|
|
Return-Path: Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 22:35:58 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #352 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Friday, November 14 1997 Volume 01 : Number 352 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: What's the timing for FE engine? ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: now I am really confused ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: now I am really confused [Brian & Jacque Milbrandt I D #'s [am14 C-6 Slipping [am14 White sludge [am14 Clark 5sp [am14 RE: Stumbles on takeoff [Keith Srb ] Re: Cool Ford Events in Minn. [rick Re: Stumbles on takeoff [sdelanty Re: Hi i need some tips to know what i've bought [sdelanty Re: Slipping C6 tranny [sdelanty Re: Clark update [sdelanty RE: 1969 Lincoln 2-door --anything worth saving? [Sleddog 460 '69 Vintage [am14 Re: now I am really confused ["Dave Resch"] Re: C-6 weight ["Jason K. Schechner" ] Re: 460 '69 Vintage ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] MOPAR Minivan [am14 Re: C-6 weight ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Dist Won't seat [am14 Sudden loss of oil pressure [Alan Horwitz ] RE: Sudden loss of oil pressure [Sleddog ] RE: 460 '69 Vintage [Sleddog ] Re: 1969 Lincoln 2-door --anything worth saving? [DBrents105 Hello All ["Chris Samuel" ] Re: Sudden loss of oil pressure ["George Shepherd" ] Leaking Windshield ["The Zahn's" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 07:32:58 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: What's the timing for FE engine? > From: danadeb > Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 18:13:18 -0800 > Subject: Re: What's the timing for FE engine? > Are you saying that you have the initial advance at 28 deg? > If so how does the engine crank. I was playing around with the > initial similarly and when it got up to about 20 or so it would > almost not crank. My guess is that the vibration damper either isn't right or has slipped so that the TDC mark is no longer valid. Unless the rings are completely gone (physically) I can't imagine cranking at that kind of advance?? One possible exception is with some electronic ignitions which have various retards built in for cranking but an initial of 28 degrees would still put you way out of sync at 3k unless the mechanicals are stuck or erratic. Before I set my timing at 28 I'd check all these things out carefully cuz that don't make no sense :-) We've discussed this at length and the high performance guys say 10 initial and 34 - 38 total including mechanical and initial, all in by 3500 or so depending on useage. If your mechanical is capable of 13 - - 21 degrees then it's possible to have as much as 49 mechanical degrees in but with no retard available for accelleration etc.. If you really have that much I can't imagine how it could run without sefl destructing from pre ignition and subsequent detonation?? Do we have the right spares in our beast? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:13:21 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: now I am really confused > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 03:44:56 -0600 > From: Don > Subject: now I am really confused > Okay, now I am really confused...... > heads say D1AE-A1C > block says D1AE-A1C > > so are the heads from a 351C-2v and the block a 400 ? > as I am just starting to rebuild.....I sort of need to know what I If you have 335 series heads you have 335 series block too unless they're cleveland 4v heads then you could have 351w or 302 since some guys think all the hassle is worth it to make them fit but you definitely don't have an FE in that case IMHO :-) > am building haha...... btw.....what is a GOOD book with all the > numbers in it ? Get Tom Monroe's book on the 335 and 385 series by HP Books, I think Summit and Jeggs both sell it as well as PAW. He also has the FE and small block books out and they are all very good. Do we have the right spares in our beast? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 07:36:59 -0500 From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt Subject: Re: now I am really confused Don wrote: > > Okay, now I am really confused...... > heads say D1AE-A1C > block says D1AE-A1C > > so are the heads from a 351C-2v and the block a 400 ? > as I am just starting to rebuild.....I sort of need to know what I am > building haha...... > btw.....what is a GOOD book with all the numbers in it ? > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ Don, I do have a HP book on the FE & FT engines, also the 335 & 385, I got the information I sent you from theses books...And yes it is confusing !! I think you may want to check with your local Ford Dealer and see what they say. I'm in the process of rebuilding my 460 and the books are pretty helpful. I got them from Summit, there like $16.95 each. The books don't list your exact #'s. They only list the way I sent you before...D1AE-A...no 1C after it. Good Luck...Brian ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:39:57 -0500 From: am14 Subject: I D #'s I knew that --- Must have fumble fingered!!!!!!!!Thanks for the confirmation. >>You are partially correct. C=60, D=70 and E=80. The second digit is the year. Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:51:57 -0500 From: am14 Subject: C-6 Slipping I've never seen this either. Erratic shifts - no shifts yes, but never slippage caused by a vavuum modulator. I guess anything can happen though. I always thought that all pressure points were controlled by the valve body as supplied by the pump. Slippage is a fact of not enough compression of the clutch pack -- right???? Usually worn clutches causing the piston to reach its limit of travel prior to compressing the clutches or low pressure on the piston. Just my experience. >>A bad sucuum modulator can DEFINATELY cause the symptoms Ken describes, slipping clutches and all... I've been there, owned it, driven it, and fixed it before. Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:59:51 -0500 From: am14 Subject: White sludge Sounds like water in the oil to me. Maybe just a gasket, maybe much worse. Give everything a good inspection. Could be just condensation. I would drain the oil and look very closely at the very first drops as they begin to come out just prior to the oil plug coming completely out of the hole. Water is heavier, so will come out first. Can't help you with the engine ID. >>There's some white sludge on the oil filler cape ( i assume it's a broken head gasket. Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:21:04 -0500 From: am14 Subject: Clark 5sp 390 and 391 are the same so I am told. I've never confirmed this, but they are supposedly both the FE block - same bore, journal size, etc. What was the model # of the clark?? I need a 280V0.. I have a 285V23.. Don't know about the crank flange bolt pattern, but I would bet they are the same. 429/460 and the FE car crank flanges are the same, because that is where I got my flywheels for the 460's I'm running. (Off 360 trucks) >>I did some crawling around under a 76' F-700 and found a clark. It was packing a 391. Does the 391 have the same bellhousing pattern as the 390? howabout the crank flange to bolt on the flywheel? It definatly had the 13" clutch. The bolt spacing looked the same as the truck four speeds. Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:33:44 -0700 From: Keith Srb Subject: RE: Stumbles on takeoff At 01:04 AM 11/14/97 -0500, you wrote: >The Carter troubleshooting instructions that I got with my AFB lists >the following solutions for "Loads up or stumbles on acceleration" > >Check float level and drop. Reset to specifications. > >Excessively rich. Requires leaner rods or jets. > >Increase accelerator pump stroke. > >Check choke setting, may require richer or leaner setting. Manual Choke, fully open. > >Replace carburetor filter. Don't have a carburetor filter, have a large canister filter on top of the fuel pump. This filter is about half the size of an oil filter. > >You don't say what engine or carb you have, Check my signature for info on the 66, the only thing it doesn't have is the carb info. It is an autolite model 1100 1bbl, with an oil bath air cleaner. >and I doubt that you have >a Carter AFB, but your symptoms should have the same solutions. >(except for the metering rods). Generally "loading up" is caused by a >rich mixture, your float level could be too high, or your needle >valve leaking, or too much fuel pump pressure. Wouldn't "loading up", too much fuel getting into the engine cause an occasional back fire through the carb? >Starving on the other >hand can produce similar symptoms. This can be corrected by changing >the accelerator pump stroke and/or resetting the float level. > >Dan Lee >"53 F100 351C- 4V > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request >+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > Keith Srbherbie Mesa, AZ 1986 Ford Bronco II, 2.9L (I HATE LITERS) V-6, Mitsubishi 5-Speed. 1980 Harley Davidson, XLH, Rebuilt from the frame up. 1974 Ford F250 Ranger XLT, Camper Special, 390ci 4bbl, Automatic, Long Box, Style Side. 1966 Ford F100, 240 C.I. Straight Six, Warner T-18 4-Speed, Short Box. My Blood runs "TRUE BLUE FORD on Four Wheels and Pure HARLEY on Two Wheels!" ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:59:02 -0600 (CST) From: rick Subject: Re: Cool Ford Events in Minn. Brett wrote: >On a new note. Does anyone know of any cool Ford / Ford truck events >in Minnesota? Seems like most of the cool stuff on one coast or the >other. Major bummer if you can't travel much :-( There is a Ford only meet at the St. Paul Ford Truck plant every year. I missed this year but I think it is in late summer or early fall. Shows start around April and are usally end around Labor day. We need time to get the snow blowers tuned up. rick '66 Mustang '71 F100 '90? toro snow blower - -- Rick Larson rick Minneapolis ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:45:25 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Stumbles on takeoff >> Her dist shaft has *lots* of side play in it, so we will replace with >> d-spark setup soon. >I am going to assume that you got the duraspark parts from a newer 300/6, >correct. Other than that does everything else hook up the same way the V8 >setup does? Yep, all hooks up the same. Only difference is less plug wires. Our "donor vehicle" was actually a 240 in some kind of early 80's big sedan. Don't remember the model, but it was big, and light blue... >> We got all the d-spark goods at the wreckers already for $26 (-: >> Will probably install it in the next week or 2. >> Keep me posted on Your progress, and I'll do the same. >> Oh yeah, don't forget to check for a bad PCV valve... >I just replaced the PCV, plugs, points, wires, rotor and cap less then 5 >months ago. When I did that, I checked for side play in the shaft, there >wasn't any "noticeable" play. Since the parts only cost $26.00 Dollars in >your part of the country, I think I will try the new setup anyway. They cost ME about $40 at pick'n'pull in windsor for everything when I did mine! I thought *that* was pretty reasonable... When we went to the wreckers in sacto to get Her stuff, we got everything, including the connectors with about 3' of wiring harness, and a nice brand new looking rotor and cap and new 8mm plug wires off a different 240. The lady in the booth looked at our pile and says "Distributor, control box, coil, plug wires and 2 brake light switches, uh, that'll be $26. I'll be going back THERE again! Can't beat an under $30 duraspark conversion! Steve Delanty ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:45:32 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Hi i need some tips to know what i've bought > >Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 13:36:36 -0500 >From: Thierry Delattre >Subject: Hi i need some tips to know what i've bought > >Hi, i just bought a 79 F100 for 200$ canadian, >I want to be sure of which engine is in there, i would like to know >where i can fin the I.D. number on the engine because i don't know if >it's a 302 or 351 ????? If You count the bolts holding the intake manifold to the heads, a 302 has 14 bolts total, 7 on each side. The 351 has 16 bolts... Also, the front edge of the manifold on the 351 sits about "2 fingers" (maybe 1-1/2") higher than the top edge of the timing cover. The 302 manifold starts *right* above the timing cover. Happy motoring, Steve Delanty ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:45:41 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Slipping C6 tranny > A bad sucuum modulator can DEFINATELY cause the symptoms Ken > describes, slipping clutches and all... I've been there, owned it, > driven it, and fixed it before. BTW, I don't understand how the modulator can affect clutch pressures? My understanding is that it only pressurizes the piston that controls the shift but the piston would fully open the valve when pressurized? Can it be partially pressurized so the valve doesn't fully open? Do we have the right spares in our beast? - - -- Gary -- Hmmm, that's a good question. I guess I don't know why. Maybe the modulator gets sticky and slow to move and leaves the valve in some intermediate partially open state for a while. My first experiance with it was in a girlfriends '67 galaxie, 390/C6. It rather suddenly started acting funny. Spun way up before shifting, and then took *forever* for the clutches to hook up in the next gear. After several seconds, it would finally hookup and it would drive fine. We had several people tell us "time for a new tranny", including a local tranny shop She took it to. )-: A friend of mine mentioned the sucuum modulator and since it was cheap I figured what the hell and screwed a fresh one in. Hey! It be fixed! We put probably another 30-40K miles on that tranny before I broke reverse while being exceedingly stupid... (Yes, a C6 is quite heavy, but a guy and his girlfriend can replace it with only a cheap floor jack.) Years later, a friend had the same problems with his C6, a new modulator cured his also. Maybe Kens problems are deeper inside, but I'd put good odds on it just being the modulator... Happy motoring, Steve Delanty ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:45:45 -0800 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Clark update >I did some crawling around under a 76' F-700 and found a clark. It >was packing a 391. Does the 391 have the same bellhousing pattern as >the 390? Yes. howabout the crank flange to bolt on the flywheel? It >definatly had the 13" clutch. Yes. The bolt spacing looked the same as the >truck four speeds. I didn't have a tape with me, but I did the old >bailing wire trick. The shifter also looked to be about the same >location inside the cab. The Clark is also much longer. If someone >has a 390 and 391 crank to compare I would like to know. The cranks are essentially the same. The 391 crank is steel and has a larger snout where the front damper/pulley goes. If You turn down the snout to accept the pass car damper, a 391 crank will drop right into a 390 block and bolt up to the stock flywheel. I think the clark should bolt right up to the 390. Lucky dog, where's my clark? Steve Delanty ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 11:59:23 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: 1969 Lincoln 2-door --anything worth saving? i would keep the whole motor, and trans. if it is a c-6, it has the HD cluth packs i am told. if the motor has the power steering pump on the end of the crank instead of belt driven, it makes for a nice installation into a truck. and, these parts are getting harder to find. i dread the day i will need to fix mine. the cranks are different and so are the timing cover and wsater pump than a later model 460. the con rods may not be the CJ type, i do not know. the pistons are good if they are not too beat. the heads are good to keep, but make sure you keep the rockers too, or you will be buying new rollers, as i do not think that the rail type are available anymore, and the newer pedastal type won't fit. sleddog "There is nothing new except what is forgotten" - ---------- From: Chekerdpst Sent: Thursday, November 13, 1997 9:51 PM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: Re: 1969 Lincoln 2-door --anything worth saving? Hi everyone-I haven't posted much to the list, but have learned quite a bit by reading your communications. A friend gave me a 69 Lincoln today, and I am curious what parts I should remove before hauling it away to the local yard. The car runs and drives, but suffers from severe rust. A plaque under the hood says "11.5 to 1 compression" and "365 horsepower". I am thinking that this might make my 78 camper special really haul. (Currently powered by 460/C-6/non posi.) From your postings, I know to keep the heads, and probably the con rods and pistons. Any help much appreciated. Darren +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:00:10 -0500 From: am14 Subject: 460 '69 Vintage I'd keep the whole driveline. Someone might want the 9"rear, and the C6 might come in handy as a spare someday. I'd install the 460 in the truck, AFTER I peraonally went through it and replaced such things as timing gears/chain; oil pump, did a head rework as well as an overhaul of the block assy. These old buggers are quite impressive in stock form, and I think you can live with the compression as long as you aren't keeping it under a heavy load most of the time. If that is the case, I might go for a bit lower compression. >> The car runs and drives, but suffers from severe rust. A plaque under the hood says "11.5 to 1 compression" and "365 horsepower". I am thinking that this might make my 78 camper special really haul. (Currently powered by 460/C-6/non posi.) From your postings, I know to keep the heads, and probably the con rods and pistons. Any help much appreciated. Darren Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 11:04:00 -0700 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: now I am really confused >From: Don >Subject: now I am really confused >Okay, now I am really confused...... >heads say D1AE-A1C >block says D1AE-A1C Yo Don: According to my references, any head or block with the numbers D1AE-A?? is from an early generation ('71-'74) 400. The early generation 400 cylinder heads do not have the thermactor/EGR ports. The D1AE number w/ no suffix is from a later series ('71-'73) 351C 2V cylinder head. >btw.....what is a GOOD book with all the numbers in it ? IMHO, the BEST book you can get on the 335 series engines (351C/351M/400), is "How to Rebuild Ford V8 Engines" by Tom Monroe, published by HP Books, ISBN 0-89586-036-8. It covers all the casting numbers and other specs. Good luck. Dave R. (M-block devotee) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 14:02:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Jason K. Schechner" Subject: Re: C-6 weight It's about 140 lbs without fluid or torque converter. TC is around 30 lbs or so. - -Jason - ----- Jason K. Schechner - check out www.cauce.org and help ban spam-mail. ===The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has bounds=== ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 14:34:24 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: 460 '69 Vintage > From: am14 > Subject: 460 '69 Vintage > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:00:10 -0500 > I'd keep the whole driveline. Someone might want the 9"rear, and > the C6 might come in handy as a spare someday. I'd install the 460 That rear end probably has the 28 spline axles so isn't as strong as the truck axles (31)? Is a 4 wheeler really a 4 wheeler with no oil in the front end? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 14:49:42 -0500 From: am14 Subject: MOPAR Minivan Kevin: Did you ever get your neighbors Minivan going??? Just curious. Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 15:14:33 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: C-6 weight > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 14:02:24 -0500 (EST) > From: "Jason K. Schechner" > Subject: Re: C-6 weight > It's about 140 lbs without fluid or torque converter. TC is > around 30 lbs or so. Come on over to my house and I'll give you my bronco if you can pick up my 205 with your bare hands and walk away with it! Remember, Jason, they used to make them right :-) Is a 4 wheeler really a 4 wheeler with no oil in the front end? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:04:03 -0500 From: am14 Subject: Dist Won't seat Can't remember who this was, but did you ever get the Distributor to seat properly???? >> the distributor seated all the way. It sticks up about 1 inch. Azie ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:54:45 -0500 From: Alan Horwitz Subject: Sudden loss of oil pressure I finally have e-mail again, so I can access this list-server. I give thanks to Azzie and Ron for responding to my first message. I'm losing oil pressure, all of a sudden, on my 1977 F-250 4x4 CrewCab with a 351-M. It happens after a warmup of several miles at highway speeds. Everything seems normal until roughly 40 psi( 2200 rpm), then the needle on my mechanical S.W. oil pressure gauge suddenly drops to 5 psi or lower( I shut it off, at this point). When I restart the engine, the pressure is normal again, but the incident repeats after a few miles. The truck has 177,000 miles and the engine was rebuilt, supposedly at 100,000 miles with new bearings. Since I've owned it, the pressure was high( near 80 psi with 20W-50 oil) when cold, and much lower( at or slightly below 20 psi at idle in the summer) when hot, but I've always had more than 1 psi per 100 rpm. The engine runs smoothly with no bad noises and little blowby. I replaced the original oil pump shortly after buying the truck, 3 summers ago. The original pump probably failed because the crud that was sealing it was dissolved by the Gunk Motor Flush that I used to clean out the sludge. The symptoms were similar, except that the pressure decreased to zero much more slowly after each restart. The replacement was a Dana Perfect Circle high volume oil pump. How can it be bad after only 3 years and 13,000 mile?!! Even the pressure relief valve shouldn't be sticking in the open position! I don't think that sludge is blocking the oil pump screen because I flushed the engine thoroughly, and I've changed the oil frequently. I've never noticed gunk coming out when I change oil. I can't see how the oil filter can cause a pressure drop, short of having a hole in it. Can it be the oil pump, or should my truck and its engine part ways? Short of replacing the oil pump again ( a 2 day job for me, the first time through ) is there another remedy? Can anyone recommend a REPUTABLE brand for high volume oil pumps? Thanks for your help. Alan Horwitz horwitz ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 17:29:12 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: Sudden loss of oil pressure - ---------- From: Alan Horwitz[SMTP:HORWITZ Sent: Friday, November 14, 1997 4:54 PM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: Sudden loss of oil pressure Can anyone recommend a REPUTABLE brand for high volume oil pumps? Thanks for your help. Alan Horwitz horwitz melling and trw are popular sources and i have never heard any complaints against them, but then i never heard anyone complain about a ford pump either. it is just that when anyone i know builds a motor, they always get a high volume pump, even though it costs about 5 hp more than a stock pump. sleddog +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:11:45 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: 460 '69 Vintage , and I think you can live with the compression as long as you aren't keeping it under a heavy load most of the time. If that is the case, I might go for a bit lower compression. my first 460 in my truck was a 69 (or 68, the part numbers are 68 on most parts). 