|
|
Return-Path: Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 03:50:27 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #407 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Thursday, January 1 1998 Volume 01 : Number 407 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Suburbans by Ford? [John Pajak ] Fuel Economy ["James E. Brady III" ] RE carb advice, blue ovals [Thomas Hogan ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion [Thomas Hogan ] Removing sway bar mounts [Thomas Hogan ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion [Tyler Wilkins ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion [Tyler Wilkins ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion ["Bill Beyer" ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion ["Bill Beyer" ] Re: carb advice, blue ovals ["Bill Beyer" ] Speakers on a '63 [Jesus Cardoso ] Re: carburetor/intake advice ["Dave Resch"] Re: 9" Disc Conversion [danadeb Re: Fuel Economy [danadeb Re: Removing sway bar mounts [danadeb Gauges [Jesus Cardoso ] Re: Removing sway bar mounts [danadeb RE: RE carb advice, blue ovals [Sleddog ] Re: Lincoln Rear Disc Brakes ["Dennis K. Austin" ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion [mcat RE: carb advice, blue ovals [DC Beatty ] Re: Engine Paint Color [DBrents105 ] Re: Suburbans by Ford? [Mike Blazek ] Re: 9" Disc Conversion [Mike Blazek ] ADMIN: Street Classics [Ken Payne ] Re: Suburbans by Ford? [Kurt Albershardt ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 04:49:48 -0800 (PST) From: John Pajak Subject: Suburbans by Ford? Anyone ever seen an El Detalle? Ford sold these in Mexico in the 73-79 era. They look like C#evy Suburbans! Wonder why they never tooled up stateside? They coulda sold ~millions~ of 'em. One of my Ford truck books show a photo.... === John Pajak JSPajak Lexington Park, Maryland http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://members.tripod.com/~JSPajak 75 F100 360/C6 (390 soon!) 68 Fairlane SW 351W/FMX +a buncha Oldsmobiles and a Suburban (arghh) _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 08:59:27 +0000 From: "James E. Brady III" Subject: Fuel Economy Guys, I am new to the list and own a 1971 F-100. It has a 360 with 4barrel manifold from a 390 and a Holley 600 cfm carb. The rest of the driveline is a four speed with granny low (is this a top loader?) and 9 inch with 3.70 or 4.11 rear gears. I want to improve fuel mileage. My first obvious choice is to get a taller rear gear since I don't even use first gear. The second thing I want to do is get 'The Ignitor' to replace the points. Does anyone have any suggestions for other improvements? I am willing to change to a more efficient cam also. The current cam is stock. I know this is not the most efficient motor but any suggestions would be appreciated. Jim ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 07:34:50 -0800 From: Thomas Hogan Subject: RE carb advice, blue ovals I have several friends who swear by the Interstate brand. I have never bought one myself but was considering one. One guy I work with gave me some of his tips on battery maintenance. He uses a hydrometer (sp?) to check the concentration of acid in the battery cells. If the concentration is wrong he adds more electrolyte. If the concentration is ok but the level is low then he uses distilled water. I knew to use distilled water but I didn't know about the electrolyte. As the chemicals in the battery react the electrlyte and water can boil off as gasses. I checked at a couple of stores and one had electrolyte and the other didn't carry it because of liability reasons. It is an acid and there are idiots/criminals (and criminal idiots) out there. My friend claims to have kept a deep cycle marine battery operating 10 years with this method. It was his trolling motor - -- full charge, run FLAT, sit long time, full charge, run FLAT..... now the battery in in his truck. Thought I would try his method. I usually get about 5 years from a battery just by adding water. Whatever brand you choose I would recommend getting one that is NOT a seald battery (NO maintenance). You cannot get to the electrolyte to check it. There are vents on the battery -- there has to be to allow the gas to escape -- and the electrolyte and water boil off just like a regular maintenance battery. I know Sears Diehard is still a maintenance battery. - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:02:13 -0800 From: Kurt Albershardt Subject: Re: carb advice, blue ovals At 09:42 PM 12/30/97 -0800, marko wrote: >Does anybody have any experiences good or bad with different brands of >batteries? I'm in need of a new one and am wondering what's what. Three words: Buy an Optima. Period. If you can spring for the $120-150, you'll never regret it. - ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 07:42:30 -0800 From: Thomas Hogan Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion Just to keep this thread alive, did Lincoln offer a 9" rear with disk brakes? Could those parts be adapted or swapped directly? I saw mention of a Granada as a donor vehicle. Did it have rear disk brakes too? Tom Hogan 76 F-150 390FE Super Cab (now featured on the best Ford Truck page's pictorial) 96 Windstar (wife's hot rod) PS. I'm on vacation and taking the list at my house, hence the change in my address. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 07:50:03 -0800 From: Thomas Hogan Subject: Removing sway bar mounts I may be going to parts heaven today. I located a truck with front and rear sway bars and since F-150s don't have them I thought a little swap is in order. The wrecking yard I'm going to is relatively neat and every car is on blocks about 2 feet off the ground supported at the frame. To get the factory front mounts off I will have to drop the front coil springs. Since front wheels are completely off the ground can I safely do this by disconnecting the shock and then unbolting the spring? If the sway bar, and shock are disconnected will the spring tension be released to allow safe removal without a spring compressor? Please reply to the list and cc me directly because I am on digest format and I would like to know if I am about to do something trully Darwinian before I go. Tom H. 76 F-150 Supercab 390FE 96 Windstar (wife's Hot Rod) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 11:11:52 -0600 From: Tyler Wilkins Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion > > Tyler If your still out there, you have my apologies for my part in the > "Great Ford vs. chevy debate"! > > I know I and at least one other responded with info! Did you get > anything useful? > > Dana > > P.S. Thanks to the other loyal Ford Folks for support! > --- Deacon I just had to ;) --- Yes, Dana I got some very useful info, just about to head to the boneyard now this morning. Hopefully be able to find what i need. Thanx for everything! Tyler Wilkins Milwaukee, WI '79 F-100 4x2 351M, C6, 9" '74 F-100 4x2 360 (68,000 origanal miles on whole truck) '73 F-250 4x4 360 w/390 Heads, 4-barrel '94 Explorer 4-Door ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 11:19:29 -0600 From: Tyler Wilkins Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion Tyler Wilkins wrote: > > > > > Tyler If your still out there, you have my apologies for my part in the > > "Great Ford vs. chevy debate"! > > > > I know I and at least one other responded with info! Did you get > > anything useful? > > > > Dana > > > > P.S. Thanks to the other loyal Ford Folks for support! > > --- Deacon I just had to ;) --- > > Yes, Dana I got some very useful info, just about to head to the > boneyard now this morning. Hopefully be able to find what i need. Thanx > for everything! > > Tyler Wilkins > Milwaukee, WI > > '79 F-100 4x2 351M, C6, 9" > '74 F-100 4x2 360 (68,000 origanal miles on whole truck) > '73 F-250 4x4 360 w/390 Heads, 4-barrel > '94 Explorer 4-Door > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ p.s. I forgot to put this in the above, I'm with you completely Dana. Just had to get my info in. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:03:32 -0800 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion > So what are you saying about MY truck! I don't have a blue oval in the > front but it's still a Ford. So if I don't have a blue oval, my truck > isn't good enough for you! Is that what your are saying. *g* My apologies to all of you "oval challenged" Ford owners. I certainly didn't mean to leave y'all out of the picture. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:05:45 -0800 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion - ---------- > Bill Beyer wrote: > > As long as the truck has a blue oval on the front > > who really cares what the guts look like? > > > > O.K. last one I promise! > > so if I buy a chevy truck and stick a Ford oval on it, its a Ford, > right?????????? ;) > > Dana Naw, that's called putting lipstick on a pig. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:12:48 -0800 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: carb advice, blue ovals - ---------- > From: marko > To: fordtrucks61-79 > Subject: carb advice, blue ovals > Date: Tuesday, December 30, 1997 9:42 PM > > Hey y'all. > > Well, just updating you from the great wet north. Lettuce is $2.00 a head!! > All of you seem to have got our winter weather, and we yours, sort of. The > sunshine is all of the liquid variety though. Yeah but that's $2.00 CANADIAN so it's really about $0.14 US! > Anyway, enough talk about blue ovals already! Most of us 67-72'ers have > block letters, doncha know. I happen to have two sorts: Ford and Mercury!! Once again, sorry about leaving all you "oval challenged" Ford guys out of my post. > I have been phoning around engine builders. Piece of advice to those of you > also shopping: become knowledgeable! Happily I have an oddball engine > (410) to rebuild so most people really don't know it's an FE. Those that > do, tend to know a lot. Those that know off the tops of their heads are > probably the ones to go to. Steve Christ's book (is he related to Jesus > Cardoso? :-0) was really helpful. Evidently, basically everything is > available, including new rocker arm/shaft assemblies. I am dropping it off > next week so will keep you all posted. > > Also, I picked up a spacer, wide cap, and wires for my Duraspark 360. Every > little bit helps I guess, I'll let you know if I notice a difference. > > Does anybody have any experiences good or bad with different brands of > batteries? I'm in need of a new one and am wondering what's what. I have had great luck with my DieHard. It's stood up to 4 years and 3 trucks including sitting in a project vehicle for 3 years on a trickle charger. I just put it into my F250 after the 2 year old Schuck's special died and it's still runnin' strong. > I looked at the website for that roll-on bedliner stuff--looks interesting. > Has anybody ever tried it? I would think it'd make an excellent stone guard > on the cab mounts and wheel wells. Any thoughts? > > Finally, since I am building a motor I might as well bite the bullet and > pick up a proper new carb. I bought a new Holley (sat in a box for years > but was otherwise new) and have had nothing but ups and downs with it. Fuel > consumption went up, my degree of happiness went down. Somebody please > explain to me what the difference is among the Holley, Edelbrock and Carter > designs (the builder recommended the Edelbrock, said "you bolt it on and > forget about it") and the plusses and minuses of each. Also, please explain > to me what cfm rating I shud use. The volumetric charts say you don't need > 700+ cfm until over 5000 rpm (which I never do) but what about lower-end > performance, fuel atomization, etc. > > Thanks in advance for all of your help! Here's wishing all of you a safe, > happy, and prosperous new year! Same to you! Bill Beyer Vancouver, USA ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 12:42:40 -0600 (CST) From: Jesus Cardoso Subject: Speakers on a '63 Hey Ya'll, A couple of weeks ago someone (maybe a couple of you) mentioned installing speakers in the panel of the doors of '61-'66 truck. I want to know what were the largest speakers that you were able to fit... 6.5", 6"x9", etc? The reason I ask is that I want to build a particle board panel to mount the speakers (I would not dare cut the metal in the original panels). One of the concerns that I have is adding to much weight to the doors and having them sag. Any ideas on how much weight is to much? On John Pajak's question on the suburban looking vehicles Ford produced in Mexico....I have seen a couple of them when I was done there. They are okay looking, fixed up they look really nice but if you look at them with no customizing it looks like Ford just slapped it together and did not put to much time on the design of the body. One thing that I have noticed about trucks down there is that they are not built with the same quality as up here. I know alot of people that would rather buy an old American truck than a new truck down there. They say that they are more reliable and are better work trucks. Thanks and have a Happy New Year. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Cardoso, a.k.a. Chuy Graduate Research Assistant (Power System Automation Lab) Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3128 w: 409-845-4623, h: 409-775-0737, fax: 845-6259 Personal Address: P.O. Box 2214, College Station, TX 77841-2214 e-mail: cardoso Keep in mind the following: - Minds are like parachutes, they only work when there are open. - Todos en el mundo sonreimos en la misma lengua. "All of us in the world smile in the same language." ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 12:02:07 -0700 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: carburetor/intake advice >From: Adam Clever >Subject: carburetor/intake advice > >'79 bronco, 351M (soon to be 400), Motorcraft 2150, manual > transmission. > Yo Adam: Wise choice to rebuild the 351M as a 400. With the 400, you'll have a wide variety of good pistons available to get the compression ratio up in that engine. All the aftermarket pistons made for the 351 Cleveland are compatible with the 400. BTW, which pistons are you going to use? What compression ratio are you looking for? If you don't get the compression up beyond 8.2:1 (the factory CR for the 400), you won't be as happy w/ the results of the rebuild. IMHO, 9:1 or so will make a significant improvement, is easily doable, and runs well on pump gas. >Towards the end of the rebuild process, I'm going to need a >replacement for the worn out 2150 carb. I've read and heard >too much conflicting reports about carbs and need some >more feedback to make my selection. I would agree with the suggestion from Jason Schechner (jas with a modest 4V carb. >I also will be replacing the cam for more torque, I'd like some >advice here too. Do I just tell them to give me the 'low-end' >model? Is it important to specify a 'RV' model? The important characteristics of a cam are the lobe profile specifications, such as degrees duration at 0.050" lift, total lift, lobe separation, and advertised duration. Look at the cam specs, not the "name" of the cam (i.e., "low end" or "RV"). The names (especially "RV") mean way different things to different companies and different people. The specs are the specs. IMHO, for optimum low-end torque in a moderately built 400 engine, you should look for a cam that gives less than 210 degrees duration at 0.050" lift. I would also look for total lift (at the valve) of about 0.50". There are several nice cams out there that provide these specs. You might also consider beefing up the entire valve train, while you're at it. I'd pop for at least a double-roller timing set w/ steel gears, and if you can afford it, some roller bearing/roller tip rocker arms. Overall stability of the valve train will be an important factor in long-term reliability and performance of the engine. (A nice cam doesn't do much good when the timing chain has enough slop to allow +-2 or 3 degrees variation in the timing.) >With a torque cam and a 400 engine should I just keep the the >stock manifold and get another OEM carb? I shouldn't need >very much CFM if my cam won't comfortably rev very high and >all I intend to do is idle over the rocks and trails (and use as a > daily driver), right? As I understand carb theory, at low engine speeds, a smaller venturi will give better throttle response than a large venturi. At a given air flow rate (cfm), the smaller the diameter of the venturi, the higher the velocity of the air flowing through it. When the air flows at a higher velocity, the carb is more sensitive to throttle changes and it provides more precise fuel/air mixture control and better atomization of the fuel. BTW, the Motorcraft 2150 carb used on trucks is rated at 380 to 425 cfm. In terms of the venturi size, this equates to a 700+ cfm four barrel! IMHO, if you want a simple and reliable emissions-legal carb (and manifold), I would recommend the Edelbrock #3771 intake manifold (with EGR) and either the 500 cfm Carter AFB (#9504) or the 600 cfm Edelbrock 1400-series EGR carb (#1408, I think). One snag with the Edelbrock manifold, you'll have top cough up an extra $40-$50 for the 4V EGR spacer to adapt it to the 4V carb. Even though it's made for the 4V carb, it comes from the factory w/ only a 2V carb EGR spacer (to allow you to mount the stock Motorcraft 2150 carb). >Opinions? You name it, we've got it! Happy new year. Dave R. (M-block devotee) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 12:56:10 -0800 From: danadeb Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion Thomas Hogan wrote: > > Just to keep this thread alive, did Lincoln offer a 9" rear with disk > brakes? Could those parts be adapted or swapped directly? I saw > mention of a Granada as a donor vehicle. Did it have rear disk brakes > too? > Ya the mid to late 80 and up Lincoln had a rear disk on a 9" option and I think it was the Versailles ( sp? ) rather then the granada that had the 9" with rear disk ( the two types of rear disk breaks are not the same ) There are kits for the lincoln ( see Curry Ent. in California ) I used the Versailles and made my own mounting brackets. turned the end of the stock 9" axle down and away I stopped! Dana ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 13:02:18 -0800 From: danadeb Subject: Re: Fuel Economy What kind of fuel mileage are you getting now? I'm Getting a whopping 7-8 MPG in the city! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 13:11:20 -0800 From: danadeb Subject: Re: Removing sway bar mounts With the wheel in the full droop with the shock attached I think that there is still some spring tension. if you have a jack put it under the axle then remove the shock then lower the axle. If you feel brave you might be able unbolt the shock and jump back fast enough to get out of the way ;) Dana ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 15:08:33 -0600 (CST) From: Jesus Cardoso Subject: Gauges Hi, One more question.... I am thinking about adding some aftermarket gauges to my truck, temp, oil pres, current, and rpm gauges. Can you all recommend any particular brand? Thanks. p.s. Do they just plug into to the same sensing units or do I have to replace them? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Cardoso, a.k.a. Chuy ('63 LWB Flareside F100, 292, T87) Graduate Research Assistant (Power System Automation Lab) Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3128 w: 409-845-4623, h: 409-775-0737, fax: 845-6259 Personal Address: P.O. Box 2214, College Station, TX 77841-2214 e-mail: cardoso Keep in mind the following: - Minds are like parachutes, they only work when there are open. - Todos en el mundo sonreimos en la misma lengua. "All of us in the world smile in the same language." ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 13:20:07 -0800 From: danadeb Subject: Re: Removing sway bar mounts Speaking of sway bars: I have found that some 80s LTDs have very thick sway bars that bolt on to the rear axle and only require two holes be drilled in to the lower flange of the frame to mount the ends of the sway bar. Frame rail distance might be a problem. ( I did the swap on a 1956 with 9" ford rear ) on the 56 I had to bend the sway bar ends in a few inches but every thing else fit great ( and it was all ford!!!!! ) Just a thought!! Dana ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 17:11:39 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: RE carb advice, blue ovals Whatever brand you choose I would recommend getting one that is NOT a seald battery (NO maintenance). You cannot get to the electrolyte to check it. There are vents on the battery -- there has to be to allow the gas to escape -- and the electrolyte and water boil off just like a regular maintenance battery. I know Sears Diehard is still a maintenance battery. - ------------------------------ some kinds are no maintainance but are accessable. i have several ATV/bike batteries like this and the brand i have been using most often, DEKA, for my trucks are like this. they are sealed but the caps are removable for maintainance. i also try to buy a HD battery for big trucks, dozers, etc. the batteries are less likely to be damaged from vibration - shock. the 1100 CCA DEKA HD is about $60 to $70 if i remember right. they are larger than light truck batteries, but fit right in on my 77 f150. it used to crank over a 460 with 11.5:1 compression and sae 50 oil on very cold Pa nights :) sleddog ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 22:03:47 -0600 From: "Dennis K. Austin" Subject: Re: Lincoln Rear Disc Brakes > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 20:12:35 -0000 > From: "mei > Subject: Re: 9" disc conversion > > I don't know about the dana 60 but the I am designing a kit for my 9" using > lincoln calipers and rotors out of a 82 to 92 lincoln---so far so good on > adaptions just got to design a caliper mount and route the emergency brake > cable--curry has a couple of kits available for the 9" and I think for a > dana or two. > > ------------------------------ > >Here is the bomb guys... There is an article called "The Straight Scoop on the Lincoln Disc Brake 9-inch." Its written by Ralph Lisena and is subtitled "If you're going to do it...Do it right!" This is about using the complete Versailles disc brake rearend. You can find this article in a pub called "All About Chassis, Street & Custom Rodding Illustrated." Its the Winter 1998 isssue and says Display Until 2/10/98. It talks about disc brakes, dropped spindles, hydraulics and air bags, and has a parts directory. $3.95 U.S. & 4.95 Canada. I found this on a newsstand at Books A Million. Its put out by Street Rodder Magazine. Besides, if its not completely applicable it should have some good insights on doing other conversions. - -=DENNIS=- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 97 17:39:46 PST From: mcat Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion Tom, I did a rear disc conversion last summer on my 56 efie last summer using lincoln 9" discs. They came from a mk5 which used a 9" disc rear. Some work was involved on the axle shafts and rotors but is mostly a bolt on. The truck uses a 66-72 truck 