|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 80-96-list); Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:08:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:08:44 -0500 (EST) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 80-96-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 80-96-list Subject: 80-96-list Digest V2001 #10 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 80-96 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 80-96-list Digest Fri, 12 Jan 2001 Volume: 2001 Issue: 010 In This Issue: 1985 F350 For Sale Re: Message Order Re: erratic engine Re: Message Order Re: erratic engine Burp Approaching Re: Message Order Re: Message Order Re: Message Order Re: Speedometer Calibration Re: Message Order Re: Message Order Re: So...I need to Burp my truck eh? ADMIN: New FTE record A true Dual Exhaust w/Headers ADMIN: New list policy Fwd: Re: erratic engine Re: ADMIN: New list policy Re: ADMIN: New list policy Re: ADMIN: New list policy ADMIN: More... New list policy Re: ADMIN: More... New list policy Re: ADMIN: More... New list policy Re: ADMIN: More... New list policy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:14:01 -0700 From: Andrew Antipas <aantipas Subject: 1985 F350 For Sale I'm selling my '85 F350, 4x4, crew cab, 4spd, 460, ac, cruise, limited slip, goose neck hitch, receiver hitch, capper, brake control, new: brakes, clutch, fan clutch, black paint. 125,000 miles and the engine runs strong and does not burn oil. The truck is located in western Colorado. If interested email me directly. Thanks, Andy ------------------------------ From: "Atkinson, Chip" <CAtkinson Subject: Re: Message Order Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:17:59 -0700 This problem doesn't happen directly to me, but it may be that nothing is "wrong" at all. I often see this on other lists, and especially at my appartment where I download mail every 1/2 hr. Here's a possible scenario. A machine is running sendmail and gets bogged down and stops recieving messages. The machine sending mail to this bogged down machine then queues up the messages until the next "run", often around 1/2 to 1 hr. In the mean time, the replies to the original message are sent out. The originally bogged down machine has cleared out its mail queue and is ready to process/recieve messages. The reply messages now go straight through to your machine. Then the queue is processed and the original questions go through, now after the answers arrived. Chip > -----Original Message----- > From: rexbennett > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:52 AM > To: 80-96-list > Subject: [80-96-list] Message Order > > > > I have been getting the messages out of order the last couple > of days, is > any one else getting this or have I messed something up on my > end? It gets > a little confusing when you get the answer before the > question. Even the > time stamps show some of the replies before the original message. > > Rex > > ------------------------------ From: "Atkinson, Chip" <CAtkinson Subject: Re: erratic engine Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:32:11 -0700 Do you know if the timing is advancing properly? You can use a timing light to check it as you rev the engine with everything connected. > -----Original Message----- > From: Lingus0169 > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:47 PM > To: 80-96-list > Subject: [80-96-list] erratic engine > > > > Hi all, > For those who have been around for while, I am back, i > swapped in a 351w into > a 85 f150 4x4 which had a 300 I-6. It was quite a project > till i was all done > with everything,including changing 2 rears in 1 week. > But here is my problem. i set my timing to 10* BTC, (its a > high performance > engine 400hp). it idles smooth and as you depress the gas > pedal gradually, it > stays smooth and sounds great untill i get to about 3K rpm's, > fomr there on > if i keep giving it more gas gradually, it runs like hell. it > seems like its > missing and the timing is thrown off, but everything is set > right right, > timing,point gap in the distributer, the only thing i can > think of is the > fuel mixture, but would that make it that erratic? thankx for > your help in > advance > nick > 85 f150 4x4 np208/t-18 dana 44/60 400hp 351w > also 89 f250 leaf sprung IFS ext cab 351w auto > ------------------------------ From: "Garrett Nelson" <garrettnelson Subject: Re: Message Order Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:57:13 -0600 I have always had that problem, sometimes I don't get the original message until everyone has answered the question, sometimes even a week or two after that! I never gave it much thought though, I assumed it was some kind of problem with my email server. Garrett www.1966ford.com ----- Original Message ----- From: rexbennett To: 80-96-list Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 9:51 AM Subject: [80-96-list] Message Order I have been getting the messages out of order the last couple