|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list 61-79-list); Mon, 04 Sep 2000 21:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 21:58:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: 61-79-list digest users <listar Reply-to: 61-79-list Subject: 61-79-list Digest V2000 #225 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 61-79-list Digest Mon, 04 Sep 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 225 In This Issue: Smog diagrams Re: The Muny Pit disc to drum on a 66-see tech articles 2-3/4" rear leaf springs? Looking for help - diesel fuel in a gas motor Re: headers for my 66 with a 390.. Re: Tires, 16" with 5.5 pattern, found 'em :-) Re: headers for my 66 with a 390...and some other stuff ADMIN: New tech article New 390 in '65 F250 4X4 Help with a few questions 429/460 swap 1967-72 Black Dash Pad (For Sale) ADMIN: Picture Gallery Additions Re: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap Re: bench seat Re: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap Re: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap 73-79 seat New truck mabye! Re: oil filters Re: New truck mabye! Re: oil filters Re: 73-79 seat Re: The Muny Pit Re: The Muny Pit Re: headers for my 66 with a 390...and some other stuff Re: Bench Seat ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "tony something" <tonysjunk Subject: Smog diagrams Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 06:02:31 GMT I desparatley need a California emissions diagram for a '79 F150 Ranger 2WD. I am going to use the motor in a '79 Cougar, and need to know what smog stuff I can reuse off of the 351Mutt already in the car, what stuff I need to find at the junk yard, and how it is all supposed to look. Somebody who shopped the junkyard and spotted the truck before did me the favor of stripping the motor down to the long block before I had a chance to get to it, but I think I can use some smog stuff of a earlier 460's, 351M/400's and 351's (75&up maybe) anybody with one of these trucks (light duties with 460's) please email me!! I really really really want to pull this swap off legally and I need your guys' help with this stuff. Thanks. Tony Lover of the boat anchor and the gas hog _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ From: "Gary" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: The Muny Pit Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 06:24:25 -0700 Well, I must say I don't understand the problem? I have two 78's and they run a long time once all the stuff is fixed but when I got them I put quite a bit into them to fix them up. They both had about 150k on them so this was certainly expected. I do understand that on military pay this may be a bit more adventuresome to do all at once but I've enjoyed the use of my trucks for many years with a relatively small outlay. The engine in my truck has been in 3 vehicles now, two since it was rebuilt and it still runs strong. Both trucks have the original rear ends in them with well over 200k miles now and the C-6 in the pickup is still like new, shift wise. (Np435 is another matter) 4x4's are more trouble to maintain, especially if you "Play" a lot. I don't play much except in the snow which is not very hard on the drive train. Most of my truck's miles have been on the road as daily drivers. My biggest issue has been time to do what I really wanted to do with them. Now that is no longer an issue but money will become an issue since I'm on a fixed income so I have to budget now if I want to "Build" that fancy 460 (and I do :-)) Money Pit? I call my bronco the "Black Hole" for similar reasons but it's still cheaper over all than a new truck and more satisfying than being stuck with a piddly 4.2 or 4.6 or 5.4 with stuff on it I can't even pronounce much less fix so these trucks will be in my family til I die. After that they can do what they want and I won't really care too much :-) My friend just blew a belt on her car (serpentine) which was old and weather checked but should have lasted a long time yet. I put an alternator on it for her but didn't notice the pulley wasn't quite right for the belt. After replacing the ignition pickup and cleaning out the damper and replacing the belt (Belt took out the ignition at the crank) I noticed that the belt was riding up on the edge of the alternator pulley and realized that that was what caused the demise of the original belt so sent her back the place that sold her the alternator to have it replaced with the correct one......