|
|
Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages contained in these archives without consent from the respective author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors. Received: with LISTAR (v0.128a; list 61-79-list); Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:36:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:36:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server To: 61-79-list digest users Reply-to: 61-79-list Subject: 61-79-list Digest V2000 #81 Precedence: bulk ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 61-79-list Digest Tue, 25 Apr 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 081 In This Issue: Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Re: cargo light gasket Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: cargo light gasket Re: 460 vs Modified Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: root beer truck Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: 9 inch gear swap Re: 460 vs Modified Re: Fans Re: Fans 20th century Lincoln 4x4 Ford 390cid for sale Re: Fans Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: Tailgate for sale Re: Engine identity Re: cargo light gasket 66 Merc for sale The Muny Pit Trucks for sale Re: Intermittent wipers. Re: 9 inch gear swap ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 09:57:52 -0700 From: Jeff Harsha Subject: Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket AutoKrafters, LMC and Dennis Carpenter all have ------------------------------ From: Matt Senn Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:02:08 -0700 isn't there a filter on the list to keep this type of posting error (Michael_Taylor -----Original Message----- From: Michael_Taylor Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:34 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. Matt Senn Please respond to 61-79-list Sent by: 61-79-list-bounce To: 61-79-list cc: Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. thanks!!! motorcraft still sells the switch but the box is discontinued . . . now i know where to get mine . . . -----Original Message----- From: Steve Schaefer [mailto:schaefer Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 9:54 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Intermittent wipers. Good morning. This is a not to all on the list that want intermittent wipers on there 73-79 Ford trucks. I had been searching high and low ant the local yards for the box and the switch for my truck. Unable to find 1 in a truck I went looking else where. The cars of the 70's have a totally different plug, so I scrapped that idea for a bit. Last weekend I found an 87 Ford truck with the intermittent wipers, so I grabbed the switch and control box. Low and behold, plugs right in. The only minor difference is that the new switch has a separate ground wire. No big deal. Both of my trucks now have intermittent wipers. Next project, factory power windows. Just thought I would share. Steve S. 77 F-250 Supercab 76 F-350 Crew cab http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ From: Matt Senn Subject: Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:03:46 -0700 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dennis-carpenter.com . . . part # C7TZ-13790-A price $18.50 . . . hope this helps -----Original Message----- From: Southerland, Rich [mailto:rsouther Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:35 AM To: '61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] 67-72 cargo light gasket Scored a cargo light, switch and all the wiring off of a '69 Ranger and plan to install it on dad's '67. The switch, wiring, and light (I was suprised to find out it's REAL glass and not plastic) are in excellent condition (paid $7.50 for the lot!), but the rubber gasket, while intact, is starting to disintegrate. Does anyone know if this is being repro'ed? Thanks in advance! Rich '77E150 '67 F100 (dads) ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ From: Michael_Taylor Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:51:16 -0400 Any idea how to really unsubscribe? I've tried the web page, sending email, etc... You think you're getting killed... I'm getting several copies of every email going to the list.... "Southerland, Rich" 12:37:33 PM Please respond to 61-79-list Sent by: 61-79-list-bounce To: "'61-79-list cc: Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. AAAAUUUUGGGHHHH!!!!! Make it stop!!!! (Wishing I was on digest today!) Might want to cut down on the cappuccino, Michael... :) ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ From: Matt Senn Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:06:17 -0700 sorry, i guess i could have asked this earlier but what "kind" of 87 Ford truck (ranger, bronco, 150, 250, 350, van)?? -----Original Message----- From: Steve Schaefer [mailto:schaefer Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 9:54 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Intermittent wipers. Good morning. This is a not to all on the list that want intermittent wipers on there 