|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:31:02 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest To: fordtrucks61-79-digest Subject: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #267 Reply-To: fordtrucks61-79 Sender: owner-fordtrucks61-79-digest fordtrucks61-79-digest Monday, October 6 1997 Volume 01 : Number 267 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks61-79-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: roller camshafts [John MacNamara ] freezing block - anti freeze [Sleddog ] RE: roller camshafts [Sleddog ] Re: freezing block - anti freeze ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] RE: Cooling Fan Options??? ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] missed digest [jniolon 460 roller stuff [jniolon Re: Cooling Fan Options??? [Mike Schwall ] Re: Cooling Fan Options??? [sdelanty Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #261 [OBKBEE RE: Timing causing engine vibration and poor emissions? SOLVED! ["John F.] Re: freezing block - anti freeze [SuperMagot Re: Cooling Fan Options??? [SuperMagot Re:70 options [RL ] Re: Anyone ?? [Brian & Jacque Milbrandt ] Re: Cooling Fan Options??? ["Dave Resch"] Re: freezing block - anti freeze [Brian & Jacque Milbrandt Re: '64 F100 CrewCab Info [Jeffrey.Carver Block.. [Brian & Jacque Milbrandt ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 07:25:42 -0700 From: John MacNamara Subject: Re: roller camshafts Sleddog wrote: > yes, please post number-name etc. > > sleddog Here's the phone number of a Cam grinder in the San Fernando valley that has his own equipment and can make any cam you might want. I've forgotten his name but he is very helpful and will do his best to get you what you want. 1-818-982-3445. Thanks John 78 F250 4X4 Supercab 67 GT500 66 Corvette > > > ---------- > From: John MacNamara[SMTP:JohnMcn > Sent: Saturday, October 04, 1997 8:54 AM > To: fordtrucks61-79 > Subject: Re: roller camshafts > > Gary, 78 BBB wrote: > > > > > From: Sleddog > > > Subject: roller camshafts > > > Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 17:18:08 -0400 > > > > > searching has come up with the smallest one being about 280 > > > .570 lift. this may suit my needs, but according to the desktop > > > dyno runs best at 6000-8000. 6500 is all i really want to run, 7000 > > > is pushing it, so i need a "smaller" cam to deliver the power > > > earlier on. > > > > I second that emotion :-) That's about all I could find but I only > > have one catalog so far, Comp Cams. I'd like one rated for lower too > > but even lower than that. They are available for the 335 series of > > all things but not the 460??? > > > > I'll be listening to this one as to mods required as well. Wish I > > knew :-( > > > > The swift of foot and slow of wit > > have more off road experiences > > > > -- Gary -- > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > Gary: We have a cam manufacturer out here in the San Fernando Valley. He > made a cam for my old 400 motor. He will make you any grind you want at > no extra cost. If your interested, I can give you his number. > > Thanks > John MacNamara > > 78 F250 4X4 Supercab > 67 GT500 > 66 Corvette > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:34:34 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: freezing block - anti freeze hello all, last year i did a stupid thing. i didn't have enough antifreeze for the winter and a freeze plug blew out. (the hardest one to get at too!) this year, i won't be so dumb! but, i will be rebuilding the top end this winter/spring. i run water in the summer because of the possibly frequant disassembly, etc. so, can anyone tell me - if i just drain the water, can the block still freeze? i would hate to fill the thing up with antifreeze only to waste it in a couple of monthes. i realize that all the water doesn't drain. that is why i don't know what to do. i can't just start removing parts before the pennsylvania winter closes in either. the truck must be mobile as much as possible - and i can still start the motor to move it out of (or in?) the way without coolant for a minute or two. any thoughts? sleddog ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:39:41 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: roller camshafts thank you. i'll call soon and see what they can do for me. sleddog. a fellow puller also mentioned a place called cam dynamics. anyone ever deal with them? - ---------- From: John MacNamara[SMTP:JohnMcn Sent: Monday, October 06, 1997 10:25 AM To: fordtrucks61-79 Subject: Re: roller camshafts Sleddog wrote: > yes, please post number-name etc. > > sleddog Here's the phone number of a Cam grinder in the San Fernando valley that has his own equipment and can make any cam you might want. I've forgotten his name but he is very helpful and will do his best to get you what you want. 1-818-982-3445. Thanks John 78 F250 4X4 Supercab 67 GT500 66 Corvette > > > ---------- > From: John MacNamara[SMTP:JohnMcn > Sent: Saturday, October 04, 1997 8:54 AM > To: fordtrucks61-79 > Subject: Re: roller camshafts > > Gary, 78 BBB wrote: > > > > > From: Sleddog > > > Subject: roller camshafts > > > Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 17:18:08 -0400 > > > > > searching has come up with the smallest one being about 280 > > > .570 lift. this may suit my needs, but according to the desktop > > > dyno runs best at 6000-8000. 