(interestingly enough this one also had to have the housing rotated to make it work on this engine) so much for GM interchangeability and trusting the counter guy, eh? I expect her car to hold up for a while now and it's costing her a lot less than a new one of the same quality for sure with only 11k miles on it. She got a really good deal. If she asked for my advice on a car purchase again I would make the same choice, hands down :-) All old vehicles need periodic maintenance. I have since removed the brake booster on both trucks and fixed the linkage and now the brakes work like new and will for a long time but I did have to take the time to do the maintenance :-) My biggest complaint with the bronco is the fact that the brakes, though identical to the pickup, don't stop it very well yet the truck brakes do work pretty well unless it is loaded with 2 tons of stone, then it acts like the bronco......Stock tire, two tons of stone vs big tires, heavy vehicle......I wonder........ BTW, met a guy at PF with a truck loaded up with a nice 460 package and he was complaining that he only got........21 mpg on the way up......WoooooHooooooo! I just upped my 15 mpg goal, baby :-) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary :-) > I just have to say, I dont believe in Demons or bad Fords. :) > what I mean when I say it NEVER > > stops with this demon truck. On the way over - threw the altenator belt - ------------------------------ From: "Harvey, Blaine" <HarveyB Subject: disc to drum on a 66-see tech articles Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 07:58:21 -0400 For the answer, look no further than the excellent tech article on the site by our august webmaster, Mr. Payne. Detailed instructions. ------------------------------ From: FORDTRKNUT Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:10:28 EDT Subject: 2-3/4" rear leaf springs? Hello, I am at a "cross roads" in converting my 1979 F-350 Crewcab to a 4x4 from 2wd. The front is completly done, and I have to lif the rear about 5 inches from stock to match the 5" lift in the front. My questions is has anybody swapped out the 2-3/4" (or is it 2-1/2") wide rear leaf springs to the 3" ones? If so what shackles did you use. I ask this because the spring dimensions Eye to Eye is shorter for the 2wd. sure hope someone can hep me. Thank You Very Much In Advance!!! Wayne Grabley (Clifton, NJ) ------------------------------ From: draco Subject: Looking for help - diesel fuel in a gas motor Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:26:09 -0700 (PDT) My friend is having big problems with his truck (390FE). The oil light is coming on at idle and there is loud ticking like valve noise. The worst thing is that the motor turns over fine when it is cold, but if it is warm the starter can barely crank it over. After it cools down it will crank easily again. Is it possible that the motor is binding up due to the lack of lubrication when hot? Anyways, he says this all started when he mistakenly put diesel fuel in the truck. After discovering the mistake he took it to a guy who siphoned out the diesel and changed the oil. He may have done some other things, but that is all he told me. So what I am asking is, what happens when you run diesel in a gas engine? Could there be a connection, or is it just coincedence? Is there anything else we should do to the motor? Also, is the oil pressure switch before or after the filter? I know what you are thinking. "I have this friend...." Right? No, my truck is fine. Mark in Southwest Washington http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pacifier.com/~draco/Truck.html -- '74 F-100 Ranger XLT 4X4 in digest mode ------------------------------ From: draco Subject: Re: headers for my 66 with a 390.. Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Garrett wrote: > Anybody have any recommendations on what headers I should buy? If fit and quality are your primary concerns, I think best solution for headers on an FE are Sanderson's block hugger, shorty headers. If you are looking for higher performance you will want to find something in a full length header. I like the Sanderson headers because 4WD full length headers always have the drivers side drop down real low so the exhaust can be run under the transfer case. I have never seen a good way to run the exhaust with these kind of headers. You can install and remove them without removing anything else or lifting the motor. At least on my truck you only have to remove the winshield washer tank. You will really