From: owner-80-96-list-digest ford-trucks.com (80-96-list-digest)
To: 80-96-list-digest ford-trucks.com
Subject: 80-96-list-digest V3 #185
Reply-To: 80-96-list ford-trucks.com
Sender: owner-80-96-list-digest ford-trucks.com
Errors-To: owner-80-96-list-digest ford-trucks.com
Precedence: bulk


80-96-list-digest Saturday, July 3 1999 Volume 03 : Number 185



=======================================================================
Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980-1996 Trucks and Vans
Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
majordomo ford-trucks.com
with the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list-digest" in the body of the
message.
=======================================================================
In this issue:

Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Preliminary Success in IVR Replacement
Re: FTE 80-96 - landscape truck
Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Preliminary Success in IVR Replacement
FTE 80-96 - Charging problems
FTE 80-96 - Rade's fourth of July soapbox
FTE 80-96 - Charging problems
RE: FTE 80-96 - Rade's fourth of July soapbox
Re: FTE 80-96 - engine size
Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels
Re: FTE 80-96 - Charging problems
FTE 80-96 - engine boggy under 2000rpm
Re: FTE 80-96 - engine boggy under 2000rpm
FTE 80-96 - Fuel Pump Problem: Closure!
RE: FTE 80-96 - Fuel Pump Problem: Closure!
RE: FTE 80-96 - RE: 85 F-150 Rough Idle
Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels
Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels
RE: FTE 80-96 - RE: Tailgate down...
Re: FTE 80-96 - RE: Tailgate Down
Re: RE: FTE 80-96 - shocks
FTE 80-96 - 460 conversion
Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels
Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels
Re: FTE 80-96 -DOES ANYONE HAVE PERFORMANCE PARTS AVAIL.

=======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 05:02:23 EDT
From: LHopk99567 aol.com
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Preliminary Success in IVR Replacement

I'm interested in this "Nuts N Volts" Publication. Can you give me a phone
number or an address?
Thank's
Dick Hopkins. Anchorage AK. lhopk99567 aol.com
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 07:47:09 -0400
From: Mike Sloane
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - landscape truck

Bodies for trucks that are not standard pick-up configuration are made by
hundreds of independent shops, varying from little mom & pop outfits to huge
factories. There is no such thing as a "standard" size.

As far as tractor sites, one good starting point is the Antique Tractor
Internet Service . There are lists for Ford/Ferguson,
John Deere, Farmall/IH, etc., as well as the main general list. They don't
just concern themselves with antiques either, and they are more than willing
to help you out if the subject of your message is a little off topic.

Mike

Scottie Schmidt wrote:

> Hi
> Was wondering what the bed dimensions are for a F-350 stake bed, and a
> F-250 utility bed?
> Also was wondering if their is a tractor discussion list? Kind of like
> this but for tractors, or maybe a farm one. Sorry to bring this up, but
> need to know and figured someone on this list might know.
> Thanks,
> Scottie Schmidt JR.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

- --

- ------------
Mike Sloane
Allamuchy NJ
(msloane att.net)



== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 08:23:42 -0400
From: Mike Sloane
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Preliminary Success in IVR Replacement

will get you all the information and a sample copy.

Mike

LHopk99567 aol.com wrote:

> I'm interested in this "Nuts N Volts" Publication. Can you give me a phone
> number or an address?
> Thank's
> Dick Hopkins. Anchorage AK. lhopk99567 aol.com
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

- --

- ------------
Mike Sloane
Allamuchy NJ
(msloane att.net)



== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 08:24:48 -0500
From: Steve Randa
Subject: FTE 80-96 - Charging problems

First off I had to get a jump after work. I noticed the amp. gauge on my
'84 was way above normal as the rpms went up. As you may know, the amp
gauge isn't incredibly informative. Its normally just a hair over from
straight up and usually doesn't move more than another hair either way.
It got to the 3/4 mark driving around! I got home and tried to start it
again immediately and I didn't even get a dome light. I lifted the hood
and the alternator was so hot I couldn't keep my hand there. The
regulator was not quite as hot and the positive battery cable was very
warm. My first assumption was that the regulator is shot since it
couldn't keep a steady charge but that's not to say something could be
wrong with the alternator. Maybe it's getting ready to lock up...but I
don't hear any bearings screeching. I don't need any underhood fires!

