|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 80-96-list); Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:37:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:37:52 -0500 (EST) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 80-96-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 80-96-list Subject: 80-96-list Digest V2001 #43 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1980-1996 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== Serious help maintaining your Ford truck! ---------------------------------------------------------- Check out the following items in our online store: -How to Build and Modify Ford Fuel-Injected 5.0 Liter V-8 Engines -How to Rebuild Your Small-Block Ford -Performance Modifying Ford Trucks -Ford Engine Overhaul Manual -Ford Windsor Small-Block Performance -Saddleman Seat Covers for 1992-1996 F150 - F450 Lariat <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/"> http://www.motorhaven.com/</a> ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ 80-96-list Digest Tue, 27 Feb 2001 Volume: 2001 Issue: 043 In This Issue: 351 Build Up Re: 351 Build Up EFI 300 Re: Fuel Injection on a '81 300cid FTE ADMIN: Change to classifieds Help on 4.9L oil pan gasket Re: Help on 4.9L oil pan gasket ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Perkins, Jim (Spokane)" <Jim.Perkins Subject: 351 Build Up Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:33:11 -0500 OK all you hi-po guys, Wayne are you listening? There is a decent chance that I'm going to have to dig into my '91 351 pretty soon, so I'm looking for everyone's best advice on what kind of performance enhancements I should make while I'm in there. My truck has been an oil leaker for awhile (valve covers, rear main, and maybe oil pan) but not enough to do anything to fix it. Now I'm starting to suspect a head gasket failure as I've been losing a little coolant with no signs of a leak and I periodically have an unidentified engine noise (sort of a very low dieseling or knocking noise) that I speculate could be caused by coolant leakage into either the cylinder or an exhaust passage. If it is a head gasket, I would consider pulling the engine in order to make the head work easier, do the rear main and oil pan gaskets (perhaps a new pan as well although no signs of rust so far), and generally clean things up. Given the possibility of needing to dig deep enough to re-do the head gasket, it seems like an opportune time to make performance enhancements. So far I only have a K&N, a 3" cat back system with a turbo muffler, and a shift kit. I've owned the truck since new and it has always been and remains a strong, reliable runner. I still tow about a 6000 pound travel trailer periodically (although not as much as I used to) so I wouldn't want to do anything that would adversely affect my low end grunt. I'd greatly appreciate any suggested enhancements anyone might have. My ultimate goal is to end up with a strong, reliable truck engine, which is what I have now only I want more of it. :-) Obviously I'm thinking cam, heads, throttle body, manifold, headers, etc. and would appreciate everyone's thoughts about where I can get the most bang for my buck and real world experience with any of the myriad of different products out there. I'd also appreciate any information anyone has about how far I can go without changing my speed density system to mass air. I really don't want to run premium so a chip may be out of the question and I don't really want to get into the bottom end if I don't have to. I've toyed with the idea of a supercharger in the past, but I've been a little leery of how that might fit with a towing application, not to mention the fuel mileage scares me. Thanks for your help. Jim Perkins '91 F150 4X4 Supercab 351 E4OD 3.55LS 82K Spokane, WA ------------------------------ From: "Atkinson, Chip" <CAtkinson Subject: Re: 351 Build Up Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:15:33 -0700 I can't give much if any advice, but will request that you post updates to the list. I'd be very interested in hearing about your adventure. Chip > -----Original Message----- > From: Perkins, Jim (Spokane) [mailto:Jim.Perkins > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:33 PM > To: '80-96-list > Subject: [80-96-list] 351 Build Up > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > OK all you hi-po guys, Wayne are you listening? There is a > decent chance > that I'm going to have to dig into my '91 351 pretty soon, so > I'm looking > for everyone's best advice on what kind of performance > enhancements I should > make while I'm in there. > > My truck has been an oil leaker for awhile (valve covers, > rear main, and > maybe oil pan) but not enough to do anything to fix it. Now > I'm starting to > suspect a head gasket failure as I've been losing a little > coolant with no > signs of a leak and I periodically have an unidentified > engine noise (sort > of a very low dieseling or knocking noise) that I speculate > could be caused > by coolant leakage into either the cylinder or an exhaust > passage. If it is > a head gasket, I would consider pulling the engine in order > to make the head > work easier, do the rear main and oil pan gaskets (perhaps a > new pan as well > although no signs of rust so far), and generally clean things up. > > Given the possibility of needing to dig deep enough to re-do the head > gasket, it seems like an opportune time to make performance > enhancements. > So far I only have a K&N, a 3" cat back system with a turbo > muffler, and a > shift kit. I've owned the truck since new and it has always been and > remains a strong, reliable runner. I still tow about a 6000 > pound travel > trailer periodically (although not as much as I used to) so I > wouldn't want > to do anything that would adversely affect my low end grunt. > > I'd greatly appreciate any suggested enhancements anyone > might have. My > ultimate goal is to end up with a strong, reliable truck > engine, which is > what I have now only I want more of it. :-) Obviously I'm > thinking cam, > heads, throttle body, manifold, headers, etc. and would appreciate > everyone's thoughts about where I can get the most bang for > my buck and real > world experience with any of the myriad of different products > out there. > I'd also appreciate any information anyone has about how far I can go > without changing my speed density system to mass air. I > really don't want > to run premium so a chip may be out of the question and I > don't really want > to get into the bottom end if I don't have to. I've toyed > with the idea of > a supercharger in the past, but I've been a little leery of > how that might > fit with a towing application, not to mention the fuel > mileage scares me. > > Thanks for your help. > > Jim Perkins > '91 F150 4X4 Supercab 351 E4OD 3.55LS 82K > Spokane, WA > > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > ------------------------------ From: "davewild Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:35:18 GMT Subject: EFI 300 Gary, I am currently working on putting a EFI 300 into my 78' F150. The way I went was to buy the whole engine wiring and everything else I needed all at once from the junkyard. I am currently having machine work done to the engine so I can't really tell you if a EFI head will work with the non EFI engine. But when I pulled my engine from an 87' 3/4 ton econoline van I got the intake manifolds computer complete wiring harness and all the other goodies that will be needed to make the EFI system operational for $250. Granted I have to rebuild and purchase alot of parts but I still think I was better of than trying to use a after market system. I should have it back this week or next and maybe I can check then. But I did not see much difference in the EFI and non-EFI heads, the valve train looked like slighly different (rocker arms were a different style) and there are the emission holes also, but I can not tell you for sure if the are excatly the same geometry wise. Well I hope this may have helped (or maybe not) let me know if you have any questions I can try to help ya out. David Wild www.geocities.com/davewilds_78f150/index.html Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ From: DTrowbridge Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:30:15 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Fuel Injection on a '81 300cid i have actually been looking at doing this swap as well on my 85. i've been researching this now for about a month. you can keep the cylinder head. the bolt pattern is the same. you will have to change out the exhaust manifold because the old log does not have provisions for an O2 sensor, plus it flows better. you also have to do some upgrades to the fuel system. like add a fuel injection fuel pump and a return line. i am looking at going with factory components. i know of 3 junk yards where i can get everything i need for under $300, tops. this swap has already been performed by a guy that owns an 82 truck. he is very pleased with the results. i will be doing this swap as soon as i get the money to get the parts. inspection is due next month and the carb is shot so i know it won't pass right now. David 85 F-150 300 I6 C-4 3 speed auto 2.47 FDR ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:52:13 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: FTE ADMIN: Change to classifieds As many of your are aware "dot com" companies have been hit hard in the last few months. FTE is now feeling the affects. Our ad revenues through our reseller have taken a serious hit and have plunged by 80%. FTE is taking steps to insulate itself from the advertising slowdown. Many of you have enjoyed the use of our bandwidth with free classifieds. As is the case with many web sites, the free lunch is over. Our classifieds use a significant amount of bandwidth per month and we >>HAVE to come up with new revenue sources in order to keep FTE operational. Thus, we're implementing a >>reasonable fee<< for placing an ad. The classified ads will now be $4.00 for up to 45 days plus an additional $1.00 for each additional category you place it in. After placing your ad you will be given a link to a page on our secure server to pay for the ad. Our classifieds have over 75,000 visitors per month and this number grows every month. $4.00 for that kind of exposure represents a tremendous value. Anyone who thinks $4.00 is too much to pay ought to consider the thousands I've shelled out to keep the site operational and the need to continue to keep the site going. Thank you for your understanding as we implement this changes. It's unavoidable given the current economic climate. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: LeeCraner Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:36:38 EST Subject: Help on 4.9L oil pan gasket The rubber oil pan gasket on my '92 4.9L (I-6) is failing *it is actually squeezing out). Two questions: 1. It appears that the oil pan cannot be removed without either undoing the motor mounts and lifting the engine or removing the transmission (auto). However, is there any reason why I can't drop the pan enough to remove the old gasket and slide the new gasket under the oil pump, without removing the pan entirely? 2. I only want to do this operation one time. What is the best oil pan gasket material and manufacturer? Thanks in advance for your wisdom. Lee ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:41:28 -0600 From: a&b <pedalfox Subject: Re: Help on 4.9L oil pan gasket You can drop the pan enough to thread the gasket under the pump pickup but it is hard to keep it out of the residual oil in the pan I think I may have jacked up the motor on my wife's '91 to get a little more room. Thing is, the rubber gaskets will squish back out if they get the least little oil on 'em, so you really gotta try to keep it dry. I used some lacquer thinner to kind of dry mine off before tightening up the pan. Be sure to get a 12 pack before you start :-) bill g LeeCraner > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > The rubber oil pan gasket on my '92 4.9L (I-6) is failing *it is actually > squeezing out). Two questions: > > 1. It appears that the oil pan cannot be removed without either undoing the > motor mounts and lifting the engine or removing the transmission (auto). > However, is there any reason why I can't drop the pan enough to remove the > old gasket and slide the new gasket under the oil pump, without removing the > pan entirely? > > 2. I only want to do this operation one time. What is the best oil pan > gasket material and manufacturer? > > Thanks in advance for your wisdom. > > Lee > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. ------------------------------ End of 80-96-list Digest V2001 #43 ********************************** Serious help maintaining your Ford truck! ---------------------------------------------------------- Check out the following items in our online store: -How to Build and Modify Ford Fuel-Injected 5.0 Liter V-8 Engines -How to Rebuild Your Small-Block Ford -Performance Modifying Ford Trucks -Ford Engine Overhaul Manual -Ford Windsor Small-Block Performance -Saddleman Seat Covers for 1992-1996 F150 - F450 Lariat <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/"> http://www.motorhaven.com/</a> .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|