73-79 Ford trucks. I had been searching high and low ant the local yards for the box and the switch for my truck. Unable to find 1 in a truck I went looking else where. The cars of the 70's have a totally different plug, so I scrapped that idea for a bit. Last weekend I found an 87 Ford truck with the intermittent wipers, so I grabbed the switch and control box. Low and behold, plugs right in. The only minor difference is that the new switch has a separate ground wire. No big deal. Both of my trucks now have intermittent wipers. Next project, factory power windows. Just thought I would share. Steve S. 77 F-250 Supercab 76 F-350 Crew cab http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ From: skordik Subject: Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:12:14 -0500 Try LMC Truck (1-800-222-5664) http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://lmctruck.com They list all of the parts for the lamp. They show two rubber parts, one is the seal for the lens, it cost $5.95 the other is a pad for the entire light, it is listed for $22.95 I hope this helps. Steve Kordik > -----Original Message----- > Southerland, Rich > Scored a cargo light, switch and all the wiring off of a '69 > Ranger and plan > to install it on dad's '67. The switch, wiring, and light (I > was suprised > to find out it's REAL glass and not plastic) are in excellent > condition > (paid $7.50 for the lot!), but the rubber gasket, while > intact, is starting __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://im.yahoo.com ------------------------------ From: Michael_Taylor Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:15:54 -0400 For those of you who are wondering... yes.. I'm having problems with my email. I'm getting numerous copies of emails, as well as sending numerous copies... I've tried unsubscribing through the web page, as well as sending an email, as the instructions say... but I'm still subscribed, and still getting numerous copies of all emails. Anyone have the ability to unsubscribe me.... please feel free... geeze.. Matt Senn Please respond to 61-79-list Sent by: 61-79-list-bounce To: 61-79-list cc: Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. isn't there a filter on the list to keep this type of posting error (Michael_Taylor -----Original Message----- From: Michael_Taylor Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:34 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. Matt Senn Please respond to 61-79-list Sent by: 61-79-list-bounce To: 61-79-list cc: Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. thanks!!! motorcraft still sells the switch but the box is discontinued . . . now i know where to get mine . . . -----Original Message----- From: Steve Schaefer [mailto:schaefer Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 9:54 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Intermittent wipers. Good morning. This is a not to all on the list that want intermittent wipers on there 73-79 Ford trucks. I had been searching high and low ant the local yards for the box and the switch for my truck. Unable to find 1 in a truck I went looking else where. The cars of the 70's have a totally different plug, so I scrapped that idea for a bit. Last weekend I found an 87 Ford truck with the intermittent wipers, so I grabbed the switch and control box. Low and behold, plugs right in. The only minor difference is that the new switch has a separate ground wire. No big deal. Both of my trucks now have intermittent wipers. Next project, factory power windows. Just thought I would share. Steve S. 77 F-250 Supercab 76 F-350 Crew cab http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:18:02 -0500 Subject: Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket From: "John LaGrone" > Scored a cargo light, switch and all the wiring off of a '69 Ranger and plan > to install it on dad's '67. The switch, wiring, and light (I was suprised > to find out it's REAL glass and not plastic) are in excellent condition > (paid $7.50 for the lot!), but the rubber gasket, while intact, is starting > to disintegrate. Does anyone know if this is being repro'ed? > > Thanks in advance! > Rich Rich, You might try LMC Truck. They have a lot of that type stuff. I don't have my catalog here at work. Oops, I don't think my catalog goes back to 67. Their web site is http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.lmctruck.com If it isn't on their website, you can order a free catalog for your year range. -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom, Long Wide Bed, Regular Cab, 351M, C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! ------------------------------ From: "Southerland, Rich" Subject: Re: 67-72 cargo light gasket Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:26:58 -0700 Thanks everyone! Dennis Carpenter has the gasket (pad) for $18.50 and LMC has it for $22.95. I have ordered catalogs from both companies. Looks like I may have opened a can of worms for dad with this one as a short search through dennis' site produced several