Steve Randa
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:52:03 EDT
From: BRIGANDBAR aol.com
Subject: FTE 80-96 - Rade's fourth of July soapbox

Rade:

Few of us will know personally, as you do, the sacrifices that a nation makes
in maintaining its independence, so all should yield to you on the point of
re-reading the Declaration of Independence, although there is much more that
must be perused to define the intent and spirit of its authors, i.e. the
Federalist Papers and the individual writings of the authors of the
Declaration. Please also remember that the Declaration of Independence,
while the starting point for our nation retains legal standing only in aiding
us in our interpretation of the intent of the founding fathers in their
construction of the Constitution. This not said to diminish the Declaration
in its importance, but to place it in perspective. The Declaration
represents the "first shot" in the process of freedom, but the Constitution
is the "contract" between the government and the governed, and it, in
reality, is the final aribiter of any dispute between those parties.

In respect to purchases of products made in China, you remarks are on point,
but not complete. Not only do they aim "nuclear missles at us", but they
actively seek to subvert our democracy and threaten its existence through
espionage, and interference with our political process. Again, one only
needs to review the history of that nation to begin to place the threat that
it poses to ours in perspective. The difficult task will be to identify the
products manufactured or assembled in the PRC (you know its scary how they
bastardize the word "Republic") and those that contain components that are
manufactured there. And, quite honestly Rade, given your affinity for
firearms, look to your AK-47 or the SKS that you may own, or the ammunition
that you may use on the 4th of July celebration (which would consitute the
ultimate travesty), when you purge your property of offending products. This
is not said to chastize or offend you, but simply to point out the difficulty
of actually placing your suggestion into practice in a nation that grants its
enemies "Most favored nation" trade status. Perhaps American freedoms would
be placed in lesser jeopardy if manufacturers were required to place a
"surgeon general's" type warning "This product contains materials and
components produced by an enemy of our nation who is committed to the demise
of freedom" on each and every qualifying product.

Sorry for the use of everyone's bandwith on an off-topic commentary, but
then, if we fail in the defense of our freedoms the consequences will be much
greater than the loss of public lands which we own as taxpayers as a place to
enjoy our Broncs.


Steve


buy Chinese fireworks (or anything else made in China) you are giving money
to a nation that is aiming nuclear missiles at us. I would ask everyone of
you to think about that before you go out and buy your fireworks. I have
personally pledged to not buy a single thing made in China>>
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 09:02:41 -0500
From: Steve Randa
Subject: FTE 80-96 - Charging problems

First off I had to get a jump after work. I noticed the amp. gauge on my
'84 was way above normal as the rpms went up. As you may know, the amp
gauge isn't incredibly informative. Its normally just a hair over from
straight up and usually doesn't move more than another hair either way.
It got to the 3/4 mark driving around! I got home and tried to start it
again immediately and I didn't even get a dome light. I lifted the hood
and the alternator was so hot I couldn't keep my hand there. The
regulator was not quite as hot and the positive battery cable was very
warm. My first assumption was that the regulator is shot since it
couldn't keep a steady charge but that's not to say something could be
wrong with the alternator. Maybe it's getting ready to lock up...but I
don't hear any bearings screeching. I don't need any underhood fires!

Steve Randa
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:21:17 -0700
From: Eric Sneed
Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - Rade's fourth of July soapbox

" If the south would have won we'd of had it made!"
As long as you are a white boy! race relations are bad enough in this
country as is, we need to get past that part of our history

Proud to be an American!!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: barry mitchell [SMTP:fishin4bass hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 1999 7:01 PM
> To: 80-96-list ford-trucks.com
> Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Rade's fourth of July soapbox
>
>
> To qoute Hank JR. " If the south would have won we'd of had it made!"
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Radoje Spasojevic"
> Reply-To: 80-96-list ford-trucks.com
> To: "Big Bronco List" ,
>
> Subject: FTE 80-96 - Rade's fourth of July soapbox
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:33:59 -0700
>
>
>
> As we come upon the fourth of July here it is important for us to
> remember
> just what the holiday means to us as Americans, and while fireworks
> are an
> important part of the traditional fourth of July celebration, I have a
> great
> deal of difficulty buying them when you consider where most of them
> come
> from. As you all probably know, most of the fireworks you can buy are
> made
> in China, a country that has (probably) stolen our nuclear missile
> technology, and now has nuclear missiles pointing at the US. In China
> all
> businesses are ultimately owned by the government, so when you buy
> Chinese
> fireworks (or anything else made in China) you are giving money to a
> nation
> that is aiming nuclear missiles at us. I would ask everyone of you to
> think
> about that before you go out and buy your fireworks. I have
> personally
> pledged to not buy a single thing made in China, and truth be told I
> like
> shooting guns off in the back yard on the fourth alot more than
> fireworks
> anyway. I hope I don't sound like I am preaching, but I think it is
> something worth considering. Thanks
>
> Rade Spasojevic -- rspasoje gte.net
> http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.off -road. com /~2big/
> http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=194
>
>
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info
> http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info
> http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:46:03 -0700
From: Mark Ponsford
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - engine size

>Hi
> was wondering what the standard engine sizes are on the different trucks?
>Ranger, F-100, F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450.
>Thanks,
> Scottie Schmidt JR.
>

Hi Scottie.