9" rear. The front uses a superbell mustang kit that was bolt on. Everything works fine and stops like a champ with the horsepower i~m packing. Garry - --- On Wed, 31 Dec 1997 07:42:30 -0800 Thomas Hogan wrote: >Just to keep this thread alive, did Lincoln offer a 9" rear with disk >brakes? Could those parts be adapted or swapped directly? I saw >mention of a Granada as a donor vehicle. Did it have rear disk brakes >too? > >Tom Hogan >76 F-150 390FE Super Cab (now featured on the best Ford Truck page's >pictorial) >96 Windstar (wife's hot rod) >PS. I'm on vacation and taking the list at my house, hence the change >in my address. > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 >| List removal information is on the web site. | >+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > - -----------------End of Original Message----------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Garry E-mail: mcat Date: 12/31/97 Time: 5:39:46 PM 427 Fe powered 56 F-100 Wild by design ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 19:12:46 -0500 From: DC Beatty Subject: RE: carb advice, blue ovals On December 31 Marko wrote: Does anybody have any experiences good or bad with different brands of batteries? I'm in need of a new one and am wondering what's what. > The last time I bought a battery (in July I think), I called the Intersta= te battery store and asked for a "blemished" battery for my truck. I guess these batteries are exactly the same as the high dollar Interstate batts,= but they have some little ugly about them such as the sticker being crooked. So they can't sell them at full price. I guess full price folks want a pretty battery. Mine isn't winning any beauty contests, it's starting the truck!! Mine has a melted spot on the top plastic. It's a 950 cold amp battery an= d I got it for $30.00. So far it has been perfect all winter. = Just a suggestion. DC Beatty 1967 F100 352 1974 Maverick 302 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 19:16:03 EST From: DBrents105 Subject: Re: Engine Paint Color The 65 was Gold., but I believe that the 66 was blue. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 18:15:02 -0600 From: Mike Blazek Subject: Re: Suburbans by Ford? Hold that thought..... There was a picture in Car & Driver a couple of months ago, showing a Ford "Crew Wagon". It's built off of the soon-to-be released F-350, and it's gonna hit the Suburban where it lives. (It is, in fact, even longer than a Sub). They were predicting a 1999 debut. Mike Blazek Baton Rouge, LA 73 F-100 460/C6 "That 429 P.I. engine was the best hundred bucks I EVER spent." John Pajak wrote: > Anyone ever seen an El Detalle? Ford sold these in Mexico in the > 73-79 era. They look like C#evy Suburbans! Wonder why they never > tooled up stateside? They coulda sold ~millions~ of 'em. One of my > Ford truck books show a photo.... ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 18:33:11 -0600 From: Mike Blazek Subject: Re: 9" Disc Conversion Tom, I should have thought of that earlier, but as I've had the flu since this thread started, I've been a little brain-dead. I have access to a 78 Mark V, that has the rear disks and I'm 99% sure is a 9 inch. I don't think that there is more than an 1-1 1/2" difference in housing width, but the Lincoln does have coil springs so you would have to add mounting pads for the springs. I'll make measurements this weekend and pass them along to the list.. Mike Blazek Baton Rouge, LA 73 F-100 460/C6 "Meddle Ye not in the affairs of Wizards,for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup." Thomas Hogan wrote: > Just to keep this thread alive, did Lincoln offer a 9" rear with disk > brakes? Could those parts be adapted or swapped directly? I saw > mention of a Granada as a donor vehicle. Did it have rear disk brakes > too? > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 20:37:16 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Street Classics Dear Ford Truck Enthusiasts: We have another new advertiser on our web site. As we've done for our other advertisers we're going to make a brief announcement for 2 days. This is the 2nd day. This is our way of saying thanks to them for helping us to expand our services to everyone here. Please show your appreciation to them for helping to support the web site and lists by checking out their site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/streetclassics.shtml (This is an "anchor" page that will forward you to theirs) Street Classics carries thousands of Obsolete and Hard-To-Find Genuine FORD and LINCOLN/MERCURY parts and accessories for your.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|