|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list 80-96-list); Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:37:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:37:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 80-96-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 80-96-list Subject: 80-96-list Digest V2000 #204 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 80-96 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 80-96-list Digest Thu, 28 Sep 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 204 In This Issue: Re: "86 vs "87 info needed Re: Rattle Noise Re: F350 opinion Re: F350 opinion Brake problem on F-150 Re: Brake problem on F-150 Re: valvetrain chatter and losing oil About Crew Cabs.... Power Steering pump pully removal. Re: Power Steering pump pully removal. Re: Power Steering pump pully removal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:17:03 -0700 From: Bob Kennedy <bobkennedy Subject: Re: "86 vs "87 info needed I've got an '86 Bronco (5.0L) and am in the same boat. I have found that just about everything short of sheet metal will swap. There are other minor differences on the motor as well. I think the alternator changed mounting positions and the motor went with a serpentine belt. I've put the one piece oil pan gasket on (sweet) that was listed for '88 and up 5.0L. Clear as mud ??? Bob johnhfleming > I have an "86 F150 and am always on the lookout for "goodies" for it. I > see a lot of adds for stuff for "87-"9? and was wondering what the > difference was on certain parts. I realize the body changed then (I > think) but I mean things like "shorty headers", mechanical stuff mostly. > How about front springs? are they the same? > > John > > ________________________________________________________________ > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. -- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.superford.org/cgi-bin/sf.cgi?uid=default&vr2=1&ID=311 86XLT/5.0/AOD/8.8/D44 4.56 Detroit/EZ, 36x12.50x16.5, 6"/0" ------------------------------ From: "Obert, Scott AT3" <ObertS Subject: Re: Rattle Noise Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:12:44 -0700 Yes, I replaced the pilot bearing and the throwout bearing -----Original Message----- From: Roger Lane [mailto:Lanero Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:21 AM To: 80-96-list Subject: [80-96-list] Re: Rattle Noise When you replaced the clutch, did you also check/replace the pilot bearing? My guess is, if there was a lot of play with the input bearing, maybe the pilot bearing was also bad. On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:08:17 -0700, 80-96-list > Hi guys, > > I have a rattle noise coming from my tranny I think. I noticed it last > week. It happens when I step on the gas pedal real good in any gear except > 1st or reverse. It's most noticeable when on the freeway in 5th going over > 60. I pulled the transmission out last weekend because it was time to > change the clutch anyway. There was a lot of metal on the drain plug when I > drained the fluid, so I took the top cover off of it and took a look inside > and it was real clean all the metal sludge was only collected on the drain > plug. Also, the input shaft had a lot of play in it, nobody open on the > weekend had an input shaft bearing besides Ford ($90) so I put the tranny > back in and went and picked up the bearing yesterday at a transmission shop > for $50. Put the bearing in today, got the tranny back in, lots less play > in the input shaft now, but it still makes the rattle noise. It's the M5OD > tranny. Anybody got any clues?? > > Thanks, > Scott > > 1995 F150 4X4 > 302 SB > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > "Accomplishing the impossible only means the boss will add it to your regular duties." _______________________________________________________ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html ============================================================= To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 Please remove this footer when replying. ------------------------------ From: Ledski Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:00:25 EDT Subject: Re: F350 opinion Paul, I bought a 94 F350 SC dually with a 460 and 14,000 miles in June this year and I love it. The only drawback from my point of view is the 8 mpg the 460 gives me. When gas get close to $2 a gallon I just say to myself every mile "there's a quarter". But I never