Seems you've lots of questions for a variety of different things.

Sometime ago I scanned a sales brochure for 91 F-series and put the info on
the web. Take a look at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://gateway1.uvic.ca/staff/mponsford/. Maybe
some of the stuff here will answer some of your questions.

cheers,


== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: throckmon webtv.net
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels

Greetings All,
I am new to list and am about to undertake the restoration of my
89 F250 Lariat 4x4.
I ordered this truck and have put 180,000 miles on it.It has all
options available and mechanically , It`ll go another 100k.
The problem,Rust is having a little party on the vehicle.I have
been down this road with a muscle car resto, so I know the ropes.
Can someone direct me to reasonably priced repair panels.Mainly
Passenger side Fleetside box is shot at wheelwell and below
taillight.I don`t want to change the entire panel,just cut out bad
section and replace.
Someone have a source for this? Also
need a left front fender.
Thanks in advance,
Markas

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:38:20 EDT
From: FULSZBRONC aol.com
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Charging problems

In a message dated 7/2/99 8:06:15 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
sranda ch-advertising.com writes:


and the alternator was so hot I couldn't keep my hand there. The
regulator was not quite as hot and the positive battery cable was very
warm. My first assumption was that the regulator is shot since it
couldn't keep a steady charge but that's not to say something could be
wrong with the alternator. >>

Your alternator was working as hard as it could to try charging a BAD
battery!! Must be a dead short in you battery if it wouldn't even illuminate
the dome light. Your alt and regulator are working OK, but I'll bet you've
shortened their life some. Your guage was showing you that the alternator
was charging, but the battery wasn't taking it...you're lucky you didn't burn
up the wiring or explode the battery.
Big Mike
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:17:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: peters server.uwindsor.ca (Peter Steeves)
Subject: FTE 80-96 - engine boggy under 2000rpm

Speaking of boggy engines , hears how my problems started.
I have an '87 F150 Lariat, manual 4 speed. A few weeks ago I ran
out of gas. I put a couple of gallons in , tried to start , no go !
After all sorts of checking, it appeared that juice was going into
the distributor, but no getting to the plugs. Eventually, I towed it
to a mechanic, told him the whole story, he put his scope on. After
half a day he calls me and says the truck is ready. He put a new TFI
module and connector, and .. something else, I forget now; cost me $350.
(That's Canadian, about $ 9.95 US :)
So , I drive away, satisfied only that I've got a truck again. A few days
later, when I'm not in a hurry, I notice that the engine is acting like
it is missing a spark, or running out of gas again. This only occurs
between 1200 - 2000 rpm. As soon as 2K is reached, zoom, away it goes.

So, the questions are:
Was the TFI module not installed properly?
Is their some tuning that should have been done, but was not?
or ???
Is it just a co-incidence that the TFI failed at the same time as runnning
out of gas? Or, could their be some computer shut-off activated when
the fuel pump went dry, and the TFI really did not need to be replaced???

Anyways, where should I start looking to correct this bogginess?
I'm not sure I want to take it back to a mechanic , yet!

Also, the clutch is getting weak. How much work is it to rebuild
the clutch ?

Thanks in advance for you help!

PETER



- --
Peter Steeves
University of Windsor
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
peters uwindsor.ca
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 14:56:53 CDT
From: Jett Rink
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - engine boggy under 2000rpm

I'd try to get the pickup somewhere that could get a 'scope on the engine
and maybe save you some time in diagnosis. Sometimes when an engine runs out
of gas, it'll suck up a bunch of sludge and crap that's been laying out in
the bottom of the tank and your fuel filter needs changed. I have a factory
shop manual set that I could quote, but it's not within reach right now.
Those would be the cheapest and easiest things to start with (check your
timing, too). A clutch isn't too terribly hard to replace, but you might
want to get ahold of a good floor jack to drop the transmission with and
possibly an extra body. Should take a weekend or less. Someone who's
experienced can do it in a matter of hours, but I don't foresee any problems
if you have all of the tools and right parts. I almost forgot, you'll
probably need to remove the flywheel and carry it to a machine shop to have
it turned if you change your clutch.Remember, if it's free it can't be all
bad.


