|
|
From: owner-80-96-list-digest
To: 80-96-list-digest Subject: 80-96-list-digest V3 #298 Reply-To: 80-96-list Sender: owner-80-96-list-digest Errors-To: owner-80-96-list-digest Precedence: bulk 80-96-list-digest Sunday, October 24 1999 Volume 03 : Number 298 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980-1996 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:I6-300 on Propane FTE 80-96 - Re:Uneven acceleration FTE 80-96 - re: Shell Rotella 15w40 FTE 80-96 - Two questions... Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:Uneven acceleration FTE 80-96 - Update on Key Problem, still not fixed! FTE 80-96 - re: Shell Rotella 15w40 in 302 gas Re: FTE 80-96 - Engine Thermostats Re: FTE 80-96 - Motor oil and additives FTE 80-96 - Don't hold off FTE 80-96 - 7.3 diesel Re: FTE 80-96 - 7.3 diesel FTE 80-96 - Sway Bar FTE 80-96 - fuel guage Re: FTE 80-96 - Sway Bar Re: FTE 80-96 - RE: ROTFLMAO about...... Re: FTE 80-96 - re: Shell Rotella 15w40 ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 20:57:23 +1000 From: les williams Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:I6-300 on Propane Hi Mike and All Others, My comment was made with tongue firmly in cheek, I do appreciate your comments on OIL or anything else, as I do anybody's comments relavent to Ford Products & their particular usage. Some of the political comments go a bit over my head, what with being a resident of Australia, I think some list respondents don't realize that e-mails on this list go world wide, not just mainland USA. and F series trucks assembled in Oz can be quite a different animal under the skin/paint, to what obviously you see out of Detroit. Actually the 195F thermo did sort of work, it would open etc. BUT as the ambient temperature goes up, the performance, particularly thru the hottest part of the day was non-existent, it wasn't just a flat spot, just a real dead feel under acceleration, not dis-similar to a very badly retarded engine, the 'Getup & Go' was gone. However driven at night it was a different truck. The difference was schizophrenic like. Yes, I understand the denser cold air theories etc. but with Propane the results for effort are far more spectacular ( been known to have had a mis-spent(?) youth driving up and down a few drag strips in my life & engaging in the science(?) of 'dial-in' run-what-you-brung street racing ) In fact we have lovingly refered to this truck as Dragula, Two reasons, only runs good at night, and up until I purchased it, it's always carried bodies (human) in one form or an other..( they didn't install a Chiller unit for no good reason...) I'm having so much Fun. The 160F solved some of the problem, and have been working on other ways to expand on this principle - But all this is relevent to Propane Engines Only. Don't get the idea that this truck's performance is 'Leisurely', it's capable of low 16's over the qtr on propane in a 2 ton Block O' Flats at night. - used to be 18's or 19's in office hours. After 30 years of messing around with Petrol Only Technology, I'm Impressed....and still working on it ! Regards Les Lost in the Land of OZ > Mike Wrote: > > Propanes a totally different story. Low ash content oil and cooler temperatures are the > way to go. The engine probably wouldn't open a 195 thermostat. > > Mike > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:47:05 -0700 (PDT) From: rokkinhorse Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re:Uneven acceleration Dennis writes: accelerates unevenly when I get on it. Disconnected the egr and plugged the hole, but made no difference. I just replaced the fuel pressure regulator, also to no help. 66,000 miles and all new tune up parts. Also the mileage is bad, about 11mpg. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! >> Dennis, pull the codes from the OBD. If there is a problem with a sensor or if something is screwed up with fuel delivery,it will be reflected in the trouble codes. If you aren't comfortable pulling the codes (it is really pretty easy;write me off the list if you want,and I'll send you a link that has instructions on how to do this) it'd be worth the money to take it to the local dealership and have them put it on the diagnostic machine.Process of elimination by parts replacement is the most expensive way to troubleshoot the EEC system. Having the dealership pinpoint the problem for you would cost about as much as a new O2 sensor.Just from what you have said,it sounds like a bad TPS(throttle position sensor),but you'll have to pull the codes to confirm this. Randy Goolsby-94 Bronco EB/85 F250 4x4 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 08:00:36 -0400 From: ric tomas Subject: FTE 80-96 - re: Shell Rotella 15w40 I wonder if this oil can be used in my F150. The engine calls for 10w30, but I have 5w30 in it now. Maybe this is why it sounds like a diesel at idle. It just sounds very different. Does anybody else have this? It is a 96 f150, with