|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list 61-79-list); Wed, 27 Sep 2000 11:09:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 11:09:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 61-79-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 61-79-list Subject: 61-79-list Digest V2000 #263 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 61-79-list Digest Tue, 26 Sep 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 263 In This Issue: axle gears (full of questions today) Re: axle gears (full of questions today) Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Thermostat Options 223 Bolt Pattern Short Livers (or Lifers) Re: Manuals Re: Manuals Re: To: Dawn Re: To: Dawn Re: Short Livers (or Lifers) Re: 460 / 429 Dove heads Re: Dual Exhaust Dual exhaust Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Manuals Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Manuals Re: Manuals Re: Short Livers (or Lifers) Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Manuals Re: Short Livers (or Lifers) Re: Synthetic vs. Dino Oil Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Factory Turbos ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "J.X. Schulz" <bdijxs Subject: axle gears (full of questions today) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 16:10:15 -0600 Hey WishMan, I've broken those 44 axles several times, always right at the U-joint...this was with 33's, a 390, a lot of mud, rocks, and roots, and a heavy foot.... It's always a pleasant noise when the whole thing shears off...at the time, the red Disco Rig only had the one-speed Dana 21 (or 20, can never remember).... CJ (who learned the hard way in the Santa Cruz Mountains) ------------------------------ From: "Jason Derra" <derrar Subject: Re: axle gears (full of questions today) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:57:19 -0700 > Interesting ... you're breaking parts outside the center section again though > ... so its not really a power issue, but a power transmittance ... the axle > shafts and such just aren't putting up with it ... since the Viper and Vette > run the independant rears and such its not an issue for them ... well it is, > but its different parts ... and again you're talking about some serious shock > loading and running power through sharp angles ... all of which the Viper has > trouble mimicking because of its setup ... The reason that the internal parts are not the failure prone parts with a steering axle 4wd application is that the axle u joints are the weak link in the system. I rarely break axles with 35's and the 44. What ruins the axles is when the ujoint fails and eggs out the yoke (yolk) (pun not intended). I would imagine there would be more ring and pinion failures if the ujoint was stronger or if the 44 was used in a non steer position, like a Jeep or a Scout. Jason '69 Bronco 5.0 HO EFI, NP435 '96 F250 Ext Cab 4WD Powerstroke E4OD Happiness is a handful of warm deer guts ------------------------------ From: "Jim McCarty" <mccarty Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:22:47 -0500 Look at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.vtr.org/maintain/oil-overview.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:35:21 -0400 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize At 02:47 PM 9/26/00, you wrote: >Scott, shame on you......anyway, fill us in since you have all this info on >the subject :-) Those of us who have been around a while know that what you >see/hear is way not what you get in this area. Half truths is what you get. Not only that, but some users testify on a products behalf and don't tell they are dealers.... as happened in this case. That's why I banned Amsoil dealers from talking about the products on the lists a long time ago... they never let you know they are a dealer up front, and then claim good intentions when asked if they are a dealer. It wouldn't be so bad if they actually told you they were dealers first. So far, I've only had ONE good, up-front, honest from the start, Amsoil dealer encounter and that has happened recently. This man approached me, told me he sold Amsoil and other product lines and wants to advertise on the site. I've told him of FTE's previous experience with Amsoil people. So far, I must have turned down half a dozen people wanting to run Amsoil banner ads. His response will dictate whether or not I'll proceed with him but the mere fact that he doesn't think Amsoil is God's gift to engines earns him some points. Personally, I think its probably a good oil, but its not the magic elixir that most claim it to be. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:49:21 -0400 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize At 07:22 PM 9/26/00, you wrote: >Look at: > >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.vtr.org/maintain/oil-overview.html > This is the same old article that the Amsoil people have been using for years and is so out of date that it is not usable as a source. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: Aeroape82 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 20:31:55 EDT Subject: Re: Thermostat Options Hate to be accused of shouting, wasn't paying much attention look out for it next time. ------------------------------ From: "Eric Washburn" <bruce9 Subject: 223 Bolt Pattern Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:15:11 -0500 What type of bellhousings can I use for a 223? I was thinking about mating one to a C-4. Wanting to know if it fit the smallblock pattern or what, or is it just oddball? Thanks =P ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:16:08 -0700 From: Marv & Marge <ae722 Subject: Short Livers (or Lifers) dave Prasse <burgess4 is all non caps and run on thoughts just as annoying ? :-) YES! Content: On the front of mine, it says FORD, in all caps. Isn't that wrong, somehow? ;-) -M- Marv Miller mailto:ae722 "Striving to be the person that my dog thinks I am". ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:16:14 -0700 From: Tim Bowman <tkbowman Subject: Re: Manuals Another source of manuals is to go to www.detroitiron.com and get your manual on CD. I've got one for my '63 Galaxie and it's great to be able to look at the page on the computer and then print the page I need. Their phone number is 1-800-893-8122. -- Tim Bowman Burien, WA tkbowman Website: www.users.uswest.net/~tkbowman (Pacific NW Carshow Information & more) ------------------------------ From: TBeeee Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 22:25:36 EDT Subject: Re: Manuals Nothing like the truck manuals which are available right through this very site. http://www.ford-trucks.com Look to the right menu bar. Thom 1967 F-Series Registry http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://hometown.aol.com/tbeeee ------------------------------ From: "G & J Boling" <flash1 Subject: Re: To: Dawn Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 22:55:22 -0400 > > Where else can you get service manuals? The Helm site doesn't work > except for G# manuals! > > Thanks > Virgil ================================= the best manuals i have ever used were the old MOTORS manuals i dont know if they even still make them tho havent seen one in years other than the ones i have gordon ------------------------------ From: Natp244 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:04:11 EDT Subject: Re: To: Dawn I think dawn was looking for a manual for a 78?? Lloyd's auto lit (lloydsautolit.com) has new reprints- 5 volumes (factory shop manual) for.... brace yourself...$119.00. It's steep, but most of them are. Someone suggested checking the online store for this site- and I think that's the first place to start- especially since it help support this list- but I don't think they carry that year- still worth checking. Helm only carries manuals until they are "obsoleted"- and then you have to look for reprints like the ones above. Unfortunately they only come as a set and they cover every light, medium, and heavy duty truck- so you end up paying for a lot of info you probably won't use. Good luck. Nate ------------------------------ From: "G & J Boling" <flash1 Subject: Re: Short Livers (or Lifers) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:15:16 -0400 > dave Prasse <burgess4 > is all non caps and run on thoughts just as annoying ? :-) > > YES! > > Content: On the front of mine, it says FORD, in all caps. > Isn't that wrong, somehow? ;-) > -M- ============================================================= YEA but not all of us spent our lives teaching english or typing either the main thing IS i think when someone asks a question they get a answer i guess who cares about the rest of it IF we were all english majors i bet we wouldnt be on here either gordon ------------------------------ From: JJJJJGRANT Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:41:29 EDT Subject: Re: 460 / 429 Dove heads they're my second choice of heads if i'm building a performance engine, they already have screw in studs, small combustion chambers, and good size ports although i would do some porting on the exhaust side to make them flow better. no use to put aluminum intake,big carbs, bigger cams etc unless you open up the exhaust ports. ------------------------------ From: GMontgo930 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:45:15 EDT Subject: Re: Dual Exhaust In a message dated 9/26/2000 10:14:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Tom.Hogan << > << Hello list, Can anyone give me some insight into dual > exhausts on a '79 > f150 4x4 351M 4sp dual tanks. I want to keep my stock > manifolds for now. Is > there anyway to run the exhaust down both sides or would I > have to run both > down the ditch side. If I do then would it better to exit > both on the same > side or run another pipe over at the back end. It seems like > this would make > one pipe run a heck