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:35:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Kourtney Ray de Haas
Subject: FTE 80-96 - Fuel Pump Problem: Closure!

Greetings again, Ford-o-philes:

You all may recall my "fuel pump" problem in which I described how my 90
F150 was returning gas to the wrong tank, etc. I took everyone's advice,
looked up the recall and called my Ford dealer. They did the VIN query
and noted I had two outstanding recalls, the ignition switch and the fuel
pressure regulator & check valve. They scheduled me for an appointment
and I got the problem fixed this morning, free of charge. The truck,
which I bought just last month for a song, runs just fine and the fuel
system now works as it should. I'm a little embarrassed that I didn't
look up such an obvious recall-oriented problem earlier, but I thank you
all anyway for your guidance.

kourt


== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:30:28 -0700
From: "McMahon, Todd R."
Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - Fuel Pump Problem: Closure!

I'm glad that everything went well for you... Enjoy the long weekend!

Todd

- -----Original Message-----
From: Kourtney Ray de Haas [mailto:kourt uts.cc.utexas.edu]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 1:35 PM
To: 80-96-list ford-trucks.com
Subject: FTE 80-96 - Fuel Pump Problem: Closure!


Greetings again, Ford-o-philes:

You all may recall my "fuel pump" problem in which I described how my 90
F150 was returning gas to the wrong tank, etc. I took everyone's advice,
looked up the recall and called my Ford dealer. They did the VIN query
and noted I had two outstanding recalls, the ignition switch and the fuel
pressure regulator & check valve. They scheduled me for an appointment
and I got the problem fixed this morning, free of charge. The truck,
which I bought just last month for a song, runs just fine and the fuel
system now works as it should. I'm a little embarrassed that I didn't
look up such an obvious recall-oriented problem earlier, but I thank you
all anyway for your guidance.

kourt


== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:31:32 -0700
From: "McMahon, Todd R."
Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - RE: 85 F-150 Rough Idle

Walt: What does the MAP sensor do?

Todd

- -----Original Message-----
From: Posluszny, Walt (POSL) [mailto:POSL chevron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 1999 9:39 AM
To: '80-96-list ford-trucks.com'
Subject: FTE 80-96 - RE: 85 F-150 Rough Idle




Mike, Check the MAP sensor. Usually mounted on the firewall, has one vacuum
line and one connector. Check out the voltages vs. vacuum as per Ford spec.
Walt

> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 06:42:52 -0400
> From: "Michael McCarthy"
> Subject: FTE 80-96 - 1985 F-150 Rough Idle
>
> I have been experiencing rough idling in my '85 F150/I6. [snip]
> I have replace the EGR valve, PCV valve and the Oxygen sensor. I have
> checked for vacuum leaks and can't find any. When the engine is running
> particularly rough at idle the emissions smell strange (not like burning
> oil) and the exhaust is black.
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Michael McCarthy
> Export, PA
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 19:06:41 EDT
From: Skullxbonz aol.com
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels

Action body panels in Redford Michigan has great repair panels available
cheap, also try JC Whitney (www.jcwhitney.com)
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:06:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: throckmon webtv.net
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels

Thanx for the response,Whitney lists nothing,got any more info on Action
Body Parts?
markas

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:08:14 -0400
From: "Troy"
Subject: RE: FTE 80-96 - RE: Tailgate down...

On 1 Jul 99, at 9:16, Giddens, Scott wrote:

>Putting the tailgate down causes the rear air to be more turbulent
>(disruptive) and increases the drag/reduces fuel mileage. This has been
>confirmed by many tests and studies and is the main reason the auto
>manufacturers don't indorse it or design a better one. It also is very
>dangerous to other people on the road (not to mention the damage to your
>truck) when the tail gate comes out of the catch on any negative G forces
>like it is designed to do. If you insist on running with it down you should
>buy an Airgate or remove it completely.

I don't know. I have found the truck to be much easier to control by
putting the tailgate down on the highways, especially on the windy
days. I have also noticed when I was working in Belleview (about a
30 minute drive from my house) the weeks that I would leave the
tailgate up, the gas mileage was less than the weeks I did put it
down. I have run my own tests on it.

My tail gate has not come out of the catches.

>On a related item, I had to chase a guy down in his truck years ago when he
>was running with his tailgate down and his 4-way bounced out of the back of
>his open bed and impaled itself into the grill of my truck. Missing the
>radiator by a few inches. Anytime I see someone so stupid as to drive on the
>freeway with anything in the back that is not constrained I report them. The
>life you save may be someone you know.