the 302, 76k miles. Other than that I love the truck, and want to put an exhaust on it, something with a bit of a sound to it, but not to loud, where it will drone in the cab. Thanks, Rich in CT == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 05:36:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Christopher Tirone Subject: FTE 80-96 - Two questions... Hello all, > >My '86 302 (new to me) has two little problems I'm not sure where to start on. > >1. If it sits for a short while after being driven and then I start it again, she won't hold idle > > by herself until she's run awhile. > >2.Sometimes the oil pressure guage works, sometimes it doesn't. > >Any thoughts? > >Greenman ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 09:30:09 -0700 From: "Tony & Chris Phaneuf" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:Uneven acceleration Randy, I would like to know the like that you have for instructions on pulling computer codes. you can send it here or just e-mail to me at aphaneuf would appreciate it........... Tony P. - -----Original Message----- From: rokkinhorse To: 80-96-list Date: Saturday, October 23, 1999 6:23 AM Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re:Uneven acceleration Dennis writes: accelerates unevenly when I get on it. Disconnected the egr and plugged the hole, but made no difference. I just replaced the fuel pressure regulator, also to no help. 66,000 miles and all new tune up parts. Also the mileage is bad, about 11mpg. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! >> Dennis, pull the codes from the OBD. If there is a problem with a sensor or if something is screwed up with fuel delivery,it will be reflected in the trouble codes. If you aren't comfortable pulling the codes (it is really pretty easy;write me off the list if you want,and I'll send you a link that has instructions on how to do this) it'd be worth the money to take it to the local dealership and have them put it on the diagnostic machine.Process of elimination by parts replacement is the most expensive way to troubleshoot the EEC system. Having the dealership pinpoint the problem for you would cost about as much as a new O2 sensor.Just from what you have said,it sounds like a bad TPS(throttle position sensor),but you'll have to pull the codes to confirm this. Randy Goolsby-94 Bronco EB/85 F250 4x4 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 09:53:52 -0700 From: "mike mueller" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Update on Key Problem, still not fixed! Thanks for all the replies and even the phone call! (This is a little wordy but you get the whole story now) Originally I thought the key was like a normal vehicle and had a cylinder and lock set that actuated the electrical half below it making all the right contacts. I bought the cylinder and key, and a new switch assembly, came home and started to take it all apart. The cylinder comes out with no tools except a small drift pin. After looking down the hole I was surprised to find no contacts. So off came the wheel and I traced the mechanism down the column to the switch. Replaced the switch, put it all back together and still the same problem! The key doesn't have the spring return at the start position, and doesn't make the necessary contact to turn over the starter. Now I started looking at the rod and how all this was supposed to work. The rod seemed to move most of the way but didn't move back. I ended up pulling out the whole steering column and that's when I found the broken part. At the back and deep inside of the unit, right before it goes to straight column under the dash, there is a little pivot lever that actuates the rod. The pivot is made of pot metal and has a 3" long shaft that connects to a spring that pulls the rod back at start position. This shaft had broken. I took the whole column down to the dealer and as I walked up to the counter, column and little broken shaft in hand, the parts boy (all of 18 yrs), said "I'll be right back". I thought he may be going to get a parts guy but he returned with the exact part I needed without asking me a thing about year, make or model! He said they always keep about 6 on hand as they are prone to break. The only problem was he knew t took some special tool to get the old one out and put in the new one. He walked me over to one of the mechanics who spent the next 30 minutes replacing it with me standing next to him. He was on his lunch hour. There was no mention of time or labor and he really was doing this out of kindness. I thanked him greatly, slipped him a twenty and now the only thing I have left to do is put it all back together. BTW: the name of the Pivot thingy is an "Actuator", the part number is E9TZ*3E715*B, and the cost was $11.14 from the local dealer who always has parts at the highest rates. (Walnut Creek Ford, CA) I'm off today so I should be able to get it back in. I'll keep you posted. Thanks! Mike Mueller