of a lot longer than the other. If I ran > a crossover pipe > would this make it not matter. Thanks. > >> > > The choice is really up to you. with most 4x4's it's hard to > get the pipe > around the xfer case. This makes the dual "ditch side" look > more attractive. > One possible alternative if you want the exit on both sides > look is to route > the Pass side pipe over to the drivers side and let the > drivers side exhaust > on the pass side. This would keep both approx equal length > and avoid the > hassles getting the pipe around the drivers side xfer case. > With dual tanks I would be really hesitant to route an exhaust pipe anywhere down the passenger side. I have seen one truck where the owner routed the pipes down the outside of the frame. Looked kinda weird. >> OOps, I over looked the dual tank bit in the origional post. That is a problem for the Dr Dide (though Ive never had one w a Dr side tank, jsut the aft end one). Otherwise the basic idea is sound! George M in Fl. ------------------------------ From: "Phillips" <hosses Subject: Dual exhaust Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:22:40 -0600 From: James Oxley <joxenburger Subject: Re: Dual Exhaust GMontgo930 > > In a message dated 9/24/2000 7:42:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > hosses > > << Hello list, Can anyone give me some insight into dual exhausts on a '79 > f150 4x4 351M 4sp dual tanks. I want to keep my stock manifolds for now. Is > there anyway to run the exhaust down both sides or would I have to run both > down the ditch side. If I do then would it better to exit both on the same > side or run another pipe over at the back end. It seems like this would make > one pipe run a heck of a lot longer than the other. If I ran a crossover pipe > would this make it not matter. Thanks. > >> > I have headers, but this is how my exh runs. It all fits, but the muffs need to be real small unless you don't care if they hang down a bit. I have not noticed any problems with the drivers side exh being longer than pass side. I've had this exh setup with a stock 2 bbl 351M, 4 bbl 351M, 4 bbl 351M with 400 cam (hair more lift) and mildly built 400 with a healthy cam. I do not have a crossover pipe. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thecore.com/~luxjo/BRONC_DETAILS/under.jpg OX -- 78 Bronco Custom, 400, T-18, 14 bolt/detroit/4.56, D60/detroit/4.56, 44 boggers, 9" lift 79 Bronco XLT, 351M, C6, D60/detroit/4.10, D448lug/Lokrite/4.10, 38.5 SX's, 4"lift 79 Bronc XLT, 351M, C6, 35 BFG AT's, 2" lift 86 Capri, turbo 5.0 (13.4 90 Talon AWD turbo (12.7 95 F250-460,4WD (16.9 Thanks for all your input guys. but like they say a pictures WATWs. Lots of other cool pics too. Hey this is a great list. ------------------------------ From: SHill48337 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 02:34:14 EDT Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize In a message dated 9/26/00 8:09:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, sch8489 << and burt, don't sweat it, I go to a *lot* of cruises where some old-timer *swears* castor oil is the best lube 'cause that's the way they did it way back when. older folks can be a stubborn and tenacious lot when it comes to deeply held convictions. my neighbor a few years back was ready to burn me at the stake because I didn't worship at the temple of mopar. >> Not a 100% sure, but we may be about 95% in violent agreement. You obviously know what you are talking about. Burt Hill ------------------------------ From: "Gary" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:25:58 -0700 If my information is correct, Amsoil is an offshoot of the company who pioneered the polymer oil for the military and jet engine commercial intersts some 30 or 40 years ago. The owner of this company is one of the designers/developers of this technology and it is a valid technology for it's intended purpose........jet engines. It has limited use as an automotive oil because auto engines don't abuse it like turbines and jet engines do. In other words, the properties of this very expensive oil are lost on auto engines except in the most rigorous racing applications such as 5000 hp nitro sleds........maybe :-) The simple fact is that by the time a normal dino oil will have begun to deteriorate it needs to be changed anyway due to chemical contamination so polymer oils have little place in our applications except for the "Cool" factor. I use Mobil 1 because I'm lazy and feel it does give me a slight edge over dino oils IF I happen to go over the change limit a little bit but even this may be wishful thinking on my part due to the chemical contamination. Most of the chemicals that develop over time in the oil won't damage the cast iron or steel parts but have a dramatic effect on soft metal parts, that is, Bearings, so if you don't change oil regularily, this is the first place most engines will fail. Rings usually are the result of poor air filter