Oh, if there is something in the bed of the truck, the tailgate stays
up. It's that simple. I don't care if it's a simple gas can or
something, it is strapped into place and the tailgate stays up.

You might be a redneck if... You always thought 'Guns and Roses'
was something you get for your anniversary. - Jeff Foxworthy


Troy Williams
________________________________________________________
NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:09:55 -0400
From: "Troy"
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - RE: Tailgate Down

On 30 Jun 99, at 20:18, Dave Harmier wrote:

>Mine is a Tommy Lift, it's a pretty solid piece, attached very
>solidly to my truck. Woe to any car fool who hits me!!! (I'd like a
>new truck anyway!)

Hehehehehe, I've got the stock step bumper on the back end,
gonna take it off and put a pipe bumper on the rear end. Let one of
these idiots get too close to that back end when I might have to
make a panic stop. :) It's not very often that I am out on the
highways and would have to put the tailgate down so I don't worry
about that factor much anymore.

You might be a redneck if... Your bra size is higher than your S.A.T.
score. - Jeff Foxworthy


Troy Williams
________________________________________________________
NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 18:32:49 PDT
From: "Jim Kudulis"
Subject: Re: RE: FTE 80-96 - shocks

I just put a set of Edelbrocks on my 250
They were about $70 USD each.
Jury is still out, they seem to make the truck bounce and rebound more than
the HD original gas shocks.
ShockWarehouse (on the internet) has about a 3 week delivery, but the lowest
prices.
Jim

On Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:29:58 +1000, les wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 30, 1999 8:09 AM, ROlson1039 aol.com
> [SMTP:ROlson1039 aol.com] wrote:
> ............ So for whatever its worth I wouldnt use anything BUT
> > Gabriels
> > Bob
> > ROlson1039 aol.com
> > 1989 F250 2WD
> Hi All,
> I am in the market for replacement shocks BUT Which one ??? The truck is

> used mainly around suburbia and an occasional hit out on the highway.
> I have been tossing up between Rancho's adjustable ($165 aud ea.) and a
> life time of the purchaser guarantee (?) Is this one of those guarantees
> that is actually worth something ? or Koni adjustable ($130aud ea.) just
> pay your money and clear off ? Is anybody using either of the above units

> or have any other suggestions ?
> At these prices I don't particularly want to make the wrong choice. The
> gas mongrel wylies that are currently installed - well I wouldn't fit 'em

> to a ride-on mower! or maybe this set is just plain unlucky.
> It appears I have one glowing recommendation for Gabriels. I had not
> considered these to be serious since the days of the Hi-Jacker series with

> the air bag ( wow, this is time warping! - the mid to late '70s) that, no

> matter what you did to protect them, something would manage to spike the
> bag and blow out the unit, or is that happy motoring in Australia ?
> Thanks In Advance.
>
> Regards.
>
> Why is it called 'Tourist Season' if we can't shoot at them?
>
> Les
> E-mail: lesw cyber.net.au
> '86 F100 351 LPG POWERED 2WD LWB
>
> ��
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html





_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://mail.excite.com/
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 22:48:05 EDT
From: Jgearhead aol.com
Subject: FTE 80-96 - 460 conversion

A month or so ago I posted a note that I was in the process of doing a 460
conversion in my 84 F250LD from a 351W. The truck is equipped with a T-18
granny 4 sp. and 4.10 Dana 60 non-floater (c-clips).
The conversion turned out GREAT!!! can pull any hill at 70 MPH with a
7800# trailer in tow. Just got back from the Shelby American Auto Club
convention in Detroit (1200 mile round trip) averaged 9.6 M.P.G.
The motor is a 73 460 out of a big Lincoln, used junkyard parts, no
expensive kits.
Now the question is; can I adapt a later model heavy duty overdrive
transmission to this engine?
Jgearhead aol.com
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:06:56 -0400
From: "Steve"
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels

My J.C.Whitney lists just about every piece you need to redo the entire
truck!!!

Steve
- ----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels


> Thanx for the response,Whitney lists nothing,got any more info on Action
> Body Parts?
> markas
>
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 03:20:07 EDT
From: Skullxbonz aol.com
Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Re:89 F250 Body Repair Panels

I have Whitney's free catalog, and it has everything. I will list Action
Body panels phone # on Saturday. Also If anyone needs parts shipped they do
ups. I was very impressed with Actions quality, especially the fact that on
a new fender, their price was $10 less than that of most junkyards, I had no
prep to do, no dents, no rust, no old paint, it was also better quality in....


To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.




Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.