|
|
From: owner-61-79-list-digest
To: 61-79-list-digest Subject: 61-79-list-digest V3 #409 Reply-To: 61-79-list Sender: owner-61-79-list-digest Errors-To: owner-61-79-list-digest Precedence: bulk 61-79-list-digest Monday, November 8 1999 Volume 03 : Number 409 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 61-79 - High beam problems. RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing light RE: FTE 61-79 - New To List RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing light RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor Re: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor FTE 61-79 - 400M & C6 into my 67' RE: FTE 61-79 - Another one saved from the reaper RE: FTE 61-79 - Re: Fluid coupler vs. Torque Converter FTE 61-79 - An update and a Thanks FTE 61-79 - dim lights FTE 61-79 - valve cover gasket on my 360 v8 Re: FTE 61-79 - High beam problems. FTE 61-79 - water temp high ? FTE 61-79 - 400 M rebuild FTE 61-79 - Great Auction! FTE 61-79 - M blocks back from the dead Re: FTE 61-79 - M blocks back from the dead RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor Re: FTE 61-79 - 400M & C6 into my 67' RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor Re: FTE 61-79 - grille for 78-79 FTE 61-79 - 4x4 oil pan needed 351m Re: FTE 61-79 - 352 Probs Re: FTE 61-79 - 4x4 oil pan needed 351m Re: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor Re: FTE 61-79 - grille for 78-79 FTE 61-79 - ADMIN: New feature for users FTE 61-79 - winter tire pressure? ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 06:36:29 EST From: DENKC5 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - High beam problems. It sounds like the switch which is actually a rheostat. Had the same problem with an old 71' F100. DJ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 05:57:45 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing light God I hate to do this but...(well I guess I don't hate it enough ;0) ). Voltage can be measured in an open (not completed circuit). Current (amps) cannot. The inductive light won't flash in a non-firing cylinder because if no current flows then there is no magnetic field generated around the wire to induce a signal to the light to trigger from. Tom H - -----Original Message----- From: John LaGrone [mailto:jlagrone Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 9:56 AM To: -FordTruckDigest Subject: FTE 61-79 - Timing light >>I always assumed that the strobe was independent of the plug or anything after the source to the attachment point of the strobe pickup wire. What you are saying implies that the strobe wire needs a complete circuit to engine ground in the wire being tested to function? Sort of like a Clamp? Not arguing with you, just curious. Dang it , Gary, just when I begin to trust you.... The timing light won't flash on a non-firing cylinder because there is no current, voltage, or any other hojo term you want to use. Without the spark, the circuit isn't completed. Think about it. You can put 6 million volts on one end of a wire and it won't go anywhere until you complete the circuit in some manner. You can't measure voltage without completing the circuit. (grin, grin) - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 05:57:39 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - New To List Gear Vendors supplies aftermarket electrically shifted overdrive units. Look under the truck after the transmission and see if there is an "second" transmission that may look something like a transfer case but with only one output. You say you have a 4x4 so it will probably be between the transmission and transfer case. Not sure how it should be operated. Tom H - -----Original Message----- From: James Stepke [mailto:jstepke Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 12:13 PM To: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - New To List Hi Everyone!! I am new to the list and i wanted to introduce myself and ask a question or two!! I used to own a 1978 f150 4x4 351M but sold it last fall. I recently bought a 1979 F150 4x4 400M. It is a very interesting truck, like nothing i have seen before. It is silver with black and orange accents and the interior is accented with orange. The doors say "Official Truck of the May (something)1979 Indianapolis 500 Mile Race." This brings me to my first questions. Was this a package offered by ford, a special edition or some kind of homebrew ripoff?? It looks very authentic!! Next, there is a button that is mounted under the dash under the headlight switch that is green and says "Gear Vendor O/D." What the heck is it?? It doesn't seem to do anything when i push it. It is lighted and has two positions, in and out!! I wanted to know if anyone can help me find information about my new truck. I love it!! Bye the way my name is James and I live in Michigan. Thanks In Advance for any and all Help James 79 F150 4x4 400m 91 Wrangler 5spd. 4.0L 2.5" 31x10.5 MT's ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 05:57:46 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing light - -----Original Message----- From: Peters, Gary (G.R.) [mailto:gpeters3 Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 10:17 AM To: '61-79-list Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Timing light Well, Dang it John! I assumed it grounded through the battery ground some how :-) Feed the spark plug wire to a device in the light which is grounded to the battery ground wire from the light and you certainly do have a circuit :-) Why the heck else would you hook the stupid thing to the battery in the first place? The light is connected to the + and - terminals of the battery to provide the power it needs to operate. The 3rd connection is the "sense" line to trigger the light. Without the + connection to the battery the light wouldn't be able to source enough power from the sense line to fire the light. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 05:57:48 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor No. In general: Automatic transmissions have torque converters. Standard trannies have clutches. I remember reading some silliness in a hot rodding mag about someone using a clutch in an automatic. Always passed it off as a typo. Tom H - -----Original Message----- From: rich may [mailto:doom460 Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 10:55 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor Do all transmissions have torque converters? ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 05:57:49 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor The torque converter is mounted to the rear of the motor to the auotmatic transmission's version of a flywheel called a flexplate. It is inside a housing that is either cast as part of the transmissin case or bolted to the front of the transmission. Either way it is not easy to see it. There is usually an inspection cover on the bottom of the housing that really just allows you to unbolt the converter from the flexplate. The converter looks something like a doughnut with the hole filled in. Are you having problems with yours or just want some information? Tom H - -----Original Message----- From: rich may [mailto:doom460 Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 11:28 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor I have a 1968 390Gt mated to a C-6. Where would it be located and do you know what it would look like? - --- "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" wrote: > All transmissions "Are" torque converters (or > amplifiers?) :-) Actually > only automatics have what are "commonly" called > torque converters. They are > more accurately called "Fluid Couplers" because they > use ATF to connect the > engine to the transmission via vanes or turbins. > Manual transmissions use > mechanical clutches in most cases (for you guys > waiting for me to make a > mistake, I know all about the Auto stick VW :-)) > which are operated by the > driver for changing gears etc.. > > Why they are called "converters" isn't exactly clear > to me since they don't > really convert anything. If anything they "Amplify" > torque under load and > at low speeds but since it's still torque and it's > still rotary motion I > don't see the conversion? :-) > > -- > Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, > 78 Bronco Loving, Gary > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 > -- > > > Do all transmissions have torque converters? > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info > http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 08:10:05 -0600 From: "Norm" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor > I remember reading some silliness in a hot rodding mag about someone using a > clutch in an automatic. Always passed it off as a typo. > > Tom H Actually.......you can have an automatic tranny withot a tourque converter......At least in an aftermarket sense! The practice of eliminating the converter and using a clutch design is popular in drag racing! Also it is seen in truck pulling circles as well! It is called a Crower Glide! But this is not an automatic tranny of the style you would see in a street driven vehical.....:-) Norm/Tracie dahorse http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=231 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jvlnet.com/~dahorse == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 09:33:04 EST From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - 400M & C6 into my 67' This sounds like a job for "Mike In Burien". He has an awesome 72 with a 351 in it........ CJ (back from the Orient) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 06:42:24 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Another one saved from the reaper Congrats on the find and way to go on saving a great truck. On the heater core, I've done two. The factory manual's procedure is posted on the web page. Check it out. It worked pretty well for me. Just take your time and remember that all of your work will be done inside the cab. Tom H. - -----Original Message----- From: Hedges [mailto:bhedges Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 1:40 PM To: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - Another one saved from the reaper On a recent trip to the local "treasure" yard, I stumbled upon a new addition, a 77 F150 Ranger XLT, 400 ci, auto, ps, pb, ac, factory duel tanks, most of the factory cruise. Sticker on the valve cover indicates the 400 met 76 emissions. (Story is it was replaced with one out of a car) Only parts missing so far were the ps pump and the mirrors. Seems the yard just switched to its third owner, this was the first owner's truck. (New one didn't want it and was ready to sell whole or part it out) The story was the engine was only so so, and the trans leaked too bad to drive. Truck had not seen a road since 83 (at least from its license plate) and had been stored in a shed for 10+ years. (Can you say No rust through). Last time it was titled was 84, showing 50,6xx for an odometer reading, current reading 51,6xx. Was a little rough around the edges, but too good for me to see it parted out. After I parted with $ 250 it became my newest addition. (Am I lucky or what?) Figured if nothing else there were alot of good parts for my 77 3/4 ton (switch to 1/2 ton, auto, ac, XLT trim). Good news is that after only