expected 20 mpg either. I can haul a 3000 lb camper and pull a 20ft boat and not have any problem and still get 7-8 mpg. I changed oil to Mobil 1 last week and first estimates are a 25% increase in mpg. From 8 to almost 10. Yahoo! I don't drive it everyday so that could be a fluke. Tim 94 F350 94 EB Explorer In a message dated 09/28/2000 11:47:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, listar << From: Paul Rozell <prozell Subject: F350 opinion Hi All, Just wanted to get some opinions on a 1995 F350. I am looking at an F350 W/ crewcab. single rear wheel with a 351 motor. I do not do alot of heavy duty hauling at this point. I wanted to see what the rest of your opinions might be. thanks, Paul Rozell 65 F100 460 C6 96 F150 SC 5.0 >> ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:32:09 -0400 From: James Oxley <luxjo Subject: Re: F350 opinion Ledski > > Paul, > > I bought a 94 F350 SC dually with a 460 and 14,000 miles in June this year > and I love it. The only drawback from my point of view is the 8 mpg the 460 > gives me. When gas get close to $2 a gallon I just say to myself every mile > "there's a quarter". > But I never expected 20 mpg either. > I can haul a 3000 lb camper and pull a 20ft boat and not have any problem and > still get 7-8 mpg. > > I changed oil to Mobil 1 last week and first estimates are a 25% increase in > mpg. From 8 to almost 10. Yahoo! I don't drive it everyday so that could be > a fluke. I have a 95 250 SC long bed with a 460. I get close to 10 MPG around town, 12.5 on the highway and 7 to 8.5 towing 8600 lbs (highway). I did not notice any change in milage from going to mobil 1. i have a set of doug thorley's (headers and Y-pipe) on the way and I'm hoping to maybe pull a 1/2 MPG out of them, maybe evena MPG omn the highway. I'm sure I'm hoping for the world :-) > Tim > 94 F350 > 94 EB Explorer > > In a message dated 09/28/2000 11:47:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > listar > > << From: Paul Rozell <prozell > Subject: F350 opinion > > Hi All, > Just wanted to get some opinions on a 1995 F350. I am looking at an F350 W/ > crewcab. single rear > wheel with a 351 motor. I do not do alot of heavy duty hauling at this > point. I wanted to see what > the rest of your opinions might be. > If you are not doing major hauling/towing, I don't see the need for a 350. If you are doing major towing/hauling, then I don't think the 351 will have enough snort. I'd get a 351 in a 150, but for amjor work ina 250/350, I'd prob go powerstroke if I had to do it again. Just for info, the 250's ride 10 times better than the 350's. OX -- 78 Bronco Custom, 400, T-18, 14 bolt/detroit/4.56, D60/detroit/4.56, 44 boggers, 9" lift 79 Bronco XLT, 351M, C6, D60/detroit/4.10, D448lug/Lokrite/4.10, 38.5 SX's, 4"lift 79 Bronc XLT, 351M, C6, 35 BFG AT's, 2" lift 86 Capri, turbo 5.0 (13.4 90 Talon AWD turbo (12.7 95 F250-460,4WD (16.9 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:22:47 -0500 From: Chuck Biggs <biggs Subject: Brake problem on F-150 I changed the front brake pads on my 1990 F-150 several months ago and ever since, when I brake and the truck is almost stopped, I hear a grinding-moaning sound from the front wheels. When I installed the new pads I had the disks turned and used the "stickum" and lubricant as recommended by the pad manufacturer. This seems like an easy problem to find but I have been into the front wheels several times and I cannot locate the cause of the noise. Anyone out there ever have a similar problem? The replacement inside pads do not have the little round clip that snaps into the piston like some of the newer model 150's have. Could this cause the problem you think? TIA Chuck ------------------------------ From: "Atkinson, Chip" <CAtkinson Subject: Re: Brake problem on F-150 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 14:45:22 -0600 Whenever I have heard the grinding sound it meant that there wass metal to metal contact. Perhaps there is a loose spring or a rock stuck in the pads. Do you think that the pads could be going past the turned area on the rotors? You might hear the grinding sound if the pads are rubbing on the unsurfaced area of the rotors. Chip -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Biggs [mailto:biggs Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 2:23 PM To: 80-96-list Subject: [80-96-list] Brake problem on F-150 I changed the front brake pads on my 1990 F-150 several months ago and ever since, when I