|
|
From: owner-80-96-list-digest
To: 80-96-list-digest Subject: 80-96-list-digest V3 #329 Reply-To: 80-96-list Sender: owner-80-96-list-digest Errors-To: owner-80-96-list-digest Precedence: bulk 80-96-list-digest Monday, November 22 1999 Volume 03 : Number 329 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980-1996 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 80-96 - shocks FTE 80-96 - Re: Dual to Single Shock Set-up FTE 80-96 - 81 Vacuum Schematics, I6 300 FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag Re: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling Re: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag FTE 80-96 - Re: Carburetor Jetting Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling FTE 80-96 - Clunking Noise Re: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag FTE 80-96 - How much is too much mileage.. FTE 80-96 - New To List / Questions ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 09:26:29 -0600 From: "Joel Thomas" Subject: FTE 80-96 - shocks I wrote in about the shocks on my dual setup I took off the front one and it rides considerably better , actually tons better hardly any bouncing at all just glides over the bumps now. and they are the gabriels. thanks for the help.. :) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 09:27:02 -0800 From: Joan and Walt Posluszny Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re: Dual to Single Shock Set-up Joel, you can do this, I have an 85 with the dual shock set-up. I switched to one a shock set -up but there are a few caveats....let me explain. You have to get new shocks, ones that were designed for the normal single shock set-up so they have the correct damping and rebound characteristics. Just removing one of the existing two will screw up the handling characteristics. They are not designed to work alone and will be so soft they are downright dangerous. I know because I tried this at first. A drive around the block will be enough to convince you. This new shock will go in the rear position. Depending on which shocks you buy (and this is like flavors of ice cream), the new ride with just one shock can be softer or harder than the previous ride with two shocks, so choose wisely. Bottom Line : The type of shock you choose has more of an effect on ride and handling than the number of shocks used. Been there, done that. Walt > > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 09:06:41 -0600 > From: "Joel Thomas" > Subject: FTE 80-96 - Shocks > > I have dual front shock on my 84 F-150 > can I take one shock out to make it ride better? > and which one should i take front or rear on the front?? > thanks > right now it rides real stiff and i have ridden in one shock 4x4's like mine > and they ride much better.. > any help? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 09:45:22 -0800 From: "robert moffatt" Subject: FTE 80-96 - 81 Vacuum Schematics, I6 300 "Moore, Jimmy" wrote: Robert, I don't have an answer on your question about the vacuum hose, but I do have a question for you about your '81 F150 300 Six. Do you have the vacuum schematic, and if so, can you either A: email or fax a copy of it, or B: send a copy of it in the mail? I have received one for an '80 and an '82, but neither is the same. Thanks Jim Oklahoma City 1981 Ford F-150 300 Six Jimmy, I can try to copy the schematic. 1. My first thought is to make sure that it's the correct schematic. Inside the door frame of the truck, the label states that the vehicle was manufactured 9/81. But the registration says that it is an 82. I just went outside to take a better look at the emissions tag and it says that this vehicle conforms to standards set for the 1982 model year, and further that it is for sale only in California. At the bottom left hand corner of the tag it says, "E2AE-9C485-AJT". Sorry about the oversight. Especially if I went and put the wrong cam in my engine. (I'll post this to the Ford Truck list also just in case any body else has some input. I'm also still trying to figure out how to get my email program setup straight so I want to see how the message posts.) 2. If it is the correct schematic (I doubt it at this point but let's see) I'll would try to take a picture of it and email it to you. I might be able to find someone with a digital camera to help me. If not I could take a couple of regular film pictures, then scan them on a digital scanner. My schematic is in color and I think it would be important to you in reading it. 3. I'm also going to try to see what I can find on the Ford website. I've tried this before and got a dead-end, but I'll keep trying. After checking, it seems that Ford has the info available on CD. I didn't see any price info. I do remember a friend saying that he went to a local ford dealer to get the emissions schematics for his car, you might try that. I don't think that they charged him too much. I'll keep trying to see if I can find any free info online. 