|
|
80-96-list-digest Thursday, July 9 1998 Volume 02 : Number 237 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1980-1996 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 80-96-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 80-96 - Lincoln 9" rear with disc brakes > FTE 80-96 - Re: SUV Survey Re: FTE 80-96 - Lincoln 9" rear with disc brakes > FTE 80-96 - Re: Catalytic converter FTE 80-96 - RE: Feedback Solenoid FTE 80-96 - Vapor Lock - Thanks for all the help! FTE 80-96 - roadhog's...and trail destruction FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! Re: FTE 80-96 - roadhog's...and trail destruction Re: FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! Re: FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! FTE 80-96 - Fwd: Suzuki4x4: Fwd: This will make you mad!! FTE 80-96 - Ken Payne Re: FTE 80-96 - Ken Payne RE: FTE 80-96 - Vapor Lock - Thanks for all the help! Re: FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! FTE 80-96 - RE: Fuel Injector Cleaner FTE 80-96 - Re: Anti SUV Survey FTE 80-96 - Re: Suzuki4x4: Survey FTE 80-96 - Re: Aftermarket doorlocks Re: FTE 80-96 - Re: Anti SUV Survey FTE 80-96 - Car & Driver this month FTE 80-96 - New tires for the truck...... FTE 80-96 - Re: Anti-SUV survey ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 07:17:12 -0500 From: "Rick Wojciechowski" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Lincoln 9" rear with disc brakes > John Miller wrote: > Hi gang ran across a nice Lincoln 9" rear end complete assembly with disc > brakes today at the boneyard for $175.00. Does this sound good? I don't > need it right now so I thought I would pass it on to everyone. If it's good > enough I just might buy it for safe keeping.... what do you all think? If > anyone needs it let me know privately and I'll give you the info... If you don't then I will. :-) What year was it ? - -- Thanks, Rick Wojo '83 Fsize BRONCO,Stock I-6,"The BROWN BULL",33x12.5x15-Mud Blasters '92 Mstng 5.0L '95 eclipse-Wife's(For Sale) == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 10:09:50 EDT From: JDavis1277 Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re: SUV Survey Yes, the survey results were very surprising. Now, if only they would do an 18 wheeler survey ;=) == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 09:45:03 -0600 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - Lincoln 9" rear with disc brakes > >From: "John Miller" >Subject: FTE 80-96 - Lincoln 9" rear with disc brakes > > >Hi gang ran across a nice Lincoln 9" rear end complete >assembly with disc brakes today at the boneyard for >$175.00. Does this sound good? Yo John: >From what I've seen, I'd say that $175 for a 9" disc rear end is a steal! Last time I asked around here (Colorado), they were getting $500 for them at the boneyards. Grab it and keep it stashed until you need it, or pass it on for a profit (and still a bargain) to another Ford trucker. Dave R. (M-block devotee) == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 07:48:27 -0800 From: Casey Vandor Subject: FTE 80-96 - Re: Catalytic converter I am pretty sure it is illegal, but then how do I find what was it was originally equipped with? The build sheet said high-altitude exhaust, but that doesn't tell me much. Anybody that has a stock 83 351W, could you let me know what you have? (only a muffler or muffler and cat.....) Thanks Casey Vandor == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 08:46:09 -0700 From: "Posluszny, Walt (POSL)" Subject: FTE 80-96 - RE: Feedback Solenoid Thanks for the tip Dave, Can I assume from your note that you changed out the feedback solenoid on the carb and the pinging went away? If that's the case... I'm off to the dealer................. Mine too pings like mad on reg. gas all the time(except idling of course). I unplugged the Feedback Solenoid once and truck seemed to have noticeably more power but couldn't tell about the pinging because I had Supreme in the tank. The exhaust did smell awfully sulfurery thought so I assumed it was running too rich and hooked it back up. I've been living with this since 1984. Thanks Walt =============================================================== RE: Ignition Timing/pinging I had a similar problem on a 86 F-150 w/ 4.9L . The carb on my truck is a feedback type. The feedback solenoid on the carb failed and it would ping like mad all the time. Several dealers and several independent garages could not find the problem. They kept blaming the EGR. I also fooled with the timing but it really hurt performance. I forget how I finally figured it out it was several years ago. Dave == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 11:28:28 -0600 From: "Linda Lawrence" Subject: FTE 80-96 - Vapor Lock - Thanks for all the help! Just wanted to update all on the posting I made with my vapor lock problem. I got many great replies, thanks, guys, for all the help. Yes, I found that the fuel line runs very close (2 inches or so) to the exhaust. Also, in the engine compartment the fuel pump is fairly close to the exhaust manifold. Also, the fuel line running over the engine was resting on it! Almost everywhere the fuel goes, it's HOT! So far: I made a metal shield and fastened it between the fuel pump and exhaust > manifold. I wrapped the fuel line with aluminum foil ( running over the engine). Since the problem doesn't happen until the engine heats up (it happened again yesterday), I'm assuming that the main area to fix is in the engine > compartment? Roger Laguna, NM == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 13:53:55 EDT From: FSTFORDS Subject: FTE 80-96 - roadhog's...and trail destruction It's obvious that you don't have a complete understanding of the world around you and aren't paying attention too other polluters and how they are managed. I myself pay over $300 a year to access the public land my taxes pay for and strongly uphold the moral's of "PACK IT IN, PACK IT OUT," destruction is a very broad term and obviously your org. uses it negligently. I foresee strong opposition from many sides if you can't be little bit more diverse in seeing the truth and reality of the way the majority of off-roading enthusiast's use there vehicles. In short, you don't have any idea of what your talking about. AND, this roadhog thing your on...get a clue...pick on the truckers...and the old cars......my vehicle runs less than 100ppm and my CO's are well within tolerance! Michael long Tacoma, WA == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 12:55:20 -0500 From: Ezekial Subject: FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! No one responded to my post yesterday so here it is again cause I really need to know this....... Someone I talked to said you could advance the timing on a 88 302, and it is a truck block, to