 |
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages contained in these archives without consent from the respective author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors. Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list 61-79-list); Fri, 07 Jul 2000 22:05:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 22:05:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server To: 61-79-list digest users Reply-to: 61-79-list  ford-trucks.com Subject: 61-79-list Digest V2000 #150 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar ford-trucks.com with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ 61-79-list Digest Thu, 06 Jul 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 150 In This Issue: Bloomsburg 4 wheel Jamboree Re: Get together in Laughlin Re: Tailgate stuck Re: the long of it Re: 352 Blown Exhaust Manifold Gasket Thanks plus Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels Re: Custom Cab Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels Re: Custom Cab Re: Custom Cab Re: Custom Cab Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels Re: Custom Cab Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels Plastic truck models Re: Plastic truck models freedom Re: Custom Cab Re: freedom Re: Plastic truck models Re: Need ID mill supply and mac? Re: mill supply and mac? Re: Need ID Truck show in Lake Havasu Utah contact Re: Plastic truck models ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: FORDTRKNUT aol.com Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:50:54 EDT Subject: Bloomsburg 4 wheel Jamboree Well....Its time for the Bloomsburg 4 Wheel & Offroad Jamboree again!!! It is July 7th, 8th, & 9th held at the Bloomsburg PA Fairgrounds (10 Minutes off Route 80 in PA). Last year was a blast as my friend entered tough truck with his Heep. This year I am going to bring my 1979 F-350 2wd Crewcab (not to show...just to get there). I am going to put a "CrewCab Wanted" poster on it, Hoping someone has a "Spare" 1973-1979 Crewcab they want to sell. My Crewcab has a little rust the drip rails, but I really hate doing bodywork. This year will be different as there will be no "Truck Parade" though town. Don't know what they have planned, but it will be great just being there. Well.....Thats About it!!! See Ya there!!! Wayne Grabley ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 18:12:07 -0700 From: Keith Srb Subject: Re: Get together in Laughlin At 07:20 PM 07/06/2000 -0400, you wrote: >Sounds like a plan, do you know about when that show is? I am trying to get a hold of some one there that knows the dates now. As soon as I find out, I'll let you know. Later Keith ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 18:52:50 -0700 From: Eric Subject: Re: Tailgate stuck All good advice, but if you still can't get it open, try what worked for me. Remove the handle and the rods from the holes in its back side.( Small cotter pins I think) Put vise grips on the hooked end of the rod. Get a friend to do the same on the other one. Pull! Good luck. Eric ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 19:11:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "D. DiMartino" Subject: Re: the long of it i've asked this same question before and i was looking into what my '68 would xfer to. 68 to 72 are the same, and if you look as far ahead into the year 75 your ok. as for the tiny differences i haven't reached that far yet, still looking for a frame that meets my needs. --- Lyndell Smith > > would there be a problem putting a 71 body on a 73 frame? they > both are long > beds. > > I was wondering if the frames were similar or if I need to > make a lot of > changes.. > > > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/scb3552/ > > thank in advance smitty > > > ========================================================== > To unsubscribe: > http://www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > ===== Daniel DiMartino 1968 F-250 soon to be a 4x4 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://im.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ From: "Bill Templeton" Subject: Re: 352 Blown Exhaust Manifold Gasket Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:28:11 -0400 >Snip, snip Someone had cut the inner pan and replaced the cut-out with a neat cover. -- This is still an option in replacing the left exhaust manifold gasket. However, even with an access hole through the inner pan it is still almost impossible to get at the threaded end of bolts to soak or heat. >>Snip, snip Is the goal here to stop an exhaust leak? If it is then I can't see pulling the heads making things easier. Pulling the heads is a lot of work. I think It'd be easier to take a fender off to get access to the exhaust manifold than pull the intake off an FE. OK, maybe not. An