Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages
contained in these archives without consent from the respective
author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on
any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by
individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors.

Received: with LISTAR (v0.128a; list 61-79-list); Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:58:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:58:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server ford-trucks.com>
To: 61-79-list digest users ford-trucks.com>
Reply-to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Subject: 61-79-list Digest V2000 #12
Precedence: bulk

==========================================================
Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List

Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com

To unsubscribe, send email to: listar ford-trucks.com with
the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of the
message.
==========================================================

------------------------------------
61-79-list Digest Sat, 19 Feb 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 012

In This Issue:
Re: Need Sources for 429/460 Exhaust Manifolds (not
streetmaster for 460
'72 F100/ Engine for sale
Re: Web Site Updates
Re: streetmaster for 460
Re: I lost my little red book
Re: I lost my little red book
ThatBlackBookThing!
parting out 78 f150
Re: c-6 wide ratio
Re: parting out 78 f150
Re: I lost my little red book
Replacement floor panels ?
ADMIN: Pictorial updated
Re: I lost my little red book
Re: I lost my little red book
Re: Floorpan goof
Re: parting out 78 f150
Re: Replacement floor panels ?
Re: c-6 wide ratio
Re: Replacement floor panels ?
New Pictures!
Re: New Pictures!
Re: New Pictures!
7.3 diesel in 79 ford in pictorials

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: SHill48337 aol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:28:55 EST
Subject: Re: Need Sources for 429/460 Exhaust Manifolds (not

In a message dated 2/19/00 3:00:48 AM Eastern Standard Time,
bpmusic choice.net writes:

<< Anyway, 10 years later, the original smooth-looking one on my
driver's side has a crack in it, so I need another one. Can
anyone recommend a good source for these (preferably the
improved type, but the original type is fine, too)? It was
hard enough finding one ten years ago, and apparently that
was the extent of the local supply (Cincinnati, OH).

Thanks in advance,

Sean
>>

If you have expanded your search to 460's they are the same I suspect you
will find one. Ford quit putting 429's in cars at the beginning of 73. Good
Luck, I have seen cracked ones on 78 models.
Burt Hill Kennewick WA F-250 4x4 460

------------------------------

From: "GOLDHUNTER" h2net.net>
Subject: streetmaster for 460
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 20:55:31 -0700

I have a used Edelbrock "Streetmaster" 460 Intake(aluminum). It has small
rectangle shaped intakes. I do not know what it's worth. Make me a
reasonable offer and pay shipping; it'll be yours.
Charles Tyer
Houston, TX
www.hal-pc.org/~charlest/ford.html
79 F150 4X4 swb

I have one of these Streetmaster 460 intakes too,,,,,,I just want info on
it,,,,Is it a streetable intake,,racing intake,,,,,,towing intake,,,,,power
at diff rpm ranges,,,,,etc,,,,,,Anybody got the info?

Thanks, Colorado Rick


------------------------------

From: "Christopher Worley" hotmail.com>
Subject: '72 F100/ Engine for sale
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 20:03:53 PST

I have a '72 F100 excluding the engine for sale, the body panels are in
pretty good shape, it is missing the grille, the bed is badly rusted, it
also includes the automatic transmission and drive train. I also have a 352
for sale, ran pretty good when I pulled it a week and a half ago, needs new
rings, and valve job. The only reason I pulled it is to drop a 390 into the
'67 F100 it came out of. If anyone is interested, contact me off list
cworley76hotmail.com, the truck and engine are located in Waxahachie, TX
about 30 mins south of Dallas.




Chris
67' F100 (full restore going on)




______________________________________________________


------------------------------

From: TBeeeeaol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 23:08:03 EST
Subject: Re: Web Site Updates

I am reposting this message since I didn't see it go through this morning or
in today's digest. I apologize in advance if it already posted.
__________________

Hi gang! I first want to say that I appreciate all the thoughts and prayers
we received last month at our time of loss. It is comforting to know that so
many care.

I have been busy updating my web site. I would really apprecite if I
could get some of you to test drive it for me. Please report any problems
you experience and I am particlularly interested in hearing from all 1967
owners. Please tell me what you would like to see included. Many thanks!


Stock Man
1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd
1966 F-250 I6 240 2wd LWB Flare Side
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:05:46 -0500
From: Ted Wnorowski onebellevue.com>
Subject: Re: streetmaster for 460

Edelbrock probably has a website that could give you all that info.