what I think was 13 degrees for more power. Is this correct??? And also I removed one cat on my truck and the muffler. Now the exhaust > exits through the first cat then to pipe which ends about 2 feet behind the cab and faces toward the ground. Since then my truck has bogged down bad off the line. At night it seems to be a bit faster. Anyone know how to solve this?? One of my friends with a 96 experiences my same situation except he still has 2 cats on it and no muffler. == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:09:39 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - roadhog's...and trail destruction Who are you talking to and what are you talking about? Did you send this to the wrong place? You'll catch more flys with honey. Perhaps you ought to learn to argue without calling people clueless and saying they don't know what they're talking about. Ken Payne PS - My 67 F100 runs very clean. Properly tuned old vehicles are clean. That's a clue for you. At 01:53 PM 7/9/98 EDT, you wrote: >It's obvious that you don't have a complete understanding of the world around >you and aren't paying attention too other polluters and how they are managed. > >I myself pay over $300 a year to access the public land my taxes pay for and >strongly uphold the moral's of "PACK IT IN, PACK IT OUT," destruction is a >very broad term and obviously your org. uses it negligently. I foresee strong >opposition from many sides if you can't be little bit more diverse in seeing >the truth and reality of the way the majority of off-roading enthusiast's use >there vehicles. > >In short, you don't have any idea of what your talking about. > >AND, this roadhog thing your on...get a clue...pick on the truckers...and the >old cars......my vehicle runs less than 100ppm and my CO's are well within >tolerance! > > >Michael long >Tacoma, WA == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:14:51 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! At 12:55 PM 7/9/98 -0500, you wrote: >No one responded to my post yesterday so here it is again cause I really >need to know this....... > - -snip- Can't answer your question, but let me give list members some advise.... Before posting a question twice, let it go for a couple of days. 70% of the users get the digest version of the list and the digest doesn't go out until 4:00 am (EST) the next morning and they may not see it until they get home from work the next night. Ken Payne == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:33:27 +0000 From: Garr&Pam Subject: Re: FTE 80-96 - 302 timing, 2ND POST! Yes if you bump up your timing and run higher octane gas then you will get some hp from it. I run 14 degrees in my Lightning, factory is 10! I always run 93 or better. Hope this helps Chris == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 14:34:17 EDT From: FSTFORDS Subject: FTE 80-96 - Fwd: Suzuki4x4: Fwd: This will make you mad!! This is a multi- part message in MIME format. - --part0_900009258_boundary Content-ID: Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In a message dated 7/9/98 10:56:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, drew_huber > DJ JONES wrote: > > > >> As I get stuff like this I will try to send it along if I don't see it > >> posted out here. Once again trying to make us look like the bad guys! > >> DJ > >> > >> >Subject: This will make you mad!! > >> > > >> >Something has got to be done about these GAG's!!! > >> > > >> >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.foe.org/act/trails.html > >> >-- > >> >Kevin Curry > >> >Red '94 Hummer Fast-back "HummuH" > >> >Kevin > >> > > >> >Campbell's Law of Auto Repair: > >> >"If you can get to the faulty part, you won't have the tool to remove > >> >it." > >> > - --part0_900009258_boundary Content-ID: Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from relay18.mx.aol.com (relay18.mail.aol.com [172.31.109.18]) by air11.mail.aol.com (v45.18) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 1998 13:56:15 -0400 Received: from liam.avenza.com (liam.avenza.com [205.207.138.1]) by relay18.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id NAA13285; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 13:55:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from majordom by liam.avenza.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA20333 for suzuki4x4-l-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 13:55:31 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: liam.avenza.com: majordom set sender to owner-suzuki4x4-l Received: from UPIMSSMTPUSR05 (smtp.email.msn.com [207.68.143.177]) by liam.avenza.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA20329 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 13:55:29 -0400 Received: from drew - 153.34.13.126 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 9 Jul 1998 10:55:25 -0700 From: "Drew Huber" To: Subject: Re: Suzuki4x4: Fwd: This will make you mad!! Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 12:55:04 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Message-ID: Sender: owner-suzuki4x4-l Precedence: bulk Reply-To: suzuki4x4-l Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I'll bet none of those people have ever been off-road. Either in a vehicle or by foot. Just sitting around trying to come up with a way to seem like they're doing something good. I personally run with a couple of organizations and we have hauled trash out of the woods a lot of times. It wasn't left by anyone that is serious about off-roading, and your absolutely right about the trash on the side of the roads. I guess we need to start a web site to abolish paved roads! More trash and pollution there than in the woods. What do you think? Drew Huber ---- Team Zuki ---- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.off -road. com /~teamzuki - -----Original Message----- From: Alvin To: suzuki4x4-l Date: Thursday, July 09, 1998 12:34 PM Subject: Re: Suzuki4x4: Fwd: This will make you mad!! > > >DJ JONES wrote: > >> As I get stuff like this I will try to send it along if I dont see it >> posted out here. Once again trying to make us look like the bad guys! >> DJ >> >> >Subject: This will make you mad!! >> > >> >Something has got to be done about these GAG's!!! >> > >> >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.foe.org/act/trails.html >> >-- >> >Kevin Curry >> >Red '94 Hummer Fast-back "HummuH" >> >Kevin >> > >> >Campbell's Law of Auto Repair: >> >"If you can get to the faulty part, you won't have the tool to remove >> >it." >> > >> > >> >> ______________________________________________________ >> > > >I suggest every one go to that site and respond to there email don't flame >them just say not all off-roaders are irresponsible and there's more.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |