|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 03:50:38 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #4 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Monday, January 5 1998 Volume 02 : Number 004 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #3 [bradyiii Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #2 [bradyiii Re: F-100 Milestone [BULL229 ] Re: Duraspark transplant [BULL229 ] Linf Kit [Jason ] 6V Automatic Bat'ry Charger? [JRFiero ] Re: Lift Kit [SAR HOG ] Fuel tank, tranny rebuild [mark heims ] Re: Lift Kit [Don Grossman ] Re: Fuel tank, tranny rebuild ["J. Oxley" ] Re: Duraspark transplant [danadeb Re:66 F100 Trans Swap [Tred123 ] Re: Fuel tank, tranny rebuild [marko ] Need help on my 73 F250 [Lee Craner ] Re: Need help on my 73 F250 [Kurt Albershardt ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 09:41:58 +0000 From: bradyiii Subject: Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #3 > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 03:50:28 -0700 (MST) > From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest > To: fordtrucks61-79-digest > Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #3 > Reply-to: fordtrucks61-79 > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 1998 12:53:52 -0800 > From: Randy Collins > Subject: Power Steering Cooler > > List members, > > I would like to buy one of the old Ford power steering coolers. I believe > that these were used on late 60's early 70's 429 equipped cars. Anyone > have one or know where I could get one of these? > > Later, > > Randy Collins > Boise, Idaho > rcollins > Randy, I have one from 360 equipped '71 F-100. I removed it because it looked unessesary. Let me know if you are interested in mine. Jim Brady ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 09:41:58 +0000 From: bradyiii Subject: Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #2 > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 1998 03:50:33 -0700 (MST) > From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest > To: fordtrucks61-79-digest > Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V2 #2 > Reply-to: fordtrucks61-79 > Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 13:21:20 -0600 > From: "kingw" > Subject: Re: Fuel Economy > > Jim, > Finally, you might consider building a front spoiler for your truck if you > do a fair > amount of highway driving (*flame proof suit now on*). I had seen an old > Car > and Driver series from the early 1970s where they only put front spoilers > onto > a bunch of cars (I recall a Pinto and 240z) and got substantial mileage > improvements. > You could make one yourself out of sheet metal (I wouldn't buy one. They > may look nicer, but they won't work as well as one you made yourself. The > idea behind them > is very simple) and (provided you made it right) should see some > improvement. > Just an idea. > > Bill > >Bill, This sounds interesting. I want to add fog lamps so a spoiler could be an integral part of my plan. What sort of angles come into play here? Let me know any details that might help. Jim Brady ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:23:32 EST From: BULL229 Subject: Re: F-100 Milestone Just wanted to add a story of Ford longevity. My father drove a 68 F-100 4WD shortbed up until 1984. This truck traveled ove 400,000 miles before it succumbed to a fire in our garage. It had a 68 390 4V in it since 72, replacing the anemic 360, and the motor had been rebuilt once after that. Keep in mind this was no regular daily driver, it was a work truck for a heavy equipment mechanic and plowed every Berkshire winter. He once used the truck to pull a tractor-trailer from PA, only to get stopped by a trooper, telling him it was WAY out of legality Our belief was that this truck refused to die, and I am sure, even today it would be running if not for a catastrophic fire that took the truck as well as 12 other cars, tools, and treasures. Thought you may like this story! - Ross ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:32:20 EST From: BULL229 Subject: Re: Duraspark transplant Changing an FE to Duraspark is an easy swap, best done with a factory wiring harness. Its can be done in a few hours with little brainpower (good thing for all of us) I have done this 3 or 4 times, including my own truck, a 70 F-100 4wd shortbed. The harness you need to make it easiest is a 76 360 truck, the wiring harness is fromt he distributor to the box stays intact, you just need to mount the ign box on the fender just like the 76's and plug it in, and the coil harness will be in the proper place (use the 76 push on coil). That will leave two remaining wires on the ign box, you will see, the two are a seperate harness coming out of the box, just put 12v to these two wires, make sure the 12V you use is switched off when the key is off, then BOOM, you have spark! One last point, the ign box MUST be grounded, be sure to clean the back with a little sandpaper, and scrape a little paint off the fender where it mounts. I have saved many a customer who thought they had a bad box, just by cleaning the mounting to make a good ground. Good luck to all, and talk to you soon - Ross ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 17:13:35 From: Jason Subject: Linf Kit Hi Guys, I have a 1994 F150. 4X4. I want to a a 2 inch lifk kit to it. What is the way to do this? And about how much? Thanks! - -Jason disalvo ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 18:53:11 EST From: JRFiero Subject: 6V Automatic Bat'ry Charger? I''ve been looking in vain for an automatic battery charger with 6V capabilities. I've found several chargers labeled 'automatic' that have 12V/6V, but if you look close, the 6V is only manual. I've also found 6V 'maintenance' chargers (the little baby ones), but they're manual also. The 12V maintenance chargers all seem to be automatic these days. By 'automatic' I mean the charger can sense the state of battery charge, and taper down to nothing when the battery gets to full charge, the kick in for a little bit every now and then if the vehicle is idle for a while. Anybody know of one? I don't care if it has the now-common high amp start feature. Griot's Garage sells one which the catalog claims does all this, but it's $99.95. To quote: "Sophisticated circuitry checks whether your battery is 6 or 12 volt, if the polarity (connection) is correct, then allows for a delayed start so no sparking across the leads can occur! Depending on the condition of the battery and how much charge it can accept, the computer varies the rate between 2 and 10 amps to provide maximum charge. To equalize charge on all of the cells, it provides a taper charge at the end. Fully automatic shut-off and restart keeps your battery at its maximum charge for extended periods of time." That's what I want, but Griot's usually is more expensive than anywhere else you can find equivalent stuff. Cool catalog, tho, with drool tools, so if you don't have one, they're at 1-800-345-5789. Don't know about a web site. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 19:04:31 EST From: SAR HOG Subject: Re: Lift Kit In a message dated 98-01-04 17:14:28 EST, you write: is the way to do this? And about how much? Thanks! -Jason disalvo The most inexpensive way to do it would be to use a body lift. They lift the cab and bed off of the frame, but they require a lot of labor for things like the steering column, fuel filler neck, radiator shroud, brake lines, tranny linkage, etc. Suspension lifts cost more, and they require a fair amount of labor on non-solid axle/leaf spring setups such as yours, but you will get a better riding, more capable truck overall and you'll be glad you did in the long run. I've done both, and I was not very impressed with the body lift. Just research both before you start. John Z 67 F-100 460/C-6 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 17:02:29 -0700 From: mark heims Subject: Fuel tank, tranny rebuild Hi all, I've been thinking of putting a bigger fuel tank on my 78 shortbed 4x4. Will a 33 gal bronco tank work, there fairly cheap but aren't as wide or long. My 35" spare won't fit under the truck so the depth isn't a problem. Can I get some bronco mounting straps and put one under there easily or are the filler holes in different locations? I'm also looking for a good source of info for rebuilding my New Process 435 4 speed. The third gear syncros are going, it grinds going in to gear and pops out while I'm accelerating. A friend of mine suggested getting a greaseable throwout bearing, drilling a hole in the bellhouseing and running a hose to a 1/4 28 barb fitting or a 1/4 28 to 1/8 female pipe thread fitting. This way the throwout bearing can be easily greased, what do you think? Mark 1978 F150 4x4 "The Great Pumpkin" ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 19:05:45 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: Lift Kit SAR HOG wrote: > > In a message dated 98-01-04 17:14:28 EST, you write: > > > is the way to do this? And about how much? Thanks! > > -Jason > disalvo > > The most inexpensive way to do it would be to use a body lift. They lift the > cab and bed off of the frame, but they require a lot of labor for things like > the steering column, fuel filler neck, radiator shroud, brake lines, tranny > linkage, etc. Suspension lifts cost more, and they require a fair amount of > labor on non-solid axle/leaf spring setups such as yours, but you will get a > better riding, more capable truck overall and you'll be glad you did in the > long run. I've done both, and I was not very impressed with the body lift. > Just research both before you start. > > John Z > 67 F-100 460/C-6 Maybe all you need is a set of leveling coils for the front. A two inch lift would be a little more expensive then body job but would be faster than having to adjust all the previously mentioned items above. - -- Don Grossman duckdon 63 Ford F-100 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44, power steering, power brakes, and now ON BOARD AIR! ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 22:17:39 -0500 From: "J. Oxley" Subject: Re: Fuel tank, tranny rebuild > I'm also looking for a good source of info for rebuilding my New Process > 435 4 speed. The third gear syncros are going, it grinds going in to > gear and pops out while I'm accelerating. Chiltons has some prety good info if you don't have the factory manuals. It was a pretty straight forward rebuild as it was the first manual transmission ever rebuilt. >A friend of mine suggested > getting a greaseable throwout bearing, drilling a hole in the > bellhouseing and running a hose to a 1/4 28 barb fitting or a 1/4 28 >to 1/8 female pipe thread fitting. This way the throwout bearing can be > easily greased, what do you think? > I would like to hear more on this. My throwout bearing is going after only about 5000 miles, but almost all my milage is towing heavy loads or serious deep water wheelin. It took me 5 years to acumulate this milage, so I'm not that upset about it. I would like to be able to grease it though. Where can I get a greasable throwout bearing?? OX > Mark > 1978 F150 4x4 "The Great Pumpkin" > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 20:14:38 -0800 From: danadeb Subject: Re: Duraspark transplant BULL229 wrote: Snip > That will > leave two remaining wires on the ign box, you will see, the two are a seperate > harness coming out of the box, just put 12v to these two wires, make Snip Although this will work the white wire should be hooked to a 12 V source when the ignition key is in the start position only. It is there to allow an amount of retard while cranking and if it is on all of the time there may be problems. See the wiring diagram at the site below: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.wrljet.com/engines/duraspark.html It is a world of knowledge. Also the Duraspark I and Duraspark II use different connectors on the 4 prong connector. According to the tech people at Auto-Tune ( BWD Automotive Corp. ) there is a Control module # PT 289 ( white insulator ) that provides 16 degs of cranking retard vs. the 2-3 degs that the blue insulator # PT 313 offers. I don't know if it is a direct ( blue ) Duraspark II replacement but the tech said it was and that it was intended for the 460 eng. ( I can't see how it would hurt to use it on the other engines ) Disclaimer: I have not used the White #PT289 and can not be held responsible if it doesn't work or causes harm. I have only used the blue #PT313. I would have bought the #PT289 if I had known about it before I bought the Blue one. Good Luck Dana ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 23:33:46 EST From: Tred123 Subject: Re:66 F100 Trans Swap Hello & Happy New Year To All My 66' Short Bed has original Manual 3 speed column shift. I would like to install a C6 behind the 352FE. Can I use/ modify the current transmission cross member/support or should I find a F100 that came with auto trans and use that crossmember? Are they the same??? Other than after market does anybody know what tilt column will swap in easily? ie model / year. Any help would be appreciated, sincerely, Fred ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 22:33:25 -0800 From: marko Subject: Re: Fuel tank, tranny rebuild At 10:17 PM 1/4/98 -0500, you wrote: >> I'm also looking for a good source of info for rebuilding my New Process >> 435 4 speed. The third gear syncros are going, it grinds going in to >> gear and pops out while I'm accelerating. > > Chiltons has some prety good info if you don't have the factory >manuals. It was a pretty straight forward rebuild as it was the first >manual transmission ever rebuilt. > >>A friend of mine suggested >> getting a greaseable throwout bearing, drilling a hole in the >> bellhouseing and running a hose to a 1/4 28 barb fitting or a 1/4 28 >to 1/8 female pipe thread fitting. This way the throwout bearing can be >> easily greased, what do you think? >> > > I would like to hear more on this. My throwout bearing is going >after only about 5000 miles, but almost all my milage is towing heavy >loads or serious deep water wheelin. It took me 5 years to acumulate >this milage, so I'm not that upset about it. I would like to be able to >grease it though. Where can I get a greasable throwout bearing?? > > OX > When I worked excavating we had a number of dump trucks, all with greasable throw bearings. Not that an Eaton 15 speed is anything like an NP 435, but it made me think: An NP435 is more than likely also a reasonably standard trans for some F700's of the early 70's vintage. Looking in my Chilton Truck Repair manual from 1974, I note there's nothing really indicating the existence of a greasable throw bearing except when the 14" single-plate clutch is mentioned. The bearing used with that one is greasable. As for rebuilding the 435, It doesn't look impossible. I had mine done by a shop but have the how-to instructions here. I could photocopy and mail to you if you're interested. marko in vancouver marko ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 00:44:51 EST From: Lee Craner Subject: Need help on my 73 F250 I've got a 390 in my '73 w/25,000 miles on the engine (complete rebuild by prior owner). The other night, I blew the top radiator hose (it literally exploded). After replacing it, the engine had no power and quickly overheated. A compression check showed 30 lbs on #2 cylinder and 155 lbs on #3. All the rest were between 120# and 130#. Both pushrods on #3 were severly bent, accounting for the higher than normal compression. The valves on #3 looked ok, as did the top of the piston. There was no obvious evidence that the head gasket at blown at #2. The head is currently at the machine shop being checked out. Before pulling the head I suspected I blew the head gasket at #2. Finding both #3 rods bent really surprised me. Any ideas how I can bend both rods and how this would relate to overheating?\ Lee ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 00:01:21 -0800 From: Kurt Albershardt Subject: Re: Need help on my 73 F250 At 12:44 AM 1/5/98 EST, Lee Craner wrote: >The head is currently at the machine shop being checked out. Before pulling >the head I suspected I blew the head gasket at #2. Finding both #3 rods bent >really surprised me. Any ideas how I can bend both rods and how this would >relate to overheating? Engine overheats & blows head gasket (or head gasket develops hairline crack and causes overheating which causes serious gasket problem).... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|