|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 80-96-list); Sat, 09 Dec 2000 21:18:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 21:18:04 -0500 (EST) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 80-96-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 80-96-list Subject: 80-96-list Digest V2000 #255 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 80-96 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 80-96-list Digest Fri, 08 Dec 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 255 In This Issue: Re: LPG/Propane Re: Pinging Re: LPG/Propane Another stupid dual tank question Re: Another stupid dual tank question ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:25:54 -0800 From: Chris McKinnon <chrism Subject: Re: LPG/Propane As the list knows, I'm the thrid member of the propane triangle. I've got a propaned '84 351W as single fuel, the only way. With single fuel there is way less stuff to break, no gas tanks to rust or rip on rocks... Just a simpler system. Over here (in Canada) propane is about $.50/L CAN or 66% of the price of ULP and available almost everywhere ULP is. Keep us up to date, we won't lead you too far astray. Oh yeah, when you are looking at converions, don't forget about Technocarb. They make a fine system. Chris > Nephew Phred is running a dual fuelled '95 302 and I'm sure he will be only >too happy to tell you about it. >I am using a 351 Clevo, and will still argue against the dual fuel option, >and defend a mono Propane/LPG installation to the hilt. The only reservation >is the availability of Propane/LPG refills. I obviously have no idea of the >'propane scene' in the UK. Is the LPG readily available? At what cost in >relationship to ULP fuel ? Down here it is about 60% of ULP fuel. The >majority of 'Effies' would be on an LPG diet. Is it worth the trouble in >Oz ? Yes!! I have to admit, when you first posted to this forum and said >what you were driving and where you were from (UK) my immediate reaction was >'How much is this going to cost to re-fuel in the real world ?' ;-)) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:34:18 -0800 (PST) From: Joseph Osborn <josepho Subject: Re: Pinging > From: "D. L. Young" <dlyoung > My truck is an 88 F150 ext cab with the 5.0 engine > and AOD tranny. > I am having a bit of a pinging problem as well as a > strange shake when under load. I have a 89 Bronco with the same powertrain and the same problem, until I let a Ford mechanic look at it. He showed me all the gunk that had built up in the intake plenum, robbing the engine of airflow. After a thorough cleaning with a chemical he uses in the dealership shop, the pinging and shuddering went away. Might be worth a look into your intake to see if it's all gunked up. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ From: Fred Moreno <fmoreno Subject: Re: LPG/Propane Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:51:41 -0700 Conrad wrote: Has anyone got any experience of a 1995 vintage 351W on dual fuel? I am thinking about a conversion as UK fuel prics continue to get higher. Phred replies: Well as Uncle Les mentioned I do run a '95 F-150 302, 5-speed on either propane or gasoline. This dual fuel set-up is pretty convient since the short bed set up only allows for the rear tank. I work for a company that is very involved in designing the electronics for LPG and CNG vehicles. Your truck is a piece of cake to convert, but then again.... I don't know of anyone doing conversions in U.K. but there is a very compentent gentleman by the name of Mark Wilmet doing well in COLFONTAINE BELGIUM. I have dealt with a few outfits doing conversions in Belgium and France. This individual's work has been proven to be above the rest when it comes to quality. If this is something serious you are considering, I will gladly forward you off the list this person's business phone number. I am sure he will be able to at least supply you with parts at a reasonable price. Good luck Phred 1995 F-150 4X4 dual fueled 5.0L, 5-speed, 201K miles and going strong. ------------------------------ Subject: Re: LPG/Propane Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 04:26:38 -0000 From: "Conrad" <conrad Hi les, > I am using a 351 Clevo, and will still argue against the dual > fuel option, > and defend a mono Propane/LPG installation to the hilt. The we dont have that much LPG available here so I couldnt do that, but when we can get it its around half the price of unleaded. > Oz ? Yes!! I have to admit, when you first posted to this > forum and said > what you were driving and where you were from (UK) my > immediate reaction was > 'How much is this going to cost to re-fuel in the real world ?' ;-)) well, yes, a bit of a concern. I've not beena ble to get an accurate price for the conversion, but its looks like around 1500 GBP. that will pay for itself in around 12000 miles, which will only take 1-2 years. It comes down to if you do get close to MPG of unleaded without much power loss. If would not take that much of a loss for it not to really be worth the bother. > Rather than try and pre-empt the questions you may have, and I'd be > suprised if you didn't have many, how about you get a > written(?) quote for the conversion paying particular notice thanks, I'll do that. One problem is that there is no-one anywhere near me that has even heard of an econoline. I dont think I can legally fit the stuff myself, but I'm still trying to confirm that. Is it a doable DIY job? Obviously fitting the bits is not hard, but what about setting it all up? What sort of prices to you pay for kits over there? Conrad ------------------------------ From: "Travis Moore" <webdoc Subject: Another stupid dual tank question Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:23:52 -0600 Guys, The old 94 is exhibiting the infamous dual tank problem. The rear tank works just fine. The front tank dumps into the rear when in use. I know one of the check or "shuttle valves" as Ford calls them is bad, but which one? And do I have to buy the whole in tank unit from Ford, or is it available aftermarket? TIA, Travis Moore 1994 F-150 Extended Cab 4.9L -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- File: winmail.dat ------------------------------ From: Spruce1495 Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 20:14:52 EST Subject: Re: Another stupid dual tank question I just had mine repaired. It's the rear pump check valve. Have to replace pump. There is an upgrade kit for the job. About $350.00 for pump and labor. Bill in KY ------------------------------ End of 80-96-list Digest V2000 #255 *********************************** ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts 80-96 Truck Mailing List Send posts to 80-96-list If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|