|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 61-79-list); Thu, 01 Mar 2001 03:11:22 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 03:11:22 -0500 (EST) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 61-79-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 61-79-list Subject: 61-79-list Digest V2001 #64 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== Serious help restoring and maintaining your Ford truck! ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts carries hundreds of Ford licensed reproduction decals to put that finishing touch on your truck! Air Cleaner Decals Interior Decals Emission Decals Chassis Decals Exterior Decals Body Decals Valve Cover Decals Jack Decals and much more, including Ford oval decals in several sizes! <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/"> http://www.motorhaven.com/</a> ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ 61-79-list Digest Wed, 28 Feb 2001 Volume: 2001 Issue: 064 In This Issue: Re: suprnatioals and power steering conversion Re: Pigeon Forge Re: Engine Swap Questions Re: suprnatioals and power steering conversion Ford truck models Cab mounts Re: Cab mounts Re: The toughest Ford EVER Re: Rear axle recommendations Re: 67-72 dash removal, revisited Re: cab mounts Re: 67-72 dash removal, revisited FTE ADMIN: Change to classifieds Re: Rear axle recommendations 428 stroke Re: 351W V. 351C Re: www.powerheads.com Stroker 400??? Re: Stroker 400??? Re: www.powerheads.com 428 ID/F-250 t-case Re: 67-72 dash removal, revisited Re: 351W V. 351C ADMIN: New list guidelines Re: www.powerheads.com Re: www.powerheads.com Re: Stroker 400??? Re: 351W V. 351C fan clutch 78 f-150 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Tim and Pam Allgire" <tim-pam Subject: Re: suprnatioals and power steering conversion Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:59:34 -0500 across the parkway & down a little ways on a little side street is the Park Tower Inn. it is one of the places that I stay sometimes when I go to the P F shows. Diagonally across the corner from the Park Tower Inn there is a little bungalow type place(can't remember the name) " something Condos -- has its own kitchenette so you don't have to eat out all the time. go food shopping & save yourself some money.cook your own meals,just like at home. -----Original Message----- From: Zane Baumann <Coscow To: 61-79-list Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:00 PM Subject: [61-79-list] suprnatioals and power steering conversion >---------------------------------------------------------- >Support FTE - Check out our store: >http://www.motorhaven.com/ >---------------------------------------------------------- > >My Father and I are planning to go to the supernationals. I plan to >drive my 71 F-250 crewcab if I get all the bugs worked out and hopefully >painted. Are There any recommondatios on places to stay. Also I am >wanting to convert it to power steering. It has a 300 6cyl and manual >transmission. any ideas > >============================================================= >To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 >Please remove this footer when replying. > ------------------------------ From: "GaryBBB" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: Pigeon Forge Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:02:22 -0800 Didn't think you were. I was just passing along some info I thought some might enjoy :-) Bob is a real truck nut. He built a flat head roadster from junk parts he found lying around all over the country just to see what it would cost him and he made a really nice open roadster with wood bed and fully detailed flathead V-8 for about $1500 and drove it to the show :-) -- Happily Retired (but broke) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary -- > I wasn't meaning to be unkind regarding that P/F video. I realize > how tough it > is to assemble and mix those things. I just wanted to see more of > that fantastic > variety of trucks in the background. ------------------------------ From: "GaryBBB" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: Engine Swap Questions Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:23:29 -0800 While I agree in principle I don't think it will work out to be much of a problem in reality. What I did is mount the tranny on the cross member to anchor that end and just made the engine fit in the bay in such a way that it looks straight and the passenger side exhaust just fits past the frame with slight notching. If you use headers or the truck passenger side manifold notching is not required. Another clue is to look at the way the fan interfaces with the radiator but if you get the dumb thing centered in the bay so it looks right I don't believe you will have any trouble with it. The front darn well better be higher than the rear or you will have some big problems though :-) One fellow who mocked up a 460 in his Ranger (late model, small ranger) used a tube that just fit the output bushing in the tranny (an empty case used just for the mockup so he could run the tube all the way to the crank) and moved stuff around till it found the input of the rear diff :-) Lot of work if you ask me. That's what they made U-joints for :-) I do agree that straighter is better, strength wise and wear increases as the angles increase etc. but I don't see it as a real serious issue in this case because the location of the engine will be so close to original when it finds it's natural home you won't be able to measure