|
|
From: owner-80-96-list-digest To: 80-96-list-digest Subject: 80-96-list-digest V3 #192 Reply-To: 80-96-list Sender: owner-80-96-list-digest Errors-To: owner-80-96-list-digest Precedence: bulk 80-96-list-digest Saturday, July 10 1999 Volume 03 : Number 192 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980-1996 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Airbag light flashing RE: FTE 80-96 - F150 emissions test (not there yet) FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control Re: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control Re: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control FTE 80-96 - Again, no whole digest...what gives?????? RE: FTE 80-96 - F150 emissions test (not there yet) FTE 80-96 - Driving Me Crazy! Re: FTE 80-96 - Driving Me Crazy! Re: FTE 80-96 - Driving Me Crazy! Re: FTE 80-96 - Need more power for 300 FTE 80-96 - Bedcovers RE: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control FTE 80-96 - F150 Emissions Test-Fuel Filler Hose ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 07:14:47 -0400 From: Mike Sloane Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Airbag light flashing When I read a message like this I know why I am going to keep my '83 F250 and '87 F350 for a very long time. (-: Mike FLR150 > If its a code 32, then that means its the Clock Spring. The clock spring is > the spring that goes behind the airbag assembly and carries current through > to your horn and wheel mounted cruise controls. I have just had to replace > this on my 94 F150. Its not a hard job, just time consuming. With the right > tools, you should be able to do it in around 2 hours. The reason the light > starts flashing is because the resistance in the spring has gotten too low. > The spring for mine cost around $100. > Hope this has helped. > Later, > Wayne Foy > '94 Flareside SC - -- - ------------ Mike Sloane Allamuchy NJ (msloane == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 08:19:50 -0400 From: D & E Fann Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - F150 emissions test (not there yet) Gary, I had a 77 J##P J20 a while back that had twin fuel tanks. One was mounted in the bed and gravity fed the main tank. When I had to change the rubber hose (apppx 3 inch diam.) in 94, I just bought a 1 foot section of fuel hose from the local parts house for about $45 and cut to fit. I got lucky because there weren't any severe bends in the direction I needed to go. I'm no expert, but I was told they wouldn't recommend using any other type hose in fear the fuel will basically eat it up and either plug up the filter or start to leak. Hope this helps, or at least helps someone more mechanical with new ideas. Darrell 90 F150 XLT 4X4 North Carolina == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 09:01:40 -0500 From: "Ken Phillips" Subject: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control driftwood, texas (15 miles just sw of austin) Been reading the list for a couple days now and I am very impressed with the knowledge base formed here. I have an '89 F150. Lately, people have been stopping me to say my brake lights are not working, but when I check them out they appear just fine. It seem when slowing to a stop the brake lights are not always triggered and when checking them I am applying more force on the petal and they work. I assume the factory installed cruise control's brake shut off is also activated by the brake light control switch, because the cruise has become very difficult to disengage using the brake petal. I look forward to all comments. Regards, Ken Phillips == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:58:24 EDT From: ROlson1039 Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control Sounds like the brake light switch is going bad on you.. and according to the Chilton's book it doesnt look like ahard item to replacce.. Its atop the brake pedal bar and it appears that this is only held in by a bar with a cotter pin retainer.. perhaps a half hour to do if you dont have decent tools and are a novice at tinkering... Uh in addition to having to run the risk of getting a ticket.. sometimes these switches break with the brake lites on .. which could drain down the battery if left overnite.. so this is something that you wanna do on the quick side Bob 89 F 250 2WD becoming a headache!! ROlson1039 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 14:37:09 -0500 From: "Ken Phillips" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control Hey Bob, thanks for the quick information. BTW, I checked and my truck does have pedals not petals. Sometimes spell check does more harm than good. ROlson1039 > > Sounds like the brake light switch is going bad on you.. and according to the > Chilton's book it doesnt look like ahard item to replacce.. Its atop the > brake pedal bar and it appears that this is only held in by a bar with a > cotter pin retainer.. perhaps a half hour to do if you dont have decent tools > and are a novice at tinkering... Uh in addition to having to run the risk of > getting a ticket.. sometimes these switches break with the brake lites on .. > which could drain down the battery if left overnite.. so this is something > that you wanna do on the quick side > Bob > 89 F 250 2WD becoming a headache!! > ROlson1039 > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.htmu == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:31:32 -0500 From: "Dave Harmier" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Again, no whole digest...what gives?????? I got just about half of V3 #191???????? I haven't changed any settings that I am aware of??? And I love the wealth of information you guys know!!! HELP!!!!! Dave H. Houston == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:52:19 -0500 From: Blake Malkamaki Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - F150 emissions test (not there yet) Use some copper in-house sewer pipe if you have to for your bends and just clamp your hose to it. >Gary, > > I had a 77 J##P J20 a while back that had twin fuel tanks. One was >mounted in the bed and gravity fed the main tank. When I had to change the >rubber hose (apppx 3 inch diam.) in 94, I just bought a 1 foot section of >fuel hose from the local parts house for about $45 and cut to fit. I got >lucky because there weren't any severe bends in the direction I needed to >go. > >I'm no expert, but I was told they wouldn't recommend using any other type >hose in fear the fuel will basically eat it up and either plug up the >filter or start to leak. > >Hope this helps, or at least helps someone more mechanical with new ideas. > >Darrell > >90 F150 XLT 4X4 >North Carolina >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Blake Little Mountain Concord, Ohio Early Oil Well Historian http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://little-mountain.com http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://little-mountain.com/blake Web site design http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://hitechdesign.com Desktop Publishing service "Society is safest when the criminals don't know who's armed." == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:59:51 -0400 (EDT) From: DBblueboy Subject: FTE 80-96 - Driving Me Crazy! I appreciate all the replys I have gotten. The problem is I only get the anouncement page or half of the listings. This happens when mainly when I need the information. Not my lucky day. If you guys don't mind, could you resubmit you thoughts about my brake problems. 1987 F150, new shocks, tires, brakes with turned rotors. Goes down the road with double knocking sound in the front brakes in stereo. I have had it back to the shop. I get the standard BS and brush off. I have had the front wheels off my self. Can't find anything. Could anybody help me? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:14:39 EDT From: ROlson1039 Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Driving Me Crazy! ok ive tried sayin this before but perhaps ya didnt get it.. try the hold down clips ontop of the pads that hold them in place they are designed to avoid the exact symptom you describe..... there should be one on each calpier on the top.. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 21:18:08 -0500 From: Jim Cannon Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Driving Me Crazy! Actually the clips go in the lower end of the inner shoes, not the top. I had to get out my shop manual to confirm this because I THOUGHT they went on the lower end, but your reply made me doubt myself. Be sure the tabs on the clip are positioned properly and the clip is fully seated. The problem could also be a weak support spring between the key "wedge" and the caliper body. (But very low probability of that being the case.) I think Jerome is suffering from the "only getting partial digest" problem that Dave H. has been reporting. At 18:14 09/07/99 EDT, you wrote: >ok ive tried sayin this before but perhaps ya didnt get it.. try the hold >down clips ontop of the pads that hold them in place they are designed to >avoid the exact symptom you describe..... there should be one on each calpier >on the top.. Jim Cannon Houston, TX '29 Ford Model A Phaeton '63 Buick Riviera 401 V-8 '80 Ford F-150 300 I-6 2WD == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:59:05 -0600 From: "CalvinB" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Need more power for 300 Here Here...... I have a 87 300 fuel injected with the same 3.55 rear end (4x2). It has a lot of punch. Highway I get around 20 mpg and in town about 14 mpg. I still have some tweaking as the engine in new but some of the sensors and such need replacing. One thing I noticed was a very sluggish performance in the begining of using the new engine as the mechanic put the old injectors back in the new engine. I had sluggish performace and found out the the injectors were leaking. I replaced the injectors ( you can pull out the fuel rail without removinge the upper air intake manifold off) and runs excellent. I still have some pieces to look at such as replacing my EGR valve (it gets stuck fully open when warm thus shooting in warm exhaust back into the intake while idling.). I just had to put in my two cents on the matter. Cal. Canada - -----Original Message----- From: Erston Reisch To: 80-96-list Date: Saturday, June 26, 1999 1:38 AM Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Need more power for 300 >"Monty Levere" wrote: >> [snip] >> The computer and all of the smog stuff took the heart out of the 300. To >> bad it was a good motor in its heyday. But I suppose that is why ford >> discontinued it in the new trucks. > >Like the other poster said - the FI system on the 300ci is a blessing, not >a curse. As for why Ford dropped it: > >1) Emissions targets (again, like the previous poster said). We can >assume the old I-6 OHV motor just wasn't as emissions friendly as the OHC >motors. > >2) The new (97+) trucks have modular engines - the 4.2, 4.6, and 5.4 all >share many parts, which cuts costs and hassles. > >3) The 300 I6 is a very long, very tall engine - and it would't fit easily >in the sloping, aerodynamic hood of the 97+ trucks. > >I personally love my 300 in my '90 F-150. I have 3.55 gears in a 4x2 >118", so it's light and fairly quick. It also pulls like a mule and never >notices hills. > >- Erston > > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:01:55 -0500 From: "Harris, Scott" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Bedcovers For those of you trying to decide on bedcovers, here's a good site with description of various types. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.calconcepts.com/ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:05:54 -0500 From: "Harris, Scott" Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control I had a problem with this too and it turned out to be the switch on the brake pedal that activates the lights. Mine was out of alignment and was simple fix. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Phillips [SMTP:r14201 > Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 9:02 AM > To: 80-96-list > Subject: FTE 80-96 - brake lights and criuse control > > driftwood, texas (15 miles just sw of austin) > > Been reading the list for a couple days now and I am very impressed with > the > knowledge base formed here. I have an '89 F150. Lately, people have been > stopping me to say my brake lights are not working, but when I check them > out > they appear just fine. It seem when slowing to a stop the brake lights > are > not always triggered and when checking them I am applying more force on > the > petal and they work. I assume the factory installed cruise control's > brake > shut off is also activated by the brake light control switch, because the > cruise has become very difficult to disengage using the brake petal. I > look > forward to all comments. > > Regards, Ken Phillips > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 00:22:40 -0700 From: "Leo Mosley" Subject: FTE 80-96 - F150 Emissions Test-Fuel Filler Hose Gary I don't think you should use radiator hose to replace a fuel filler line. I suspect you would find that it will break down when it is in constant contact with fuel. I had a similar situation with a boat that I owned a few years back, which had a built-in fuel tank and a rubber filler hose to a deck fitting. I went to a local industrial hose supplier and got a piece of hose designed for fuel use that worked great. I can't recall what it cost, but it was not very expensive. If you still have your old hose, a place like this should be able to match up something for you. Cheers Leo - ------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:55:24 -0400 From: "Ratcliff, Dale" Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - F150 emissions test (not there yet) If all else fails, you may be able to get by with a piece of radiator hose cut to length. Dale Ratcliff 92 F150 SC LB - - -----Original Message----- From: Gary Perry [mailto:az_brit_99 Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 12:39 AM To: 80-96-list Subject: FTE 80-96 - F150 emissions test (not there yet) Friendly Folk, 6 weeks or so ago I was asking questions to do with getting my 82 F150 through the emissions test here in Maricopa County, Arizona. I'm part way there now but need to locate a replacement flexible pipe that runs from the midship tank to the filler neck. Whether through age or not, the pipe looks as though it flares out to fit the filler neck. The local dealer said the part was no longer available, though a Canadian derivative could be found at upwards of $200!!.. for a bit of rubber.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|