|
|
Return-Path: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 03:50:27 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #400 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Thursday, December 25 1997 Volume 01 : Number 400 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #398 [A66f100 ] Re: Married or Divorced [Don Grossman ] RE Gas Tank Filler Tubes ["Hogan, Tom" ] Re: Married or Divorced [Jim Henjum ] Re: 460 Oil Pan.. [danadeb Re: Three on the tree [Mike Schwall ] LeMans rods #398 [Alan Mittelstaedt ] Re: LeMans rods #398 [John MacNamara ] Re: Three on the tree [GMPACHECO ] Christmas wishes [Ken Payne ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:55:56 EST From: A66f100 Subject: Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #398 Thanks for the info. I have looked in several different catalogs and found repair panels for 67 and up, but nothing older than that. Mike B. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:31:55 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: Married or Divorced Jim Henjum wrote: > > Hello, > I've got a 75 Highboy with a 390/C-6/divorced 203. I am swapping in > a 460 with 4-speed (probably 435, not sure- maybe a T-18, I haven't > gotten it yet) and probably a 205 transfer case. It will be down to bare > frame at the time, since I am also putting on a 78 body as well. Should > I keep the divorced transfer case or go to a married? I would like to go > with a married because it would be a stronger setup (no in-between > shaft) and also I'd have room for dual tanks, which I'd get the side > tank from the 78. Would the crossmember used on married cases fit on my > frame? What will I end up with for a front driveshaft? P.S.- I'm > getting alot of parts (the 460, and also tranny, 'case, clutch linkage, > etc.) from a local wrecking yard. They have a lot of knowledge about old > Fords. > > Thanks, Ross (Jim is my dad) Well Ross, If you have all the parts off the 78 you shouldn't have much of a problem. All the crossmembers should bolt right in. Driveshafts might be a little different between the two. The front driveshft will be shorter than your current one so grab the one from the 78. The 78 should have the reverse rotation front axle and your 75 could have either the standard or reverse rotation. The drive shaft will be close but should work. Where you at I could use some 78 parts or parts leftover from your 75 ;) One question I must ask is why keep the 75 frame if you are changing the body also? Just get the complete 78 and have 2 trucks. It sounds like alot more work for very little gain. There must be an underlying motive.... - -- Don Grossman duckdon 63 Ford F-100 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44, power steering, power brakes, and now ON BOARD AIR! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 10:09:53 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE Gas Tank Filler Tubes Do it. DO it. DO IT!!!!!! Oh Oh OOOOOHHHHHH!!!! Seriously, I had the same problem on my '76. Out here in California all the pumps have that 'vapor recovery condom' and the end of the nozzle does not go far enough into the filler neck to prevent back splash. Really intelligent of the powers that be huh? "We'll protect the environment from all these nasty vapors (0.00000000000002473 gallons) by putting these things on the nozzle to make the user spill 3 gallons every time he fills up." (Which btw ends up on the ground and turns to 'vapors') I was sick of getting a gas bath on my hand every time I filled up. In December at 35 degrees F gas on the hand feels like frostbite city!!! Anyway I had decided to do the mod and I figured the easiest way was to swap the bed when along comes a lady and tries to total my truck, my house and a tree in the front yard!!! Thank YOU!!! After some quick dealing with her insurance I was able to keep the truck from being totaled. ( the bed was gone but all damage confined to above the frame so it was straight) I then traded the tree for enough money to repair the truck. After that I had to convince the body shop that 'yes a 78-79 bed WILL fit a 76 frame'. ( Look MR body shop I know what I'm doing JUST SHUT UP AND DO IT ALREADY!!!!) Aside from being without my baby for 12 weeks :0( I came out pretty good and the gas ALL goes into the tank. There are Two choices. 1 cut and weld the pieces in. or 2. swap beds. If you can get a new bed and you need a new paint job anyway I'd go that way. If you find a good body shop the cut and weld will work too. Just get enough of the donor truck to aid aligning the doors (Like the entire side of the bed). They actually did both on mine. Replaced the bed but it had 1 tank so they cut and welded in the aux tank. Been a year and can't see where the seam is. IMHO if you have the money it is definitely worth it. Makes the lines of the truck cleaner too. Good luck and happy holidays. Tom H San Francisco, California 76 F-150 SuperCab 390FE 96 Windstar 200 hp 3.8L (Wife's Hot Rod) >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 09:18:51 -0700 >From: Keith Srb >Subject: Gas Tank Filler Tubes > >Hi all, > > >1974 F250, Dual Tanks, Filler tubes that splash gas back out when >pumping gas. Has anyone every tried to replace the filler tubes with >filler tubes and swing out doors that are on the newer Trucks?? I >should be able to snag all of the need parts from a Salvage Yard. >Unless I am forgetting something, I don't think it would be to hard to >fit this stuff into my 74, would take some time to do though. > > >What do you think? > > >Happy Holidays! > > > > >Keith ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 12:58:04 -0600 From: Jim Henjum Subject: Re: Married or Divorced Don, You're right about the underlying fact- the 78 is a 2 wd with a 302 ( 35,000 on complete rebuild) and I think a C-4, so the body is the only thing worth much to me. The 460 (which I'm rebuilding right now), and also the tranny and 'case I will be getting through a local wrecking yard. That's why it's all going onto the highboy frame. I'm not going to mess with our '79, I need it for the milage, also it's still partly my dads. So if anyone's interested in the 302 and/or C-4, let me know. They might be available now (it would need to be pulled out), but I won't be doing any swapping 'till next summer. By the way, I live in western Minnesota. Thanks, Ross (if anyone's wondering, I'm 15 yrs. old) '75 Highboy Custom - 390, C-6, 203 '78 F150 Ranger - 302, C-4 '79 F150 Custom - 300, T-18, 205 -partly my dads '86 F150 XLT Lariat - EFI 302, AOD, 