things he's been looking for... He and I thank you (his wallet and my mother do not) ;-) ------------------------------ From: "Tim Neasham" Subject: Re: cargo light gasket Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:32:21 -0700 Dennis Carpenter sells them. Now, if anyone knows where I can get ahold of a rear side-of-the-bed marker light for a '69 Ranger, let me know! :) Mine's missing and NONE of the junkyards around here have one. Thanks. Tim Neasham Benton City, Washington ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:32:19 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap Jason Derra wrote: > > No problem. I have the same ailment from time to time. > The 9" isn't all that bad. But yes it does have it's shortcomings with a > 7K lb pickup with a camper and a boat in tow. But, if you really want > stout, the (I hate to say this) GM 14 bolt is much stronger than the Dana > 60. The 10.25 ford is just as stout ,cept for all slight neck down on pinion gear (Not a problem unless you rock crawl with 500 HP or something). I've heard early one's had hub seal problems. Nice part is it bolts in from 77.5 on up. OX ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:33:25 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap Clare Waterman-Storer wrote: > > that article is great on the tech section. thanks james! > > sounds like a do-able weekend project. that was all i needed!! > Good luck with the rebuild. Take your time and ask lots of questions :-). OX ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:35:53 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap Clare Waterman-Storer wrote: > > James- > > would the instructions in that article change if the rear were a > trac-loc? > I did not cover the actual rebuild of the diff. One thing I just thought of that will change is if you try to use an axle shaft to hold diff to tighten/loosen ring gear bolts, it will slip with open or limited slip diff. I had a detroit which was locked, so it was easy for me :-). OX ------------------------------ From: "Southerland, Rich" Subject: Re: cargo light gasket Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:36:24 -0700 Are they different from side to side? Need one or both? I'll take a look at the one I got the cargo setup off of as it is mostly complete... Contact me off list if you wish... -----Original Message----- From: Tim Neasham [mailto:tneasham Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:32 AM To: Ford Truck List Subject: [61-79-list] Re: cargo light gasket Dennis Carpenter sells them. Now, if anyone knows where I can get ahold of a rear side-of-the-bed marker light for a '69 Ranger, let me know! :) Mine's missing and NONE of the junkyards around here have one. Thanks. Tim Neasham Benton City, Washington ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:37:44 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: 460 vs Modified IanBoss69 > > Hey all, It's come time to either rebuild or replace my 351M, its leaking oil > bad out the back between engine and tranny, and I figured while I had it > pulled might as well rebuil it or put a new one in. so here is my question, I > know alot of you have gone to 460's in your trucks, I also know that the 460 > will bolt up to the 351M tranny, my question is will the motor mounts need to > be changed? I'm sure they will but will the location be the same? and does > anybody know where I can get the right mounts? > See http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.off -road. com /ford/bigbroncos/tech/bigblock.html It is geared towards Broncos, but most of it is applicable for 250's OX ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:39:18 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap JUMPINFORD > > In a message dated 4/25/00 8:45:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > derrar > > << No problem. I have the same ailment from time to time. > The 9" isn't all that bad. But yes it does have it's shortcomings with a > 7K lb pickup with a camper and a boat in tow. But, if you really want > stout, the (I hate to say this) GM 14 bolt is much stronger than the Dana > 60. > Great Writeup OX!!! >> > > But Technically the 14 bolt is the GM equivalent to a Dana 70. > Both of them need pratically a 35" tires to keep from dragging diff on the road, LOL!!!! OX ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:48:02 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap Don Grossman wrote: > > >There is no carrier split on the 9". This only applies to the Dana > >differentials. > > Jason > Thanks Jason > > For some reason I was stuck in front diff mode. Been awake > to many hours at the time I guess. > > Just read the Ox article and all I have to say is wow! I > really like the last line, that is why I run a dana 60 in the rear:) > Broke an axle shaft pulling out the parts store and that was the last > straw for me. No matter how strong people say the 9" is it just > can't hold 6K lbs of rock worth a damn ( I'm ducking under desk now) > I've broken 60 axles, but only when I got the back end of this thing hopping pulling another 5000 lb sled from the goo. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thecore.com/~luxjo/whart52399/Fixaxle.jpg http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thecore.com/~luxjo/whart52399/Bkaxle.jpg Beleive it or not, a pair of RS9000's cured the problem of hopping and axle breakage. OX ------------------------------ From: "Gary Perry" Subject: Re: root beer truck Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:50:16 -0400 Bruce, I'ld say the red truck (51-52) is only a One-ton F-3 or maybe an F-4. It has too small of wheels and "hubcaps"(yuk), to be an F-5. I'ld stick with 1-ton as wheels on F-4 were bigger also. Nice truck though. Barrel would be first thing to junk in my opinion! "G" -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Montcombroux To: 61-79-list Date: Monday, April 24, 2000 1:18 PM Subject: [61-79-list] root beer truck >Here is a nice duo picture taken in my travels this weekend. Turns out that >the “barrel” on the back of the truck on the right was used as a promo >novelty for selling root beer at events and fairs. I was told that it was >painted with a large A&W logo. ------------------------------ From: Matt Senn Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:46:55 -0700 sorry, i wasn't picking on you :) try this link http://www.ford-trucks.com/contact/index.php3 he's always been pretty good about getting back with me . . . -----Original Message----- From: Michael_Taylor Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 11:16 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. For those of you who are wondering... yes.. I'm having problems with my email. I'm getting numerous copies of emails, as well as sending numerous copies... I've tried unsubscribing through the web page, as well as sending an email, as the instructions say... but I'm still subscribed, and still getting numerous copies of all emails. Anyone have the ability to unsubscribe me.... please feel free... geeze.. Matt Senn Please respond to 61-79-list Sent by: 61-79-list-bounce To: 61-79-list cc: Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. isn't there a filter on the list to keep this type of posting error (Michael_Taylor -----Original Message----- From: Michael_Taylor Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:34 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. Matt Senn Please respond to 61-79-list Sent by: 61-79-list-bounce To: 61-79-list cc: Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Intermittent wipers. thanks!!! motorcraft still sells the switch but the box is discontinued . . . now i know where to get mine . . . -----Original Message----- From: Steve Schaefer [mailto:schaefer Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 9:54 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Intermittent wipers. Good morning. This is a not to all on the list that want intermittent wipers on there 73-79 Ford trucks. I had been searching high and low ant the local yards for the box and the switch for my truck. Unable to find 1 in a truck I went looking else where. The cars of the 70's have a totally different plug, so I scrapped that idea for a bit. Last weekend I found an 87 Ford truck with the intermittent wipers, so I grabbed the switch and control box. Low and behold, plugs right in. The only minor difference is that the new switch has a separate ground wire. No big deal. Both of my trucks now have intermittent wipers. Next project, factory power windows. Just thought I would share. Steve S. 77 F-250 Supercab 76 F-350 Crew cab http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ From: "Gary Perry" Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:58:09 -0400 Seems you guys need to quit overfilling your trucks. If you have HD work, get a 1-ton dually and haul your camper and stones safely. Hope you don't hurt someone on road when you can't stop fast enough or a suspension, tire breaks. They also make multi-ply tires that won't "squat" with a load, just cost a lot more. "G" -----Original Message----- From: James Oxley To: 61-79-list Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 1:40 PM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: 9 inch gear swap > > >JUMPINFORD >> >> In a message dated 4/25/00 8:45:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >> derrar >> >> << No problem. I have the same ailment from time to time. >> The 9" isn't all that bad. But yes it does have it's shortcomings with a >> 7K lb pickup with a camper and a boat in tow. But, if you really want >> stout, the (I hate to say this) GM 14 bolt is much stronger than the Dana >> 60. >> Great Writeup OX!!! >> >> >> But Technically the 14 bolt is the GM equivalent to a Dana 70. >> > > Both of them need pratically a 35" tires to keep from dragging diff on >the road, LOL!!!! > > OX >========================================================== >To unsubscribe, send email to: listar >the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the >message. > > ------------------------------ From: "Southerland, Rich" Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:01:50 -0700 HD work, get a 1-ton dually and haul your camper and stones safely. Hope you don't hurt someone on road when you can't stop fast enough or a suspension, tire breaks. They also make multi-ply tires that won't "squat" with a load, just cost a lot more. Best thing I've done with my E150 was ditch the passenger car spec radials and go to a 6 ply truck tire. Rides better, stay cooler, and last longer. Weren't any more expensive when you figure in the increased tire life. Not to mention piece of mind... Rich ------------------------------ From: Rubberducky23 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:03:52 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: 460 vs Modified that swap is a piece of cake. you will need a set of conversion mounts. I got mine from L&L for $119 and they even have a lifetime guarentee. some of the problems you will find is you will probably need to find a rear sump oil pan. Luckely my truck sits high enough that the front diff cannot move far enough to contact the pan. 2wd has the crossmember under the motor that will give problems as well. Another thing is the car exhaust manifolds on the passenger side exits real close to the frame rail. some people trim a small place in the frame to get clearence or buy a truck style exhaust manifold. I just used a set of headers from Stans Headers. and finaly another problem is you will find that Ford started externaly balancing the 460 in 1980. if you get a 1980 or newer 460 you will have to get the flywheel or flexplate from the donor vehicle. if you get a 79 or older 460 your existing flexplate or flywheel will work. Good luck to ya Laters, Danny Ling ------------------------------ From: "sean michael bishop" Subject: Re: Fans Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:40:04 EDT Me personally, I would go with an electric fan if for no more reason than HP gains. Electric fans are well worth the money a dont burn out as much as some say. Plus you can set the fan thermostat at a certain temp for better combustion in the motor. Call me crazy but I swear it. It works wonders in my 79 F350. >From: "Gary Perry" >Reply-To: 61-79-list >To: "61-79 Ford trucks" <61-79-list >Subject: [61-79-list] Fans >Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:27:42 -0400 > > >I have and FT engine that I'm trying to put in 56 Big Truck. Need a smaller >fan. Problem is: Fan bolt spacing is wider on FT engines. Anyone ever try >to redrill holes in blades to match pump? The pump has a 3/4" center that >my fan doesn't use, it has a large 1-1/4 or so hole. I'm thinking the p/up >fans will have the 3/4" (or so) hole to center it and I need only drill new >holes. >Not sure if there is enough flat area on fan to allow this w/out being too >thin >at hole edge. The other choice is to drill the pump plate and I don't think >that would be as easy. Are all Ford fans about the same or do I need one >from the earlier FE type engines? Maybe I should get aftermarket flex-fan >to get more blades. Cooling may be a problem with this installation. Do >electrics have enough power to cool w/out help from eng fan? > "G" > >========================================================== >To unsubscribe, send email to: listar >the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the >message. > ________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ From: Matt Senn Subject: Re: Fans Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:00:27 -0700 how much horsepower gain would i see on my 390?? -----Original Message----- From: sean michael bishop [mailto:eaglekeeper50 Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 3:40 PM To: 61-79-list Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Fans Me personally, I would go with an electric fan if for no more reason than HP gains. Electric fans are well worth the money a dont burn out as much as some say. Plus you can set the fan thermostat at a certain temp for better combustion in the motor. Call me crazy but I swear it. It works wonders in my 79 F350. >From: "Gary Perry" >Reply-To: 61-79-list >To: "61-79 Ford trucks" <61-79-list >Subject: [61-79-list] Fans >Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:27:42 -0400 > > >I have and FT engine that I'm trying to put in 56 Big Truck. Need a smaller >fan. Problem is: Fan bolt spacing is wider on FT engines. Anyone ever try >to redrill holes in blades to match pump? The pump has a 3/4" center that >my fan doesn't use, it has a large 1-1/4 or so hole. I'm thinking the p/up >fans will have the 3/4" (or so) hole to center it and I need only drill new >holes. >Not sure if there is enough flat area on fan to allow this w/out being too >thin >at hole edge. The other choice is to drill the pump plate and I don't think >that would be as easy. Are all Ford fans about the same or do I need one >from the earlier FE type engines? Maybe I should get aftermarket flex-fan >to get more blades. Cooling may be a problem with this