|
|
Return-Path: Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 04:00:46 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest To: fordtrucks80up-digest Subject: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #109 Reply-To: fordtrucks80up Sender: owner-fordtrucks80up-digest fordtrucks80up-digest Saturday, September 13 1997 Volume 01 : Number 109 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980 And Newer Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks80up-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #108 ["Mike Jones"] Re: 84 Ranger, 2.3 L and HP? [James Federline Grille Gaurd for '93 Ranger 4x4 STX ["Bryan A. Dann" ] Re: Ford V-8` [Paul Laughlin ] 87 F-150 gas tank/pump troubles [Timothy P Fagrey Anyone Had Luck Ordering Parts Online? [Joe Maleski ] Re: 84 Ranger, 2.3 L and HP? [Max Dooley ] Re: 87 F-150 gas tank/pump troubles [Charles Cohn take me off [ERI302 FS: 1996 F250 Powerstroke [db Re: Ordering window 1997 F250 HD [jbasler Quit whining [Edward A Arkin ] RE: 87 F-150 gas tank/pump troubles ["Mark J. Salvetti" Re: Ford V-8` [PhilDyson RE: 1990 F150 STRAIGHT 6 - 4.9L RUNNING RUFF ["Lou Guerriero" '93 Explorer Upgrade ["Ryan S. Mills" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:56:29 -0400 From: "Mike Jones" Subject: Re: fordtrucks80up-digest V1 #108 Todd, I have a 4.9L 6 1990 F150 2wd and have a somewhat same problem - when one tank is empty, I switch over to the other one. The gauge registers full after switch over but the tank gauge declines rather quickly to the level of the original tank - I then switch back and the first tank reads full. I then proceed to use the fuel from the second tank. It seems as though the empty tank fills from the full one. Anyone with some clues? Tim, Tim/Todd; There may have been a recall covering this. If not, there should be. A friends wife was driving an F-150 (not even hers) when one tank began filling the other, overflowed the one tank (how, I'm not sure) which caught the truck on fire in spectacular fashion. (She received some serious burns but recovered, fortunately). This is not one to wait around on. Get it fixed! Mike J. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:06:28 -0500 (CDT) From: James Federline Subject: Re: 84 Ranger, 2.3 L and HP? On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 silent.bob > On Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:11:09 -0500 Jerad Heffner writes: > >Does anyone know of a relatively cheap way to get more HP out of the > >2.3 > >Is a K&N > > >filter worth the money in a 2.3L Ranger? Any other cheap fixes? BTW, > > Yes, the K&N air filter does help in your top end power. I'll vouch for the K&N filter, too. More pickup when entering the freeway with a nice rev. :) Also, for Rangers with EECIV engine management, Superchips has a performance chip. They claim 5-15% midrange torque increase along with 5-15 HP increase. Side effect: must run premium gasoline. (Not a downside in my book.) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.superchips.com/ - -- James B. Federline MinnSoft Corporation Principal Consultant "Actual Solutions To Real Problems" ----------M_____i_____n_____n_____S_____o_____f_____t---(sm)--- Tivoli / Lawson / UNIX Administration / Database Administration ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:05:18 -0400 From: "Bryan A. Dann" Subject: Grille Gaurd for '93 Ranger 4x4 STX Does anyone know of a grille gaurd that will fit the '93 Ranger STX with factory driving lights. Every manufacture I have looked will not fit the STX package with factory driving. please help. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 09:53:43 -0700 From: Paul Laughlin Subject: Re: Ford V-8` MR JOSH J TENNEY wrote: > > 352? Has anyone ever heard of that engine? I know I have. We have a > '64 Galaxie Convertible with a 352 and an auto. We also have a '66 F- > 250 4x4 with only 9,400 original miles on it and it has a 352 with a > 4 speed. We used to have a '65 F-250 4x4 with only 21,000 original > miles on it and it had a 352 with a 4 speed. We just can't seem to > stay away from that engine. Damn strong engine though. > > I believe that the 360 and 390 engines were basically the same block with minor stroke and bore changes. They were all good engines. Paul Laughlin '87 E350 Dually Transvan 460 engine > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:07:54 -0700 From: Timothy P Fagrey Subject: 87 F-150 gas tank/pump troubles I called up my local Ford dealer and they ran my VIN through the computer for recalls and they called me back and said I had three recalls. At least one recall had to do with the fuel - switch and I think pressure regulator - I will email the details if you need. By the way the Ford dealer said to bring it in and they will fix it at no charge. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 16:35:43 -0700 From: Joe Maleski Subject: Anyone Had Luck Ordering Parts Online? Folks, This past Monday after doing an internet search I found about a half dozen or so Ford dealers who have web pages for their parts departments, offering on line quotes (via E-Mail) and UPS shipping after credit card authorization over the phone. OK, so now it is Friday afternoon and so far *not one* response to my request for pricing on a couple of fuel pumps to solve that pesky vapor lock problem. Question: Have any of you had any luck ordering parts this way? Any recommendations short of just going down to the local dealer and buying the things the old-fashioned way? By the way, Carter does indeed make an aftermarket fuel pump, but the price is $170.00. Thanks! Joe ************************************ Joe Maleski Santa Clara, CA 1994 F-250HD SuperCab, 460/5-spd, The Silver Camel mailto:jmaleski ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 20:26:17 -0400 From: Max Dooley Subject: Re: 84 Ranger, 2.3 L and HP? Jerad Heffner wrote: > What about the 2.9L? There's also the 2.8, but problems with the lifters abound, > so i've been told. I believe the '86 and newer models could have the 2.9 V6? > Anyone have HP numbers on that? and maybe gas milage too? I had a '90 ranger 2WD 2.9 5-speed, Was rated for 140HP. This made for a very quick truck. Many times I out ran older porsche's and could keep up with mustang 5.0's thru 2nd. gear. The only other ranger PU that ever beat me was a 4.0l 5-speed ranger. But he didn't get me by much and my motor was totally stock. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 20:49:26 -0400 From: Charles Cohn Subject: Re: 87 F-150 gas tank/pump troubles At 10:26 AM 9/12/97 -0700, you wrote: > >The truck is an 87 F-150 2wd 4.9L with the dual gas tanks. The problem is >thatthe truck always gets its gas from the front tank, no matter what >position the switch is in. The switch does cause the gauge to register the.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |