|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 18:04:16 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #64 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Monday, February 2 1998 Volume 02 : Number 064 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: '68 390 2v to a 4v [marko Ford Truckin ["Deacon" ] Re: '68 390 2v to a 4v ["Donald R. Screen" ] Twin I Beam [John Strauss ] Flames ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Oil Pan for 300-I6 [al.giordano Re: '73 rearend ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Carb Size? [tfmf211 Re: Front end alignment ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: FW: Headers and a C-6? ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Carb/auto tranny linkage [am14 Re: Carb Size? [SuperMagot Re: Headers and a C-6? ["Michael Connor" ] Re: Dura-spark ????? [sdelanty Ford Truckin ["Deacon" ] Re: Dura-spark ????? ["Deacon" ] RE: Headers and a C-6? [Sleddog ] Re: Dual Point Ignitions [sdelanty Re: New V-10, Diesel, msc. [sdelanty RE: New V-10, Diesel, msc. [Sleddog ] Re: Mags and purty trucks ["Bill Beyer" ] Re: Carb Size? [SARHOG RE: '68 390 2v to a 4v ["Hogan, Tom" ] ok here's a question [KEVIN ] RE: Intierior Trim Restoration, kind of... [Randy Collins ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 12:00:21 -0800 From: marko Subject: Re: '68 390 2v to a 4v > >I would like to change my current 2v manifold to a 4v manifold on my 390. > Sounds easy to me, pull the distributor, disconnect the carb linkage unbolt >the old manifold, install the new, install carb, linkage, distrubutor and >tune. Is it just that easy or am I missing something? (Like I usually do >:-)) On the linkage there is a piece which the guys at Ford call a Trottle >Swivel Assy., it mounts to the rear of the manifold on the drivers side >and controls the linkage from the pedal going to the carb. Mine twist badly >and needs to be replaced, is this the true name of this part? Does any one >have one they are willing to sell? I lose over half of my throttle due to >the twist of this piece. > > >Any and all help/info will be appreciated. > > -Ted > Ted: Add to your list drain the coolant (of course), remove valve covers, and remove rocker arm assemblies. You have to remove the rocker shafts b/c the pushrods go thru the intake manifold. You have to unbolt the shafts according to a system so that you don't bend them. Be very careful around compressed valve springs, unbolt these stands in stages, and only after you've loosened the stands near the shut valves. As for the intake manifold gasket, throw away the front and rear corks and use silicone. If your heads have ever been milled the manifold won't sit right and will leak, leak, leak. Even the best shops only use silicone on the front and rear. And watch your back, these things are HEAVY! marko in vancouver marko p.s. while I was at it I put a mild rv grind cam in my truck and it works fine with the Holley 600 (well, as well as you can expect from a Holley!). ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 12:22:45 -0800 From: "Deacon" Subject: Ford Truckin Hi Gang! I called McMullen Argus Publishing, Inc. 774 South Placentia Avenue Plancentia, CA 92670-6846 Tel: 714.572.2255 for subscription information Ford Truckin' magazine and was told that they don't offer subscriptions to Ford Truckin' magazine that it's sold on news stands only. Who'd a thought such a thing? I can only suggest you ask your local news stand or auto parts store to carry it. I got mine at Chief Auto Parts. Their URL is http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mcmullenargus.com/default.asp I just looked and Ford Truckin' is no longer on their list of publications. It may be on it's way out from the looks of it. There is an email address for the Webmaster webmaster that may be able to answer questions. If anyone is able to get any more information on Ford Truckin' please post it. If a lot of us ask for it maybe they will start subscriptions again. Later! Deacon Blues deconblu ================================================ Visit The Deacon Blues Homepage http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dragonfire.net/~site/tbirdknights/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 14:32:25 -0600 From: "Donald R. Screen" Subject: Re: '68 390 2v to a 4v I have a metal bracket on the rear of my 390FE that looks as though it's only purpose is to hook up throttle return springs. It's made of pretty beefy steel and held with two 9/16 bolts. I dropped on Edelbrock 600 on my 390 and installed a throttle return bracket and spring on the front of the manifold near the coil. If you need this rear bracket (ie..it really does more than help the throttle return then email me and I'll send it to you for free!...what a guy I am... This bracket is not the one that is used on the rear corner of the carb mounting area for the throttle control cable. My 1974 uses a rod linkage not cable and had no bracket on the rear quarter of the 4300 Motorcraft carb. Please let me know...going on a two week trip tomorrow so there will be some delay in my response. BTW I believe my engine started life as a 360 2V and somewhere along the way somebody dropped a 390 4V manifold on it and 4300 4 barrel carb. Still gotta check that crank measurement... to see if it has a 390 crank in it. Don 1974 F100 XLT Ranger 390FE w/ 600 Edelbrock. tfmf211 > > I would like to change my current 2v manifold to a 4v manifold on my 390. > Sounds easy to me, pull the distributor, disconnect the carb linkage unbolt > the old manifold, install the new, install carb, linkage, distrubutor and > tune. Is it just that easy or am I missing something? (Like I usually do > :-)) On the linkage there is a piece which the guys at Ford call a Trottle > Swivel Assy., it mounts to the rear of the manifold on the drivers side > and controls the linkage from the pedal going to the carb. Mine twist badly > and needs to be replaced, is this the true name of this part? Does any one > have one they are willing to sell? I lose over half of my throttle due to > the twist of this piece. > > Any and all help/info will be appreciated. > > -Ted > > 68 F100 390 > 70 Torino GT 351C > 87 Ranger > 94 Mustang > 92 Sentra (Wife's Car) > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 14:38:35 -0600 From: John Strauss Subject: Twin I Beam >>Jim Writes (and its probably still raining in seattle) : >>Does the >>65-66 use the twin I beam do they still have the beam axle? >>Jim >> >> >'65 was the 1st year for the now defunct Twin I beam. > Wrongo! Check out the 1999 F-250/F-350. Twin-I-Beam lives on!! _ _| ~~. John Strauss \, _} jstrauss \( Texas Fight! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 15:44:38 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Flames I sent a fatherly note to Kevin and got an angry reply telling me "next time mind your own business" with several nasty typo's in his reply. I could post it if anyone's interested but the point here is that some folks seem to think they are somehow superior because they know something they think puts them in a "click" that's somehow more important or prestigious. Instead of recognizing his mistake and appologizing when flamed for it he covers his mistake by flaming back at the list and leaving. What a shame :-( BTW, I only burdened the list with my thought here to remind us all to be thoughtful with our replys even to the "Kevins" who occasionally pop up on the list :-) Where's Murphy when you really need him?? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:00:11 -0500 From: al.giordano Subject: Oil Pan for 300-I6 Gentlemen, I am in desperate need of an oil pan to fit the 300-I6=2E Does anyone have one sitting around or any suggestions on where to find one=2E I've searched the yards in the northeast area and no luck=2E My pan is all pinholed around the top and allows=20 moisture into the oil (not good)=2E I'm near Boston,MA =2E=2E=2EHELP! I'm almost at the point of fabricating my own=2E=2E warm up the MIG=2E thanks,=20 al g=2E 77 F250 4x4 300-I6 4spd=2E 68 Club Wagon 240-I6 3spd=2E (wants the 302 put in it) =20 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:02:05 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: '73 rearend > From: "Philip Bohrer" > Subject: '73 rearend > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 13:26:42 PST > I have a '73 F-150 w/ a mildly built 390 & C6. The problem is that > the previous owner must have towed a heavy load with it as my > Differential gearing is very low. At 65 MPH the engine is turning > 2600 RPM. I have no idea what gear set is in it, but i plan on > having it regeared. My question is, what is the typical torque curve > for this engine and how many RPM should I drop at 65 MPH while still > maintaining good power and acceleration? Thanx, in advance. Give us the tire size and we can figure it out for you if your rpm is accurate? The 390 should be able to lope along happily at 2000 - 2100 at 60 or so. Most modern vehicles with OD run near 1800 at 60 but they are cammed for that speed. A mildly built 390 could be built for rpm or torque so we need to know that too :-) Also, is the C-6 wide ratio? If it's stock, probably not since that came out around 78 as I recall? This help quite a bit with getting the gearing up and maintining performance and economy. Where's Murphy when you really need him?? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:44:56 +0000 From: tfmf211 Subject: Carb Size? >>Carb size is determined by the formula: Disp in Cu in X Max RPM X VE / 3456 For your application 302 X 6000 X .95 /3456 =3D 498 CFM If you were racing on a track with a hot cam and headers then the RPM number and VE would increase and you could use a 600 CFM. carb. Also you would not be concerned about drivability. Dan Lee '53 F100 351C-4V I understand the 302 cu. in. and the 6000 Max RPM, but what is VE/3456? -Ted 69 F100 390 70 Torino GT 87 Ranger 94 Mustang 92 Sentra (Wife's Car) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:33:31 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Front end alignment > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 14:03:52 -0600 > From: Jim Craig > Subject: Re: Front end alignment > camber are designed into the I beams themselves. If they are > seriously out of wack, then a frame shop will have to torch them and > bend them back into spec. I had the exact same problem, and my > solution was to add new springs and replace the kingpins and > bushings. To this day, it is not completely cured, but after taking > a very used '79 F150 for a test drive, My truck was about the safest > place I could think to be. You don't heat them, they use hydraulic benders to bend them cold. Caster is a function of the radius arms and "I" beam shape and since it has a fair lattitude, rarely causes trouble unless bent in an accident etc. but camber can and is often corrected by bending the "I" beams by shops who aren't afraid to politically incorrect..............:-) My 78 handles very nicely when all the king pin bushings are free. I have one froze up right now (it's been sitting) and even heat hasn't loosened it up but I'll take another stab at it before I give up and pull the pin :-( Where's Murphy when you really need him?? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:28:18 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: FW: Headers and a C-6? > From: tfmf211 > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:35:13 +0000 > Subject: FW: Headers and a C-6? Can't help with the headers but I suspect you will have to at least lift the engine to get enough room to pull them. > 2. Some one earlier said something about you can tell if you have a > C-6 if it has an integral bell housing and the pan has an "L" shape > to it? Is this true? I would like to change the shift points of > my tranny. Is this accomplished with a torque converter? It shifts > smooth, but shifts very quick and at a low RPM range. Your engine's torque curve will have a lot to do with that but you can make some changes to the modulator which will affect both 1-2 and 2-3 shifts. There are several modulators for each year so you could try one made for a larger engine application like a lincoln with 460 and see what it does or simply adjust the setscrew inside the vacuum tube or push pin orifice, can't remember where it is off hand....... Changing the torque converter will affect your overall cruise rpm as well as off line depending on how crazy you get so think about that first just a bit. I'd mess with the modulator first :-) BTW, oil will come out so be prepared to stick a finger over the hole while you mess with it if you take it out :-) Where's Murphy when you really need him?? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:39:08 -0500 From: am14 Subject: Carb/auto tranny linkage Ted writes: >>On the linkage there is a piece which the guys at Ford call a Trottle Swivel Assy., it mounts to the rear of the manifold on the drivers side and controls the linkage from the pedal going to the carb. If my memory serves me correctly, the Kickdown rod for the Auto is located on this device and I always called it a "bellcrank Assy".. Don't know if that's correct or not, but I believe that is what we called it. (I still call it that). Azie ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:39:59 EST From: SuperMagot Subject: Re: Carb Size? In a message dated 98-02-02 16:26:21 EST, you write: > Correct me if I am wrong fellow listers, but isn't 3456 the magical RPM number where Torque and HP always equal? I think this has to do with the way HorsePower is calculated, its a very old system of power measurement defined literaly by the amount a "strong horse" could do or something. Anyways, Torque is a measurement of force. Horsepower is a measure of power which is basically some force multiplied by time. Thats where RPMs comes in. I am afraid I dont remember why 3456 IS the magical number though...could someone else help? - - Mike ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:32:27 -0700 From: "Michael Connor" Subject: Re: Headers and a C-6? Ted wrote - >2. Some one earlier said something about you can tell if you have a C-6 if >it has an integral bell housing and the pan has an "L" shape to it? Is this >true? I would like to change the shift points of my tranny. Is this >accomplished with a torque converter? It shifts smooth, but shifts very >quick and at a low RPM range. > >Any and all help/info will be appreciated. > > -Ted Dunno if this will work in your application, but it worked for me. My C6 did the same thing when I first installed it. My friend told me that there is an adjustment on the vacuum modulator on the back of the tranny. Pull the vacuum hose off, and you'll see a little nozzle-looking thing in the center where the hose slides on. It has a slot in it. Insert a flat tip screwdriver in this slot and give it 1 full turn clockwise. Drive it around the block and see if it shifts differently. If not, give 'er another turn till you get it where you want it. I didn't notice a dramatic difference, but it did change it enough to suit me. There are undoubtedly others on the list who have more knowledge on it than I; perhaps they'll respond as well. Hope this helps, Mike Phoenix, AZ 77 F250 4WD 460/C6 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:49:57 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Dura-spark ????? Deacon writes: >> I just have one suggestion. Leave the white wire disconnected until >> you have it running good. You can hook it up later if you want to. >> Every time you crank it over the module will retard your timing and >> when you let go of the key, timing returns to normal. Without having >> everything adjusted yet this auto retard will drive you nuts. I've >> read that some people never got their engines to run with the white >> wire hooked up. Gary replies: >Ok, I've talked till I'm outa breath but this "auto retard" thing is >news to me?? AFAIK the dura spark II does not retard anything?? Steve says: C'mon Gary... That's what the white wire does! The red wire is the power for the D-spark box and needs to be connected to a source of 12v that is hot when the key is in the "run" and "crank" positions. Applying 12v to the white wire retards the timing (I read somewhere it was typically 6-8 degrees) That's why the white wire is 'sposed to be connected to a source that's only hot during cranking. (typically at the start relay) It retards timing during cranking to make the starter motor's job easier. You can leave the white wire disconnected if You choose, which eliminates tha crank/retard feature. Duraspark 2 has always had this feature... Happy motoring, Steve "Laws do not persuade merely because they threaten." -- Seneca, AD 65 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:16:36 -0800 From: "Deacon" Subject: Ford Truckin Hi Gang! I called McMullen Argus Publishing, Inc. 774 South Placentia Avenue Plancentia, CA 92670-6846 Tel: 714.572.2255 for *ubscription information Ford Truckin' magazine and was told that they don't offer s*bscriptions to Ford Truckin' magazine that it's sold on news stands only. Who'd a thought such a thing? I can only suggest you ask your local news stand or auto parts store to carry it. I got mine at Chief Auto Parts. Their URL is http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mcmullenargus.com/default.asp I just looked and Ford Truckin' is no longer on their list of publications. It may be on it's way out from the looks of it. There is an email address for the Webmaster webmaster that may be able to answer questions. If anyone is able to get any more information on Ford Truckin' please post it. If a lot of us ask for it maybe they will start su*scriptions again. Later! * is so my post isn't rejected by the server Deacon Blues deconblu ================================================ Visit The Deacon Blues Homepage http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dragonfire.net/~site/tbirdknights/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:36:44 -0800 From: "Deacon" Subject: Re: Dura-spark ????? > Gary replies: > >>Ok, I've talked till I'm outa breath but this "auto retard" thing is >>news to me?? AFAIK the dura spark II does not retard anything?? > > > Steve says: > > C'mon Gary... That's what the white wire does! > The red wire is the power for the D-spark box and needs to be connected > to a source of 12v that is hot when the key is in the "run" and "crank" > positions. StSteStev Steve. DDiDid GGarGary flame mme? AfAftAfter all he said ababoabout KeKevin? And here I ththought he was one of the gogogood guy's! I'm hurt! He's right about the rest of the hook-up! So there Dana (I stick out tongue and make disgusting noises at you)! :) Just spreading them joy joy feels! :) Deacon Blues deconblu ================================================ Visit The Deacon Blues Homepage http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dragonfire.net/~site/tbirdknights/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 17:28:00 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: Headers and a C-6? shift points are changed by the valve body. and use some penatrating fluid on those header bolts first, because broken ones become a bigger problem than anyone wants. sleddog - ---------- From: tfmf211 Sent: Monday, February 02, 1998 8:35 AM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: FW: Headers and a C-6? Gentlemen, I'm impressed with the knowledge base located here, it's wonderful. So here are a couple of questions I have for you: 1. I have a '68 F100 with a 390 2v. The headers are shot. Major holes! I think I can get these out with out doing any problem, but when I say things like that I generally get clobbered. So any thoughts about how hard it is to change out headers, with out removing heads and such? 2. Some one earlier said something about you can tell if you have a C-6 if it has an integral bell housing and the pan has an "L" shape to it? Is this true? I would like to change the shift points of my tranny. Is this accomplished with a torque converter? It shifts smooth, but shifts very quick and at a low RPM range. Any and all help/info will be appreciated. -Ted 68 F100 390 70 Torino GT 351C 87 Ranger 94 Mustang 92 Sentra (Wife's Car) +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | List removal information is on the web site. | +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:54:02 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Dual Point Ignitions >From: Keith Srb >Subject: Dual Point Ignitions > >Would somebody explain to me what a dual point ignition is, I am assuming they use two sets of point instead of just one. Yes, dual point distributors use 2 sets of points. They points are wired in parallel and are setup so that one set opens and closes slightly later than the other. It gives more dwell than a single points distributor and so gives the ign coil a longer charging time which makes for a stronger spark at high RPM. Solid state ignitions, which control optimum coil charge time electronically rather than by points dwell time have made dual points distributors a useless dinosaur of the past... Happy motoring, Steve "Laws do not persuade merely because they threaten." -- Seneca, AD 65 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 14:53:59 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: New V-10, Diesel, msc. >> Sure the Dodge hp/torque numbers look good, but FORDs V-10 is a lot smaller. >> If you're to compare hp/displacement in. or torque/displacement, you get >> some good looking numbers: FORD Dodge >> 265hp/415ci 300hp/488ci >> .64 hp per ci .61 hp per ci >> >> 410ft/415ci 450ft/488ci >> .99 ft per ci .92 ft per ci >> Not too shabby the way I look at it. >> -Tyler- Oh boy, 0.64 hp/CID... Wow, that's almost as good as a late 60's VW beetle motor! Lets see, 0.64hp/cid out of an FE390 would be less than 250HP. From a 460 it would be about 294 HP. Seems like pretty uninspiring numbers to me. Hell, even a stock 240/6 can muster up better HP/CID numbers than that! If that's the most HP/CID that Ford can make with their overhead cam wonder than I'm thoroughly unimpressed. Especially for a motor where there isn't any more power available unless You spend *really* big bucks on it. A 6000 RPM OHC motor that can't make *at least* 0.75-0.8HP/CID ain't nuthin but a boat anchor! As for the dodge's 300Hp from *488CID*... Giggle, giggle, guffaw! Happy motoring, Steve "Laws do not persuade merely because they threaten." -- Seneca, AD 65 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 18:01:14 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: New V-10, Diesel, msc. remember, emmisions choke the motor. emmisions equipement reduces the breathing efficiency of an engine, and that makes a big difference. sleddog - ---------- From: sdelanty Sent: Monday, February 02, 1998 5:53 PM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: Re: New V-10, Diesel, msc. >> Sure the Dodge hp/torque numbers look good, but FORDs V-10 is a lot smaller. >> If you're to compare hp/displacement in. or torque/displacement, you get >> some good looking numbers: FORD Dodge >> 265hp/415ci 300hp/488ci >> .64 hp per ci .61 hp per ci >> >> 410ft/415ci 450ft/488ci >> .99 ft per ci .92 ft per ci >> Not too shabby the way I look at it. >> -Tyler- Oh boy, 0.64 hp/CID... Wow, that's almost as good as a late 60's VW beetle motor! Lets see, 0.64hp/cid out of an FE390 would be less than 250HP. From a 460 it would be about 294 HP. Seems like pretty uninspiring numbers to me. Hell, even a stock 240/6 can muster up better HP/CID numbers than that! If that's the most HP/CID that Ford can make with their overhead cam wonder than I'm thoroughly unimpressed. Especially for a motor where there isn't any more power available unless You spend *really* big bucks on it. A 6000 RPM OHC motor that can't make *at least* 0.75-0.8HP/CID ain't nuthin but a boat anchor! As for the dodge's 300Hp from *488CID*... Giggle, giggle, guffaw! Happy motoring, Steve "Laws do not persuade merely because they threaten." -- Seneca, AD 65 +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | List removal information is on the web site. | +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:04:41 -0800 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: Mags and purty trucks - ---------- > From: CARVER, JEFFREY D > To: 'Truck' > Subject: Mags and purty trucks > Date: Friday, January 30, 1998 9:08 AM > > Unfortunately these are the vehicles that appeal to me > a LOT more than the "this was done at XXX shop using > YYY products". And of course they rarely, if ever, include > the COST of either the parts or the labor. Their intent is > to suck you into their game of pay-me-for-this. As for comparing > products from different companies, it doesn't happen. They > provide you some tidbits, but never dump on a product, as they > sometimes should. Technically I cringe whenever I see one > of those mags recommend WD-40 to loosen a bolt, as an example > of perpetuating a product at the expense of much better products > that are MADE to penetrate and loosen bolts, such as Liquid wrench, > Kroil, etc. Have they ever done a comparison of the effectiveness > of the variety of these products? Ha! No, they can't afford to dump > on ANY potential advertiser. I would have to agree with most of your opinions however the December issue of Petersens 4Wheel & Off Road did a very comprehensive test on winches comparing electric to hydraulic. The co. which makes the hydraulic winch is (was?) a very big advertiser in that mag. The hydraulic winch got TRASHED! It was one of the very few times I have seen this type of unbiased testing. The really funny thing is that in this months issue of Four Wheeler, a different mag, the co. that made the hydraulic winch took some of the statements made in the test TOTALLY out of context and used them in it's full page ad! Is this a great country or what ?! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 18:33:47 EST From: SARHOG Subject: Re: Carb Size? In a message dated 2/2/98 3:45:07 PM Central Standard Time, SuperMagot writes: > > Correct me if I am wrong fellow listers, but isn't 3456 the magical RPM > number > where Torque and HP always equal? Horsepower and torque curves cross (therefore, they are the same) at 5252rpm. Anything below that, torque is greater than horsepower. John Z 67 F-100 460/C-6 95 Fatboy ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:10:55 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: '68 390 2v to a 4v Ted, There is one other thing you should be aware of in swapping a manifold on an FE series motor, the manifold extends underneath the valve covers and the pushrods go through holes in the manifold between the runners. This will make it necessary to remove the valve covers and the rocker arm shaft assemblies. I am not trying to discourage you from this project. Just want to point out a difference in this motor from others. Edelbrock has a web page with a picture of their offerings for the FE series. Take a look at www.edelbrock.com and you'll see the holes on each side of the manifold. The rail next to the holes is where the valve cover seals. I have no experience with the Edelbrock manifold personally but you can look in the archives of the list to see what experience some members have had -- some good some bad. One other thing. The stock cast iron maifold weighs about 80 pounds. If you swap it in the truck save your back and get a cherry picker to lift it off the motor. I think the swap is worthwhile if you know what you are getting into ahead of time. Good luck. Tom H San Francisco, California 76 F-150 SuperCab 390FE 96 Windstar 200 hp 3.8L (Wife's Hot Rod) - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:30:56 +0000 From: tfmf211 Subject: '68 390 2v to a 4v I would like to change my current 2v manifold to a 4v manifold on my 390.=20 Sounds easy to me, pull the distributor, disconnect the carb linkage unbol= t=20 the old manifold, install the new, install carb, linkage, distrubutor and=20 tune. Is it just that easy or am I missing something? (Like I usually do=20 :-)) On the linkage there is a piece which the guys at Ford call a Trottle= =20 Swivel Assy., it mounts to the rear of the manifold on the drivers side=20 and controls the linkage from the pedal going to the carb. Mine twist badl= y=20 and needs to be replaced, is this the true name of this part? Does any one= =20 have one they are willing to sell? I lose over half of my throttle due to=20 the twist of this piece. Any and all help/info will be appreciated. -Ted 68 F100 390 70 Torino GT 351C 87 Ranger 94 Mustang 92 Sentra (Wife's Car) - ------------------------------.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|