installation. Do >electrics have enough power to cool w/out help from eng fan? > "G" > >========================================================== >To unsubscribe, send email to: listar >the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the >message. > ________________________________________________________________________ ========================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ------------------------------ From: "NP 540" Subject: 20th century Lincoln 4x4 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:08:20 PDT So, does the "intermitent wipers" are gonna become "permanent"? (JOKE!) On the same subject, I had the same idea; looking for intermitent wipers in late 70's Lincoln, and I found one last year, started to take apart the intermitent wiper switch and box, also started to remove the headlight delay switch with auto-dimmer, LOOKS like they bolt-on to my 1979 F-150 4x4, but alas, it was becoming too dark to work under the dash, and snow was begining on top of that........ Well, IF I can get some time, I'll go back to that junk-yard as soon as I can, and get those switches! Yep, LOOKS like they ALL bolted-on so far, and there was that nice pair of electric seats in that 1976 Lincoln....... Now, what can I use the vacuum-switch for the headlight's doors for, in my truck? mmmm...... thinking.... Anybody have any idea? Then, I'll just have to swith the FORD scrip on my hood for a Lincoln script! (But, how am I gonna do for the tailgate???) 20th century Lincoln 4x4?? grins...... Gerry Vive le FORD!! ________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ From: "Dan Starner" Subject: Ford 390cid for sale Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:13:38 -0400 Ford 390cid For Sale. Selling with C6 automatic transmission. Purchased seperately from truck as project-no time to build. Here's the facts: a.. Block: Mirror image "105" found in cast. "X" found in cast. "D3TE" found in cast. Engine is currently seperated from transmission, tore down to short block and hanging on engine stand ready for inspection. b.. Heads: Nothing special here. "D2TEAA" found in cast. c.. Intake: Nothing special here either. 2V. "D4TE9425B1(or i)A" found in cast. d.. Carb: Present. 2V. I originally thought I may mistakenly picked up a 391, but this block appears to be built to 390 specs. If memory serves, the worst cylinder was 0.006 out and I was planning a rebuild. Never heard it run, but it's torn down so there's nothing to hide. I'll be glad to answer any questions and will gladly accept suggestions. $295.00 OBO. Drop me an EMail Dan Starner dans Columbus, OH. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 18:38:32 -0700 From: William A Whited Subject: Re: Fans The have an article in this month's Car Craft about that. They gained 45 hp by removing the fan and using an electric one. The also tested other fans. -- William A Whited 74 F100 RANGER SUPERCAB 390 77 F150 CUSTOM 460 EL Paso, TX SEMPER FI ------------------------------ From: GMontgo930 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:19:10 EDT Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. Keep us posted on teh power windows. Ive been interested in doing a power conversion on my 799 bronco (by golly, it's already got one oout back. only makes sense). havent gotten round to checking into the possibilities yet though..... George in FL. In a message dated 4/25/2000 11:57:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time, schaefer > > This is a not to all on the list that want intermittent wipers on there 73- > 79 Ford > trucks. I had been searching high and low ant the local yards for the box > and the > switch for my truck. Unable to find 1 in a truck I went looking else where. > The cars > of the 70's have a totally different plug, so I scrapped that idea for a bit. > Last > weekend I found an 87 Ford truck with the intermittent wipers, so I grabbed > the switch > and control box. Low and behold, plugs right in. The only minor difference > is that > the new switch has a separate ground wire. No big deal. Both of my trucks > now have > intermittent wipers. Next project, factory power windows. > Just thought I would share. > ------------------------------ From: JJJJJGRANT Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:22:01 EDT Subject: Re: Tailgate for sale its stock ford, it is pushed in a bit just above the latch, i suspect its from years of pushing in that area to close it. i don' have any pics. ------------------------------ From: canzus Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Engine identity At 08:10 AM 25:04:2000 -0500, John LaGrone wrote: > >Even then, they still have problems. I had a 67 Cadillac with a 426 Hey John, you sure that was a 426? I had a caddy that had a 429, a '66 Factory Limo (6 window) and the parts chimps used to try to sell me '71 Torino parts for it... Steve & the Rockette 68 F100, 390cid, FMX 63 F100, 292cid, 3speed 72 Capri 2000, hers 73 Capri 2600,tube frame going in..... 73 MGB GT, Our Toy 94 SHO, SWMBO's 98 Contour SVT, Mine, Mine, All Mine.... ------------------------------ From: canzus Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: cargo light gasket At 10:32 AM 25:04:2000 -0700, Tim Neasham wrote: >Dennis Carpenter sells them. Now, if anyone knows where I can get ahold of >a rear side-of-the-bed marker light for a '69 Ranger, let me know! :) >Mine's missing and NONE of the junkyards around here have one. Thanks. > > I don't think you're traveling to far from home, I think I saw one or two at Sideline Auto Wrecking in Aberdeen, Wa last weekend... Steve & the Rockette 68 F100, 390cid, FMX 63 F100, 292cid, 3speed 72 Capri 2000, hers 73 Capri 2600,tube frame going in..... 73 MGB GT, Our Toy 94 SHO, SWMBO's 98 Contour SVT, Mine, Mine, All Mine.... ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:43:15 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: 66 Merc for sale >Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:09:52 -0700 (PDT) >From: Scott >Subject: could you forward >To: Ken Payne > >Hi Ken, could you forward this to the proper list for me, I would like >FTE to have first pick of it: > >I've got a 66 merc for sale, it is missing the trim and the body is in >poor shape. The engine runs and is a 352 with a 4 speed. Will sell as >whole truck or parts. Open to offers. > >Thanks >Scott > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites. >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://invites.yahoo.com ------------------------------ From: JefriHansn Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:59:59 EDT Subject: The Muny Pit Ahy- evil it is fer shure. Demon truck straight from the very depths of general motors headquaters itself. Can't get in her and put the key in without SOMETHING happening. ------------------------------ From: "Tim and Pam Allgire" Subject: Trucks for sale Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:34:04 -0400 Here's some goodies:1969 F-250,Arizona truck,360,automatic,mild cam,3:73 gears,2-wheel drive, $1,750.00 Six Lakes,Mich. (517)352-7762 Looks pretty good in picture!! 1966 F-100,Very nice condition,rebuilt 300 c.i.,new kingpins,shocks,exhaust,spray in bedliner,header,dual port intake,Carter AFB carb, $3,700 or best offer-with parts truck.Sturgis,Mich. (616)651-9718 1973 short bed,V-8,Automatic,Arkansas truck,needs some work. $1,500 Sand Lake,Mich. (616)636-5918 1969 F-100, 2 wheel drive,long bed,46,000 orig. miles,mint condition,S. Dakota truck,orig. paint,very well maintained,new exhaust, $3,495 Grand Rapids,Mich. (616)364-8962 Looks really nice in picture! ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:41:27 -0700 From: Jason Derra Subject: Re: Intermittent wipers. My intermitent wiper switch and module came from a '73 T Bird. Jason Steve Schaefer wrote: > Good morning. > > This is a not to all on the list that want intermittent wipers on there 73-79 Ford > trucks. I had been searching high and low ant the local yards for the box and the > switch for my truck. Unable to find 1 in a truck I went looking else where. The cars > of the 70's have a totally different plug, so I scrapped that idea for a bit. Last > weekend I found an 87 Ford truck with the intermittent wipers, so I grabbed the switch > and control box. Low and behold, plugs right in. The only minor difference is that > the new switch has a separate ground wire. No big deal. Both of my trucks now have > intermittent wipers. Next project, factory power windows. > Just thought I would share. > > Steve S. > 77 F-250 Supercab > 76 F-350 Crew cab > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ > > ========================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to: listar > the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the > message. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:43:31 -0700 From: Jason Derra Subject: Re: 9 inch gear swap I'd say the 70 has a slight edge over the 14 bolt except for availability. Jason JUMPINFORD > In a message dated 4/25/00 8:45:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > derrar > > << No problem. I have the same ailment from time to time. > The 9" isn't all that bad. But yes it does have it's shortcomings with a > 7K lb pickup with a camper and a boat in tow. But, if you really want > stout, the (I hate to say this) GM 14 bolt is much stronger than the Dana > 60. > Great Writeup OX!!! >> > > But Technically the 14 bolt is the GM equivalent to a Dana 70. > > Darrell Duggan > 74 F-350 "Tweety" > ========================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to: listar > the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the > message. ------------------------------ End of 61-79-list Digest V2000 #81 ********************************** ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Send posts to 61-79-list If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, send an email to: listar with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com ---------------------------------------------------------- .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|