of days, is any one else getting this or have I messed something up on my end? It gets a little confusing when you get the answer before the question. Even the time stamps show some of the replies before the original message. Rex ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:17:34 -0700 From: Robert Hansen <rhansen Subject: Re: erratic engine This rig has a 4 barrel carb on it right? It sounds like the float levels are off. If it is a Holley or Ford Motorcraft then resetting it is a matter of taking out the plugs on the side of the carb and adjusting the level until the fuel just does not run out. The threads on the adjuster are really fine so it takes a bit to get it where you need it. The engine is running while doing this so be careful with the fuel that may spill on your hot manifold. This will make more sense if you are familiar with the Holley line. I had the same sounding problem last winter, very frustrating. Good luck -----Original Message----- From: Lingus0169 Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:47 PM To: 80-96-list Subject: [80-96-list] erratic engine Hi all, For those who have been around for while, I am back, i swapped in a 351w into a 85 f150 4x4 which had a 300 I-6. It was quite a project till i was all done with everything,including changing 2 rears in 1 week. But here is my problem. i set my timing to 10* BTC, (its a high performance engine 400hp). it idles smooth and as you depress the gas pedal gradually, it stays smooth and sounds great untill i get to about 3K rpm's, fomr there on if i keep giving it more gas gradually, it runs like hell. it seems like its missing and the timing is thrown off, but everything is set right right, timing,point gap in the distributer, the only thing i can think of is the fuel mixture, but would that make it that erratic? thankx for your help in advance nick 85 f150 4x4 np208/t-18 dana 44/60 400hp 351w also 89 f250 leaf sprung IFS ext cab 351w auto ------------------------------ From: Fred Moreno <fmoreno Subject: Burp Approaching Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:22:52 -0700 This morning before starting the truck, I checked the coolant reservoir and it was level with the mark label COLD. Okay so the system must have just about all of the capacity it should hold. We are fast approaching swapping the hoses to the heater core. Will do that tomorrow morning once the sun warms things up a bit. It has to be something blocking the flow,...who put that idea in my head? I like it, thanks. Sunday if the heater still does not produce heat, then the burping will ensue. The highest point is certainly the propane regulator coolant lines, that will be easy to access. I can leave the engine running, crack the line and see what happens. Steve: As far as the brand of thermostat is concerned I really don't recall. It was purchased at Checker Auto Parts. I seem to remember the cardboard backing being striped yellow and blue? I looked for the bleed off nipple so that I could install it correctly and noticed there was none. If none of the above work I will remove the thermostat cover and see if I installed it wrong. Maybe since it's mounted in the verticle position on the 5.0L it slipped during the installation? I do remember the cover being grooved to accept the thermostat, I imagine that if it were installed incorrectly I would develop a leak but I do not beleive I have. There is no tell-tale drips/wet spots, nor the infamous smell of anti-freeze. Thanks Chuck, Bob, Steve,D.P. Whipkey, Steve, Uncle Les and all others. Phred Chile feet in 1995 F-150 5.0L. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:36:00 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Message Order At 10:51 AM 1/12/01, you wrote: >I have been getting the messages out of order the last couple of days, is >any one else getting this or have I messed something up on my end? It gets >a little confusing when you get the answer before the question. Even the >time stamps show some of the replies before the original message. > >Rex Rex, The list server sends the posts in the order received. Your software is probably ordering posts by date/time and some people either don't have their date/time set right, time zone set up correctly or their email software doesn't transmit all of this information. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:46:28 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Message Order At 11:17 AM 1/12/01, you wrote: >This problem doesn't happen directly to me, but it may be that nothing is >"wrong" at all. I often see this on other lists, and especially at my >appartment where I download mail every 1/2 hr. > >Here's a possible scenario. A machine is running sendmail and gets bogged >down and stops recieving messages. The machine sending mail to this bogged >down machine then queues up the messages until the next "run", often around >1/2 to 1 hr. In the mean time, the replies to the original message are sent >out. The originally bogged down machine has cleared out its mail queue and >is ready to process/recieve messages. The reply messages now go straight >through to your machine. Then the queue is processed and the original >questions go through, now after the answers arrived. > >Chip We're pretty good as far as machine resources. Less than 5% overall CPU usage and the system is running 512 megabytes of RAM (the swap file has NEVER been hit). At most times, there are less than 100 emails in the queue, pretty good considering the tens of thousands of emails sent per day. If anything FTE over builds our resources. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: rexbennett Subject: Re: Message Order Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:49:19 -0600 Thanks, It's probably my mail server, it only started in the last couple of days and I was trying to figure out where the problem might be. I should have known it wasn't the FTE server ;) Keep up the good work Ken. Rex -----Original Message----- From: 80-96-list-bounce [mailto:80-96-list-bounce Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 12:36 PM To: 80-96-list Subject: [80-96-list] Re: Message Order At 10:51 AM 1/12/01, you wrote: >I have been getting the messages out of order the last couple of days, is >any one else getting this or have I messed something up on my end? It gets >a little confusing when you get the answer before the question. Even the >time stamps show some of the replies before the original message. > >Rex Rex, The list server sends the posts in the order received. Your software is probably ordering posts by date/time and some people either don't have their date/time set right, time zone set up correctly or their email software doesn't transmit all of this information. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: Lwskywalk Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:06:19 EST Subject: Re: Speedometer Calibration what i did was went to a speedometer place and they only charge like 25$ in georgia i dont know where you live but it was a whole lot less hassle luke ------------------------------ From: Lwskywalk Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:06:49 EST Subject: Re: Message Order im not gettin a out of order message luke ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:33:16 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Message Order At 02:49 PM 1/12/01, you wrote: >Thanks, > >It's probably my mail server, it only started in the last couple of days and >I was trying to figure out where the problem might be. I should have known >it wasn't the FTE server ;) > >Keep up the good work Ken. >Rex Rex, When something happens with the FTE server I'm made painfully aware of it by hundreds of e-mails from the users! The fiasco of last January/February when the lists were down for 2 weeks is still fresh! Ken ------------------------------ From: "les williams" <lesw Subject: Re: So...I need to Burp my truck eh? Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:57:56 +1100 Hi Nephew Phred, There has to be a better, more environmentally friendly and socially acceptable way of clearing the roads of Chebys !! ;-)) regards [Uncle] Les, Still lost in the Land of OZ. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Moreno" <fmoreno To: <80-96-list Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:22 AM Subject: [80-96-list] So...I need to Burp my truck eh? > My question remains, was the Dominoes pizza delivery girl's truck a Cheby? > > Thanks to all, > > Phred > 1995 F-150 4X4 propane or gasoline fed 5.0L with a 5-speed and 204K miles. > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:23:18 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: ADMIN: New FTE record Just an FYI to the Ford Truck Enthusiasts users.... We just completed analyzing the web server log files for December 2000. We had a amazing 675,000+ visitors for the month, double what we did in the Summer. FTE is on track for our goal of 1 million visitors/month by Spring 2001. Thanks to everyone for your support over the years. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "ideasusr" <ideasusr Subject: A true Dual Exhaust w/Headers Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:56:52 -0600 Hello All, I am a first time writer, but long a time reader. I am more than positive most of you Ford fans out there can help me with something. I am wanting to rid my truck from the catayletic converter and switch to a true dual exhaust system. What has to take place in order for this to happen regarding any sensors and what not. Also, where should I start looking for headers, meaning will regualr 5.0L "shorties" work or will all the major brand producers make headers that fit my truck? By chance what size of ID pipe should I use, 2 1/2". Thanks a bunch! ideasusr '93 F-150, 4x4, 5.0L. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:26:12 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: ADMIN: New list policy Since December 2, FTE has received a total of 24 emails from list subscribers containing the "Sexy Fun" virus (sometimes known as "Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs"). In each case, our anti-virus software has caught it. Additionally, the list server has successfully stripped virus code 36 times since Dec 2 (you can't get a virus through our list server because it strips all attachments). I don't know who started this epidemic but everyone who's system has sent a virus is at fault. Anyone with a computer connected to the Internet should, without exception, run anti-virus software. Our new policy is: Make sure you have anti-virus software on your computer. Although our list software rejects posts with attachments, we are notified by it of all attachments. If we receive notification that a virus was sent by your system, you will be removed immediately and banned from resubscribing. In other words, if your system sends a virus, you can't resubscribe ---- forever. Yes, this is harsh, but the issue is very serious. What would you do if you received emails with virus attachments 1-5 times per day? If you don't have anti-virus software, do yourself a favor and get it. Then run the update utility every week or two. Later, Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: Lingus0169 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:40:36 EST Subject: Fwd: Re: erratic engine In a message dated 1/12/01 1:32:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, rhansen writes: << This rig has a 4 barrel carb on it right? It sounds like the float levels are off. >> Yes it has a 4 barrel on it. It is a new Edelbrock 600 part # 1405. any info on changing the float levels on this would be helpfull, thankx nick -- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar -- Return-Path: <80-96-list-bounce Received: from rly-xb05.mx.aol.com (rly-xb05.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.106]) by air-xb03.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:32:08 -0500 Received: from linux1495.dn.net (motorhaven.com [216.167.77.152]) by rly-xb05.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:31:50 -0500 Received: from linux1495.dn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux1495.dn.net (8.9.3/(dn/norelay)) with ESMTP id OAA08872; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:34:08 -0500 Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 80-96-list); Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from roper.uwyo.edu (roper.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.8] (may be forged)) by linux1495.dn.net (8.9.3/(dn/norelay)) with ESMTP id OAA08859 for <80-96-list Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (asuwlink.uwyo.edu [129.72.60.2]) by ROPER.UWYO.EDU (PMDF V5.2-32 #33749) with ESMTP id <0G72005BNB2KZS Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:23:08 -0700 (MST) Received: from javelina (javelina.uwyo.edu [129.72.27.224]) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA28831 for <80-96-list Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:17:35 -0700 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:17:34 -0700 From: Robert Hansen <rhansen Subject: [80-96-list] Re: erratic engine To: "'80-96-list Message-id: <01C07C89.43A78630.rhansen Organization: University of Wyoming MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: 80-96-list-bounce Errors-to: 80-96-list-bounce X-original-sender: rhansen Precedence: list Reply-to: 80-96-list X-list: 80-96-list This rig has a 4 barrel carb on it right? It sounds like the float levels are off. If it is a Holley or Ford Motorcraft then resetting it is a matter of taking out the plugs on the side of the carb and adjusting the level until the fuel just does not run out. The threads on the adjuster are really fine so it takes a bit to get it where you need it. The engine is running while doing this so be careful with the fuel that may spill on your hot manifold. This will make more sense if you are familiar with the Holley line. I had the same sounding problem last winter, very frustrating. Good luck -----Original Message----- From: Lingus0169 Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:47 PM To: 80-96-list Subject: [80-96-list] erratic engine Hi all, For those who have been around for while, I am back, i swapped in a 351w into a 85 f150 4x4 which had a 300 I-6. It was quite a project till i was all done with everything,including changing 2 rears in 1 week. But here is my problem. i set my timing to 10* BTC, (its a high performance engine 400hp). it idles smooth and as you depress the gas pedal gradually, it stays smooth and sounds great untill i get to about 3K rpm's, fomr there on if i keep giving it more gas gradually, it runs like hell. it seems like its missing and the timing is thrown off, but everything is set right right, timing,point gap in the distributer, the only thing i can think of is the fuel mixture, but would that make it that erratic? thankx for your help in advance nick 85 f150 4x4 np208/t-18 dana 44/60 400hp 351w also 89 