|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:33:07 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #317 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Monday, October 27 1997 Volume 01 : Number 317 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: [none] [jniolon Re: 5 Speed and an FE ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: distributor update ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: '77 Door Hinges [John MacNamara ] Axle Splines [Jerry & Lisa ] Re: 77 DOOR HINGES [STCLASSICS Re: Parts "GOLD MINE !" [rick Re: Axle Splines ["dan jones" ] Re: Axle Splines ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: 460 heads ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Torque Specs.... ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] RE: 460 heads [Sleddog ] RE: Torque Specs.... [Sleddog ] RE: Torque Specs.... [Sleddog ] Re: 5 Speed and an FE [mcat Re: Parts "GOLD MINE !" [Brian & Jacque Milbrandt ] Re:heater ["art l" ] Re:heater ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: 5 Speed and an FE ["deconblu" ] Re: 5 Speed and an FE ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: 351C bellhousing pattern ["Dave Resch"] Re: Re:heater ["George Shepherd" ] Re: 351C bellhousing pattern ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] RE: heater [Sleddog ] what do you think? [Clssicford Re: what do you think? ["dan jones" ] Re: what do you think? ["deconblu" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 07:04 -0400 (EDT) From: jniolon Subject: [none] My '71 F100 has this red light on the dash, at the extreme lower left corner, just above the parking brake. It's about 3/4" diameter with a chrome trim ring around it and matches the general F100 "decor", but I always thought that some previous owner had added it for some unknown purpose. Steve, that light is connected to your brake balance valve...it indicates when one side of your brake system is inoperative. there is a piston in this valve that is held in the center position by brake fluid pressure. if one side fails it "should" come on to warn you of a pending brake failure. It should light momentarily at startup only to show its working...if it doesn't the bulb might be bad. Correlation to your new central heating system is purely coincidental. hope this helps.. culater John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 08:06:58 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE > From: "JAMES MERLO" > Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE > Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:21:07 -0600 > When did that ZF-547 debut? I think it was 96 but not sure. I read a brief thing in the ford net about the change due to the diesel breaking them in the 542 version and just before that they also went to the BW 1356 for the same reason, both are stronger versions of the originals (ZF-542 & BW 1345) I also had direct discussion with ZF rep here in the states about them and located a Michigan distributor, new ones are about $1700. ZF has a web site, which reminds me, does anyone watch Hercules and Xena? This week Herc was in a spider cave and when confronted with all the trapped men wound up it spider webs he made this comment: "What a big web site!" I almost fell off my chair!! :-) Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:00:08 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: distributor update > From: SARHOG > Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 18:50:21 -0500 (EST) > Subject: Re: distributor update > Try this #....C8VF-12131-B31 is on the old one, C8VF-12131-B44 is > on the new one. Hmmm...does that last number difference mean > anything? That's the engineering change number, I can look it up and see what the difference is but with the first 4 the same it's not likely to be anything major. > > out so that it interferes with the installation. >> > > Would the engine run like that? Keep in mind, the truck ran o.k. > considering the timing was probably moving plus or minus 30 degrees. When the engine died, were you able to restart it? The cam breaking could be the force that sheared the pin but I don't have all the particulars of the event so can't say for sure? As I said this is way out there but a possibility. What you take to be filing could be metal upset from the force of the cam etc.. Should be easy enought to determine with a remote start button or helper to turn the motor over while you look in the hole to see if everything is turning together? Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 06:02:40 -0800 From: John MacNamara Subject: Re: '77 Door Hinges Jerry & Lisa wrote: > Hi all, got a couple questions for ya. Our old truck has the sag in the > doors, guess gravity got the better of them finally. Anyway, we need > some ideas on where to get replacements; new or used. > What is the best way to go? Do newer model truck hinges work on '70s > models or are they different. We are interested basically in the best > price. > Thanks in advance for any help. Jerry& Lisa: Here is the part number D3TZ-1022800-A(upper) & D3TZ-1022810-A(Lower). They are still available from Ford or you can find them at any truck salvage yard. I replaced mine with one from a junkyard. They're about $65 each new. Thanks John MacNamara 78 F250 4X4 Supercab 67 GT500 66 Corvette > > > Gerald & Lisa > '77 F150 351M 4x4 > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:33:15 -0800 From: Jerry & Lisa Subject: Axle Splines We recently went to a u pull it yard and picked up a 9" 3rd member in pretty good shape, but it had 28 splines. Come to find out, our '77 F150 has 28 splines too! Well, the question is, is there any difference in performance or strength between the 28 and 31? Jerry & Lisa ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:20:54 -0500 (EST) From: STCLASSICS Subject: Re: 77 DOOR HINGES Jerry & Lisa, All the doors are the same on 1973-1979 F-series trucks, thus the door hinges would be too. Anything later will not fit as the doors are different. The part numbers that you need are as follows; D3TZ 1022800-A upper hinge, and D3TZ 1022810-A lower hinge. These will work on either side. Your best bet is to find new ones as used ones will probably be as bad or worse than what you have already. Check out our website or some of the other suppliers for genuine ford parts. Kenny / Street Classics ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:30:58 -0600 (CST) From: rick Subject: Re: Parts "GOLD MINE !" Brian, > Hey everybody, my son went to a boneyard to look for parts for a 69' > mach 1, I remember the place from my earlier days and the guy had any > part you ever needed for mustangs. He called me and told me this guy has > tons of old ford trucks. the guy specializes in fords, he has nothing > but Fords. I'm going to check it out on friday as its about 50 > miles away. but here's the phone # and address for anyone interested. > > Joe Kummer auto sales > 5849 190th street east > Hastings, MN 55033 > 612-437-6787 How was the gold mine? I've heard good things about this place but never been there. rick - -- Rick Larson rick Minnetonka ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:11:48 -0500 From: "dan jones" Subject: Re: Axle Splines >We recently went to a u pull it yard and picked up a 9" 3rd member in >pretty good shape, but it had 28 splines. Come to find out, our '77 F150 >has 28 splines too! Well, the question is, is there any difference in >performance or strength between the 28 and 31? yes. The 31 are stronger. Dan ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:30:32 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Axle Splines > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:33:15 -0800 > From: Jerry & Lisa > Subject: Axle Splines > We recently went to a u pull it yard and picked up a 9" 3rd member > in pretty good shape, but it had 28 splines. Come to find out, our > '77 F150 has 28 splines too! Well, the question is, is there any > difference in performance or strength between the 28 and 31? 31 is much bigger thus much stronger, more splines is stronger even with the same diameter etc. so 31 is better but I've pulled logs out of dead falls with big yanks with a 75 4wd van and still have the rear end sitting in my barn in good shape so the difference may be moot :-) If you're drag racing get the 31's for sure :-) Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:45:19 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: 460 heads > From: "JAMES MERLO" > Subject: 460 heads > Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:19:45 -0600 > What did Ford do to the 460 head in 1988 and later that makes it > incompatible with Edelbrock intake manifolds? Does this apply to > the Weiand Stealth also? They may have made some changes to accomodate the EFI stuff, don't know for sure though. This is the first I've heard of any significant change like that? What specifically is different? Ports? Bolt pattern? Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:48:27 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Torque Specs.... > Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:13:20 -0500 > From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt > Subject: Torque Specs.... > I can't find my book !! Can someone help me out with the torque > specs for the mains and rods on a '71 429/460. This will allow me to > get a few things done till I can locate my book !! I don't have mine either but 105 and 45 stick in my mind on those two specs? Torque to 90 and then to 105 and 35 and then to 45 for best results. Where's Dog? I know he knows :-) Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:44:10 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: 460 heads i was wondering the same thing but since i don't have any of these "new" parts i never really looked into it. i'll keep my ears open. in none of my reference materials here does it say what the deal is. why not ask edelbrock? they should know why it doesn't fit. sleddog - ---------- From: JAMES MERLO[SMTP:JJKMER Sent: Sunday, October 26, 1997 5:19 PM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: 460 heads What did Ford do to the 460 head in 1988 and later that makes it incompatible with Edelbrock intake manifolds? Does this apply to the Weiand Stealth also? +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:55:08 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: Torque Specs.... mains 1/2-13 95-105 lbsft rods 40-45 lbsft if you are using aftermarket bolts make sure you use their torque numbers, or the results can be catastophic. rod bolts (new) need to be torqued and loosened 3 times and proper lube