6500 is all i really want to run, 7000 > > > is pushing it, so i need a "smaller" cam to deliver the power > > > earlier on. > > > > I second that emotion :-) That's about all I could find but I only > > have one catalog so far, Comp Cams. I'd like one rated for lower too > > but even lower than that. They are available for the 335 series of > > all things but not the 460??? > > > > I'll be listening to this one as to mods required as well. Wish I > > knew :-( > > > > The swift of foot and slow of wit > > have more off road experiences > > > > -- Gary -- > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > Gary: We have a cam manufacturer out here in the San Fernando Valley. He > made a cam for my old 400 motor. He will make you any grind you want at > no extra cost. If your interested, I can give you his number. > > Thanks > John MacNamara > > 78 F250 4X4 Supercab > 67 GT500 > 66 Corvette > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:52:13 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: freezing block - anti freeze > From: Sleddog > Subject: freezing block - anti freeze > Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:34:34 -0400 > i just drain the water, can the block still freeze? i would hate to > fill the thing up with antifreeze only to waste it in a couple of > monthes. i realize that all the water doesn't drain. that is why i There are two pipe plugs in the bottom of the block casting for this purpose. I believe they are below the engine mounts. 1/4" or 5/16 pipe threads as I recall, one one each side. Noone ever takes them out so you don't think about them but they are there. Leave them out for the winter and when you go to put the coolant back it they will remind you to put the plugs back in, trust me :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:59:24 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: RE: Cooling Fan Options??? > From: Sleddog > Subject: RE: Cooling Fan Options??? > Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 09:42:12 -0400 > as the belts are tight enough on the water pump). also, the plastic > fan won't come apart ever, is extemely light and won't cut your hand > off if you ever get too close. electric is the best choice, but the Have you tested that theory? Remember centrigugal force will "harden" those blades considerably :-( > price! there is actually a certain distance the fan should be from > the shroud. All the OEM's I can recall working with pretty much have the fan centered in the opening of the shroud with the blades about 2 - 3" from the radiator. The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 10:40 -0400 (EDT) From: jniolon Subject: missed digest did anyone miss digest 263 other than me ???????? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 10:44 -0400 (EDT) From: jniolon Subject: 460 roller stuff reading with great interest the thread on the roller cam.. I would also like to see a mild 460 roller for my truck project but can't seem to find one other that the big race stuff. Also I had another question... has anyone ever heard of oiling problems with roller rockers and hydraulic lifters in the 460's. My engine expert is expressing some concern over my plans to use roller rockers and hyd lifters..saying that without the lash of solids that insufficient oiling might be a problem How's bout it guys...your opinions please john ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 11:13:34 -0500 From: Mike Schwall Subject: Re: Cooling Fan Options??? At 09:06 PM 10/5/97 -0500, you wrote: >List, > >OK guys it's time to haul out those opinions again! Should I ; > > 1) Go to the boneyard and dig up a stock fan/thermostatic clutch set-up. > > 2) Get a new flex fan with spacers to get it centered in the shroud >opening. > > 3) Pitch the flex fan and go with an electric fan set-up. > >I'm leaning toward the electric fan but am interested in hearing your >opinions. Go to the junk yard and find a good 7 blade clutch fan. I found one for mine off of a '79 F250 with thermal fan clutch. Cost me $5.00. Then go to the local parts house and buy a heavy duty thermal fan clutch for your truck. Take your new fan along to make sure the bolt holes line up. I'd stay away from electric fans unless you have a 90 amp or higher alternator. With the lights on, A/C on max, and the fans going, your going to be pretty close to maxing out a stock 60 amp alternator. If you get stuck in traffic a lot, you'll end up replacing batteries every other year. Alternators don't charge very much at idle. My $.02 Mike _____________________________________________ Email: mikes Home Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.intx.net/mikes Ford Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.intx.net/mikes/fordarea.htm ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 09:33:48 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: Cooling Fan Options??? >My question