f250 leaf sprung IFS ext cab 351w auto ------------------------------ From: "Rex Bennett" <rexbennett Subject: Re: ADMIN: New list policy Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:46:18 -0600 While I agree with 99% of this policy you can't say that just because you run an antivirus program and keep it updated you are 100% protected. I am very diligent with antivirus software on the systems I am responsible for and run forced updates at least once a week but there are times when a virus spreads too fast and the antivirus venders get caught. For example "I Love You Virus" hit our systems nearly a day before there was fix and there are sure to be more like this in the future. Certainly repeat offenders or people passing old viruses should be dealt with but I would hate to see someone permanently banned from the list when they are taking very good precautions and get hit with one of these viruses that there is no protection for. Keep up the very good work you do running this list. Rex -----Original Message----- From: 80-96-list-bounce [mailto:80-96-list-bounce Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:26 PM To: pre61-list 80-96-list small-list pre48-list superduty-list Subject: [80-96-list] ADMIN: New list policy Since December 2, FTE has received a total of 24 emails from list subscribers containing the "Sexy Fun" virus (sometimes known as "Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs"). In each case, our anti-virus software has caught it. Additionally, the list server has successfully stripped virus code 36 times since Dec 2 (you can't get a virus through our list server because it strips all attachments). I don't know who started this epidemic but everyone who's system has sent a virus is at fault. Anyone with a computer connected to the Internet should, without exception, run anti-virus software. Our new policy is: Make sure you have anti-virus software on your computer. Although our list software rejects posts with attachments, we are notified by it of all attachments. If we receive notification that a virus was sent by your system, you will be removed immediately and banned from resubscribing. In other words, if your system sends a virus, you can't resubscribe ---- forever. Yes, this is harsh, but the issue is very serious. What would you do if you received emails with virus attachments 1-5 times per day? If you don't have anti-virus software, do yourself a favor and get it. Then run the update utility every week or two. Later, Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:57:57 -0800 From: chuck & kathy sanborn <slammer Subject: Re: ADMIN: New list policy At 09:26 PM 1/12/01 -0500, you wrote: >Since December 2, FTE has received a total of 24 emails from >list subscribers containing the "Sexy Fun" virus (sometimes >known as "Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs"). > >I Ken, My McAfee hasn't caught this one (I get it with a .scr) extension but I sure as heck don't open it. AND it's coming for a MAILER-DAEMON address!! Also Midgets3.scr from same address. I have tried to return them but doubt if I had any luck. Chuck ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:12:02 -0800 From: chuck & kathy sanborn <slammer Subject: Re: ADMIN: New list policy I agree with and second Rex's motion. Repeat offenders yes, but once in awhile type stuff is not negligent or purposeful. What would happen say, if Phred passed on a virus that he didn't even know that he had? I'd hate to see that resource banned for life. Chuck At 08:46 PM 1/12/01 -0600, you wrote: >. Certainly repeat offenders or >people passing old viruses should be dealt with but I would hate to see >someone permanently banned from the list when they are taking very good >precautions and get hit with one of these viruses that there is no >protection for. > >Keep up the very good work you do running this list. >Rex ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 22:24:46 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: ADMIN: More... New list policy This email is in response to a question/concern posted on a couple of the mailing lists.... First, if anyone doesn't believe the virus isn't a serious problem, I just received two more email's from list members while writing this that had the previously mentioned virus attached. Second, it takes far too much time to keep a score board of who's been warned and who hasn't. I'm not going to be an absolute tyrant, if the virus is too new for anti-virus software I certainly won't fault the user. If however, the virus is currently covered by anti-virus software they'll be unsubscribed. I understand that not everyone is computer savvy, but anti-virus software is a basic necessity. Since viruses make prime-time news, how can anyone not be aware that they exist? No one gets AIDS on purpose, but anyone having sex out of wed-lock without a condom has no one to blame but themselves if they get infected. Likewise, take precaution with your system and it will not get