the difference in most cases, I would say. That's certainly the way it turned out with my 78. You can't swing it much in any directon without hitting something so it pretty much goes where it goes and that's it :-) The biggest issue with home made mounts is doing a decent job of clearing all the junk in there and still have something that will support the engine and handle the torque it puts out. Mixing stock small block parts with 460 parts makes a weak mount but that's how I did my first ones. I made the second ones out of LTD mounts and welded the bottom part to the truck with a bunch of scrap metal for support. Ugly as sin but it works and it's all 460 mount stuff :-) With the L&L or other after market swap mounts you just bolt the darn thing in. Trust me, work a little overtime and buy the mounts, it aint worth it to make them. -- Happily Retired (but broke) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary -- > Be careful in keeping these angles as close to stock as you can. > Ford decided > they are necessary, so I wouldn't mess with them too much. > > Rollie ------------------------------ From: "GaryBBB" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: suprnatioals and power steering conversion Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:27:12 -0800 Yeah, get a "Food City" card and save some bucks like the rest of us did last year :-) Just a couple blocks south of the Grand :-) -- Happily Retired (but broke) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary -- > -- has its own kitchenette so you don't have to eat out all the time. go > food shopping & save yourself some money.cook your own meals,just like at > home. ------------------------------ From: "Mike Mackie" <bigred Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:56:04 -0700 Subject: Ford truck models You're right, Darrel, about that attention to detail. Modeling is also a good way to teach a kid to follow directions and work in a logical order. That other point you touched on, about using the model to see how different paint treatments look, is great, too. If you don't like how it looks, just soak the paint off with brake fluid and start fresh. My latest project is a 1/25 scale 40's-50's era Texaco gas station, ordered from Design Detail in Seattle. This is an awesome kit and will make a great diorama to take to car shows. ------------------------------ From: "Pat" <patsplace Subject: Cab mounts Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:54:33 -0800 I think that the cab has to at least be lifted, if not fully removed. What I've found works REALLY well is to have a set of the tripod mounted, crank the cable camper jack with the angle iron lifting parts. Lifts the cab off, allows you to roll the chassis out and then you can set the cab down or at least block it for safety and change to your hearts content. Pat 72 Ranger parts truck 73 F250 4X4 75 F250 4X4 78 150 W/overloads 79 F250 4X4 Dream Truck in progress If anyone has any tips for doing them with the cab on the truck, please let me know. ------------------------------ From: "Travis Johnson" <flatheadv8 Subject: Re: Cab mounts Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:56:43 -0700 To seperate the upper/lower cab mount use a piece of rebar. After you've gotthe bolt out, hammer the rebar from the top and it should push the bottom half out. This is what I did on my '87 ranger and the radiator supports on my'67. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://explorer.msn.com[1] --- Links --- 1 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://explorer.msn.com ------------------------------ From: "Matt" <draygo Subject: Re: The toughest Ford EVER Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:24:56 -0800 Hey, Darrell, send some of those pics my way, too. That thing sounds awesome! draygo Matt "Accomplishing the impossible only means the boss will add it to your regular duties." ----- Original Message ----- From: <JUMPINFORD To: <61-79-list <offroad-list Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:58 PM Subject: [61-79-list] The toughest Ford EVER > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > I think I just met the reincarnation of Henry Ford. While at my dealer > pickin up a dipstick for my 73 F-250 project, up pulls a black Super Duty > F-350 Crewcab 4x4. Only this sucker had 2 live rear axles! I got to talkin > with him, this truck is totally custom. Made his own frame, to which he hung > a dana 60 front in the convention manner, but the rears are set up just like > a big rig, with huge control arms and airbags. Made his own power splitter, > including having custom gears made, so that both axles were live. Both rear > axles are also sporting duals, which makes for one heck of a look. Basically > this is (according to him) the truck dodge got the idea from to build the > T-Rexx. This thing was flat awesome. Tilt bed, so he can show off the > goodies, the running boards were custom made to be his fuel tanks, but they > are still filled via the door on the bed by way of a slip joint, and some > ingenious lever action. Im going tomorrow to take some pics of it, And with > his permission, Im gonna send em to Ken to be posted. If any of you read > Truck Trends, it was featured in the Feb issue last year. Man I cant stop > thinkin about this truck. The power plant is a power stroke V-8 thats been > boosted by Banks. Said with his huge 5th wheel (I saw a pic, its got 4 > axles!) hes sittin at just under 34,000 lbs, and can still hit 105 on flat > ground. without the trailer he said it'd do about 135. Anyone thats > interested, I'll email you these pics when I get him tomorrow, just lemme > know, I'll put ya on a list. This is one Truck you dont wanna miss! > > Darrell & Tweety (who was extremely humbled today) > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:48:46 -0600 From: Steve Schaefer <schaefer Subject: Re: Rear axle recommendations I know, just jabbing back. Suprisingly, I got lucky it happened in the parking lot. The day before, I had my box trailer full of furniture for a friend. Guess that would have been better than on my way to Carlise for the All Ford Show with the trailer. Steve S. 54 F-100 76 F-350 Crew cab 77 F-250 Supercab 79 Bronco http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ > I was just kidding, sort of :-) I had a tractor axle break like that out in > the woods and couldn't put my finger on anything we had done wrong. When I > took it apart to fix it we could see that it had been cracked and coming > apart for a long time. It just chose that day, in the mud, with everything > loaded to the gills to break on us...........way out in the woods :-) > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 07:01:33 -0600 From: Stu Varner <nukegm Subject: Re: 67-72 dash removal, revisited Yes I do, Have not tried too hard to sell it. I guess maybe advertising it some would help. At 11:42 PM 2/27/01 -0800, you wrote: >---------------------------------------------------------- >Hundreds of Ford licensed decals to put the finishing >touch on your truck! Support FTE - Check out our store: >http://www.motorhaven.com/ >---------------------------------------------------------- > >Bummer! Hey, Stu, still got that truck you took to the show last year? > >-- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:18:47 -0600 From: Doss Halsey <halsey Subject: Re: cab mounts Azie wrote: >Can't say about the pre '73, but on the '73/'79 series the mounts are rubber >donuts that slip between the cab and frame. I've changed several by >raising the cab just a few inches with a jack and a piece of 4X4 as wide >as would clear the frame. Remove the old ones and insert the new ones. I'm talking about the whole shootin match: the big sheet metal horns that are spot welded to the floor pan. The new ones from Dennis Carpenter were very nice, but very major work to put in. I had good luck (on my previous truck) removing the old ones with a spot weld cutter and bolting the new ones in place with lots of 10-24 bolts (cab on it's back in the driveway). The bolts made it possible to pull the mount up tight to the floor pan as well as to POR-15 the back of the mount including the area in between the joint. If you wanted it to look completely original, use a few bolts to pull it up tight, then duplicate the spot welds (with a MIG), then remove the few bolts and weld over the holes. BTW, the reason I am prohibited from such behavior is that SWMBO has spoken. No more frame-offs in the driveway. Doss '67 F250 Camper Special ------------------------------ From: "GaryBBB" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: 67-72 dash removal, revisited Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:43:37 -0800 That's why I asked, I remember you saying it was for sale at the show. So, you going to start another one? -- Happily Retired (but broke) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary -- > Yes I do, Have not tried too hard to sell it. I guess maybe > advertising it > some would help. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:52:13 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: FTE ADMIN: Change to classifieds As many of your are aware "dot com" companies have been hit hard in the last few months. FTE is now feeling the affects. Our ad revenues through our reseller have taken a serious hit and have plunged by 80%. FTE is taking steps to insulate itself from the advertising slowdown. Many of you have enjoyed the use of our bandwidth with free classifieds. As is the case with many web sites, the free lunch is over. Our classifieds use a significant amount of bandwidth per month and we >>HAVE to come up with new revenue sources in order to keep FTE operational. Thus, we're implementing a >>reasonable fee<< for placing an ad. The classified ads will now be $4.00 for up to 45 days plus an additional $1.00 for each additional category you place it in. After placing your ad you will be given a link to a page on our secure server to pay for the ad. Our classifieds have over 75,000 visitors per month and this number grows every month. $4.00 for that kind of exposure represents a tremendous value. Anyone who thinks $4.00 is too much to pay ought to consider the thousands I've shelled out to keep the site operational and the need to continue to keep the site going. Thank you for your understanding as we implement this changes. It's unavoidable given the current economic climate. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:30:08 -0600 From: Steve Schaefer <schaefer Subject: Re: Rear axle recommendations Well the decision has been made. I went ahead and orderd a Detroit Locker for the truck. We shall see if I like it or not in the truck. I love them on the street in the street/strip cars I have had. I will make a spare axle on board equipment from now on :>). This should be fun once I get the 460 in it:>). Now I have to get the trac lock in the front too. Steve S. 54 F-100 76 F-350 Crew cab 77 F-250 Supercab 79 Bronco http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ > Well Gary, > > >From the looks of the the axle, it broke due to a hairline fracture with the grain of the axle. It is almost a straight line, through the centerline of the axle, about 4" long. Besides, 7500 lbs, 39's, 400 (actually 406 :>)), and C-6, doesn't make for a tire screamer :>). Now when the stock wheels are on it, that is an entirely different story (can hardly move > when it rains:>). > ------------------------------ From: "Azie L. Magnusson" <maggie11 Subject: 428 stroke Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:41:04 -0600 Raymond P. writes: >>I need to know the stroke on a 428<< 3.98" on 410 & 428 390, 406, & 427 is 3.78" 352 & 360 is 3.5" 332 is 3.25" Azie Magnusson Ardmore, Al. ------------------------------ From: "PitStop Performance" <thepitstop Subject: Re: 351W V. 351C Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:49:44 -0600 OK Guys, Edelbrock list an intake for a 351C with Yates heads. So that has be confused. I Emailed Ford MotorSports. I'll tell you guys what they say. If I can't find anything I'll use Aussie heads with a single plane intake. BTW, if they aluminum 351W heads will work on a 351C does that mean I could use a 351W intake as well? If so, I would just use the 351W GT40 EFI intake set-up. Thanks again. >Bill Beyer >Yates heads are designed for the W block but they're based on the C > >design. I've heard that there are some aluminum C heads out there > >somewhere but I've never been able to find them. If you're trying to > >build a hot C then go for the Aussie heads. You can also look at > >www.powerheads.com. They carry built Aussie heads. As far as intakes > >look at the Edelbrock or Weiand single planes. >From: JJJJJGRANT >i had a set of aluminum heads and intake for a 351c, they were from >ford >motorsports, i believe they were the same heads as the 302 and >351w, they >just had a coolant passage for the intake. you can put >351c heads on a >302, but you have to drill the passage, as mentioned >before the yates 351w >heads are the same design as the cleveland, so >i would guess to use them >on a cleveland you just weld up or plug the >passages. but i am currently >looking for a set of 351 aussie heads. > >jeff _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://explorer.msn.com ------------------------------ From: "PitStop Performance" <thepitstop Subject: Re: www.powerheads.com Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:50:42 -0600 Bill, The website www.powerheads.com didn't work and I can't seem to find it. Any help? Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://explorer.msn.com ------------------------------ From: "Jeff Rice" <jrice Subject: Stroker 400??? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:01:08 -0600 Does anybody know if it's possible & what it would take to build a stroker motor out of a 400??? The motor is in a '78 F-150 4x4. Thanks ------------------------------ From: "Bill Beyer" <bbeyer Subject: Re: Stroker 400??? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:49:17 -0800 Go to the FTE website and look on the message board under 351M/400 forum. There's a very recent thread about 400 stroker motors and a guy who built a 667 hp, 564# torque monster stroked to 4.1". He's in the middle of building a 4.2" stroker now. Not cheap however. /// Friends help you move...Real friends help you move bodies \\ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Rice" <jrice To: <61-79-list Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: [61-79-list] Stroker 400??? > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Hundreds of Ford licensed decals to put the finishing > touch on your truck! Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Does anybody know if it's possible & what it would take to build a stroker motor out of a 400??? The motor is in a '78 F-150 4x4. > Thanks ------------------------------ From: "Bill Beyer" <bbeyer Subject: Re: www.powerheads.com Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:51:59 -0800 Hmm...don't know what to say. It works fine for me. /// Friends help you move...Real friends help you move bodies \\ ----- Original Message ----- From: "PitStop Performance" <thepitstop To: <61-79-list Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:50 AM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: www.powerheads.com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Hundreds of Ford licensed decals to put the finishing > touch on your truck! Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Bill, > > The website www.powerheads.com didn't work and I can't seem to find it. Any > help? > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:51:21 -0800 From: Scott Harkema <bad76f250 Subject: 428 ID/F-250 t-case I have a 428 in my truck and the block is marked with a "352" and C6ME-A casting number. I also have a 390 that has the EXACT same marks. My 76 F-250 was originaly a Full Time married 203 T-case equiped truck. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:01:21 -0600 From: Stu Varner <nukegm Subject: Re: 67-72 dash removal, revisited >That's why I asked, I remember you saying it was for sale at the show. So, >you going to start another one? > I have already started my '68 Mercury Prosteet truck but things are a little slow due to priorities set forth by my wife etc. Money is always a factor and the sooner the 1971 4x4 sells the sooner I go hogwild on the '68. Frame work will begin as soon as the addition on my house gets finished - probably in early May. Until then, there is no time to do much except look and wish it were farther along than it is. Stu Nuke GM! (1971 F-100 4x4 restored for sale!) ------------------------------ From: "GaryBBB" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: 351W V. 351C Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:15:55 -0800 Deck heights between the 302, 351W, 351C and 351M are all different so the spacing between the heads is also different. The intakes can not be interchaged between any of these. The 351M and 400 do interchange as do the 429 and 460. The heads on the first 4 do interchange but the 335 series is a dry manifold where the 302 and 351W are wet so some machining is necessary to swap between them. -- Happily Retired (but broke) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary -- > BTW, if they aluminum 351W heads will work on a 351C does that > mean I could > use a 351W intake as well? If so, I would just use the 351W GT40 > EFI intake > set-up. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:44:45 -0500 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: ADMIN: New list guidelines A couple of weeks ago the message board guidelines were overhauled. They have worked out well and they leave little gray areas as opposed to the old guidelines. Because of their success, the mailing list guidelines have been brought in sync with the message board guidelines. Please read the new guidelines at: http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html These are the new Terms Of Service the lists will be operating under. If you do not agree with them, please unsubscribe from the list(s) or contact me personally. Regards, Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "Garrett Nelson" <garrettnelson Subject: Re: www.powerheads.com Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:47:02 -0800 Doesn't work for me. Garrett Nelson www.1966ford.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Beyer To: 61-79-list Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:51 PM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: www.powerheads.com ---------------------------------------------------------- Hundreds of Ford licensed decals to put the finishing touch on your truck! Support FTE - Check out our store: http://www.motorhaven.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------- Hmm...don't know what to say. It works fine for me. /// Friends help you move...Real friends help you move bodies \\ ----- Original Message ----- From: "PitStop Performance" <thepitstop To: <61-79-list Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:50 AM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: www.powerheads.com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Hundreds of Ford licensed decals to put the finishing > touch on your truck! Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Bill, > > The website www.powerheads.com didn't work and I can't seem to find it. Any > help? > ------------------------------ From: "Bill Beyer" <bbeyer Subject: Re: www.powerheads.com Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:54:56 -0800 Yep...looks like they have a server/provider problem. It worked for me earlier today. Keep trying 'cause that is the correct URL. /// Friends help you move...Real friends help you move bodies \\ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garrett Nelson" <garrettnelson To: <61-79-list Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 5:47 PM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: www.powerheads.com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Hundreds of Ford licensed decals to put the finishing > touch on your truck! Support FTE - Check out our store: > http://www.motorhaven.com/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Doesn't work for me. > > ------------------------------ From: "Stevel" <canzus Subject: Re: Stroker 400??? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:57:11 -0800 ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Rice <jrice To: <61-79-list Sent: Wednesday, 28 February, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: [61-79-list] Stroker 400??? > Does anybody know if it's possible & what it would take to build a stroker motor out of a 400??? >The motor is in a '78 F-150 4x4. The best question is "How fast do you want to spend??" I should add that it's probably not impossable to stroke a 400, but a stock 460 would be cheaper to put together than a custom cranked 400, I'M NOT SAYING EVERYONE *SHOULD* REPLACE YOUR 400 WITH A 460, I hope this doesn't restart the war... Steve & the Rockette ------------------------------ From: JJJJJGRANT Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:30:40 EST Subject: Re: 351W V. 351C the 351 w aluminum heads i'm speaking of are made just like the cleveland heads but have the cooling passages, you can't use a 351 w intake with these heads on a 351c, these heads are for serious racing applications. jeff ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:09:24 -0800 (PST) From: kerry corey <fansong9 Subject: fan clutch 78 f-150 I have a 1978 F-150 2wd 351m w/C-6 and NO AC. It looks like it would be fairly easy to add a silicone temperature controlled fan clutch and perhaps new fan blades, eliminating what appears to be the spacer in the process. This should (in theory) give better cooling at low speed, better gas mileage (ha!) and less noise at highway speed. I think some of the A/C vehicles came w/fan clutch. Anyone already gone .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|