used. always ffollow the manufacturuer of the bolts directions, not ford (unless you got the bolt from ford of course). oh, you are using NEW rod bolts, right? sleddog - ---------- From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt[SMTP:milbrand Sent: Sunday, October 26, 1997 11:13 PM To: Fordtrucks Subject: Torque Specs.... I can't find my book !! Can someone help me out with the torque specs for the mains and rods on a '71 429/460. This will allow me to get a few things done till I can locate my book !! Thanks, Brian '64 F100 shortbox '78 F150 4x4 '96 F150 4x4 shortbox '97 J**P wrangler +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:04:36 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: Torque Specs.... - ---------- From: Gary, 78 BBB[SMTP:gpeters3 Sent: Monday, October 27, 1997 6:48 AM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: Re: Torque Specs.... > Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:13:20 -0500 > From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt > Subject: Torque Specs.... > I can't find my book !! Can someone help me out with the torque > specs for the mains and rods on a '71 429/460. This will allow me to > get a few things done till I can locate my book !! I don't have mine either but 105 and 45 stick in my mind on those two specs? Torque to 90 and then to 105 and 35 and then to 45 for best results. Where's Dog? I know he knows :-) do the mains in three steps preferably. sleddog Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 97 13:24:00 PST From: mcat Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE Man some ones ripping somebody off! The local yards want $21-2200 for a real nice one and $12-1500 for a so so one. And this is even if they can locate one on line. Garry - --- On Mon, 27 Oct 1997 08:06:58 +0000 "Gary, 78 BBB" wrote: >> From: "JAMES MERLO" >> Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE >> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:21:07 -0600 > >> When did that ZF-547 debut? > >I think it was 96 but not sure. I read a brief thing in the ford net >about the change due to the diesel breaking them in the 542 version >and just before that they also went to the BW 1356 for the same >reason, both are stronger versions of the originals (ZF-542 & BW >1345) I also had direct discussion with ZF rep here in the states >about them and located a Michigan distributor, new ones are about >$1700. > >ZF has a web site, which reminds me, does anyone watch Hercules and >Xena? This week Herc was in a spider cave and when confronted with >all the trapped men wound up it spider webs he made this comment: >"What a big web site!" I almost fell off my chair!! :-) > >Broncos really are supposed >to have brakes aren't they? > >-- Gary -- >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request >+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > - -----------------End of Original Message----------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Garry E-mail: mcat Date: 10/27/97 Time: 1:24:00 PM 427 Fe powered 56 F-100 Wild by design ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:21:39 -0500 From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt Subject: Re: Parts "GOLD MINE !" Rick Larson wrote: > > Brian, > > > Hey everybody, my son went to a boneyard to look for parts for a 69' > > mach 1, I remember the place from my earlier days and the guy had any > > part you ever needed for mustangs. He called me and told me this guy has > > tons of old ford trucks. the guy specializes in fords, he has nothing > > but Fords. I'm going to check it out on friday as its about 50 > > miles away. but here's the phone # and address for anyone interested. > > > > Joe Kummer auto sales > > 5849 190th street east > > Hastings, MN 55033 > > 612-437-6787 > > How was the gold mine? I've heard good things about this place > but never been there. > > rick > -- > Rick Larson rick > Minnetonka > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ Sorry .. didn't get there, had to help pull my dad's dock out of the mighty Mississippi, and it took longer than expected...plus I had to work all weekend. will try again next Saturday. Brian ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:12:11 -0800 From: "art l" Subject: Re:heater I got a chance this weekend to look at the drain for the a/c, it was in the wheel well above the passenger tire. There was a dip of anti-freeze on it, but nothing else came out when I blew air into it. I don't think this was the problem, it is anti-freeze that is causing the problems. It has to be a small weep in the heater core, or something in the heat exchange box is leaking. I guess the only way to find out is to start pulling everything out and look for tell-tail signs. I was also thinking about using some radiator stop leak, then if the heater stops steaming It would be a good indicator that it was the core. I'm just not sure if the stop leaks work for the heater cores, has anybody tried it. I don't Know why it wouldn't work, the heater core is just a small radiator. Thanks for your help Art >Remember he said it smelled I.E. radiator fluid. I have had to replace >heater cores in an 89 mustang, 63 econoline, and 56 F100 all didn't have> >A/C and all had the same symptoms as were described and all had pinhole >weeps. I have had an A/C unit plug up and yes water goes everywhere but >it doesn't steam or smell (except that the carpet tends to gets musty. >That's a chevy for you) >Dana Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 11:05:42 -0500 >From: "George Shepherd" >Subject: Re: heater >Sounds like you have water getting in the plenum, but no heater core leak. >If you have a/c and the drain is plugged water can build up. If no a/c the >plenum is getting water from the outside. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:33:21 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re:heater > From: "art l" > Subject: Re:heater > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:12:11 -0800 > that it was the core. I'm just not sure if the stop leaks work for > the heater cores, has anybody tried it. I don't Know why it wouldn't > work, the heater core is just a small radiator. Thanks for your > help Art Yup, works great, stops up everything between the inlet and outlet so nothing can leak :-) Seriously, stop leak doesn't care why there is a hole when it finds one, it trys to plug them all including the tubes :-( I don't recommend using it except in an emergency myself :-) Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:23:07 -0800 From: "deconblu" Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE > Man some ones ripping somebody off! The local yards want $21-2200 for a >real nice one and $12-1500 for a so so one. And this is even if they can >locate one on line. > Garry 2200 & 1500 is a what? Where you at? Don't tell Steve or Don! We can.... Ooops, darn that reply to button! Deacon Blues deconblu ================================================ Visit The Deacon Blues Homepage http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dragonfire.net/~site/tbirdknights/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 16:41:59 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE > From: "deconblu" > Subject: Re: 5 Speed and an FE > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:23:07 -0800 > > Man some ones ripping somebody off! The local yards want > $21-2200 for a > >real nice one and $12-1500 for a so so one. And this is even if > >they can locate one on line. > > Garry > > 2200 & 1500 is a what? Where you at? Don't tell Steve or Don! We > can.... Ooops, darn that reply to button! I might add that the distributor said that was with a core and I think the core charge was about $400 - $600 so a new one was around $2200 without core or $1650 with core, something like that. Rebuild were $1300 as I recall :-) BTW, this is concerning the Ford ZF tranny for big blocks. It has an integral aluminum housing so can only be used on engines with the modern big block transmission flange :-) It also uses ATF and is sensitive to dirt and low oil levels etc. so is less tolerant of sloppy maintenence than the older cast iron jobs that use the 90 wt.. I saw one at a junk yard where the owner had purchased it to replace the one that he thought was going bad again in his stake truck but turned out to be the trans brake causing all the rukus. It's one huge chunk of aluminum, sort of like the C-6. Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 14:57:42 -0700 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: 351C bellhousing pattern >From: "Gary, 78 BBB" >Subject: Re: 351C bellhousing pattern > >snip > >That's interesting, when I checked on a clutch for my 351M is seems >there is only one diameter flywheel but two different bolt patterns >and sizes of clutch pressure plate assy only 1/2" different or so??? >Why? Yo Gary: In 1982 and 1983 (last 2 years of the great M-block engine and sensible mechanical clutch linkage in Ford pickups), Ford used a new flywheel design with the 351M engines so that they shared the same clutch pressure plate as the 351W engines. Why? Probably to save --. Both 351s use an 11 inch clutch disk, so the friction surface is the same size for both, but the 351W style pressure plate used a slightly smaller (less than 0.5 inch) mounting. I discovered this little anomaly the hard way recently when the bozos at Summit shipped the wrong clutch kit for my truck. I had to make a call to the Ram Clutch factory tech support to get it figured out because the tech guys at Summit had the wrong part number information. Dave R. (M-block devotee) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 17:19:11 -0600 From: "George Shepherd" Subject: Re: Re:heater I just used some Bars aluminum leak stop (heater core was leaking). It stopped the leak, haven't checked the heater yet. A norther just blew into Dallas. I figured a heater was superfluous in a Bronco With 3 windows which go up. - ---------- > From: art l > To: fordtrucks61-79 > Subject: Re:heater > Date: Monday, October 27, 1997 2:12 PM > > > I got a chance this weekend to look at the drain for the a/c, it was in the > wheel well above the passenger tire. There was a dip of anti-freeze on it, > but nothing else came out when I blew air into it. I don't think this was > the problem, it is anti-freeze that is causing the problems. It has to be a > small weep in the heater core, or something in the heat exchange box is > leaking. I guess the only way to find out is to start pulling everything > out and look for tell-tail signs. I was also thinking about using some > radiator stop leak, then if the heater stops