brake and the truck is almost stopped, I hear a grinding-moaning sound from the front wheels. When I installed the new pads I had the disks turned and used the "stickum" and lubricant as recommended by the pad manufacturer. This seems like an easy problem to find but I have been into the front wheels several times and I cannot locate the cause of the noise. Anyone out there ever have a similar problem? The replacement inside pads do not have the little round clip that snaps into the piston like some of the newer model 150's have. Could this cause the problem you think? TIA Chuck ============================================================= To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 Please remove this footer when replying. ------------------------------ From: "Phil" <imstobu Subject: Re: valvetrain chatter and losing oil Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:10:45 -0400 > I agree that the Fram was a bad move, but I also think you're looking in the > right direction when considering the PCV. I've seen high crankcase pressure > on many Ch > constructed, however, especially around the throttle body). Usually a leak > such as a poorly sealed valve cover won't lose as much oil as you mention > unless there is also high pressure involved, such as loss of crankcase > ventilation. > I haven't had a chance yet to work on it yet but was wondering if the catalytic converter was clogging up, would that cause the oil to blow out? I failed emissions, its down on power, usually stalls trying to pull out of the driveway, and the air pump isn't working right, although was hooked up for emissions test. how do you tell if one is bad? Phil Beattie 66 F100 70 F100 91 F150 4x4 ------------------------------ From: "Dave Harmier" <dharmier Subject: About Crew Cabs.... Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:12:57 -0500 I absolutely LOVE the cab of my Beast. (Only wish the rear doors had power locks too). My Beast is a Diesel, so my 351 Experience comes from Dads 150. Pretty good power. MISERABLE mileage. If it had to pull my Beast around, I'd be lucky to see 8 mpg. To be very fair, Dads truck could (I firmly believe) use a new high flow cat. It doesn't flash engine light, so I haven't tried to pull codes. There COULD be 16-18 mpg hiding in there somewhere, but he sees 10-11. Dave H. Houston 90 F-350 Crew Diesel / E4OD / Service Body / Tommy Lift.... The BEAST! 91 F-150 SC LWB 5.8 / E4OD / Crossbed toolbox / Tommy Lift.... Dads 92 F-150 SC SWB 5.0 / E4OD / Crossbed toolbox.... my former workhorse... Sisters 80 C#e?y El Camino 5.7 / 200R4 / BLACK as Night paint / approx. 400 hp... Stress Relief 87 Yamaha FJ 1200.... Reality Bender ------------------------------ From: MRStace84 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:53:38 EDT Subject: Power Steering pump pully removal. Hello List Can someone tell me what kind of tool is required to remove the pully on a power steering pump? And if it is something that is easy to find and purchase? The pump I'am going to be working on is off my 84 F150 with a 300. Thanks, Stacy Fisher 84 F150 4x4 98 Ranger XLT 4x4 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:31:47 -0400 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Power Steering pump pully removal. At 08:53 AM 9/29/00, you wrote: >Hello List > >Can someone tell me what kind of tool is required to remove the pully on a >power steering pump? And if it is something that is easy to find and >purchase? The pump I'am going to be working on is off my 84 F150 with a 300. NAPA or any decent auto parts store sells a tool for this. Ask if they rent/loan it first because it usually comes in a kit for pulley, steering wheel and balancer removal/installation and will run $60. Ken ------------------------------ From: slikness Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Power Steering pump pully removal. > Hello List Can someone tell me what kind of tool is required to remove the pully on a power steering pump? And if it is something that is easy to find and purchase? The pump I'am going to be working on is off my 84 F150 with a 300.< Most local mechanics also have this tool and are willing to pull it. One local wanted $15, but my regular mechanic did it for nothing. Takes about 2 minutes. When you get your new pump, there is usually a tool included to press the pulley back on. If not, let me know, I've got a couple laying around the garage. .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|