FE intake is big and heavy and takes 2 people or a engine lift to pull off and put back on. Some people have done it alone so it can be done, but if things go wrong it could go way wrong. Making access doors in the wheel wells (I know this isn't their official name but it's what I've always called them) is what I do when I need to. At times I think design engineers and tooling are in cahoots. >>Who needs a special tool when you have a cutting disk. ;]Looking at the 360 in my '76 F350 I don't think I can get a socket on the bottom row of head bolts without removing the exhaust manifold. My manifolds use bolts. I think if I disconnect a motor mount I could use a bottle jack to twist and lift the engine giving a little angle at the manifold bolts. Deacon, you changed my thinking. I hear you on easier to pull fender than pull heads and intake. My revised strategy is to pull fender and inner pan and see what that buys. (And pull motor mount/jack motor if necessary.) If that fails, then we can go back to original plan and pull top end off. -- However, I still maintain the concern of soaking with penetrating oil (and heat if necessary) UP (and under) around those manifold bolts at head bosses with head on engine. [Please understand that I am thinking worst case in a bolt breaking.] > The threads are eroded away, there isn't much thread remaining. >>My bad. I was thinking length. Just a little FYI, my 360 uses bolts Those exhaust crossover pipe studs will have to be replaced. To your point, bolts will go back in if at all possible. >IF those heads come off it would be prudent to have a look at the valves and seats. I hear you on the "old guys lapped valves" (I am one). Doesn't a valve grind remove more material than a lap? >>Snip, snip If these angles are correct with no damage to the face or seat then it will seal. The valve also needs to have a min. margin width. Without this margin width the end of the valve will have an edge like a knife. Snip, snip Deacon, you point on width and angle is clear and also brings back memories. Just out of high school and like many kids, I really didn't know what I wanted to do for a career. So I went to a school that taught auto mechanics. A lot of theory (including of course valve seat theory) and some hands on. We pulled apart and put together (ground/lapped valves/seats), time and time again the same flat head military surplus Jeep engines. >Exhaust pipe flat flange is slightly pitted and could stand facing. It could very well be the manifold's head face is also eroded is the area of gasket leak. If could very well be that the manifold will need to be replaced. >>Sorry Bill but this was my lame attempt at humor. I'm King of the over killers! 8] It's your truck, your time and your money. Any way you choose, I hope works out for you. Son, your doing fine. I consider you wisdom valuable, and look forward to your comments. In fact, the comments of anyone who takes the time to put thought into a response should be respected and evaluated! Thanks, Bill ------------------------------ From: "Azie L. Magnusson" Subject: Thanks plus Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:03:57 -0500 To all those of you that answered my query on the small block "stuff", I say "T H A N K S" I knew you would come thru. Now I have to make a decision about using it in something>>. Lyndel Smith Ask:>> would there be a problem putting a 71 body on a 73 frame? they both are long beds.<< Haven't done it but I'm led to believe that it is fairly easily done. Rich Southland writes: >>. A buddy of mine guesses that the trailer is equipped with "surge brakes".<< Give that man a cigar. I believe he is correct and you are too in assuming that the cable with the hook is a "breakaway brake". I have that same set up on my hauler trailer. I almost wrote car trailer, but it is much heavier duty than that. Had a farm tractor on it that weighed nearly 12000#. Azie Magnusson Ardmore, Al. ------------------------------ From: Natp244 cs.com Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:29:58 EDT Subject: Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels In a message dated 7/6/00 7:09:25 PM Central Daylight Time, garrettnelson writeme.com writes: << I don't have any trim of any sort on the inside of my doors. This may be a silly question, but what exactly is a custom cab? >> The custom Cab was the interior trim option- all the shiny stuff inside. On the 61-66, that meant a trim strip running the width of the dash, a "custom cab" switch panel bezel thing below the speedometer panel, trim around the upper inside of the doors, and on the door panels themselves- among some other things. I'm pretty sure door panels only came on the custom cabs, and they had brightmetal trim which clipped to the door and held the plastic door panel in place. Nate ------------------------------ From: EffieFrd aol.comDate: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:35:48 EDT Subject: Re: Custom Cab In a message dated 7/6/00 11:31:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Natp244 cs.comwrites: << The custom Cab was the interior trim option- >> It also had the chrome trim down the outside. And the Custom Cab script on the door. ~Mel Marietta, GA 1965 F100 Custom Cab 1989 Bronco XLT G.R.I.T.S ~ Girls Raised In The SOUTH! ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:37:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Scott Hall Subject: Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels On Thu, 6 Jul 2000 Natp244 cs.com wrote:> This may be a silly question, but what exactly is a custom cab? >> > > The custom Cab was the interior trim option- all the shiny stuff inside. On > the 61-66, that meant a trim strip running the width of the dash, a "custom > cab" switch panel bezel thing below the speedometer panel, trim around the > upper inside of the doors, and on the door panels themselves- among some > other things. I'm pretty sure door panels only came on the custom cabs, and > they had brightmetal trim which clipped to the door and held the plastic door > panel in place. did all the trucks come with a 'collar' around the steering column with four small gauges in it, or was that just the custom cab? scott ------------------------------ From: Natp244 cs.comDate: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:40:16 EDT Subject: Re: Custom Cab In a message dated 7/6/00 10:36:32 PM Central Daylight Time, EffieFrd aol.comwrites: << It also had the chrome trim down the outside. And the Custom Cab script on the door. >> You are absolutely right- I guess I just got to thinking inside stuff and forgot all about that exterior trim. (oh- and those cool door handle guards on some models, too!) I do have a question, though- was the exterior side moulding only on custom cab trucks (61-66)? Or was it possibly an option on the others? I have seen a few (maybe 2 or 3) that had the exterior trim, but none of the goodies inside. I guess its possible someone just added it all, but it got me wondering. Anyone know? Nate ------------------------------ From: JUMPINFORD aol.comDate: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:40:59 EDT Subject: Re: Custom Cab Funny how the names work. Custom Cab started out as the luxury truck, then it was moved down to the standard truck, and was replaced with Ranger XLT, When the Ranger came out, it was shortened to XLT, but by then I believe Lariat had become the nice version. And now the base truck is an XL. I imagine pretty soon, most work trucks will be Eddie Bauers, and all the nice trucks will come with my name on the script....... Darrell and Tweety ------------------------------ From: EffieFrd aol.comDate: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:45:54 EDT Subject: Re: Custom Cab In a message dated 7/6/00 11:41:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Natp244 cs.comwrites: << was the exterior side moulding only on custom cab trucks (61-66)? >> Yep. The outside chrome only came on custom cab. AFAIK. I could be wrong. It happens. :o) I have seen several trucks with the interior goodies but no chrome on the outside. It all depends on how somebody has chosen to restore the truck. ~Mel Marietta, GA 1965 F100 Custom Cab 1989 Bronco XLT G.R.I.T.S ~ Girls Raised In The SOUTH! ------------------------------ From: Natp244 cs.comDate: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:52:45 EDT Subject: Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels In a message dated 7/6/00 10:38:21 PM Central Daylight Time, sch8489 garnet.acns.fsu.edu writes:<< did all the trucks come with a 'collar' around the steering column with four small gauges in it, or was that just the custom cab? >> That doesn't sound like anything I've seen on a 61-66 truck- unless I am misunderstanding your question. These trucks were definitely lacking in the guage area. I'm not sure what changes were made with the 66 sweeping speedo cluster, but up until then all you had was two idiot lights (oil,amp), a temp guage, and a gas guage. These were all in the same assembly as the speedometer and were crowded into a 7" round hole in the middle of the inst. panel. Is it possible this is a custom jobby you are referring to? If not, I sure would like to hear more about it. I learn more about these trucks every day (and am reminded of how little I know about them). ------------------------------ From: "Garrett Nelson" Subject: Re: Custom Cab Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:57:39 -0500 I have (had) outside chrome trim, but I don't think I have a custom cab. The interior is pretty plain, about the only trim inside is a thin