Ted Wnorowski
Bellevue,OH


> I have one of these Streetmaster 460 intakes too,,,,,,I just want info on
> it,,,,Is it a streetable intake,,racing intake,,,,,,towing intake,,,,,power
> at diff rpm ranges,,,,,etc,,,,,,Anybody got the info?
>
> Thanks, Colorado Rick
>



------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:09:42 -0500
From: Ted Wnorowski onebellevue.com>
Subject: Re: I lost my little red book

What year of truck is this from? I could figure it out from the serial #. I'm just too lazy as usual.

Ted Wnorowski
Bellevue,OH

Don Grossman wrote:

> Hay ya'all
>
> someone with a little red book want to decode a VIN for me, I lost my
> copy :(
>
> F25BRY66683
>
> I know the F250 part, it's the BRY I don't know.
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Don Grossman
> duckdonpacific.net
> 99 Contour
> 63 F-100 4x4
> 43 GPW
> maybe soon to be 77 F250 4x2



------------------------------

From: TBeeeeaol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:18:25 EST
Subject: Re: I lost my little red book

In a message dated 2/20/00 12:10:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,
wnorowskionebellevue.com writes:

> Don Grossman wrote:
>
> > Hay ya'all
> >
> > someone with a little red book want to decode a VIN for me, I
lost
> my
> > copy :(
> >
> > F25BRY66683

That should be a 1977 F250 - 2wd Pickup with a I-6, 300ci built at the San
Jose Assembly Plant.

Stock Man
1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd
1966 F-250 I6 240 2wd LWB Flare Side
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 21:42:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "J. Allison" yahoo.com>
Subject: ThatBlackBookThing!

Must not have been hanging on to it like the little
'black' book ;)

> From: Don Grossman pacific.net>
> Subject: I lost my little red book

> Hey y'all... someone with a little red book want to
> decode a VIN for me, I lost my copy :( Don Grossman

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://im.yahoo.com

------------------------------

From: JJJJJGRANTaol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:44:44 EST
Subject: parting out 78 f150

i have a friend parting out a 78 f150 , if anyone needs anything let me know.

jeff grant

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 10:47:05 -0500
From: Steve Schaefer PLASTEKGROUP.COM>
Subject: Re: c-6 wide ratio

> Steve, I guess when your talking about a wide ratio, your talking about a
> lower first gear.
> That is the only gear differences that I know of. If that is the case I
> can pick that up at local trans parts store.
> Jeff in KC

Jeff, Actually it changes 1st gear and second. The kit from Ford motorsport cost me about $300. ANy of the aftermarket kits I found cost around $500 or more. Any idea how much it is on your area? Most of the tranny shops around here suck, the best one retired about 2 years ago when urbon development wanted his land for a
new highway:>(.

Steve S.
77 F-250 Supercab
76 F-350 Crewcab
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/




------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:34:27 -0600
From: Ron Martens flash.net>
Subject: Re: parting out 78 f150

I could use a power brake booster, am really looking for a variable speed
windshield gov & switch. Thanks

JJJJJGRANTaol.com wrote:

> i have a friend parting out a 78 f150 , if anyone needs anything let me know.
>
> jeff grant
> ==========================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to: listarford-trucks.com with
> the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the body of the
> message.


------------------------------

From: JUMPINFORDaol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:10:19 EST
Subject: Re: I lost my little red book

In a message dated 2/18/00 4:51:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
duckdonpacific.net writes:

<< I know the F250 part, it's the BRY I don't know. >>

I know the B means 300 cube six, with a 1 bbl carb

Darrell Duggan
74 F-350 "Tweety"

------------------------------

From: pdesantoCinergy.com
Subject: Replacement floor panels ?
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:23:23 -0500

Hi fellow listies-
I need a little info on the differences on floorpans for Ford cabs. I'm not
aware of anybody making any replacement panels for 57-60's or 61-66's.
There's a place here locally that has made floor repair panels for classic
50's Fords for years, and he's thinking about expanding into Ford trucks and
early 60's Galaxie's.
What I'm wanting to know is, are the 61-64 floors all the same, and the
65/66 all by itself ; OR is the 65/66 floor like a 67-72 since the chassis
is "more" like the later models? In every catalog I have they don't show the
65/66 with the 67-72.(actually, they show nothing for 65/66's at all)
I currently only have a 64, and I've had a 63, so I know those are the
same, but I don't know about the 61& 62. Not only that, but is the
"integral" cab the same as the std. cab? (think so but not sure....Dennis? )
I've also had several 67-72's but never a 65/66, so I don't have anything
to compare to. Anybody out there got both and looked them over, or maybe
tried panels for a 67-72 in a later model ? Any help is appreciated. There
aren't enough surviving examples around here to even go look at one. I'm
gonna work this as much as I can on this end since I have a Galaxie AND a 64
F-100, and maybe us guys in the rust belt can get some relief. {I'm on
digest so I'll get back when I can.}

Thanx for any input. Phil (rust never sleeps)
















------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:58:48 -0500
From: Ken Payne ford-trucks.com>
Subject: ADMIN: Pictorial updated

The pictorial has been updated. Photos sent in from November
15th through Feb 15th have been added. If you didn't get an
email saying yours has been added, then it hasn't so please
don't email me about it as I'm been absolutely swamped with
work.

I just have to get away from computer as I've been working on
the web site, ftp and email for 3 and a half weeks and I just
can't take it anymore.

As it stands, 54 trucks have been added to pictorial. Enjoy!

Ken Payne
Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts



------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:17:12 -0800
From: Don Grossman pacific.net>
Subject: Re: I lost my little red book

TBeeeeaol.com wrote:

> > > F25BRY66683
>
> That should be a 1977 F250 - 2wd Pickup with a I-6, 300ci built at the San
> Jose Assembly Plant.

thanks Stock Man. I just wanted to make sure it matched to what I got.

Laters
--
Don Grossman
duckdonpacific.net
99 Contour
63 F-100 4x4
43 GPW
An soon to be 77 F-250

------------------------------

From: TBeeeeaol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:35:33 EST
Subject: Re: I lost my little red book

In a message dated 2/20/00 3:17:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
duckdonpacific.net writes:

> thanks Stock Man. I just wanted to make sure it matched to what I got.

Your welcome Don. Glad to help.

Stock Man
1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd
1966 F-250 I6 240 2wd LWB Flare Side
http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee

------------------------------

From: pdesantoCinergy.com
Subject: Re: Floorpan goof
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:24:44 -0500

Sorry, meant to say "earlier" not later. You mean what I know ? Phil

Anybody out there got both and looked them over, or maybe tried panels for a
67-72 in an model ?



------------------------------

From: "Charles T." hal-pc.org>
Subject: Re: parting out 78 f150
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:36:04 -0800

> i have a friend parting out a 78 f150 , if anyone needs anything let me
know.
>
> jeff grant

Is it a 4x4? I am looking for a gear box and shaft.
Thanks,
CharlesT


------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:53:24 -0500
From: Ted Wnorowski onebellevue.com>
Subject: Re: Replacement floor panels ?



pdesantoCinergy.com wrote:

> There's a place here locally that has made floor repair panels for classic
> 50's Fords for years, and he's thinking about expanding into Ford trucks and
> early 60's Galaxie's.

I'm REALLY interested if this guy does start making them for '61-'64! I live in North Central OH, and mine are GONE!



>
> What I'm wanting to know is, are the 61-64 floors all the same, and the
> 65/66 all by itself ;

I do know that the '65-'66 is different in the fact that the floorpan is level with the rocker panel. Except the 350's for these years, I think.
The '61-'64 has the "step-up". It just makes for another place to rust out.
As far as similarities to the the '67-'72, I really don't know.

Ted Wnorowski
Bellevue,OH
'64 F-250



------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:43:23 -0500
Subject: Re: c-6 wide ratio
From: Jeff Simmons juno.com>

Steve, I'll have to check into it for my next project. I will write and
let you know what I found out.
Jeff in KC

On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 10:47:05 -0500 Steve Schaefer
PLASTEKGROUP.COM> writes:
> > Steve, I guess when your talking about a wide ratio, your talking
> about a
> > lower first gear.
> > That is the only gear differences that I know of. If that is the
> case I
> > can pick that up at local trans parts store.
> > Jeff in KC
>
> Jeff, Actually it changes 1st gear and second. The kit from Ford
> motorsport cost me about $300. ANy of the aftermarket kits I found
> cost around $500 or more. Any idea how much it is on your area?
> Most of the tranny shops around here suck, the best one retired
> about 2 years ago when urbon development wanted his land for a
> new highway:>(.
>
> Steve S.
> 77 F-250 Supercab
> 76 F-350 Crewcab
> http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/
>
>
>
> ==========================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to: listarford-trucks.com with
> the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the body of the
> message.
>

________________________________________________________________





------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:01:59 -0500
Subject: Re: Replacement floor panels ?
From: Jeff Simmons juno.com>

Phil, I believe a replacement floor panel for 67-72 will fit in the65-66.
If if you had to do any modifying it wouldn't be much. same with the cab
mounts. Also those after market cab mounts, I bought a pair of them.
After I brought them home I could not believe I purchased such a cheap
looking piece for my Fabulous Ford. So I went to the local salvage yard
and cut cab mounts off a truck that the mounts weren't to rusted out.
When I got home I cut the rust out and welded in new metal in its place.
Now you can't
tell that they have been replaced.
Hope this can help some truck lovers out.
Jeff in KC

On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:23:23 -0500 pdesantoCinergy.com writes:
> Hi fellow listies-
> I need a little info on the differences on floorpans for Ford cabs.
> I'm not
> aware of anybody making any replacement panels for 57-60's or
> 61-66's.
> There's a place here locally that has made floor repair panels for
> classic
> 50's Fords for years, and he's thinking about expanding into Ford
> trucks and
> early 60's Galaxie's.
> What I'm wanting to know is, are the 61-64 floors all the same,
> and the
> 65/66 all by itself ; OR is the 65/66 floor like a 67-72 since the
> chassis
> is "more" like the later models? In every catalog I have they don't
> show the
> 65/66 with the 67-72.(actually, they show nothing for 65/66's at
> all)
> I currently only have a 64, and I've had a 63, so I know those are
> the
> same, but I don't know about the 61& 62. Not only that, but is the
> "integral" cab the same as the std. cab? (think so but not
> sure....Dennis? )
> I've also had several 67-72's but never a 65/66, so I don't have
> anything
> to compare to. Anybody out there got both and looked them over, or
> maybe
> tried panels for a 67-72 in a later model ? Any help is
> appreciated. There
> aren't enough surviving examples around here to even go look at one.
> I'm
> gonna work this as much as I can on this end since I have a Galaxie
> AND a 64
> F-100, and maybe us guys in the rust belt can get some relief. {I'm
> on
> digest so I'll get back when I can.}
>
> Thanx for any input. Phil (rust never sleeps)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ==========================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to: listarford-trucks.com with
> the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the body of the
> message.
>

________________________________________________________________





------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:05:31 -0900
From: "Matthew Schumacher" 7x.com>
Subject: New Pictures!

Ford list people,

This is a little tiny bit off topic, but not to much....

Anyway, I put new pictures of me and my new born son on my web site.
Check out the little FORD hat I had made for him. ;)

http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://odoa4.odoa.org

thanks,
schu

------------------------------

From: JUMPINFORDaol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:09:35 EST
Subject: Re: New Pictures!

Classic man! Good lookin kid ya got there. Congratulations, good luck, and
all that groovy stuff.

Darrell Duggan
74 F-350 "Tweety"

P,S, Love the hat!

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:45:21 -0500
From: Ken Payne ford-trucks.com>
Subject: Re: New Pictures!

At 02:05 PM 2/20/00 -0900, you wrote:
>Ford list people,
>
>This is a little tiny bit off topic, but not to much....
>
>Anyway, I put new pictures of me and my new born son on my web site.
>Check out the little FORD hat I had made for him. ;)
>
>http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://odoa4.odoa.org
>
>thanks,
>schu

If he's anything like my son, he'll be a Ford man. My
son's favorite word is "truck."

Ken



------------------------------

From: JJJJJGRANTaol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:59:39 EST
Subject: 7.3 diesel in 79 ford in pictorials

with all the talk going on about the 7.3 in an older ford truck, there is a
f350 in the pictorials that has the 7.3, that guy would be a good source of
dos and don'ts.
i would still like to have a cummins turbo diesel w/ five speed in mine.

------------------------------

End of 61-79-list Digest V2000 #12
**********************************
----------------------------------------------------------
Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1961-1979 Truck Mailing List

Send posts to small-listford-trucks.com

If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing
list, send an email to:

listarford-trucks.com

with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the subject of
the message.

Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com
----------------------------------------------------------

....


To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.




Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.