualtor is bad. Don't know how many miles you have on that C-5, or if it has ever been worked on, but here is a bit of advice: I think, The C-5 was dropped after the 84 year because of torque converter problems. The conv. has asbestos clutches in it for the centrifical lock-up and they are of very poor design. They will eventually wear out and fill your pan full of "Screen choking" particals that will clog up resulting in a no-drive condition. The rebuilt converters for this tranny have the lock-up clutches removed. They look the same and are also identical to the c-4 converters. It won't do massive injury to the tranny, but you will have to remove and carefully flush out all the "MUD" it will leave inside. If you have over 60,000 miles on this truck it has probably already been repaired. If not here are the symptoms. Slow to engage in drive, then after running a few blocks the engine will feel like it jumped into nuetral (no-drive or reverse). If you turn off the engine and let it sit a few minutes the tranny will start working again for a few more blocks untill it unlocks again. While you drive, the loose particles gather on the screen untill it is completely clogged and control pressure drops to zero. When you shut off the engine they fall back into the pan and your pressure will return. Good luck, Phil ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 13:24:28 -0400 From: Claude King Subject: 1997 vs 1999 F350 CrewCab7.3L powerstroke I've been monitoring all the chat about the new fords, looked at the new photo's on the Powerstroke page, looks like first of October is last order date for 1997's and 1999 won't deliver until March or April 98. So my I'd like to hear the pros and cons of buy now or wait, I'll be ordering not taking a dealer lot truck. //ck ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 13:16:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Filip M Gieszczykiewicz Subject: Re: Bronco II Leakage problems.... You (Lou Guerriero) wrote: > I have an 88' Bronco II and I'm getting water on the floor both sides. > It's not the floor that I can see, as I have had the carpets up, and sealed > any suspicious spots. The winshield was recently (yr ago) replaced, but > that job was redone 3 times due to leaks (morons). Here's the clincher: > under the hood, by the driverside fender/firewall area, is a hollow area... > I can't see inside, but I noticed what looked like garbage bag. I pulled > it out, and a triangular piece of "stuff" came out. It was some sort of > absorbent material, covered in garbage bag type black plastic. The plastic > was torn, and the stuff inside was soaked. [zap] Greetings. We ought to get some sort of "known-weakness"'es of the BII going. I know many of them _WELL_ because that's what I'm patching and welding now. Let's see: * Front corners of the roof: stress-point -> paint crack, rust, holes * Rear hinge area: very high stress-point -> paint crack, rust, holes * Rear body-frame members bombarded with rocks from wheel well: abrasion -> paint sand/rock blasted, rust, holes * Lip of the rear wheel-wells long the top section: if you take off the inside trim, you will most likely find rust all along the inside edge. That WILL progress until the rear quarterpanel separates from the wheel well. Not a FUN fix! * For some reason, I have several "rust bullseyes" (like some of the Jap cars get, namely Toyotas)... got the car used, don't blame me! There is no easy fix - the metal is too thin in places... have to chop and tack-weld new metal from underneath ... and putty up to level... BTW, I discovered a really cool product to help with windshield leaks: liquid silicone. It flows like hot honey... and seeps into places that are impossible to seal with anything else. It does wick! Sets up just like normal silicone! See if your local automotive place stocks this. For your problem, I'd suspect the first 2. Also, check your fire-wall for any holes. There should be rubber-plugs on all of them. Does the steering-linkage have a rubber plug? Sometimes comes out. Check your front wheel-wells, there are a few weak-points there as well. Take care. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 14:05:03 -0500 From: "Charles A. Biggs" Subject: Good News! I have been trying to find a problem with my 4.9L 1990 truck running rough for more than six months. I have posted a number of times here related to my search for the problem and this morning I finally found the culprit. My truck ran rough when it was first started and would not idle well. When I accellerated it would "bog" down and during steady speeds it would miss. It was almost dangerous to drive. I tried all the obvious things (plugs, plug wires, fuel filter, air filter etc.) with no improvement. On a hunch, my son disconnected the tps yesterday and I drove it with the computer "estimating" the throttle positions eventhough the TPS had checked within specs on the diagnostic check. After disconnecting the tps it seemed to drive much better but it still idled rough and surged up and down for a few minutes until it warmed up. This morning I replaced the TPS and it drives like it was brand new. I just thought I would pass this on to others who might be having the same problem. Have a good week all! Chuck Biggs ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 18:13:29 -0400 From: "Chris" Subject: Ranger Winter Tires ?????????? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCC139.E7578320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a 1997 Splash with P235 /60 R15 tires on it, but am considering = changing them for the winter time. I am curious to what would be the best size and type of tires to use, I = think I might also try using 14 inch rims. Any Help (or experience) would be appreciated. Thanks from another Ranger Fan !!!! Chris cspencer - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCC139.E7578320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http-equiv=3DContent-Type> I have a 1997 = Splash with P235=20 /60 R15 tires on it, but am considering changing them for the winter=20 time. I am curious to what = would be the best=20 size and type of tires to use, I think I might also try using 14 = inch=20 rims. Any Help (or = experience) would be=20 appreciated. Thanks from another = Ranger Fan=20 !!!! Chris href=3D"mailto:cspencer ; size=3D2> size=3D2> - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCC139.E7578320-- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 19:12:03 -0400 From: "Lou Guerriero" Subject: PCV Filter Hi, Question: Does an EFI engine have a PCV filter (air breather)? The part is listed for my vehicle, but after looking in the engine, I don't see one. I know where they would normally be on a carbuerated engine... but on EFI?? (if it exists). Haynes shows a carbuerated engine, so it's no help. I looked at the part, it doesn't seem to resemble those from carb'ed engine. Thanks for the info.... Lou. ][=====================================][ ][ No Matter Where you go, there you are! ][ ][=====================================][ WWW: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.easyinternet.net/louisg/ E-mail: loug ICQ UIN: 1235438 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 19:09:05 -0400 From: "Payne, Kenneth" Subject: ADMIN: Vote results I don't have a final count nor the comments ready as I've been working all week (and administering the list from work) with 78 hours put in so far (good thing I contract!) but a quick glance at the vote emails shows about an 80% vote in favor of the split. Voting participation was light, with less than 100 votes. I'll have the third list set up within a week, with details of the list, the vote, etc. published when its all ready... Ken ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 19:59:01 -0400 From: mrkrispy Subject: Re: PCV Filter Lou, the pcv filter is on the left side of the engine if your standing in front of the vehicle. It is located on the rear of the valve cover it's under the efi manifold, hard to get to but it's there. I have a 5.0 litre 1992 F150. Good Luck Ian ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 19:14:40 -0500 From: silent.bob Subject: Re: UNDERDRIVE PULLEYS FOR NEWER 2.3's On Sat, 13 Sep 1997 20:10:49 -0400 Chris Kelly writes: >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >I have seen questions about this before now we can have something done > >about it. Unorthodox racing is willing to make them if I can get 10 >people to put a deposit down! Please read the attachment, and if >interested send me e-mail and if I get enough responses I will call >them >up! I will let you know when we get enough people! >Chris Count me in Chris.... Silent.Bob ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 20:49:59 -0400 From: Charles Cohn Subject: Re: PCV Filter At 07:12 PM 9/14/97 -0400, you wrote: > Hi, > > Question: Does an EFI engine have a PCV filter (air breather)? The part >is listed for my vehicle, but after looking in the engine, I don't see one. > I know where they would normally be on a carbuerated engine... but on >EFI?? (if it exists). Haynes shows a carbuerated engine, so it's no help. >I looked at the part, it doesn't seem to resemble those from carb'ed >engine. > On my 1994 Econoline, the breather filter is inside the air cleaner box. Charles Cohn 6311 Mark Trail, Austell, Georgia 30168, USA (770)944-7510, chasmagc ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 19:33:59 +0000 From: "Erik J. O'Daniel" Subject: WINMAIL.DAT attachment I found the following