chrome piece on the seam where the black top of the dash meets the metal bottom half of the dash panel. The inside of the doors have no trim or anything, and nothing said custom cab on it. My 1/50 of a dollar ---Garrett www.1966ford.com ----- Original Message ----- From: EffieFrd aol.comTo: 61-79-list ford-trucks.comSent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 10:45 PM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Custom Cab In a message dated 7/6/00 11:41:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Natp244 cs.comwrites: << was the exterior side moulding only on custom cab trucks (61-66)? >> Yep. The outside chrome only came on custom cab. AFAIK. I could be wrong. It happens. :o) I have seen several trucks with the interior goodies but no chrome on the outside. It all depends on how somebody has chosen to restore the truck. ~Mel Marietta, GA 1965 F100 Custom Cab 1989 Bronco XLT G.R.I.T.S ~ Girls Raised In The SOUTH ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 00:40:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Scott Hall Subject: Re: 61-66 Cheap-o door panels well, I'm no expert myself, but here goes: '65 custom cab. this is a metal panel that attaches to the steering column under the steering wheel. sorta like a rally pac on a '65 mustang, which is why I wasn't surprised to see it. well, same location as a rally pac, but this is a sheet metal kinda half-circle. it's bolted really well to the the column. looks factory (at least to me). four holes in it, right now it's got a (small, aftermarket) tach, vacuum gauge, oil pressure and I forget the last one. painted the same color as the cab (which is an old job), and looks pretty old itself. the tach and vacuum gauge look to be recent replacements. maybe it's a '60's aftermarket thing, or a dealer add-on. looks too well made and sturdy to be even close to recent. looks old, too. I was surprised, too, because like you said, the dash is pretty spartan. but then, maybe that's why this thing is there... any ideas? scott On Thu, 6 Jul 2000 Natp244 cs.com wrote:> In a message dated 7/6/00 10:38:21 PM Central Daylight Time, > sch8489 garnet.acns.fsu.edu writes:> > << did all the trucks come with a 'collar' around the steering column with > four small gauges in it, or was that just the custom cab? >> > > That doesn't sound like anything I've seen on a 61-66 truck- unless I am > misunderstanding your question. These trucks were definitely lacking in the > guage area. I'm not sure what changes were made with the 66 sweeping speedo > cluster, but up until then all you had was two idiot lights (oil,amp), a temp > guage, and a gas guage. These were all in the same assembly as the > speedometer and were crowded into a 7" round hole in the middle of the inst. > panel. Is it possible this is a custom jobby you are referring to? If not, > I sure would like to hear more about it. I learn more about these trucks > every day (and am reminded of how little I know about them). > ========================================================== > To unsubscribe: > http://www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > ------------------------------ From: "Mike" Subject: Plastic truck models Date: (No, or invalid, date.) I'm getting tired of walking into hobby stores and seeing nothing but ch#*y truck models on the shelves. The 67-72 F series has never been produced in 1/25 scale but if enough guys showed an interest in them, the model companies would probably oblige. I have addresses for AMT and Revell/Monogram if anyone's interested in letting them know we want to see these trucks modelled. ------------------------------ From: "John Webster" Subject: Re: Plastic truck models Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:25:31 -0400 I agree, I would also like to see something in the '72-'79 F series in addition to the '67-72. Please post the address(s). As with most things in life it's the squeaky wheel that gets the grease. John '77 F150 4X4 460/C6/4:11's/33's I'm getting tired of walking into hobby stores and seeing nothing but ch#*y truck models on the shelves. The 67-72 F series has never been produced in 1/25 scale but if enough guys showed an interest in them, the model companies would probably oblige. I have addresses for AMT and Revell/Monogram if anyone's interested in letting them know we want to see these trucks modelled. ------------------------------ From: A61fordtruck aol.comDate: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:32:48 EDT Subject: freedom In a message dated 07/05/2000 11:00:59 PM EST, listar ford-trucks.com writes:> recently Jane Fonda [Hanoi Jane]was included in one of the top 1oo women > of the century > i guess that what we get with freedom when we fight for it while she was > being a Traitor to her own country and because of her a few of our soldiers > DIED and were beaten SEVERELY to the point they almost died and now have > permanent disabilities Forever > in any other time she would have been SHOT or HANGED > Gordon I guess that proves the point that Vietnam vets are not "Fonda-jane"! ------------------------------ From: "wish" Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:39:34 GMT Subject: Re: Custom Cab >Funny how the names work. Custom Cab started out as the luxury truck, then >it was moved down to the standard truck, and was replaced with Ranger XLT, >When the Ranger came out, it was shortened to XLT, but by then I believe >Lariat had become the nice version. Actually I think Explorer was the stop gap between Ranger and Lariat, Explorer coming out before the Ranger line ended... > And now the base truck is an XL. I >imagine pretty soon, most work trucks will be Eddie Bauers, and all the nice >trucks will come with my name on the script....... > Hahahaha ... I can see it now, a long wheelbase Darrel and Tweety edition ... :) Actually I thought you could still get one model lower than an XL that was just a base F150 or F250, but that could be a "fleet" order deal that doesn't come with any designation ... or thinking back that was the body that ended in 91 that was the last one I saw with no designation on it... Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ From: Fseriesman aol.comDate: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:00:20 EDT Subject: Re: freedom A61fordtruck aol.com writes:>I guess that proves the point that Vietnam vets are not "Fonda-jane"!< Early in my Marine Corps carreer we had urinal pucks with her picture on them. :) Ssgt John L. Miller II USMC (Ret) Nuff said ------------------------------ From: Fseriesman aol.comDate: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:02:38 EDT Subject: Re: Plastic truck models IF you can find it, AMT made a great kit featuring the 73-79 body stlye. It was trimmed out as a '75 or '76 if I remember correctly. came with a car trailer and car, or boat trailer and boat. Good luck John ------------------------------ From: SHill48337 aol.comDate: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:29:34 EDT Subject: Re: Need ID In a message dated 7/5/00 12:15:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, maggie11 HiWAAY.net writes:<< OK now!! I've been out in my shed rumaging thru something I'm not the least bit familiar with and need your help ID'ing some "stuff". I know it is small block and when I got it I was told it was 351C, but the heads are '75 and I thought that was after the demise of the C. None of this "stuff" is in my FORD Hi Performance book.. Heads - D5AE A2A Intake - D0AE 9425 L Block - D2AE CA Date cast in 3D17 Crankahaft - 4MA Standard and looks good..Haven't yet mic'ed it, but looks AOK. Rods have D0AE A on them Pistons have 351C cast in them near the wristpin. They look like really low compression and have what I'd call a half valve relief on opposite edges of the outer circumference.. >> The block D2AE CA is listed as a 72-74 351C 4V, Boss, 71 CJ, HO additionally Tom Monroe's book says, "four bolt main-bearing caps." Does it have 4-bolt mains? Here's where it gets foggy in the next sentence it says, "Special block cast with thicker cylinder walls and siamesed bores for racing use carries and XE192540 casting number." I do not know if this means the D2AE CA block or that there are other blocks out there that are the same as the D2AE except they have these other attributes. The casting date is 1973 April 17, but you probably knew that. The 4MA is a 70-74 351C Additionally Tom Monroe says, Boss and HO hardness tested. Brinell test mark on polished face of counterweight. You might see if the brinell test mark is there, if so and the block has 4-bolt mains the combination were probably factory designed for high performance. Monroe's book goes on to say the 72 HO, a low compression version of the 71 Boss, uses a flat-top forged 9.2:1 piston. Pictures shows large valve reliefs as you described. Are your pistons forged or cast? The 1975 casting number on the heads is very odd, unless Ford did some limited production. I threw out some stuff from a book, maybe you can sort it out. Good luck. Burt Hill Kennewick WA, 1972 F-250 4x4 460 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:08:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Scott Hall Subject: mill supply and mac? anybody got the numbers for mill supply and mac supply? i hear i can get parts from them... thanks scott ------------------------------ From: "G & J Boling" Subject: Re: mill supply and mac? Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:31:45 -0700 > anybody got the numbers for mill supply and mac supply? i hear i can get > parts from them... thanks scott ======================================== mill supply www.millsupply.com 1-800-888-5072 -------------------- MACS www.macsautoparts.com 1-800-777-0948 ----------------------- macs has a on line catalog you can use instead of waiting 6 weeks for one of them mill supply,s catalog doesnt take as long to arrive tho gordon ------------------------------ From: "Jeff Rice" Subject: Re: Need ID Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:41:06 -0500 crank is '69-'74 351C ----- Original Message ----- From: To: <61-79-list ford-trucks.com>Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:29 AM Subject: [61-79-list] Re: Need ID > In a message dated 7/5/00 12:15:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > maggie11 HiWAAY.net writes:> > << OK now!! I've been out in my shed rumaging thru something I'm not the > least bit familiar with and need your help ID'ing some "stuff". I know it is > small block and when I got it I was told it was 351C, but the heads are '75 > and I thought that was after the demise of the C. None of this "stuff" is in > my FORD Hi Performance book.. > > Heads - D5AE A2A > > Intake - D0AE 9425 L > > Block - D2AE CA Date cast in 3D17 > > Crankahaft - 4MA Standard and looks good..Haven't yet mic'ed it, but looks > AOK. > > Rods have D0AE A on them > > Pistons have 351C cast in them near the wristpin. They look like really low > compression and have what I'd call a half valve relief on opposite edges of > the outer circumference.. >> > > The block D2AE CA is listed as a 72-74 351C 4V, Boss, 71 CJ, HO additionally > Tom Monroe's book says, "four bolt main-bearing caps." Does it have 4-bolt > mains? Here's where it gets foggy in the next sentence it says, "Special > block cast with thicker cylinder walls and siamesed bores for racing use > carries and XE192540 casting number." I do not know if this means the D2AE > CA block or that there are other blocks out there that are the same as the > D2AE except they have these other attributes. The casting date is 1973 April > 17, but you probably knew that. > > The 4MA is a 70-74 351C Additionally Tom Monroe says, Boss and HO hardness > tested. Brinell test mark on polished face of counterweight. You might see > if the brinell test mark is there, if so and the block has 4-bolt mains the > combination were probably factory designed for high performance. > > Monroe's book goes on to say the 72 HO, a low compression version of the 71 > Boss, uses a flat-top forged 9.2:1 piston. Pictures shows large valve > reliefs as you described. Are your pistons forged or cast? > > The 1975 casting number on the heads is very odd, unless Ford did some > limited production. > > I threw out some stuff from a book, maybe you can sort it out. Good luck. > Burt Hill Kennewick WA, 1972 F-250 4x4 460 > ========================================================== > To unsubscribe: > http://www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 12:44:51 -0700 From: Keith Srb Subject: Truck show in Lake Havasu Well I got the dates for the truck show in Lake Havasu. They had it in April. Later Keith ------------------------------ From: "Azie L. Magnusson" Subject: Utah contact Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:28:50 -0500 Anyone on this list from or near Dugway, Utah??? Please contact me off list if so. Maggie11 Hiwaay.netAzie Magnusson Ardmore, Al. ------------------------------ From: WEDIVE247 aol.comDate: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 23:03:41 EDT Subject: Re: Plastic truck models In a message dated 7/7/2000 2:19:59 AM EST, bigred connect.ab.ca writes:<< I'm getting tired of walking into hobby stores and seeing nothing but ch#*y truck models on the shelves. The 67-72 F series has never been produced in 1/25 scale but if enough guys showed an interest in them, the model companies would probably oblige. I have addresses for AMT and Revell/Monogram if anyone's interested in letting them know we want to see these trucks modelled. >> How about tring to find a 64 in 1/25 scale ? Good luck !!!!! ------------------------------ End of 61-79-list Digest V2000 #150 *********************************** <><><><><><> Serious Help Finding That Part! <><><><><><> Ford Truck Enthusiasts now has "Ford Products Interchange" manuals in its online store. Two editions: 1950-1965 and 1963-1974. Cross references thousands of Ford parts. http://www.motorhaven.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List Send posts to 61-79-list ford-trucks.comIf you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, send an email to: listar ford-trucks.comwith the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the message. Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com ---------------------------------------------------------- .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. 
|