steaming It would be a good > indicator that it was the core. I'm just not sure if the stop leaks work > for the heater cores, has anybody tried it. I don't Know why it wouldn't > work, the heater core is just a small radiator. Thanks for your help > Art > > >Remember he said it smelled I.E. radiator fluid. I have had to replace > >heater cores in an 89 mustang, 63 econoline, and 56 F100 all didn't have> > >A/C and all had the same symptoms as were described and all had pinhole > >weeps. I have had an A/C unit plug up and yes water goes everywhere but > >it doesn't steam or smell (except that the carpet tends to gets musty. > >That's a chevy for you) > >Dana > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 11:05:42 -0500 > >From: "George Shepherd" > >Subject: Re: heater > >Sounds like you have water getting in the plenum, but no heater core leak. > >If you have a/c and the drain is plugged water can build up. If no a/c the > >plenum is getting water from the outside. > > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:23:57 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: 351C bellhousing pattern > From: "Dave Resch" > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 14:57:42 -0700 > Subject: Re: 351C bellhousing pattern > >That's interesting, when I checked on a clutch for my 351M is seems > >there is only one diameter flywheel but two different bolt patterns > >and sizes of clutch pressure plate assy only 1/2" different or > >so??? Why? > Yo Gary: > In 1982 and 1983 (last 2 years of the great M-block engine and > sensible mechanical clutch linkage in Ford pickups), Ford used a new > flywheel design with the 351M engines so that they shared the same > clutch pressure plate as the 351W engines. Why? Probably to save Thanks Dave, that makes sense to me :-) They do that a lot but I think it was more of a phase out of the M block which prompted it so they could consolidate some tooling to reduce the last minute rush of switching over kind of like that 64-65 289/302 thing with the transmission flange. If they tried to change over a whole system at once it would be chaos trying to retool and get back up to speed etc.. I think that's how some drum brake 92 t-birds wound up with rear disk brake style front brake pads and rotors. I have one of those :-) Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 17:21:23 -0500 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: heater i wouldn't recommend it either, but i had a good experience with Bars brand when i first bought my f150. the radiater was so bad it would spring small leaks every time i drove it. half a bottle of bars and each leak would spring and then close up within minutes even if it was after i shut the engine down. i couldn't afford a new radiator at the time so i ran it that way almost 2 yrs before it blew such a big hole it couldn't be plugged, in fact it wasn't even able to be brazed shut. about $400 later a new radiater made things so much better! i am still amazed at how well the stop leak worked. after removing the engine i found no gunk or crap in the water ways, and i even ended up replacing the heater with no sign of trouble from the stuff. but, i wouldn't ever use it if the money is there for new parts! sleddog - ---------- From: Gary, 78 BBB[SMTP:gpeters3 Sent: Monday, October 27, 1997 10:33 AM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: Re:heater > From: "art l" > Subject: Re:heater > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:12:11 -0800 > that it was the core. I'm just not sure if the stop leaks work for > the heater cores, has anybody tried it. I don't Know why it wouldn't > work, the heater core is just a small radiator. Thanks for your > help Art Yup, works great, stops up everything between the inlet and outlet so nothing can leak :-) Seriously, stop leak doesn't care why there is a hole when it finds one, it trys to plug them all including the tubes :-( I don't recommend using it except in an emergency myself :-) Broncos really are supposed to have brakes aren't they? - -- Gary -- +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:01:40 -0500 (EST) From: Clssicford Subject: what do you think? I am putting the finishing touches on the motor installation in my 63 F100. I have the 302 in place, and was wanting some opinions. It is a 302 with an edelbrock performer,750cfm holley 4 barrel. Wht rear end ratio do you think i should use? Also, if my axle splines are 28, is it as simple to switch to 31 as just slipping it in or can that be done? View my webpage at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://members.aol.com/clssicford/index.com and tell me what you think. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:21:54 -0500 From: "dan jones" Subject: Re: what do you think? Also, if my axle splines are 28, is it as simple to switch to >31 as just slipping it in or can that be done? No big deal, (if you're gonna change the gears anyway. The problem I've had is finding someone to set up differentials. Everyone claims they can do it. Nearly all of them lie like dogs.) You gotta get the 31 spline axles. And you gotta replace the side gears. You might as well get a heavy duty yoke (for the big U-joint). No advice on what ratio for you. I have 4.56. My motor is a 300 six. 38".... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|