infected. There's one way users can prevent infection of their system even by new viruses that haven't yet been added to their anti-virus software: Don't open executable attachments (including self-extracting ZIPs), don't open screen saver attachments and don't use Microsoft e-mail software or if you do use it, turn off macros. Also, my family and FTE's employees are entirely dependent on the operation of FTE's 5 computer systems in order to make a living. The list users are not dependant on the operation of our systems in order to earn a paycheck. We, however, are. There's more here at stake than someone not being able to read list mail. Let me put it this way.... if you ran a business and someone wrote you a check that bounced, would you take a check from them again? Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "Rex Bennett" <rexbennett Subject: Re: ADMIN: More... New list policy Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:41:16 -0600 I agree with you totally on this don't get me wrong. I was just a little concerned about the once every year or two virus that has no protection. I personally think you are doing an outstanding job with the list, much better that any other list I am now or have been apart of. Rex -----Original Message----- From: 80-96-list-bounce [mailto:80-96-list-bounce Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 9:25 PM To: pre61-list 80-96-list small-list pre48-list superduty-list Subject: [80-96-list] ADMIN: More... New list policy This email is in response to a question/concern posted on a couple of the mailing lists.... First, if anyone doesn't believe the virus isn't a serious problem, I just received two more email's from list members while writing this that had the previously mentioned virus attached. Second, it takes far too much time to keep a score board of who's been warned and who hasn't. I'm not going to be an absolute tyrant, if the virus is too new for anti-virus software I certainly won't fault the user. If however, the virus is currently covered by anti-virus software they'll be unsubscribed. I understand that not everyone is computer savvy, but anti-virus software is a basic necessity. Since viruses make prime-time news, how can anyone not be aware that they exist? No one gets AIDS on purpose, but anyone having sex out of wed-lock without a condom has no one to blame but themselves if they get infected. Likewise, take precaution with your system and it will not get infected. There's one way users can prevent infection of their system even by new viruses that haven't yet been added to their anti-virus software: Don't open executable attachments (including self-extracting ZIPs), don't open screen saver attachments and don't use Microsoft e-mail software or if you do use it, turn off macros. Also, my family and FTE's employees are entirely dependent on the operation of FTE's 5 computer systems in order to make a living. The list users are not dependant on the operation of our systems in order to earn a paycheck. We, however, are. There's more here at stake than someone not being able to read list mail. Let me put it this way.... if you ran a business and someone wrote you a check that bounced, would you take a check from them again? Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "Mike Miller" <mikemilr Subject: Re: ADMIN: More... New list policy Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 02:17:50 -0700 So if someone has their Norton LiveUpdate set to run the 1st of every month and a virus comes out the 2nd of the month and they propogate it, they are permanently banned.. Pretty harsh it sounds like. I think you need to think about this a little more before issuing permanent policy. I can appreciate your position as list master, but I think you need to give the average user a little time to respond to a normal virus threat. After all, Norton default is to run once a month and the typical user has no clue how to change that. It is fortunate that the list server filters out attachments and does not contaminate the list, so why be so harsh on your rules? mike miller ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:03:20 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: ADMIN: More... New list policy At 04:17 AM 1/13/01, you wrote: >So if someone has their Norton LiveUpdate set to run the 1st of every month >and a virus comes out the 2nd of the month and they propogate it, they are >permanently banned.. Pretty harsh it sounds like. I think you need to >think about this a little more before issuing permanent policy. I can >appreciate your position as list master, but I think you need to give the >average user a little time to respond to a normal virus threat. After all, >Norton default is to run once a month and the typical user has no clue how >to change that. It is fortunate that the list server filters out attachments >and does not contaminate the list, so why be so harsh on your rules? > >mike miller .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|