maintenance or PCV maintenance or a coolant leak into the oil. Using Amsoil and, perhaps, even Mobil 1 is over kill sort of like using titanium parts in our daily driver would be. You will never stress your vehicle enough to gain any benefit from it. Use what ever oil you like, bolt on any parts you like and enjoy the "Cool" factor till your teeth fall out but don't be misled by the hype.........THERE AINT NO FREE LUNCH :-) There will never be a "Magic" weight loss pill either but books which promote such foolishness are on the best seller list because people want to be fooled. When I was a kid I had to walk............but kids now days don't..........:-) Anyway, have fun with your trucks, just don't fall for every thing you read :-) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary :-) > some points. Personally, I think its probably a good oil, but > its not the magic elixir that most claim it to be. ------------------------------ From: "Gary" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: Manuals Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:33:34 -0700 Their index page appears to be under construction and not having any links so you have to call them I guess........ Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary :-) > Another source of manuals is to go to www.detroitiron.com and get your > manual on CD. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:52:11 -0400 From: James Oxley <luxjo Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Gary wrote: Hey gary, welcome back!! Hows retirement going?? :-) > It has limited use as an automotive oil because auto engines don't abuse it > like turbines and jet engines do. In other words, the properties of this > very expensive oil are lost on auto engines except in the most rigorous > racing applications such as 5000 hp nitro sleds........maybe :-) The simple > fact is that by the time a normal dino oil will have begun to deteriorate it > needs to be changed anyway due to chemical contamination so polymer oils > have little place in our applications except for the "Cool" factor. Maybe truck engines, but what about turbo applications. I don't know what the oil temp is inside a non-water cooled turbo, but I know the EGT on my 4 banger gets up to 1600 F in the exh turbine housing. > I use Mobil 1 because I'm lazy and feel it does give me a slight edge over > dino oils IF I happen to go over the change limit a little bit but even this > may be wishful thinking on my part due to the chemical contamination. I use it mostly for cold start, especially winter. How true it is that it maintains viscosity better than dino oil?? It sure is thinner than conventional oil, weight per wieght. OX 78 Bronco Custom, 400, T-18, 14 bolt/detroit/4.56, D60/detroit/4.56, 44 boggers, 9" lift 79 Bronco XLT, 351M, C6, D60/detroit/4.10, D448lug/Lokrite/4.10, 38.5 SX's, 4"lift 79 Bronc XLT, 351M, C6, 35 BFG AT's, 2" lift 86 Capri, turbo 5.0 (13.4 90 Talon AWD turbo (12.7 95 F250-460,4WD (16.9 ------------------------------ From: "Scott Jensen" <sjensensr Subject: Re: Manuals Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 06:13:17 -0700 If you're in Portland, go down to Powells Books. They have a good selection of used Haines/Chiltons plus a bunch of old factory manuals. Bought my copy of Steve Christ's book there, too. Kind of off list, but they have a whole building FULL of Tech books. A real geek playground. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:22:51 -0400 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: Re: Manuals At 10:16 PM 9/26/00, you wrote: >Another source of manuals is to go to www.detroitiron.com and get your >manual on CD. I've got one for my '63 Galaxie and it's great to be able >to look at the page on the computer and then print the page I need. >Their phone number is 1-800-893-8122. > >-- >Tim Bowman >Burien, WA >tkbowman >Website: www.users.uswest.net/~tkbowman > (Pacific NW Carshow Information & more) Detroit Iron, according to Jim, no longer sells directly to the public or at least avoids it. Jim doesn't like dropping everything, burning one CD and sending it out. Its much more time effective for him to do a run of 10-50 for a company and send them out. As it stands, there's usually a wait of a week or two before he burns a batch. This is why he's taken everything off the page. We sell the Ford truck CDs on the web site and have about 60 in inventory at any given time, from 32-72. For this particular topic, however, the point is moot, because Detroit Iron does not sell 73-79 Ford truck manuals (yet). The CDs are generally better than the printed manuals as far as content. While a printed manual is handier, the CDs have additional literature added to them as Jim finds more to put on them. Service bulletins, accessories books, guides, etc are on many of the CDs. I'm not sure where you would go for non-truck CDs from Detroit Iron though I have run into a couple of companies on the net selling them. Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "wish" <wish Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:27:56 GMT Subject: Re: Short Livers (or Lifers) >YEA but not all of us spent our lives teaching english or typing either >the main thing IS i think when someone asks a question they get a answer i >guess who cares about the rest of it We've had a few instances in the past where the wrong wording, or just plain wrong word was used to describe a part and some people thought they were talking about one thing, others thought they were talking about something else ... so sometimes its good to be sure you are all on the same page, I'm not sayin the English or typin has to be perfect, but if there's any confusion over what's being said, then it might be time to ask for sure what they're trying to say ... >IF we were all english majors i bet we >wouldnt be on here either No, but I'd still be getting just as much mail from you guys I'm sure ... "Word won't open, when it does it locks up ..." "How come I can't print?" "My class wants to put their stuff on the web" ... sorry, flash backs to my real job... Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ From: "Gary" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:43:37 -0700 I highly recommend retirement to anyone who is not overly materialistic in his goals :-) I allowed some padding in my savings to allow for the 2 months with no income but that's all I have saved ahead. I am living on my allowance and that's it but I wouldn't trade it for all the money in China :-) I hope to build that ultimate 460 some day but it's going to require some serious care with my resources.........when I get caught up on the "Honey Do" list :-) Actually I think you are right on both counts, Cold Starts and High heat. If I had another turbo I would use synthetic exclusively in it. My last one lasted 110k miles because I always idled it for one minute before shutting it off to cool the turbo. Just in case anyone doesn't know, the reason you use "Low Ash" oil in a turbo is to reduce the "Coking" effect on shut down. With no oil flow the heat from the turbo housing "Soaks" into the bearings and litterly fries the oil in them into little carbon crystals which act like little grinding wheels next time you turn it on. Synthetic oil, expecially the polymer type resists this much better than the very best dino oils and a "Post" luber is almost a necessity with these as well. Most OEM's put them on as standard equipment now. My 86 Cougar didn't have one. Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary :-) > Hey gary, welcome back!! Hows retirement going?? :-) > > Maybe truck engines, but what about turbo applications. I don't know > what the oil temp is inside a non-water cooled turbo, but I know the EGT > on my 4 banger gets up to 1600 F in the exh turbine housing. > > I use it mostly for cold start, especially winter. How true it is that ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 06:48:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Finn <ecfinn Subject: Re: Manuals Well since I just went through trying to find the '78 manual back in April I guess I should speak up. I found at least three different places that carried either original used or new copies of the original manuals. Unfortunately I can't find the list of which companies I contacted. Dohh! I do know that I ended up purchasing the new copy (and it is just that, a photocopy) of the manuals from Irv Bishko Books. I think I got the original list from yahoo at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dir.yahoo.com/Business_and_Economy/Shopping_and_Services/Books/Booksellers/Automotive/ Bishko books is at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.autobooksbishko.com/ Be warned that it is expensive at $120+ and it comes three hold punched and shrink-wrapped in plastic. I had to find two huge three ring binders (3") to put it all in. Let me tell you though its been worth it. One other thing it does not include wiring diagrams. That's a separate book. HTH, Eric Finn '78 Bronco "The Beast" (Project Still in Progress) '95 Mustang GT "Beauty" (Daily Driver) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://im.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:09:58 -0700 From: Dennis Pearson <dpearson Subject: Re: Short Livers (or Lifers) G & J Boling wrote: > ============================================================= > YEA but not all of us spent our lives teaching english or typing either > the main thing IS i think when someone asks a question they get a answer i > guess who cares about the rest of it IF we were all english majors i bet we > wouldnt be on here either > gordon > I am an English teacher. I don't get all worked up over poor grammar/spelling/syntax/whatever unless I really want to understand what the communicator is trying to communicate. Then it can be frustrating. The previous group of words has at least four different