replacing the fuel pump and cleaning the gas tank it lives! Starts easy, sounds good, only a little black/grey smoke when revved. Road test shows trans to shift good, only small spot is left on the ground when parked (and yes its full of fluid). Soon to hit the road. Too good to be true? I know there will be alot of little things that will go wrong shortly after it sat for so long but hey, that's the fun of it, right? On to my question. Need to replace the heater core. I know in this truck with AC that it's not a fun job. Done it once quite a while back to a 79 4WD, but my memory is foggy. Any words of wisdom before I undertake this task. Any tricks that will make it easier? Thanks in advance for any help. Brian 77 F150 Ranger XLT (think I'll call her lucky) 77 F250 Custom, 351M, 4 spd 94 Explorer, Eddie Bauer 91 Ranger, 260,000 miles 60 F100 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 06:48:26 -0800 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Re: Fluid coupler vs. Torque Converter Didn't someone in the 30's or 40's make some sort of "electric clutch" where there was an electro magnet in the flywheel and a metal disk connected to the trans. The whole affair was filled with oil and the dirtier more metal shaving filled the oil was the bette it worked. When the magnet was engaget the whole mess locked togeter and tranmitted torque to the trans. Since there was no friction surfaces there was very little to wear out. Tom H - -----Original Message----- From: Brett L Habben [mailto:bhabben Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 6:33 PM To: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Fluid coupler vs. Torque Converter Trivia: The first auto trans only had "Fluid Couplers" (like the old Hydromatics). When they added the "Stator" between the drive and driven turbines, it became a "Torque Converter". The stator's purpose is redirect the fluid flow angle against the driven turbine at take off, having a torque multiplying effect. This is what makes auto trannies great for starting a heavy pull. Truly interesting reading is the "Triple Turbine" tranny section of my '59 Buick repair manual. Everything you would ever want to know about turbines. Brett Super75cab > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:29:03 -0500 From: "don" Subject: FTE 61-79 - An update and a Thanks After many many months and many time delays, my engine project is nearing completion. I have a 1979 Ford F150 that I put a 1971 400M (stock 260) HP in. It was my 1st rebuild so I took my time and asked you guys many questions. The engine was taken to the machine shop and worked, new valves etc. Modifications include a True Roller Chain , Competition Cams 272H camshaft, Edelbrock Performer Manifold (only two are even made for the 400M, other was a Weiand), Edelbrock 600CFM electric choke carb, switched it over to Electronic ignition (easy as pie since the truck was a 79, just got the distributor). Chrome everything. As long as front end was off I replaced EVERYTHING in front end for that like new feel, draglink, steering box, actually everything except the kingpins and I beams. After messing with the wiring harness (thanx to info from here) the engine cranked right over and purrs like a kitten. I am putting the Hedmen Headers on the 1st and getting ready to start on the interior. I could not have done this without the many, many questions I have asked through here and the help of all you great ford fans. Cannot even begin to thank everyone personally, but one big kudos to Bill Beyer for a hard to find part. Thanks everyone. Now I get to start on the interior and body, so in another year or so I should be done :) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 07:49:40 -0600 From: "Bob & Becky Elliott" Subject: FTE 61-79 - dim lights Just a quick comment. Shorts=blown fuses or hot/burning wires. Usually poor grounds = dim lights. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 09:13:00 -0800 From: Tim Bowman Subject: FTE 61-79 - valve cover gasket on my 360 v8 Daniel: You're on the right track. All I do (and did when I bought my 71 with a 360) is thoroughly clean the valve cover surface and the matching surface on the head. I also checked for possible indentation around the bolt holes in the valve cover and peen them back as needed. Also check (using a straightedge the flatness of the valve cover. Cosmetically, I also cleaned the inside and outside of the valve cover. I glued the valve cover gasket to the valve cover before installation using a Permatemp product for that application. I also pressure washed my engine a few times to remove all of the accumulated grime and grit. It looks reasonably presentable for a 28 year old stock truck. Enjoy the time working on your truck. I find it very enjoyable doing all my own maintenance. Tim Bowman Burien, WA 71 F100 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 11:19:06 -0600 From: Craig Cantrell Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - High beam problems. The headlight switch is actually 2 switches and a rheostat all in one. Two position switch for the headlight/park lights, a rheostat for the dash lights, and a single pole switch at the end of the rheostat for the interior dome light. In the problem described, the only difference in floor switch position is an increase amperage draw. Either the CB in the light switch is cycling or it has some bad wiring to the foot dimmer switch or both. The CB on the switch may be weak from use even if there is a wiring problem. DENKC5 > It sounds like the switch which is actually a rheostat. Had the same problem > with an old 71' F100. > > DJ > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html - -- Craig - -- 1997 Cobra Convertible--#2149 "Naw Jaw"--Pacific Green/Saddle/Saddle President, South Central Kansas Mustang Club See us at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.kscable.com/sckmc == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 04:58:36 -0700 From: mclough Subject: FTE 61-79 - water temp high ? Are you looking at the stock gauge? If so, did you change the sender? It could be a sender for a light instead of a gauge. I am not sure about that but it could cause your problem. later, mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 05:29:14 -0700 From: mclough Subject: FTE 61-79 - 400 M rebuild All M-block owners rejoice. Another has been saved from the dreaded 460 replacement. I have finally installed my freshly rebuilt M-block into my 1978 f100 2wd. I have been fixing all the other problems that I had forgotten about in the last year that it has been a lawn ornament. Anyway, it started out as a 351M but was changed to a 400 with different crank and TRW forged pistons (.040+). The heads were shaved .020 and a crane stud and roller rocker kit were installed along with ss valves and an ARP head stud kit. New timing chain kit, push rods, lifters and a speed-pro cam (CS-1021R) were also put on. I put on some Hedman Hedders also and they were a real pain. The hedders hit just about everything on their way back (lots of lying on my back bending stuff and cussing alot!) but at least I don't have to remove them to pull the starter. I wish that I could have found a set of stock manifolds easier but oh well. I also had a local muffler shop build a new dual exhaust with crossover that exits behind the rear tires. The engine runs absolutely sweet compared to the old worn out 351M. I can't wait to get it fully broken in and try to pull something with it. Anyone have any ideas on how to richen up the idle circuits on a 2v Motorcraft carb. Someone ditched all the thermactor stuff long ago and it has always had a very lean idle. I tried raising the float level but have to have the idle mix screws real loose to get a good idle. I am putting off the carb/aluminum intake installation until I recover from the financial blow of the engine rebuild and other stuff (rebuilt C6, new windshield, new tires, exhaust system). Any list members up here in Northern Arizona or Southern Utah? Thanks, Mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 13:41:16 -0500 From: "Gary L. Perry" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Great Auction! Received a mailer (in color) anouncing an antique vehicle auction in Sidney, Nebraska. 500 veh. in 2-days. All kinds of stuff from 'teens to 70's. Lots of unusual trucks including Big ones and COE's. Dates: Fri.Nov. 12, and Sat. Nov. 13 , starts at 9:30 am. Phone for directions of info: 1-800-842-0583 or 308-262-1150 "G" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 14:02:45 -0800 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: FTE 61-79 - M blocks back from the dead Wow! 2 posts on successful M block rebuilds in 1 day! Maybe there is hope for us abused souls after all. Either that or some sort of strange mind control being exerted by an unscrupulous individual. Anybody seen some sort of giant antenna array outside of Denver lately? Say near Louisville? And another thing...should we be concerned about the on-going, mysterious transformation of mild-mannered 351Ms into nasty, fire-breathing 400s? Maybe we should petition the government to put 351Ms on the endangered species list. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 17:05:44 EST From: DENKC5 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - M blocks back from the dead ==FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 14:26:23 -0800 (PST) From: canzus Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor At 05:57 AM 7:11:99 -0800, Hogan, Tom wrote: >No. In general: >Automatic transmissions have torque converters. >Standard trannies have clutches. > >I remember reading some silliness in a hot rodding mag about someone using a >clutch in an automatic. Always passed it off as a typo. > It is done that way in some forms of stock car racing, and was done that way with what was called a clutch-flite. Which was a torque-flite with a twin disc clutch instead of a TC. If you have enough HP you don't really need a converter. A Lenco is the outgrowth of the old clutch-flite transmission. The clutchflite saw most usage in Gassers in the mid/late 60's. The stockers are using Powerglides directly coupled to the flywheel, and are called Circlematics If you can figure out how to drive the front pump, how to connect the input shaft, how to stop oil from going to the TC, and plug the TC return port, you too could have a semi automatic tranny..... Steve & the Rockette 63 F100 72 Capri 2000, hers 73 Capri 2600, needs tube frame... 73 MGB GT, Our Toy 94 SHO, SWMBO's 97 Contour, Mine == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 14:26:25 -0800 (PST) From: canzus Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 400M & C6 into my 67' At 08:55 AM 6:11:99 -0800, Douglas Trotter wrote: >I'm currently in the process of gathering the parts >needed to replace my 300 c.i. 6cyl. and C4 with a 400M >and C6. I've already purchased a used engine and >transmission and now need to prepare for the >installation. > >My research indicates that I will need to: >1) Shorten the front shaft of my two piece drive >shaft. >2) Modify my transmission cross-member to accommodate >the C6. >3) Replace the radiator with a V8 unit. > Since no-one has responded, I'll give it a shot.... Step by step... For the driveshaft; 1- Find the center points of both engines 2- Measure to the end of the tail housing of the tranny 3- The difference is how much the driveshaft must be shortened or lenghtened. For the movementof the trans mount crossmember; 1- Use the center points to measure to the trans mounts 2- The difference is how much the crossmember must be moved forward or backward. I would suggest putting the engine/transmission in the truck BEFORE getting the driveshaft made up, as the C4 doesn't use the same universal joints as the C6, and you'll need the correct yoke for the C6. If you're wondering why I use the centerline of the engine for the measuring point, It's because of the indent in the fire wall, you can't get a V8 to fit that close..... Steve & the Rockette 63 F100 72 Capri 2000, hers 73 Capri 2600, needs tube frame... 73 MGB GT, Our Toy 94 SHO, SWMBO's 97 Contour, Mine == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 14:32:23 -0800 (PST) From: rich may Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor I have a nasty shaking coming from the engine. It happens when it is neutral, in gear, or is raining anywhere in North America. One of the guys on the list said that it might be the torque convertor. I was just wondering about it. - --- "Hogan, Tom" wrote: > Are you having problems with yours or just want some > information? > > Tom H > > -----Original Message----- > From: rich may [mailto:doom460 > Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 11:28 AM > To: 61-79-list > Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor > > > I have a 1968 390Gt mated to a C-6. Where would it > be > located and do you know what it would look like? > > --- "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" > wrote: > > All transmissions "Are" torque converters (or > > amplifiers?) :-) Actually > > only automatics have what are "commonly" called > > torque converters. They are > > more accurately called "Fluid Couplers" because > they > > use ATF to connect the > > engine to the transmission via vanes or turbins. > > Manual transmissions use > > mechanical clutches in most cases (for you guys > > waiting for me to make a > > mistake, I know all about the Auto stick VW :-)) > > which are operated by the > > driver for changing gears etc.. > > > > Why they are called "converters" isn't exactly > clear > > to me since they don't > > really convert anything. If anything they > "Amplify" > > torque under load and > > at low speeds but since it's still torque and it's > > still rotary motion I > > don't see the conversion? :-) > > > > -- > > Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, > > 78 Bronco Loving, Gary > > > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 > > -- > > > > > Do all transmissions have torque converters? > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info > > http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > > > > ===== > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info > http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info > http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 18:17:55 EST From: JJJJJGRANT Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - grille for 78-79 i'm looking for a straight grille shell for a 78-79 thanks, jeff grant == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 18:26:57 EST From: JJJJJGRANT Subject: FTE 61-79 - 4x4 oil pan needed 351m HELP, come on guys, with all the 429 and 460 swaps going on, someone must have an oil pan, pick up tube and dip stick for a 351m or 400 in a 78-79 4x4 truck. this will be sort of a rear sump pan. i haven't resorted to ford yet, i was hoping to find a used one cheap, i'm on a tight budget on rebuilding this truck. thanks for any help jeff grant == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 18:58:25 EST From: TWL1911 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 352 Probs Hey all well i think i definatley got it narrowed down on the truck. ok i have a 66 352, and the carb has been rebuilt there is fuel getting to it and the fuel is clean ok i checked the points and i reset them and it ren fine for a little bit then it just died and wont start again is it ignition it has new coil, points and condenser is it the vacum advance? im lost from here thanks Travis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 16:33:22 -0800 From: Mike Pacheco Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 4x4 oil pan needed 351m I have a spare dipstick for a 400 Mike in Burien == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 19:50:16 EST From: NORTONMC Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - torque convertor Friend of mine had a fuel altered back in the mid 70's. Ran a 427 Chevy with a clutch flite trans. Basically a Chrysler 727 Torqueflite trans with the bell housing area machined off and an adapter plate in place to bolt it up to the scattershield bellhousing. This was definitely a "race only" trans. Used the clutch to get moving, automatic trans after initial launch, This was precursor to Lenco transmissions. Had to use a trans blanket as well as the clutch scattershield. Lots of work and money for very little benefit that I could see. There are probably a few still running at the strip. Dennis McNamara == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 20:22:08 -0800 From: "Charles T." Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - grille for 78-79 I have an extra that is in Good shape. It's not 'show' quality, but is dent free. The finish is dull and it has scratches. Im in Houston, TX area. > i'm looking for a straight grille shell for a 78-79 > > thanks, jeff grant > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 21:29:33 -0500.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|