is >about the fan. Should I ; > > 1) Go to the boneyard and dig up a stock fan/thermostatic clutch set-up. > > 2) Get a new flex fan with spacers to get it centered in the shroud >opening. > > 3) Pitch the flex fan and go with an electric fan set-up. > >I'm leaning toward the electric fan but am interested in hearing your >opinions. I've read some negative comments about electric fans not moving >enough air for slow desert crawling, etc. While I'm not currently planning >any outing like that stop-n-go traffic is a real possibility. > >I'm looking forward to your comments. I vote for #3! I put a pair of electrics on my 71 F100. The 390 and stock modine radiator had a tendancy to overheat on hot days when idling for long periods. It would puke pretty bad on hot days. Now I've got a 12" and a 14" fan side by side on the stock rad, and it *never* overheats, even on the hottest days. My electrics move MUCH more air than the stock FE fan ever did! I sometimes sit idling or moving slowly on 100+ CA days. No problem. The electrics are quieter, eat less HP off the crank, only run when needed, and remove that heavy load that spins way out on the end of Your water pump shaft.(I expect my H2O pump bearings to last MUCH longer) A mechanical fan moves the most air when You need it least, (at speed) and the least air when You need it most. (idling) Mechanicals also eat tons of Horspower at high RPM's. (Even clutched fans and flex fans, altho they are some better) Electrics are much more efficient, and only run when needed. At any sustained speed over about 25MPH mine are off... Electrics also eat up less space in the engine compartment, and they are MUCH less likely to chop Yer fingers off if You do something STOOPID... I think that electrics are far superior in every respect.(except price) Mine were about $55 each at the local parts chain. Electric fans were one of the best mods I've done to my truck. They work very well and I have no regrets, other than I didn't install them sooner. Happy motoring, Steve Delanty ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:50:56 -0400 (EDT) From: OBKBEE Subject: Re: fordtrucks61-79-digest V1 #261 Dear Sir, I have been tryng to geyt only the pre-61 digest. I only get the 61-79 I didn''t do something right. Suggestions appreciated, thank you very much, obkbee ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 12:49:14 -0400 From: "John F. Bauer III" Subject: RE: Timing causing engine vibration and poor emissions? SOLVED! Thanks all for the tips. I'd taken the wires off, cleaned them up, put thme back on, etc. Well, for the fun of it, after much other inspection, re-seated them again this past Sunday, and vroom, totally smooth running/firing engine. After much head scratching, I guess it might just have been a faulty wire. What a massive pain, especially after checking it previously. Well, chalk it up as a school boy error. Made it around the block with massive improvement in engine vibration, noise, power, just about everything, then the fuel pump died (clear fuel filter shows gas drains dry back to the tank with engine off, engine won't stay running unless pedal constantly pumped) as I coasted back into the driveway. John At 02:17 PM 10/5/97 -0700, you wrote: >I have a similar problem with my 460 shaking at idle. I always thought >it was normal! > >Has the distributor or vacuum advance canister been replaced recently? >I went through hell because the rebuilder puts on what ever vacuum >canister they seem to have. ( all canisters are not the same. The dual >type seem to be particularly troublesome allowing mass amounts of >advance) I like Sleddogs' idea and would suggest you go one step further >use a timing light to find out what is going on. ( my $.02 is with too >much vacuum advance available initial would have to be retarded way too >much to allow the rest of the ignition timing to be correct ) although >the problem is probably carb related since it runs fine at higher RPMs. >Did it pass a (if there is one ) high RPM test ? > >E-Mail me directly and I will go into detail regarding vac advance as I >know it. > >Dana >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 thru 1979 --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks61-79 >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks61-79-request >+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 13:23:03 -0400 (EDT) From: SuperMagot Subject: Re: freezing block - anti freeze My $0.02 - Put in the proper mix of antifreeze/water, run the engine for a few minutes to circulate it, then drain it. The antifreeze/water mix can be kept over the winter in a container or used somewhere else. I strongly suggest YOU DO NOT leave any amount of pure water in the engine. Even a small pocket can freeze and expand and break something. Antifreeze is cheap compared to tearing down a block!! Also, running pure water at any time is bad idea. Modern antifreeze also contains anti-rust compounds. Pure water will rust out the inside of your cooling system no matter the tempature. Again, anti-freeze is cheap. Being cheap in the short run often costs in the long run! - - Mike ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 