at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.creativelement.com/win95ann/win95ann5.html - ------------------------------------------------------------- Stop Exchange from Attaching WINMAIL.DAT Last Modified: 1/6/96 A good way to piss people off on the Internet is to repeatedly fill their mailbox with the useless WINMAIL.DAT attachments that Microsoft Exchange insists on including. Since Exchange supports rich-text email (bold, italic, multiple fonts, etc.), and Internet email doesn't, any email sent from Exchange to a non-Exchange mail reader will contain an Attachment called WINMAIL.DAT. If you use Exchange, you won't see this file, and the message will retain its formatting. However, it can be confusing for those who don't use Exchange (the majority of the Internet population), and have no use for this file. Here's how to turn it off: Step #1: Double-click on the Mail and Fax icon in Control Panel. Click on the Services tab, and select Internet Mail from the list. If Internet Mail is not listed, click Add to add this service. Click Properties, and then Message Format. Turn off the option that reads Use MIME when sending messages. Click OK and then OK again. Step #2: Double-click on the name of each recipient in your Address Book. Turn off the option that reads Always send to this recipient in Microsoft rich-text format. This option needs to be set for each recipient of a message - if even one has this turned on, all recipients will still get the attachment. Note: Either of these methods should work for most users, but sometimes nothing seems to work - yet another brilliant design strategy by Microsoft. If you plan to be sending lots of internet email, you should seriously consider using a mail program more suited to the task, such as Eudora. - ------------------------------------- Erik O'Daniel ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 22:30:50 -0400 (EDT) From: BILLPEGZ Subject: Re: F-250 If you ever intend to pulla 5th wheel trailer the short bed will stop you. I pull a 5th wheel Avion. I had a short bed and had to trade it for a long bed. I sold the bed and installed a low profile Reading contractors body. Fantastic. Lots of bins for fishing equipment and art supplies (wife does crafts) plus tools, oil etc. Bill Zwaan 1993 F250 7.3L diesel ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 22:40:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Ducks4jim Subject: Re: New F-250 I think you have everything just about right. Make sure you get what you pay for and don't get screwed! Ford is selling your wish truck like crazy, and they may make errors that will cost you in the long run. Selling price on this vehicle varies BIG TIME from state to state, so do your homework. Ducks4jim.. 1997 4x4 supercab powerstroke ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 22:41:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Ducks4jim Subject: Re: New F-250 I think you have everything just about right. Make sure you get what you pay for and don't get screwed! Ford is selling your wish truck like crazy, and they may make errors that will cost you in the long run. Selling price on this vehicle varies BIG TIME from state to state, so do your homework. Ducks4jim.. 1997 4x4 supercab powerstroke ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 22:13:19 -0600 From: "Ryan Penner" Subject: Re: Good News! - ---------- > From: Charles A. Biggs > To: fordtrucks80up-digest > Subject: Good News! > Date: Sunday, September 14, 1997 1:05 PM > > I have been trying to find a problem with my 4.9L 1990 truck running > rough for more than six months. I have posted a number of times here > related to my search for the problem and this morning I finally found > the culprit. My truck ran rough when it was first started and would > not idle well. When I accellerated it would "bog" down and during > steady speeds it would miss. It was almost dangerous to drive. I tried > all the obvious things (plugs, plug wires, fuel filter, air filter etc.) > with no improvement. On a hunch, my son disconnected the tps yesterday > and I drove it with the computer "estimating" the throttle positions > eventhough the TPS had checked within specs on the diagnostic check. > After disconnecting the tps it seemed to drive much better but it still > idled rough and surged up and down for a few minutes until it warmed > up. This morning I replaced the TPS and it drives like it was brand > new. > > I just thought I would pass this on to others who might be having the > same problem. > > Have a good week all! > > > Chuck Biggs > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 and Newer --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks80up > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks80up-request To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|