11.5:1 compression and a hotter cam. it ran on crap gas for just driving around. 87 would work, 89 worked too, 91 or 92 worked best. the motor would knock sometimes even with the 92 octane. it would only do this when i held it at WFO for a LONG time. when truck pulling it would start getting bad just as the sled stopped me. on the street i couldn't hold it open that long normally, and off raod i could only do that when running through deep snow on the mountain trails - and then 104+ booster kept the motor in line. i really abused that motor - it even went 20 miles one day with no coolant. if you want to use those heads, or any other, a little polishing to the chambers, and pistion tops allow 11.5:1 with extremely little ping or knock. but with a really big cam the static compression falls and allows more than 12:1 and pump gas when full throttle is n't used, and race gas when the throttle is used hard. the engine i currently run, has 9.1:1 comp and i have never had a ping-knock problem, even running 87 octane. i have even pulled using 87 with no problem, and no noticeable difference using 92 octane. it is a lot cheaper to run with the lower compression. gas prices just keep going up! sleddog "Defend me from my friends; I can defend myself from my enemies" ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 21:38:46 -0500 (EST) From: DBrents105 Subject: Re: 1969 Lincoln 2-door --anything worth saving? You have one of the '"Good" 460s. I would keep the whole engine and all accessories. I would also keep the rear end. It probably has a fairly high gear ratio but it should be a heavy duty 9". Much coveted by race car drivers. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 19:46:08 -0800 From: "Chris Samuel" Subject: Hello All This could be considered a test, and if successful you will be reading this; of course if you are not reading this I will be cussing a Microsoft!!!! Anyone know if/ where I can find the optional rear side sliding windows that were available for my 79 Bronco? Thanks Chris 79 Bronco, 400M, T-18, 4.56:1, 36 Swampers, & too many $$$ stuffed in it! ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 22:04:55 -0600 From: "George Shepherd" Subject: Re: Sudden loss of oil pressure Melling is a pump with a real good reputation. First I'd try replacing the oil filter and while its off, checking the check valve and pop valve which are part of the oil filter mount. Also put a mechanical gauge on a short stalk under the hood. Jump out and check it. I am assuming your 351 M has hydraulic lifters--a good sign is that they aren't collapsing. Sounds like you do have good oil pressure-its just not registering. - ---------- > From: Alan Horwitz > To: fordtrucks61-79 > Subject: Sudden loss of oil pressure > Date: Friday, November 14, 1997 3:54 PM > > I finally have e-mail again, so I can access this list-server. > I give thanks to Azzie and Ron for responding to my first message. > I'm losing oil pressure, all of a sudden, on my 1977 F-250 > 4x4 CrewCab with a 351-M. It happens after a warmup of several miles > at highway speeds. Everything seems normal until roughly 40 psi( 2200 > rpm), then the needle on my mechanical S.W. oil pressure gauge suddenly > drops to 5 psi or lower( I shut it off, at this point). When I restart > the engine, the pressure is normal again, but the incident repeats after > a few miles. > The truck has 177,000 miles and the engine was rebuilt, > supposedly at 100,000 miles with new bearings. Since I've owned it, > the pressure was high( near 80 psi with 20W-50 oil) when cold, and > much lower( at or slightly below 20 psi at idle in the summer) > when hot, but I've always had more than 1 psi per 100 rpm. The engine > runs smoothly with no bad noises and little blowby. > I replaced the original oil pump shortly after buying the truck, > 3 summers ago. The original pump probably failed because the crud that > was sealing it was dissolved by the Gunk Motor Flush that I used to > clean out the sludge. The symptoms were similar, except that the > pressure decreased to zero much more slowly after each restart. > The replacement was a Dana Perfect Circle high volume oil pump. > How can it be bad after only 3 years and 13,000 mile?!! Even the > pressure relief valve shouldn't be sticking in the open position! > I don't think that sludge is blocking the oil pump screen because > I flushed the engine thoroughly, and I've changed the oil frequently. > I've never noticed gunk coming out when I change oil. I can't see > how the oil filter can cause a pressure drop, short of having a hole .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|