possible meanings, depending on punctuation. Since none of the possible meanings have any impact on my Ford truck or my life, I don't really care which the writer intended. My feeling is that if a person doesn't care if anyone understands exactly whatever he/she is trying to communicate, then type on. I can ignore it. It must not be that important. I guess an analogy would be caring what kind of lubricant another uses in his/her Ford truck. All one can do is give advice and/or information and let the advisee do whatever he/she wants...He/she will anyway... ------------------------------ From: "John Webster" <jwebster Subject: Re: Synthetic vs. Dino Oil Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 11:08:39 -0400 Here was another good reason for a pre-luber, post lubing! The fancy store bought has an adjustable timer for the prevention of heat soak and coking. A simple timer could be rigged up for the homebuilt though. Actually between this a combination of electric fan and electric water pump you could do a good job of cooling evenly the motor. With my luck though the next time I jump in the battery would be dead! John '77 F150 4X4 460/C6/4:11's/33's <Actually I think you are right on both counts, Cold Starts <and High heat. <If I had another turbo I would use synthetic exclusively <in it. My last one <lasted 110k miles because I always idled it for one <minute before shutting <it off to cool the turbo. Just in case anyone doesn't <know, the reason you <use "Low Ash" oil in a turbo is to reduce the "Coking" <effect on shut down. <With no oil flow the heat from the turbo housing "Soaks" <into the bearings <and litterly fries the oil in them into little carbon crystals <which act <like little grinding wheels next time you turn it on. ------------------------------ From: "wish" <wish Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:54:12 GMT Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize >With no oil flow the heat from the turbo housing "Soaks" into the bearings >and litterly fries the oil in them into little carbon crystals which act >like little grinding wheels next time you turn it on. > It should probably be noted that the "bearings" in a turbo are just like those of the crank and cam, journal bearings ... there aren't little balls flying around in there when the turbo's at speed, so that oil is just as important to the turbo as it is to the crank ... Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 11:53:52 -0400 From: James Oxley <luxjo Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize wish wrote: > > >With no oil flow the heat from the turbo housing "Soaks" into the bearings > > >and litterly fries the oil in them into little carbon crystals which act > >like little grinding wheels next time you turn it on. > > > > It should probably be noted that the "bearings" in a turbo are just like those > of the crank and cam, journal bearings ... there aren't little balls flying > around in there when the turbo's at speed, so that oil is just as important > to the turbo as it is to the crank ... > They do make ball bearing turbos, the latest in hop ups for upgraded turbos. Not sure if any were ever std equipment. OX -- 78 Bronco Custom, 400, T-18, 14 bolt/detroit/4.56, D60/detroit/4.56, 44 boggers, 9" lift 79 Bronco XLT, 351M, C6, D60/detroit/4.10, D448lug/Lokrite/4.10, 38.5 SX's, 4"lift 79 Bronc XLT, 351M, C6, 35 BFG AT's, 2" lift 86 Capri, turbo 5.0 (13.4 90 Talon AWD turbo (12.7 95 F250-460,4WD (16.9 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 10:59:19 -0500 Subject: Re: Syntehtic vs. Dino Oil was Anti-Seize From: "John LaGrone" <jlagrone > It should probably be noted that the "bearings" in a turbo are just like those > of the crank and cam, journal bearings ... there aren't little balls flying > around in there when the turbo's at speed, so that oil is just as important > to the turbo as it is to the crank ... I agree with all that has been said about synthetic oil and turbos and the properties of synthetic oil. But... Does anyone have a stock, factory original or properly restored 61-79 F series truck with a factory turbo on it? I didn't think so. It was a good discussion, but it doesn't apply. So Slick 50, WD 40, STP Oil Treatment, etc. are scams but synthetics aren't. Sorry, I'm not convinced, but I doubt I will be. There has been enough good information transpire for anyone to make an intelligent decision for their use. To me, that's what counts. -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom, Long Wide Bed, Regular Cab, 351M, C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! ------------------------------ From: JUMPINFORD Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:05:05 EDT Subject: Factory Turbos In a message dated 9/27/00 9:00:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jlagrone > Does anyone have a stock, factory original or properly restored 61-79 F .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|