4. I just realized yesterday that there is a message board at http://www.ford-trucks.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=80_96 . It seems that this is separate from the email list. Is this correct? What's the difference, should I post questions both places...? I'LL ALSO RE-POST THE MY ORIGINAL QUESTION IN THE HOPE THAT SOMEONE CAN HELP... - -----Original Message----- From: Robert Moffatt [mailto:robertmoffatt Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 2:38 PM To: 80-96-list Subject: 81 (or 82 ?) 4.9 L six cylinder I'm having trouble finding where one of the vacuum hose goes to. This is a California vehicle. The hose in question is a yellow hose (this truck has a number of different colored hoses). As best i can make out from the emissions diagram in the vehicle, the hose should run from the distributor advance (just passed a couple of splits to somewhere else) to a port on the carburetor. The port is labeled "s" on the diagram between a black hose (to port "3") and a white hose (to port "E"). I've located the other two hoses but i don't see a connector for this last yellow hose. I acquired this truck after the engine overheated so i don't know if this is the original carburetor but the tag is still on it so I can probably find out. I did not remove the carburetor from the manifold or any of the vacuum hoses (that I did not note before detaching) when overhauling the engine. I left the assembly in the engine compartment. I'm not sure if this hose was actually ever mounted before i removed the engine or got yanked when working on it. Can anyone give any advice? thank's in advance. robert. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 10:36:36 -0800 From: Joan and Walt Posluszny Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling How do the wrist pins and the piston walls actually get oiled? Thanks == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 16:00:29 -0500 From: "Jeff Fairbairn" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag Hi, Does anyone have experience with those air bags in the front coils? The front springs in my '96 F-150 4x4 are starting to sag and I was wondering if this would cure it. I was also thinking of adding a leaf in the back springs. Will this give me about an inch of lift? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 16:51:14 -0600 From: Blake Malkamaki Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag >Hi, > >Does anyone have experience with those air bags in the front coils? The >front springs in my '96 F-150 4x4 are starting to sag and I was wondering if >this would cure it. I was also thinking of adding a leaf in the back >springs. Will this give me about an inch of lift? > I put air bags in the front of my 88 F-150 for snowplowing. Those darned swing axle front ends change camber with load so you just about have to. I have a pretty heavy BOSS plow. I put about 40 - 50 psi in the bags when the plow is on. Let it down to about 10 psi with no plow. The bag people don't recomment going less than 10 or they may wrinkle up and get caught in the coils. Blake Little Mountain Concord, Ohio Early Oil Well Historian http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://little-mountain.com/oilwell http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://little-mountain.com http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://little-mountain.com/blake "Society is safest when the criminals don't know who's armed." "An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject...." == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:55:36 -0600 From: Jim Cannon Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling At 10:36 21/11/99 -0800, you wrote: >How do the wrist pins and the piston walls actually get oiled? Thanks > Oil splash and spray out of crankshaft. Jim Cannon Houston, TX "A Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech '29 Ford Model A Phaeton and a helluva' engineer!" '80 Ford F-150 300 I-6 2WD '63 Buick Riviera 401 V-8 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 20:19:58 -0600 From: Mike Persell Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, you wrote: > At 10:36 21/11/99 -0800, you wrote: > >How do the wrist pins and the piston walls actually get oiled? Thanks > > > > Oil splash and spray out of crankshaft. Makes you want to make sure those little holes are lined up in the rod bearings! Mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:02:32 PST From: "ken haley" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling There are oil passages from the main bearing journals to the main bearings, through the crank to the rod bearings through the rods to the wrist pins. The cylinder walls are oiled by splash. Ken ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:07:57 PST From: "ken haley" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag >Hi, > >Does anyone have experience with those air bags in the front coils? The >front springs in my '96 F-150 4x4 are starting to sag and I was wondering >if >this would cure it. I was also thinking of adding a leaf in the back >springs. Will this give me about an inch of lift? Airbags are a good idea for beefing sagging springs, or providing ride height restoration in loaded vehicles. A hose system that allows filling both bags at once is convenient, but be sure to add a valve in the lines somewhere to prevent body lean from forcing air from one bag to another, which will make the lean worse, which forces more air, which.... Some add-a-leafs increase ride height only the thickness of the leaf, some increase the arch of the original spring--depends on the design. Check before you buy. Ken ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:21:27 -0800 From: Joan and Walt Posluszny Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re: Carburetor Jetting If I want to richen the fuel mixture during part throttle [1,500 rpm and up] on a 1985 carbureted 351W should I [1] go with bigger jets ? or [2] go with a power valve that opens sooner [at a lower vacuum]? [3] What percent more fuel will I get if I go up one jet size? [4] Anyone know what the stock jets were in a carb on a 1985 351W with the following carb tag? E5TE PA G or C 4JI4 Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Walt == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 22:25:57 -0500 From: "Matt Fitzsimmons" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: wrist pin and piston wall oiling > There are oil passages from the main bearing journals to the main bearings, > through the crank to the rod bearings through the rods to the wrist pins. > > The cylinder walls are oiled by splash. > > Ken Not really. The rods are solid. There is often a spray hole in the "big end" of the rod that directs oil to the underside of the piston, otherwise the piston, cylinder walls and wrist pin are all oiled by oil splashed up or flung off the spinning crank. Matt == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:42:36 PST From: "Christopher Worley" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Clunking Noise Greetings, My '93 F-150 SC 351 is making a clunking noise everytime I hit the brakes, seems to be coming from the front, I haven't had time to check it very good. Was wondering if anyone has an idea what I should check when I do jack it up to take a look. TIA, Chris Worley Waxahachie, TX ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 21:55:15 -0600 From: Mike Persell Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Air lift bags to solve sag On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, you wrote: > >Hi, > > > Airbags are a good idea for beefing sagging springs, or providing ride > height restoration in loaded vehicles. A hose system that allows filling > both bags at once is convenient, but be sure to add a valve in the lines > somewhere to prevent body lean from forcing air from one bag to another, > which will make the lean worse, which forces more air, which.... How many airbags for too much good holiday cooking? Mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:59:41 EST From: craig n eggerman Subject: FTE 80-96 - How much is too much mileage.. You can expect a lot of the rotating external parts to give up in the 100,00-150,000 miles range. These are the water pump, alternator, idle pulley bearings, power steering pump, ujoints, clutch, smog pump if there is one. If you feel comfortable replacing these as they give out, no problems. Check the work tickets, some of this may already have been done. Engine internals with reasonable maintenance and non-severe service will easily go 200,000 miles before it may be time for an engine overhaul, axle rebuild, transmission rebuild. If the belts are cracked replace them. If hoses are not soft and pliable replace them. Look very closely at any high pressure hose for signs of leaks or cracks. One problem area that I especially look for are problems with hoses on the transmission cooler lines. These little buggers are out of sight and out of mind. A break in one of these can be a real problem. I found one on a Toy** Corolla this summer next to the exhaust that was brittle and cracked when flexed. Eggerman Casper,Wyoming O|||||O ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 22:15:07 -0700 From: "Jim Velasquez" Subject: FTE 80-96 - New To List / Questions Greetings! I've been subscribed to the list for a few days, and should probably introduce myself. My name is Jim Velasquez, and as I write this I'm 1/2 way through driving my 1st Ford Truck home to Colorado after buying it from a friend in MI. Up until now I've only owned a couple of Fords, both Mustangs. Some quick questions: Can anyone on the list help decode this VIN: 2FDLF47G8LCA64012 ? The Truck is a big Dually, which I presume was manufactured as a Cab+Chassis because up until I bought it there was a huge toolbox on the back. (Toolbox was removed prior to sale to go on a new truck) The Badges on the fenders .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|