13:26:59 -0400 (EDT) From: SuperMagot Subject: Re: Cooling Fan Options??? One thing to keep in mind about electrics, some of them come with those little plastic wires that stick throught the radiator fins. These things will vibrate and bounce around over time and break your radiator. (Speaking from experience) I strongly suggest you build a permamement mounting bracket or frame for your fans so that the fans weight are NOT supported by the radiator itself. - - Mike ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:35:11 -0500 (CDT) From: RL Subject: Re:70 options Okay I was out looking at trucks at the local sell your own. Saw a really nice blue 73&up Custom and a 70 3 spd. Well the 70 had what looked like to me a sun visor from JCW. But on the info list the guy said it was a rare factory fiberglass eye(?)(I can't remeber what he called it) Anway I've never seen that before on a truck. It is all in black striaght body no rust. Had outdated Louisianina(sp) plates. On more thing. On the 73 it had aftermarket side mirrors but they didn't cover up the old holes and it left a big hole in the drivers door. Repainted and looked sharp. So is it hard to fix that? I wouldn't buy it because of the door bing rusted out. Thanks Ryan 1971 Torino 500, 1971 F-100, 1977 Hornet Sportabout, 1978 New Yorker e-mail: st0478 Homepage: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/9027 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 12:40:45 -0500 From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt Subject: Re: Anyone ?? I'm looking to rebuild fresh, I originally had block bored .30 over, new trw 10.50:1 pistons, rhoades cam & lifters, performer manifold, L&L headers, Holley 650...and was quite happy. I'm not a real motor head, I'm more into the drive line/suspension stuff. I'm looking to make this motor get up and go!!. I've had block boiled and new frost plugs and cam bearings installed. I'm sending crank out for fresh grinding and bearings matched. But from there I'm not sure as to what path to take. I'm thinking about a 292 cam with matched springs & lifters. heavy pushrods, Possible the performer rpm manifold, a gear drive, possibly a predator carb. Don't know much about what I'd need for a torque convertor. and really if that cam would do what I want. Basically I want to have a noticable lopey idle, and lots of low end power. the 64' f100 will be a toy...not a daily driver...but I want to be able to take it on a long cruise. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 11:44:54 -0600 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: Cooling Fan Options??? Yo Dale: Here are my 0.02 worth of fan opinions. >1) Go to the boneyard and dig up a stock fan/thermostatic clutch set-up. This would be my first recommendation. The stock fan will move way more air than anything comparable in electric units. As far as I know, the M-block engines in trucks never used fan clutches, always direct drive on the front of the water pump. The stock fan will probably move air better than the flex fan, but the flex fan might give you better performance (eat less hp) at higher revs. The flex fan is probably lighter, which would save you a couple of pounds of weight, if you care about that. >2) Get a new flex fan with spacers to get it centered in the shroud opening. This is my second-best choice. At least replace the fan so that you have full coverage, or the maximum air movement that the fan can produce. I have toyed w/ the idea of trying a flex fan, but I'm skeptical that it would provide the air flow necessary and be a worthwhile performance enhancement at 4K rpm or less. The factory fan in my truck w/ 351M is a five blade job w/ odd spacing (prevents harmonic noises). Behind the fan is a four inch spacer that sits on the front of the water pump. From blade tip to shroud is about 1 inch at top, over two inches at bottom (not centered, obviously). The fan is spaced so that the blades are about halfway into the shroud. >3) Pitch the flex fan and go with an electric fan set-up. Don't do it, unless ambient air temperature never gets above 80F and you don't do stop & go city driving. I read an article in one of the 4x4 rags a while back that a decent stock fan moves at least twice as much air w/ the engine at idle(!) than an electric fan of the same size. With the engine at speed, the elec fan is even weaker by comparison. Dave R. (M-block devotee) 1980 F250 4x4 351M ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 12:48:56 -0500 From: Brian & Jacque Milbrandt Subject: Re: freezing block - anti freeze I can tell you that up here in Minnesota it gets real cold... I drain the water from my boat (inboard) and put nothing back in and it hasn't cracked or pushed out a plug in the 37 years its been in our family. As the water freezes...if any left it will take the easiest path as it expands. so it will move through the water jackets that are empty. before forcing its way through the block. Brian ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:47:16 -0700 From: Jeffrey.Carver Subject: Re: '64 F100 CrewCab Info.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|