|
|
From: owner-61-79-list-digest
To: 61-79-list-digest Subject: 61-79-list-digest V3 #381 Reply-To: 61-79-list Sender: owner-61-79-list-digest Errors-To: owner-61-79-list-digest Precedence: bulk 61-79-list-digest Wednesday, October 20 1999 Volume 03 : Number 381 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: FTE 61-79 - 1964, F-600 questions... RE: FTE 61-79 - 429-460 discussion RE: FTE 61-79 - Painting RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Truck 385 series Now How they rev. RE: FTE 61-79 - stalling problem(kinda long) RE: FTE 61-79 - tires Re: FTE 61-79 - In Seattle FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! RE: FTE 61-79 - W heads FTE 61-79 - RE: Whos bigger? FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! RE: FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! FTE 61-79 - 1961 F-100 Power Steering FTE 61-79 - '70 F-100 Ranger 302 fuel system FTE 61-79 - flexible tubing? FTE 61-79 - deacon returns home FTE 61-79 - Drive Shaft Strength FTE 61-79 - RE: Truck 385 series Now How they rev. FTE 61-79 - Ruby gets a diesel powered sibling FTE 61-79 - speedo change over RE: FTE 61-79 - '70 F-100 Ranger 302 fuel system FTE 61-79 - Re: flexible tubing Re: FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! RE: FTE 61-79 - speedo change over Re: FTE 61-79 - 1964, F-600 questions... RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Truck 385 series Now How they rev. RE: FTE 61-79 - W heads FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor FTE 61-79 - Re: NOS Ford Hardware FTE 61-79 - Edelbrock Intake/Bearing Adj./Holley-Carter FTE 61-79 - 78 F250 4x4 Steering Re: FTE 61-79 - 1961 F-100 Power Steering FTE 61-79 - distributor Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:34:12 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - 1964, F-600 questions... Basically on the road, more or less empty. The curb weight without bed was over 8000# so I couldn't get farm plates back then. With bed on it and all equipment I got it up around 11000 or so. When idling around in the woods and pulling out of mud holes or running my log splitter the mileage went down to zero :-) BTW, using a 330 to run a log splitter is not a good choice :-) I don't have a use for it anymore but I'd love to have it back just to have it. It was a cool truck :-) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > 9 mpg empty or full load ? > > Bill == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:47:13 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - 429-460 discussion I'm sure he believes this but I don't see it myself. I think it's much more a matter of economy. In trucks they typically use the least engine that will get the job done and typically long stroke engines have always been the choice for trucks and have held up well. The 330 FE is a good example as is the 300, I-6. In motor homes, which have considerable weight, they use both the 460 and 454 as a general rule. While they are not pulling the same loads as a fully loaded F-700 the concept is the same I would think? Perhaps what he's talking about is running hills in lower gears where you run at sustained higher rpms to get the power you need? Even then we know some truck pullers who hit 9k rpm at times with the 460 and run the whole season with no mishaps. I would really like to see more info on this if someone has it because I really can't see the logic? - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > get back in the swing of things again. I was talking with a > mechanic friend > of mine about the reasons that Ford and G**M use the smaller > stroke engines > as truck motors. He said that they found the stroke in the > 460s and 454s to > be a little too "over center" to be long term reliable. The > 429s and 427s > lived longer with sustained loads. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:49:42 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Painting My suggestion is that you forget bondo and do it with new metal if you plan to keep it for a while. The best bondo on earth still falls out eventually.....:-( - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > some advice on bodywork(techniques on sanding, bondo, painting). Any > webpages or books/videos I can check out that might be > useful? Also, the == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:52:31 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Truck 385 series Now How they rev. Mass is almost identical if not exactly identical. Pistons are the same except for compression height, rods are the same but crank is different so could be a factor, not sure. I still believe the tune has more to do with it than anything else :-) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > Could it be the mass of the 460 piston or reciprocating > assy (crank, > rods) vs a 429? Lighter mass would rev quicker. What's the > bore and stroke > difference between the two? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:07:25 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - stalling problem(kinda long) Holleys are made for WOT and can't be beaten for that purpose but at low speeds, especially just off idle they don't meter as well as a metering rod type carb and square bores meter less well than spread bores of the same CFM rating due to smaller primary venturis. Higher velocities cause stronger impulses in the venturi so control the fuel flow better for better economy and smoother throttle response. Square bore metering rod designs also have better metering at low speeds so are better for a truck in most cases. The holley is modular so has many gaskets and joints to leak and they do so this is another complaint although mine have not been too much trouble in that way. One argument for the metering rod is the motorcycle industry and small engine sports cars. They all use metering rods and VV carbs for better throttle response with small engines and also get pretty darned good economy due to this. Small engines generate small volume flow at low speeds so need all the help they can get to control fuel mixture at these settings for smooth throttle response. The VV design aids in this as does the metering rod which meters fuel relative to the opening of the venturi which is, in turn, controlled by vacuum. - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > Well as for that, a good friend of mine curses the word > holley but has yet to > give me a good reason why,, == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:12:06 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - tires I've been guily of buying only the tires that are worn out before when money was an issue but now I rotate my tires so they all wear out at the same time and last much longer as well. My daughter has 40k miles on her 97 f-150 now and the tires still look like new :-) I don't worry too much about mileage, I just rotate them at every oil change and I change oil when I get around to it......:-) (roughly every 5k miles) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > Maybe it's time for me to switch up to 33's from my "31's". > Too bad only the > rears need changing right now (one has a bubble under the > tread, the other a > slow leak). The fronts were changed about 15k ago and are > still looking fine! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 05:14:22 -0700 From: Mike Pacheco Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - In Seattle Sign me up for the meeting in Seattle, Thursday sounds great, let me know Mike in Burien == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:13:12 -0500 From: John Strauss Subject: FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! Deacon, glad you have got your house (and life) back in order now. About a year ago, we had a flood in our house after the roof blew off during a storm. Our loss was not near as big as yours, but still, the contractors and insurance hassles you described had me feeling pretty blue. My wife told me, "When it is all done this will just be one of those things that makes a house a home." Here's hoping your experience will soon be the same and you'll only be left with a good story to tell. _ _| ~~. John Strauss \, *_} jstrauss \( Texas Fight! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:06:21 -0500 From: "Don Yerhot" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - W heads Wish, I think you have the shaft mounted FE style rockers confused with the stud mounted rail style. The pedestal type rockers, used on 351C, 351M, 429, 460's and later W's use a bolt to fasten the rocker to the head as opposed to a stud used by the early W's. To make it even more confusing, they used a rail type, which has a slot on the valve side of the rocker that keeps the rocker/pushrod in alignment, and a non-rail, which used guide plates on the pushrods. As far as a cam, I'm just using a CompCam 268, set straight up. I know, it should ping itself to death. It helps to have it in a fairly light F100, If I need to haul or pull, I use my F250 with a low compession (8-1)351W. DonY 65F250-351W 74F100-351W From: "William S. Hart" > In 77 they switched from rail > rockers to > pedestal and also increased the size of the combustion chamber, We're talkin W's here right ? The 69's that we have at home have the pedestal rockers on them ... not the rails like I have in the FE ... they are non adjustable though ... > Because of the wedge combustion chamber, these engines can run > some fairly > high compression without predetonation. I'm running KB Silvolites with 75 > heads, or about 10.8-1. I get by with 93 octane gas and a can of > 104 every > other tank. What cam do you have on this ? Lots of times builders compensate for excessive compression using a big cam to "bleed off" the compression ratio a bit ... I was running a 71 351C 2V with 9.0-1 that pinged > like crazy. I > agree, 351W's are great little engines. > Wow, I've never had 9:1 ping ... my 9.6+ (FE) is pinging with too much advance, but at 8deg initial I can run it without pinging or anything on 89 octane (ethanol)...> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:18:31 -0400 From: Steve Schaefer Subject: FTE 61-79 - RE: Whos bigger? > > > Lets see: > > F-350 - F-150 > 460 - 400 > 33's - 33's > longbed - shortbed >> > > Who's taller????? =P Heehee, I have to throw my $1.298 in. F-250 Supercab 400 Longbed 39's Sorry couldn't resist:^) Steve S. 77 F-250 Supercab (Yellow/purple) 76 F-350 Crewcab flatbed http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:27:31 -0400 From: Steve Schaefer Subject: FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! Yes it's true my friends. After 10 months of living in a motel, we are back in our house!!! For those new to the list and for the those who've forgotten Ol' Deacon allow me to recap. How could we forget the great Deacon. Glad to see you are finally getting back to your home. Now that that is all behind you (hopefully for good), it is time to share your word of wisdom with the FTE group again (I hope).:>) OK everyone, it is time to be on your toes again, watch those keystrokes, he is back. Steve S. 77 F-250 Supercab (yellow/purple) 76 F-350 Crewcab flatbed http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/8663/ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:38:40 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! As others have said, I'm also happy for you. I've lost material possesions to thieves but never had to deal with a fire. I can only imagine.....:-( Insurace companies can be very unloving in these circumstances :-( You were probably planning on redecorating a few rooms anyway right? - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > Yes it's true my friends. After 10 months of living in a motel, we are > back in our house!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:26:50 -0700 From: "O'Connor" Subject: FTE 61-79 - 1961 F-100 Power Steering Mark, A few months ago, I posted a parts list for 66 thru 69's to convert to power steering. I've since updated it and transfered to Excel. I think 61's had what was called power assist. It consisted of a hydraulic cylinder attached to the drag link? I haven't heard of anyone converting a 61 to full intregal steering; but am curious. I would be happy to pass along this parts list if you are interested. Tim 66F100 Custom Cab SWB w/352 & original P/S and O/D == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:27:28 +0000 From: scotthome Subject: FTE 61-79 - '70 F-100 Ranger 302 fuel system I am rebuilding/upgrading my '70 F-100 Ranger from a two barrel carb (stock) to a four barrel carb (Edelbrock 1406). Two issues have come up: 1. The carburetor linkage needs to be completely changed out and I can't locate any four barrel linkage systems at salvage yards in my area. If you know of a good salvage yard or have any ideas on aftermarket products or modifying the current two barrel linkage system, please let me know. 2. I want to remove the fuel tank from the cab and get it under the truck. Saddle tanks are too dangerous so I am looking for something that will fit between the frame rails or even possibly in the bed under a tool box. Any ideas on tanks from other model years or aftermarket manufacturers? Thanks in advance! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 12:16:07 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - flexible tubing? Hey Wish and gang, Thanks for the info.....you're right, Wish. I need to break this engine and cam in and I didn't want to sit there for a half hour with the headers uncapped.....that's fun in the sand dunes, but not in the neighborhood where you need to be friends with your neighbors!!!!!! I'll check out the Pep Boys equivalent here, and of course, thanks to Stock Man, JCW. The Napa place said they could get it, but they wanted about $110 for a 10-foot section. If worse comes to worse, I'll buy some straight tubing, heat it with a torch and bend it myself....just need something temporary.... Thanks again gang. Headed to Asia for about 10 days, so I'll be out of touch. Hey William, have a good time with that Seattle group.....they made my trip out there a lot of fun!!!!! Deacon: Glad to see you back in the saddle! CJ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:00:28 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - deacon returns home Yeehaw!!!!!!!!!!!!! Glad everything is going well. - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:59:29 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Drive Shaft Strength Personally, I wouldn't use anything aluminum anywhere that I knew was going to be stressed, especially a drive shaft on a 400+ hp V8. - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 12:41:53 -0400 From: "Marvin Meyer" Subject: FTE 61-79 - RE: Truck 385 series Now How they rev. Gary; your right about tuning, the carb has alot too. I changed the rear jet sizes on my Holley, I forgot the size, have it wrote down some where, but the rear cylinders like running leaner in part due to runner lenghth. And velocity. Using an infarred heat detector on individual cyclinders helps to super tune (if you have access to one) I'm lucky I guess. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 12:56:22 -0400 From: "Marvin Meyer" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Ruby gets a diesel powered sibling Guess its time to play the baby name game again. How about "Millenia" or "Centura" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:57:13 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - speedo change over >>They were changed to 85 mph units when the speed limit in the US was changed to 55. They did this to fool you into going slower. I think I started this mess. I don't know what year they changed over, but George's reasoning is absolutely correct. I, like Gary, want one of those 240 mph digital dashes but can bring myself to part with the money right now. I have also considered a speedo out of a late 80s Lincoln, but too many other time consuming activities keep getting in the way. - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 12:45:01 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - '70 F-100 Ranger 302 fuel system Don't know exactly what the rear frame looks like on the earlier ones but I mounted a van tank in my 78, behind the axle. Most models had an aux tank that went there too so it should be pretty easy to find something that will fit but the aux tanks were a tad small so a plastic replacement tank from JC whittney might be a good way to go. I really like the plastic ones, they last forever, no rust problems etc.. I have one in my bronco and just had to shore it up with some straps since the skid plate rusted all the way through. Been watching it for a year and when I noticed a crack starting in the one thin area still holding the tank in I decided I better do something....quick :-) Didn't trust the strap kits though so put 4 of them on there. 33 * 6.5 = 214.5 pounds and stiff suspension to boot :-) You could probably mount a side tank cross ways in the bed under the tool box. Seems like they are just about the right dimensions? - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > 2. I want to remove the fuel tank from the cab and get it under the > truck. Saddle tanks are too dangerous so I am looking for something > that will fit between the frame rails or even possibly in the > bed under > a tool box. Any ideas on tanks from other model years or aftermarket > manufacturers? Thanks in advance! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 12:29:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Rubberducky23 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: flexible tubing I worked for Big A Auto Parts at Hampden and Wadsworth in Lakewood CO. It is illegal for any parts store to sell flex tubing in the Denver area. We were told this law intended to prevent any modification to exhaust systems by the "common" mechanic. Thus requiring a person to take any exhaust issues to a EnviroTest certified shop. As far=A0as I know you can still get flex exhaust tubing anywhere outside the front range where vehicles are not required to pass EnviroTest emissions. But I may be wrong (I've been in the ARMY and away from Denver for 4 years now) a lots changed since I've been gone..... I believe Parker does not have to conform to EnviroTest rules and you may be able to find your tubing there or someplace like Parker away from Denver. Hope this helps, Danny Ling (pre 77 1/2) 77 F250 Highboy 4X4, 69 429 "Thunder Jet" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:32:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Pat Brown Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - It's good to touch the green green grass of home! [Deacon Returns Home!] Congratulations Deacon, good to hear you have a garage again :-) So, tell us, after the Mustang C4 adventure, did you ever get the ATF stains out of the bathtub at the hotel ? :-) - -- Pat Brown Sebastopol, California == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 13:51:52 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - speedo change over I have one from a 78......:-) Got this neat clock with the flip over numbers too :-) (don't know it if works though :-)) Dash is about 1" short of fitting the bronco. Never would have guessed the bronco was wider than a lincoln :-) Sure hope the grill and headlight thingy fits :-) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > now. I have also considered a speedo out of a late 80s > Lincoln, == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:20:45 +0100 From: "Bill Brox" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 1964, F-600 questions... Yeah, me and my thoughts,,,, where did they go.... it is a 1964 F-600, but I am not sure if it is a COE or standard cab,,, Bill > > In a message dated 10/18/1999 8:37:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > bill > > sale, > and when I called him it was a F-600, so now I am curious of how it looks > like. > Does it have the same cab as the F-100 to F-350 ? > Also, he said the truck had a gross vehicle weight of 11500 kg, which means > 25330 lbs,,, is this correct ? Or have I missunderstood... (weight of truck > + weight of cargo) > Then he said it had a 6 cyl. gas engine,,,, he thought it was about 4 liter > displacement,,, what kind of engine coiuld this be ? > >> > That is the kind of truck used around here on farms. Uses 20 or 22 inch > wheels, duals in the rear. The frames come in various lengths to accommodate > beds 16 to 20 feet long. In the mid 60s and 70s the cabs looked very similar > to the pickups, fenders had bigger wheel wells. In the late 70s and 80's the > whole front end changed, does not look much like the pickup. But the doors > are recognizable as being related to the pickup of the same year. Yes, the > gross weight is truck + cargo. Probably best figure the engine out if we > knew the year. Ford Trucks of that size I've seen were V8s, so I am at a > complete loss, but suspect the six to be a 240 or 300. > Burt Hill Kennewick WA 1972 F250 4x4 460 > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:45:00 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Truck 385 series Now How they rev. I'm just a little curious, how does the rear venturis affect the rear runners? Did you have two carbs? This just gave me an idea......dual quads in the 390 range wouuld give about 800 cfm, not out of range for a decent running 460 and then you do have cylinder tuning capability :-) Problem is the tunnel ram and other dual quad manifolds have pretty large runners so velocity would suffer at lower rpms......Oh well :-( Guess I'll just have to pull a steve and make my own stuff :-) The name "Hillborn" now comes to mind.....:-) Eight little venturis on 8 big cylinders :-) I've seen what appears to be dual plane, dual quad manifolds on some engines......is this possible? The carbs were offset instead of in line. - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > the rear cylinders like running leaner in part due to runner > lenghth. And > velocity. Using an infarred heat detector on individual > cyclinders helps to > super tune (if you have access to one) I'm lucky I guess. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:41:37 -0500 From: "William S. Hart" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - W heads > I think you have the shaft mounted FE style rockers confused > with the stud > mounted rail style. The pedestal type rockers, used on 351C, 351M, 429, > 460's and later W's use a bolt to fasten the rocker to the head > as opposed > to a stud used by the early W's. To make it even more confusing, > they used a > rail type, which has a slot on the valve side of the rocker that > keeps the > rocker/pushrod in alignment, and a non-rail, which used guide > plates on the > pushrods. Doh! Right you are my man ... I was confusing myself thinking about that one earlier ... > As far as a cam, I'm just using a CompCam 268, set straight up. > I know, it > should ping itself to death. It helps to have it in a fairly > light F100, If > I need to haul or pull, I use my F250 with a low compession (8-1)351W. > The 351 we've got is in a 69 cougar, so the weight isn't too bad of an issue, though if we run 12 or more advance it will ping ... My truck however weighs a bit more and has a touch higher compression, so I'm limited to 8 for my advance if I want to pull anything :( but man is it nice when I hit the gas ... at 50 today on the interstate I was able to punch it, listen to that holley ring and merge with the other lane that was doing 65 efforlessly :) Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 4.6L 73ish F100 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:44:14 EDT From: Brazzadog Subject: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor This is a repost of a question I didn't get a response to a week or so ago. I'm sorry if there were responses and I just missed them - I've been kind of behind on digests. I've since found a guy with a bunch of early Bronco parts for sale so I have more options. I just don't know which way to go. I've got a friend with a '78 Bronco that needs new hub/rotor assemblies. I know another guy with a '80s IFS 4x4 F-150 he's parting out. Anybody know which years these hub/rotor assemblies were the same for Bronco/F-150? Seems like some of the early Broncos had the same hub/rotor as well. Thanks. Ben Williams '78 F-250 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:59:51 -0500 From: "Norm" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor > I've got a friend with a '78 Bronco that needs new hub/rotor assemblies. I > know another guy with a '80s IFS 4x4 F-150 he's parting out. Anybody know > which years these hub/rotor assemblies were the same for Bronco/F-150? Seems > like some of the early Broncos had the same hub/rotor as well. Thanks. > > Ben Williams According to the Hollanders interchange...... it looks like 69-86 are all the same! For what thats worth! hope this helps some! Norm/Tracie dahorse http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=231 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.jvlnet.com/~dahorse == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 21:16:29 EDT From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor I could be wrong, but I think the IFS is a whole separate breed. I think the only interchangeables would be the gears. best bet would be to call a Ford Dealer, they can cross-reference part #'s. Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 21:27:26 -0400 From: Tony Marino Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - '78 Bronco hub/rotor Hey Guys-- Except for that strange setup in 'late '87 and early 88 on fullsize 4x4 (with different hub assy.) the hubs are all the same from 67-96. (and rotors from '73-96). Surprise your parts guys at the autostores when you get a price of $65 dollars a piece for rotors for a '93 F-150 4x4, and you tell them you want to buy them for a '78 F-150 4x4 instead for $35 bucks.... Same exact thing-- my '93 tells me so! 8-) Tony tony http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pscico.com/~tony JUMPINFORD > I could be wrong, but I think the IFS is a whole separate breed. I think the > only interchangeables would be the gears. best bet would be to call a Ford > Dealer, they can cross-reference part #'s. > > Darrell Duggan > 74 F-350 "Tweety" > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 22:13:39 EDT From: TBeeee Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: NOS Ford Hardware Why is it that the smallest details present the most challenges! I am hopeful someone will have a suggestion for the frame clips which secure the brake and fuel lines to the frame on a 1966 F-250. I know there are several aftermarket sources. I do not want to go that route. Besides that will not solve the clips at the clutch pivot and in the rear by the brake hose because those two are quite unique. Several NOS suppliers told me to try Ford. I did that today and struck out. Anyone in a rust free-zone willing to find me some used ones? As always, I really appreciate everyone's input. So a big "thanks in advance." Stock Man 1967 Galaxie 500 Convertible (HELP!---I need 15 x5 factory rims) 1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd 1966 F-250 I6 240 2wd LWB Flare Side http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:42:42 -0700 From: "J.S.H." Subject: FTE 61-79 - Edelbrock Intake/Bearing Adj./Holley-Carter Anybody running a Edelbrock intake on thier FE? Any problems? Only thing that guy selling knows is that it is a single 4bbl manifold off a 390,it is in "excellent"condition and he wants $50. I realize some mods will be nessarary to linkage etc. >The lock ring can be flipped over to give you a "1/2 hole" if you need > it. By tapping the pin through the other side this can be done but since one hole on that ring will amount to less than 0.010" axial movement I would guess it's not really necessary. I don't do anything to the nut or the pin. If I have it set up just right ,but the pin will not quite line up with the hole in lock ring I pull just the ring out and flip it over. Some times it works,sometimes it doesn't >WE all have differing views on this but I would stay away from the >Holleys myself. Carter, Rochester, Edlebrock all make better mouse >traps for trucks Have to agree with that.Rebuilt the Carter on my 76 and the Holley on the 84 within the last 6 months. The Carter has a lot fewer parts in it,much simpler and performs better. Only advantage the Holley has is at WOT and that is slight. If it was not for smog regs. my Holley would be in the dumpster. Glad you are back under your own roof Deacon. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 23:29:12 EDT From: ETRMK Subject: FTE 61-79 - 78 F250 4x4 Steering The stock steering shaft on my 78 F250 4x4 is .... well... long overdue for replacement. First i asked a friend about buying a stock replacement and he said if i went that route i would end up paying a pretty penny for it...and the stock ones dont last very long anyway. My mom works for a FORD dealership here in town, and i can get oem parts for 10% above cost.. so i went down to check on the price... it was obsolete of course.Then i went to a custom 4x4 shop near me and when i asked if they had one in stock... the owner just looked at me with an ear to ear grin and said, "good luck" :-) He said that he could fab me up an assembly with needle bearing u joints on either end but itll be to the tune of about 2-250 bucks. Has anyone bought one of those Borgeson shafts that i see all the time in 4x4 mags? And if so, how much do they cost? Also... i put in a 4in suspension kit from trailmaster last year.. of course when i did it changed steering geometry. The kit came with a 2 in riser block that fits beetween the steering arm and the knuckle, but it doesnt complete the correction. I cant even come close to turning to the right as far as i can turn to the left, and ive already fried the rear joint on the new draglink i bought last yr. The guy at the shop said that he could fab a new drag link that has the tie rod ends inverted and is also adjustable. Anyone else done this lift on a similar rig? and if so what did you do to make the correction? Eric Norris Spokane Wa 78 F250 4x4 C6 400 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:57:54 PDT From: "White Wolf" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 1961 F-100 Power Steering Tim, I would be interested in the partslist/directions for the '66-'69. Corey Johnson '66 F100 352" >Mark, >A few months ago, I posted a parts list for 66 thru 69's to convert to >power steering. I've since updated it and transfered to Excel. I think >61's had what was called power assist. It consisted of a hydraulic >cylinder attached to the drag link? I haven't heard of anyone converting a >61 to full intregal steering; but am curious. I would be happy to pass >along this parts list if you are interested. > >Tim 66F100 Custom Cab SWB w/352 & original P/S and O/D >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 00:29:18 EDT From: JefriHansn.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|