1345 - my dads > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > Don Grossman wrote: > Well Ross, If you have all the parts off the 78 you shouldn't have much > of a problem. All the crossmembers should bolt right in. Driveshafts > might be a little different between the two. The front driveshft will > be shorter than your current one so grab the one from the 78. The 78 > should have the reverse rotation front axle and your 75 could have > either the standard or reverse rotation. The drive shaft will be close > but should work. > > Where you at I could use some 78 parts or parts leftover from your 75 > ;) > > One question I must ask is why keep the 75 frame if you are changing the > body also? Just get the complete 78 and have 2 trucks. It sounds like > alot more work for very little gain. There must be an underlying > motive.... > -- > Don Grossman > duckdon > > 63 Ford F-100 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44, power > steering, power brakes, and now ON BOARD AIR! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 11:21:08 -0800 From: danadeb Subject: Re: 460 Oil Pan.. I have had 2 different oil pans in my 1970 with 460. the first was the one that came on the automotive engine, it had a front sump but only held 5 quarts and the drain plug was on the left ( pass) side. the person who owned the truck before me and did the eng swap cut a hole in the cross member for the drain. the second is a truck pan ( at least that is what the wrecking yard said ) it has a front sump with the drain plug in the rear. It holds 6 quarts of oil. ( the sump ts the same depth but longer then the auto sump ) Is it possible that the rear sump oil pans are from vans rather then trucks? Also I have herd of mid sump oil pans from broncos ( I don't know for sure but it may be 302 or 351W pans ) Good luck Dana ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 12:36:38 -0600 From: Mike Schwall Subject: Re: Three on the tree At 04:12 PM 12/23/97 -0800, you wrote: >My Uncle was looking at a truck as a "wheel barrow" on his farm. I didn't >get all the detales but it's a 76 or 77 F100 4X2 with a 300 I6 and a Three >speed manual transmission. As soon as I heard about the three speed I was a >little turned off. Since the truck will be pulling a load, does the three >speed have a low eneough first gear for pulling (anyone know the ratios)? I >have never had personal experence with a three speed, are they reliable? >Thanks I have the three speed in my '78 F150. It's a pretty tough tranny. - Except for reverse gear - it makes nice sounding noises ever since I floored it when trying to get out of the way of an on coming car. I have a 3.00:1 rear, and I have towed heavy loads with it - like 15' trailer full of cut wood - mostly Oak. A 3.50:1 rear would work well with the tranny. Mike _____________________________________________ Email: mikes Home Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.intx.net/mikes Ford Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.intx.net/mikes/fordarea.htm ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 16:23:37 -0800 From: Alan Mittelstaedt Subject: LeMans rods #398 John-- Do you know how far oversize the rods have been taken on the big end? Are they bushed on the small end? Are they verified as being straight? Does this dude have a decent reputation? $400 for a set of LeMans rods makes me take notice, but I have been burned on used parts thru the mail before. I am currently collecting pieces for a 427 Low Riser. I am interested only if they are good pieces, as they will see ABUSE in my application. Let me know what you can, and thanks for the notice! > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 06:24:23 -0800 > From: John MacNamara > Subject: Re: Lemans Rods > > am14 > > > John: By any other means of robery this would be termed a criminal > > act!! You stole those things brother!!!Santa came a few days early, > > huh!! > > Yea, got to take them back as it turns out he had a medium riser side oiler > motor for sale that I made an offer on and he accepted yesterday. It > already has the lemans rods. > > If anybody needs or wants these rods for that price, speak up as I pick up > the motor Saturday. > > Thanks > John ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 15:05:20 -0800 From: John MacNamara Subject: Re: LeMans rods #398 Alan Mittelstaedt wrote: > > John-- > > Do you know how far oversize the rods have been taken on the big end? > Are they bushed on the small end? Are they verified as being straight? > Does this dude have a decent reputation? $400 for a set of LeMans rods > makes me take notice, but I have been burned on used parts thru the mail > before. I am currently collecting pieces for a 427 Low Riser. I am > interested only if they are good pieces, as they will see ABUSE in my > application. > > Let me know what you can, and thanks for the notice! Alan: They are in mint condition. They have been resized lengthwise and in the small and large journal, magnafluxed and shotpeened with new Arp bolts. They are better than new. They were done by friend of his shop who has been in business for over 30 years in the Pomona area so he swears by the guys work. He just built a cammer for him so I think he knows what he is doing. They are not bushed on the small journal. I pick up the motor Saturday so I would need some money before then. Thanks John MacNamara > > > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 06:24:23 -0800 > > From: John MacNamara > > Subject: Re: Lemans Rods > > > > am14 > > > > > John: By any other means of robery this would be termed a criminal > > > act!! You stole those things brother!!!Santa came a few days early, > > > huh!! > > > > Yea, got to take them back as it turns out he had a medium riser side oiler > > motor for sale that I made an offer on and he accepted yesterday. It > > already has the lemans rods. > > > > If anybody needs or wants these rods for that price, speak up as I pick up > > the motor Saturday. > > > > Thanks > > John > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 21:46:06 EST From: GMPACHECO Subject: Re: Three on the tree Speaking of 3 on a tree, I would like to put a 4 speed in my 72 f-100 any suggestions of where to get one, or what type would work? Also any idea of the costs associated with buying new versus old (junkyard). Mike in Seattle ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 00:19:03 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Christmas wishes.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|