appreciate this when it comes time to replace your starter. :) In fact, I like them so much I did a writeup on the installation with lots of pictures so others can judge whether they would fit in their trucks. You can find it on my webpage below. Follow the Sanderson Headers link. > www.jegs.com part # 289-86066 Dynomax Jet Hot coated $209.99... but >it says they are for a 4wd truck. Would they fit on mine since I have > a 2wd? Probably not, for the reasons I mentioned above. I had a set of 2WD Dynomax headers on my old '74 Supercab. They fit well and I thought for the price, were not too bad. Mark in Southwest Washington http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pacifier.com/~draco/Truck.html -- '74 F-100 Ranger XLT 4X4 in digest mode ------------------------------ From: draco Subject: Re: Tires, 16" with 5.5 pattern, found 'em :-) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Gary wrote: > Take a look at this site: Thanks, Gary. This is like a dream come true. I also noticed a 5 on 5.5 five spoke aluminum wheel in 16x7. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.americanracing.com/ar2000/wheels/details.asp?wheelid=16 Mark in Southwest Washington http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pacifier.com/~draco/Truck.html -- '74 F-100 Ranger XLT 4X4 in digest mode ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 11:29:55 -0700 From: dave Prasse <burgess4 Subject: Re: headers for my 66 with a 390...and some other stuff Hi Garret, JC Whitney lists a FLOW TECH header 65-76 352-428 2wd 97.95 dPrasse Garrett Nelson wrote: > > Here is what I have found so far: > > www.summitracing.com part # HED-89180 Heddman painted headers for $144.39 > > www.jegs.com part # 289-86066 Dynomax Jet Hot coated $209.99... but it says they are for a 4wd truck. Would they fit on mine since I have a 2wd? > > Any other options out there for me? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 13:25:37 -0400 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: ADMIN: New tech article New tech article addition on the Ford Truck Enthusiasts web site: First Generation Explorer High Performance Disk Rotor Installation By Mark Strickland Enjoy! Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "Ballinger" <ballingr Subject: New 390 in '65 F250 4X4 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 13:37:56 -0500 I've been away from the list awile, the last time I posted, my 390 was still on the stand. Here's the latest. To refesh the memory here's what I built: Block- Bored .020 over C7ME-A cast at the Cleveland foundry. Gorgeous high nickel casting, the machine shop commented on how hard the metal was. I had the oil pump to filter passge drilled to 7/16, enlarged the main openings to match the bearings, drilled out the restriction to the rear main, and blocked the lifter galleys for the use of a solid cam. I also had a 427/428CJ style oil filter adapter that came on the engine, large beautiful passages. Crank- Passenger car 390, cut .010-.010. Clevite bearings. Rods- C7AE-B(same number as the 428CJ) with ARP 3/8 bolts. They are just like the CJ's except for the bolts, I prefer the 3/8 to the 13/32 so there's more meat on the rod, the bolts should be plenty strong. Pistons- TRW forged flat-top L2291F, Sealed Power E-180K moly top rings, .010 deck clearance, which with the .041 gaskets gives me .051 quench distance between the piston and head. Heads- C4AE-G '65 390 Police Interceptor- Stock 2.03/1.56 valves. Hardened seats and Ohio factory knurled guides. Ports are just like a 427LR/ 428CJ, so I didn't port them. Chambers came out to 74.5-74.8, so I have a 9.4 to 1 CR. Intake- I wound up using the Performer after I ported it. I laid back the wall on the inside of the turns 3/16 tapering all the way to the pushrods, and took up the roof 1/4.. It kind of has a trapezoid shaped opening now. In the top inside corner of the turns I cut a rounded chute that went to the top edge of the head port and polished it with a hand file, but left the rest of the port rough. On the floor I took a punch and dimpled the port floors as far back as I could go in, and in the plenum I took an old pushrod and dimpled the floor. The carb is an 800cfm Q-jet. Cam-Valvetrain CompCams 270S 224d intake centerline. This is a KILLER cam in a 390. I have the Federa-Mogul 427 style 1.76 adjustable rockers and shafts, and Dove spacers(replacing the springs between the rockers) I set my lash at .016 int .018 exh and you can still hear them. (sounds neat to me) I also slotted the stands like the iron ones to make them clamp better. Another thing I ran into was there are two valvespring baffle types, use the type with the v-shaped tounges that divert the oil back to the valley with a solid-cam. Even with restrictors I was flooding the valve covers and submerging the guides. Smoked awful. Another solid-cam thing is that those FM rockers and shafts fit looser than stock, so you'll need to restrict the oil to the shafts. I used two Holley jets per side a #90 (.110 orfice)in first and a #612 (.054 orfice) on top. They just pushed into the oil passages under each stand. The oiling seems about right now. The standard volume Melling M57 delivers 25psi 45-55 going down the road at 2500-3000. I don't like high pressure/volume pumps with stock pans. Exhaust- Hooker 1 3/4 3 inch collectors with 2 1/4 pipes into blown out Thrushes dumping at the axle. Sounds like a stock car! Ignition-Duraspark II with 8.5mm wires and big-cap. The plugs are Champion R9YC(yuck, I had to straighten and file every one of them)for now, I need the equivilent of a Motorcraft BF32, the Champion is as close as I can get right now. Thanks to Steve Salas for his advice, you were a big help on the smoking/ oil restriction/retention issue. The ride tells the story, my bro-in-law thinks it's pulling 475 lbs ft and 400hp or better(that's what my Desktop Dyno says it will do too), he's a Chevy guy and can't believe how it runs. He said it would tear a Mustang body to pieces. I treated him to a banzai blast from 40 to 110 mph in high gear (4.56s with 31.5 tires) It rattles the exhaust like a stock car and snaps your head back and holds it there til you let off! Varner, I'm coming over to take you for a ride soon :-) HEHEHE! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 13:25:55 -0600 From: Kirk Baillie <kbaillie Subject: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap Hi im starting to get real restricted on time since winter is on its way so I want to get my engine swap on the move. I currently have a 360 in my 74 F250 4x4. My questions are what do I have to do to get a 460/429 into this truck, Im running a NP435 along with an NP205. Will the 435 and the 460 be able to mat up to each other??? All I ever see is C6's with the 460 I started out want to put in a 390 or 428 but they are very hard to find in my neck of the woods (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan CANADA) Which would be a better choice based on performace around town drivablity and mileage between the two, 429 and 460. Its going to be my daily driver. Thanks any other information on the subject would also be very appreciated ------------------------------ From: TBeeee Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 18:40:37 EDT Subject: 1967-72 Black Dash Pad (For Sale) Hi everybody! I have a nice 67-72 black dash pad which I am selling. It is very plyable with no damage or cracks; It does need to be cleaned up a little more and/or given a fresh coat of vinyl paint. It can be painted any color to match your factory interior. The speaker grille area is perfect. The defroster grates could benefit from new paint too. Picture is at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://members.aol.com/tbeeee/page/dashpad.jpg I hope no one is offended by the post here, but I did it based on the fact that it seems to be a slow "news" day and I really wanted to give list members the first crack at it. I am accepting best offer, but reserve the right to reject all offers. Please contact me no later than 9:00 p.m. tomorrow. Please send all responses off list to tbeeee Thanks. Thom B. (a/k/a Stock Man) 1967 F-Series Registry http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://hometown.aol.com/tbeeee ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 18:43:04 -0400 From: Ken Payne <kpayne Subject: ADMIN: Picture Gallery Additions The following trucks have been added to the Ford Truck Enthusiasts picture gallery: 2000 Expedition XLT 2000 F150 XLT Sport 1994 Ranger XLT 1986 F-150 1972 F100 XLT 1968 F100 1960 F100 1953 F100 <a href="http://www.ford-trucks.com/pictorial">http://www.ford-trucks.com/pictorial</a> Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts ------------------------------ From: "Gary" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 18:46:45 -0700 Going from FE to 385 is a bit more of a problem than from a 335 and you will have to get a different bell housing from a 351M or 400 along with the clutch parts. As it turns out you may already have the right flywheel since they say the 390 flywheel works on the 460 but you may want to look into a stronger, larger clutch. You should use the truck passenger side manifold for the 460 or get headers, the car manifold will not be a very good arrangement for the exhaust routing and may require notching the frame. In 4x4's there is also the problem of interference between the steering box and power steering pump and other accessories so truck braket are usually a necessity or expensive after market ones. Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary :-) > my 74 F250 4x4. > My questions are what do I have to do to get a 460/429 into this truck, > Im running a NP435 along with an NP205. Will the 435 and the 460 ------------------------------ From: SpeedyFords Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 19:12:56 EDT Subject: Re: bench seat In a message dated 9/3/00 9:38:21 PM Alaskan Daylight Time, listar << Thanks- I need to find a seat pronto- Tony Marino redneck Tony, I've swapped seats around in ford trucks from '67 thru '77 and they fit just fine. Minor seat belt hassles on some, but they still work great. I'd guess that you would be safe all the way through the '79 model year at least. Tim in Anchorage '67 F-100 '79 F-250 ------------------------------ From: JUMPINFORD Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 19:21:49 EDT Subject: Re: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap I put a T-18 behind my 460, which is for all intents and purposes the same as a 435, and it can be done, but a few things gotta move around. I couldnt tell you how your motor mounts will line up, but I hear L&L can take care of that. Anyhow, a 400 belhousing will fit, but you have to use a 390 flywheel, and make sure its balanced the way the 460 needs, most are neutral, as is the 390, but some later years need a balance weight. A 400 pilot bushing might fit. It fit in mine, but I understand that not all 460 cranks are the same. You will need a diaphragm style pressure plate, one for a 400 will bolt right to the 390 flywheel. As far as fitting goes, you will need the PS bracket from a truck or van with a 460, along with the exhaust manifolds and oil pan. Car stuff wont work. Im not sure what else you'll need. My truck is an original 460, but it had an auto. After blowing 2 up, I went with the T-18. The reason Im not sure how your mounts will work is I had to move my tranny cross member forward about 3/4 to 1 inch. Good luck, and if you have any specific questions, dont hesitate to ask. Darrell & Tweety ------------------------------ From: JUMPINFORD Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 19:23:41 EDT Subject: Re: Help with a few questions 429/460 swap In a message dated 9/4/00 3:50:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, gpeters3 writes: << As it turns out you may already have the right flywheel since they say the 390 flywheel works on the 460 but you may want to look into a stronger, larger clutch. >> Believe it or not a 390 has a bigger clutch than a 460. Stock 460 stuff I got when goin through my swap used a 10'', the 390 I ended up using had the 11'' Darrell & Tweety ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 16:52:44 -0700 From: scott <scott Subject: 73-79 seat >>>What bench seat years are a direct bolt in for 73-79 bodystyle trucks? >>Do the 80's+ fit? 72 and older? Have a 84 F-250 seat in my 76.Took the tracks off the 76 seat and they bolted right to the 84 seat. Only problem is the seat will not tilt forward when it is slid all the way back.When you pull the lever it hits the gas tank behind the seat. Have to move it forward a notch or two to tilt it. Other than that extremely minor problem,it fits perfect,is very comfortable, and looks great. ------------------------------ From: "Jason and Kathy" <kendrick Subject: New truck mabye! Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 19:17:24 -0500 Hey, all. I might be trading for a '78 F150 Supercab tomorrow. It's got a 460/C6, dual tanks, ac, ps, two wheel drive, and power brakes. Plus, it's already set up for trailer brakes. What gears were these 460 equipped trucks most commonly sold with? I realize there were probably several options, but any idea what was most common? Thanks, Jason Kendrick ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 17:24:38 -0700 From: Marv & Marge <ae722 Subject: Re: oil filters "G & J Boling" <flash1 > i was wondering if this was a better filter to use and if it was a > smaller micron inside of it does anyone know??? I've been using Wix 51515's, but recently changed to Baldwin B-2's. Some truck repair places will tell you that the Fleetguard LF3313's are even better, but I don't know. I've got one to try, but what am I gonna' find? More soot? Dunno. I used to use Baldwins some thirty years ago. Bought 'em by the case from a fleet operator. Then the distributer went out of business. They were sort of hard to find here in the Los Angeles area, so I used Fram, 'till I read the Minimopar document. I even worked for AlliedSignal, and dropped them like a hot, oil-filled piece of ........ Looked around and found a new Baldwin distributer. BTW, Hastings is made by Baldwin, as well. If you look inside a Scamsoil, they look virtually identical, too. (Wonder who makes 'em for them?) But Fleetguard is (according to those who SHOULD know) made by Cummins, not vended to them. Gotta wonder, though, why they would set up a filter line when they could have them made to their specs by a filter manufacturer. I do like the idea that they come sealed in plastic shrink-wrap, however. My local Napa guy is selling the Napa Wix for about $7.00. I've been buying the Wix's at a heavy-duty fleet truck repair place for $3.52. Call around for prices, and consider buying them by the case. They might be even cheaper that way. The Baldwins are $4.13, and the Fleetguards are $4.39 at the fleet repair places. -M- Marv Miller mailto:ae722 "Striving to be the person that my dog thinks I am". ------------------------------ From: "Gary" <gpeters3 Subject: Re: New truck mabye! Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 20:41:27 -0700 Well, the lincolns had 3.25's and 400 equipped trucks with wide ratio C-6 came with 2.75 but 4x4's may be totally different. The all time most common gear in Ford trucks is 3.50 or 3.55 in the half tons and 4.10 in the F-250's. The 460 will easily handle the 2.75 with a wide ratio C-6, that's what I have in mine and I've been seriously thinking about going 1:1......:-) Michigan Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary :-) Plus, it's already set up for trailer brakes. What gears were these 460 equipped trucks most commonly sold with? I realize there were probably several options, but any idea what was most common? ------------------------------ From: "G & J Boling" <flash1 Subject: Re: oil filters Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 20:51:32 -0400 But Fleetguard is (according to those who SHOULD > know) made by Cummins, not vended to them. Gotta wonder, though, why > they would set up a filter line when they could have them made to their > specs by a filter manufacturer. =================================================== FLEET GUARDS are made by WIX also i used to deliver steel to the plant in the Carolinas where they make them and many other brands BUT they make them by their specs tho [mfgrs] i have used the fleet guard filters for years myself on diesels but never knew they made them for autos also i,ll have to find out if i can get them here locally as well gordon gordon ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:37:21 -0400 From: David Wadson <wadsond Subject: Re: 73-79 seat >>>>What bench seat years are a direct bolt in for 73-79 bodystyle trucks? >>>>>>Do the 80's+ fit? 72 and older? > > Have a 84 F-250 seat in my 76.Took the tracks off the 76 >seat and they bolted right to the 84 seat. That's exactly what I ran into taking my split bench from a 79 F100 ... I had to change the brackets. I suspect that the split bench wasn't an option in a regular cab and the guy had put new holes through the floor. We couldn't understand why the holes wouldn't reach when we tried to drop it into my truck. Changing the track assembly quickly recitifed the problem... David Wadson - wadsond "PS1" - 79 F100 ...ground into a million pieces. "PS2" - 78 F100 ...currently alive and kicking. "PS3" - 79 F150 4x4 ...now what have I gotten myself into... Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:46:41 -0400 From: David Wadson <wadsond Subject: Re: The Muny Pit >frame rail to the rear brakes rusted through. I can't explain why it waited >for this exact moment to blow (Gary, Wish, Anybody?), but it did. As far as >the drive belts go, the pulleys are at fault. A little mis-alignement here, >a little difference in pulley gap (read, pulley belt width) there. I just >have to add this, the water pump flange is bent, causing his water pump >pulley to look like its warped. (figure the odds on that!!). The way I >figure it, (unfortunately) is to throw more money at it. ie; buy more parts. Unfortunately brake parts are not something you want to be buying at the scrapyard. It waited for that exact moment to make life interesting for you - brake cylinders are just as bad. You simply want to change them...the brake line twists as you try to undo the fitting. You want to bleed them...you snap off the bleeder screws. I've been down the road of fixing one thing after another - it's why when I was putting PS2 back together, I replaced just about everything. With the exception of the proportioning valve, everything was brand new...including bending and flaring all the lines. With the 4x4 it's going to be the fix things as they break until I get my own garage where I can rebuild it. I think the key is to have another vehicle you can drive while you're fixing the other! >PS: Jeff, the wife say's you can leave your truck here when you deploy. >She say's I need a hobby that doesn't cost US anything. Grrrrr Geez, I only hope my SO will be so understanding. :-) But we really must keep in mind...these trucks may cost us a fair bit with all the little things, but that USUALLY pales in comparison to a newer truck. The next time something goes in your old truck, consider what it would cost in a brand new F150. Especially when you'd probably be paying a mechanic to fix a lot of things you'd normally be willing to do yourself on an old truck! David Wadson - wadsond "PS1" - 79 F100 ...ground into a million pieces. "PS2" - 78 F100 ...currently alive and kicking. "PS3" - 79 F150 4x4 ...now what have I gotten myself into... Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada ------------------------------ From: TBeeee Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:48:21 EDT Subject: Re: The Muny Pit Not to mention when something breaks on the new rig...you still have to make the payments! Thom (a/k/a Stock Man) 1967 F-Series Registry http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://hometown.aol.com/tbeeee In a message dated 9/4/2000 9:43:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, wadsond > The next time something goes in your old truck, consider what it > would cost in a brand new F150. Especially when you'd probably be paying a > mechanic to fix a lot of things you'd normally be willing to do yourself on > an old truck! ------------------------------ From: GMontgo930 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 22:19:39 EDT Subject: Re: headers for my 66 with a 390...and some other stuff My 2¢ worth on the topic of Flowtech Headers. - You get what you pay for. I've got a set on my '79 Bronco (4wd) and I'm not real impressed with them. The fit was/is ok, but the quality is not what I was expecting. They had holes in the welds (down by teh collectors) that I didnt find till after the exhaust was installed. I know it's a 4wd, but the drivers side literally follows teh side of the block on down. It mates in a real strange way with the rest of the system by literally looping under teh front drive shaft before snaking plast the xfer case. I dont want to say they are junk, but take a close look before you install em. Guess that can be said about all parts really. I was so thrilled, I didnt examine them real close as I installed them. BTW, it wa on a '79 Bronco 4WD with a 400 & C6. George M in Fl. In a message dated 9/4/2000 12:31:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time, burgess4 << Hi Garret, JC Whitney lists a FLOW TECH header 65-76 352-428 2wd 97.95 dPrasse >> ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 22:00:09 -0500 From: Dan Herrmann <herrmann Subject: Re: Bench Seat At 11:19 PM 9/3/00 -0400, you wrote: > > >What bench seat years are a direct bolt in for 73-79 bodystyle trucks? Do >> the 80's+ fit? 72 and older? >Tony Marino >============================================================= >HI TONY >Well i do know the 92s are NOT a direct bolt in BUT they are really easy to >install tho i stuck a brand new one in my 79 back in 93 got it really cheap >it was a takeout from a dealer all that was needed was to drill 2 new holes >gordon > >============================================================= Tony, 1980 thru 1996 Dealer Take-Out Seats IS a perfect fit for the 73-79 Trucks. But you DO NOT have to drill holes as Gordon mentioned above! All you have to do is install you old seat adjusting tracks! Remove the two tracks from the new bench seat and install your old 73-79 tracks (2-3 bolts .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|