Loan Officer National Pacific Mortgage 800 899-3070 xt. 408 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 12:24:51 -0500 (CDT) From: "Mike Persell" Subject: FTE 80-96 - re: Shell Rotella 15w40 in 302 gas On Sat, 23 Oct 1999 08:00:36 -0400, ric tomas wrote: >I wonder if this oil can be used in my F150. The engine calls for >10w30, but I have 5w30 in it now. Maybe this is why it sounds like a >diesel at idle. It just sounds very different. Does anybody else have >this? It is a 96 f150, with the 302, 76k miles. Other than that I love >the truck, and want to put an exhaust on it, something with a bit of a >sound to it, but not to loud, where it will drone in the cab. My 85 302 loves it and has for many miles. I also use it in my wifes tired 4 cyl minivan and the oil consumption goes way down. Cold starts are not a problem with 15w-40 unless you're in severe cold climates. The pour point is not as good as 5w-30 but its pretty low. Mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 11:17:28 +0000 From: SNE REALTORS Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Engine Thermostats Mike Persell wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 06:47:58 EDT, FLR150 > >It seems lately I have a differing opinion to a quite a few posts. Again I > >disagree. While I do not know much about the I-6 motors, I can tell you that > >MOST of the V-8 Ford motors favor a cooler than stock Tstat. The stock Tstat > >runs at 195-210 depending on the model year, application, and motor size. > >Most of the Ford V-8's will run much better and cooler with the 180 degree > >Tstat. Although, any temp below this will keep the EEC computers in their > >start up "closed loop" modes. > > In every test I ran while working in oil company test labs, we found that engines would > fail the Sequence tests if they ran less than the factory temp thermostats. Ford small > blocks in particular have such a fast flame speed in the chambers that when they run > less than optimum temp they stick the rings bad. > > In the 240 inch inline six we completely killed an engine at the equivalent of 55,000 > miles running a 180 deg thermostat. In the hotter climates a hotter thermostat can > help the thermodynamics of the cooling process IF the radiator is clean and the block is > relatively free of contamination in the water jackets. > > In my own 85 302, a factory recommended 195 deg thermostat means no condensation, > more power, smotther idle, less oil consumption and better fuel mileage. > > In the words of the marketing suits, your mileage may vary. > > Mike > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html please take us off your mailing list, snerlts == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 11:18:51 +0000 From: SNE REALTORS Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Motor oil and additives Ed Mount wrote: > > >There were so many variables that I quit to a simpler business...I now am a > software > >engineer at IBM. > > >I can pick a few variables, like longevity and synthetic vs conventional > and dribble out > >some info if the list moderator will allow it. > > >Mike > > Mike, > I always wondered about the Shell Rotella oil. As a kid I heard the > truckers always ask for it at my Dad's service station, but never new if it > was ok in car engines, or just for big trucks. > > My dad was also big on what he call Pennsylvania oils, such as Quaker State > and Wolf's Head. He thought Wolf's Head was the best oil made in his time. > I guess Pennzoil is also of that category, but I'm not sure. > > I recently read a technical (to me) article about Slick 50 and other > additives, the jist of which is that you are better off without it. It uses > Teflon, which apparently changes its characteristics at the temperatures > that internal combustion engines run. Additives such as this can also > upset the balance of the formulas used to make the original oil. > > I have been using Pennzoil Supramax, a blend of synthetic and regular oils, > for no particular reason other than I wanted to get the extra benefits of > synthetic, it is made by a reputable company, and it less expensive than > other blends. Do you have any opinion on the various blends and synthetics? > Do you see any problems switching from a blend to a full synthetic, then > back again? I watch for bargains, since they are expensive, and Walmart > just had a sale on Mobil 1, so I stocked up. Some folks think you ought to > stick with one brand, but I question the need for that, since most are top > quality. But just to be on the safe side, I don't mix oils between changes, > and I don't use any additives. > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html """please take us off your mailing list, snerlts == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:54:39 -0700 From: "J.S.H." Subject: FTE 80-96 - Don't hold off > If you don't like the TTB,Super Cab or the color I would keep looking. > > I hear ya, but I need a heavy duty tow vehicle and S-10 blazers lose >their value by the second. I forgot there was a s-10 in the equation.By all means get another Ford immediatly,regardless of color ,equipment etc == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 14:10:50 -0700 (PDT) From: rich may Subject: FTE 80-96 - 7.3 diesel I am looking at a 1993 F250 powerstroke diesel and was wondering if there were any performance upgrades that are available for these motors. I saw that Banks makes a kit for them. Has anyone had experience with Banks? ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 18:14:40 -0400 From: S Spaulding Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - 7.3 diesel Careful - If it is a 1993, it is not a Powerstroke. rich may wrote: > > I am looking at a 1993 F250 powerstroke diesel and was > wondering if there were any performance upgrades that > are available for these motors. I saw that Banks makes > a kit for them. Has anyone had experience with Banks? > > ===== > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:55:34 -0700 From: "Kevin Crandall" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Sway Bar I have a 94 F-150 Xcab with a 4 inch suspension lift. My problem is that the front sway bar is rubbing on the front springs. The shop that installed the left said I can remove the sway bar to stop the rubbing. Does anyone know how this will affect handling. It is a 2wd and I don't do any off road driving. Any help or suggestions is appreciated. Thanks Kevin == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 23:32:22 -0400 From: Peter Wong Subject: FTE 80-96 - fuel guage I'm certain the following problem has been posted before, so I apologize for the redundancy. My 87 F-150 has an erratic fuel guage. The level read 3/4 before the needle started acting up. It now jumps around in the area of "full" mark. It seems to settle down (moving toward 3/4) when coming to a stop, then jumps around back up to "full." The truck has a single tank. Any advice would be appreciated. Peter (Charlotte, NC) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 20:35:05 -0700 From: Bob Kennedy Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Sway Bar You should disconnect it and run for a while and see. I've lifted my Bronco 6" and am running with no sway bar with no noticeable loss of steering control. Bob Kevin Crandall wrote: > I have a 94 F-150 Xcab with a 4 inch suspension lift. My problem is that > the front sway bar is rubbing on the front springs. The shop that installed > the left said I can remove the sway bar to stop the rubbing. Does anyone > know how this will affect handling. It is a 2wd and I don't do any off road > driving. Any help or suggestions is appreciated. > > Thanks > > Kevin > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 23:49:29 PDT From: "ken haley" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - RE: ROTFLMAO about...... But were you juggling three kittens while facing east???? One of my Broncos has a 302, 180 degree thermostat, manual trans, 3.55 twin grip, no A/C, and no fan at all. It's main uses are to tow the high school color gaurd trailer and get around when snow and ice are on the roads. Today's trip was 284 miles round trip, and the temp gauge never got over 1/3 from cold. Oh, and to the Datsun B-210 load of drunk farmworkers who decided it woud be fun to try to get a bus loaded with band members to run off the road: Repainting that 4 inch pipe on the front of my Bronco will be a lot cheaper than replacing the trunk, quarters, roof, and back window of your car, but I'm confident your insurance company will be interested in why the police report states you "backed" into a parked vehicle. haahaahaahaa Like you really have insurance. NOT!!!! #1 reason for driving an SUV is other people's delusions of manhood. Ken, the road warrior. ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 04:20:55 -0500 From: Blake Malkamaki Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - re: Shell Rotella 15w40 >I wonder if this oil can be used in my F150. The engine calls for >10w30, but I have 5w30 in it now. Maybe this is why it sounds like a >diesel at idle. It just sounds very different. Does anybody else have >this? It is a 96 f150, with the 302, 76k miles. Other than that I love >the truck, and want to put an exhaust on it, something with a bit of a >sound to it, but not to loud, where it will drone in the cab. >Thanks, >Rich in CT I would never use 5w30 in an engine. I think this is a sceme to get slightly better milage at startup to increase the fleet overall mpg to meet epa requirments. I think the stuff is just too darn thin. The best part of the 15w40 is not its weight, but the fact that it is a better oil made to higher specifications. You can also buy the same oil in SAE 10 or SAE 30 and probably more grades. Mainly you look for at least an SF-CD rating. S .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|