|
|
From: owner-61-79-list-digest
To: 61-79-list-digest Subject: 61-79-list-digest V3 #339 Reply-To: 61-79-list Sender: owner-61-79-list-digest Errors-To: owner-61-79-list-digest Precedence: bulk 61-79-list-digest Tuesday, September 21 1999 Volume 03 : Number 339 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 61-79 - Gasket/molding FTE 61-79 - Truck is running Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: 66 has ugly dash Re: FTE 61-79 - Truck is running Re: FTE 61-79 - More Questions about engine choices FTE 61-79 - 428/Howlin rear end/leak down test Re: FTE 61-79 - 428/Howlin rear end/leak down test Re: FTE 61-79 - Gasket/molding Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:16:36 EDT From: SevnD2 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Gasket/molding I have seen my Father reuse the windshield gasket and chrome trim for a 65 once and the old gasket would not meet together at the ends again even with treating it with silicone spray . The chrome is good to reuse if in good shape , but the finished installation will only look as good as the materials used . I would recommend using both new gasket and chrome . Before using the new gasket , treat it with some silicone spray . Both the gasket and the chrome should be available through a large glass supply warehouse . Harding Glass of Tulsa , Oklahoma is where my Dad gets his supplies at times . If you need more help on this I can get more details of the installation and pitfalls to be aware of . I hope this helps ! Rollie H. Hunt King , N. C. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:18:47 -0400 From: Garry Bowling Subject: FTE 61-79 - Truck is running Well finally after 3 weeks and alot of time and a major headache I finally got the truck running after removing the oil pan to change the gasket. There seemed to be a comedy of errors but in the end it is finished and running. I will have to watch it over the next day or two to determine if the oil leak is fixed. I do know that I have one valve cover that is leaking and that is an easy fix that I will do this weekend. Just want to let everyone know. Garry == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:25:38 -0400 From: Ted Wnorowski Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: 66 has ugly dash At 06:57 PM 9/20/99 -0700, you wrote: >>Some companies do make the dash pads for mid-sixties era trucks. >> but they are very expensive, like $350. to $600. My '64 doesn't have a dash pad at all, just the head cracker steel. After seeing what a new dash pad costs, it'll probably stay that way for awhile. I have yet to see any for less than $350. Ted Wnorowski Bellevue,OH '64 F-250 352 transplant 4 speed == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:25:26 EDT From: TBeeee Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Truck is running In a message dated 9/20/99 11:23:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, garrya > Well finally after 3 weeks and alot of time and a major headache I > finally got the truck running Glad to hear it's running Garry. Sometimes these little headaches turn into major surgery! Stock Man 1967 Galaxie 500 Convertible (HELP!---I need 15 x5 factory rims) 1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd 1966 F-250 I6 240 2wd LWB Flare Side http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 22:44:34 -0500 From: "Jason & Kathy Kendrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - More Questions about engine choices Greg, you could pocket port and polish your heads. It will help prevent future carbon build-up, but the Fe heads run really well without any help. I'd go with tthe Edelbrock intake over the cast iron manifold anyday. You lose about 50 lbs with the Edelbrock manifold, and you have straighter, smoother ports for more torque and hp. The 428 naturally has more torque because of the longer stroke, but the added cost of buying a 428 might be more than you want to spend. I'd not even bother looking for a 428 because I know what a 390 will do. I pulled a Charger for my brother awhile back and never got below 50 mph uphill. Never had to downshift, either. Stopping was interesting with my manual drums. (Need to get my power discs installed!) My F100 will cruise at 80 mph all day long. It's got a 390 2bbl, C6, and 3.50 gears. Mileage is around 14 or 15 average, with a low of seven, and a high of 23 mpg! Don't ask me how I got 23 mpg-my balancer has spun and I time it by ear and feel! Jason Greg Fisher wrote: > > Thanks to Jason Kendrick, George Litton, Danger (I'd like to get that 460 > off you, if just fro future use, but too far away), Tom Hogan, and Gary > Peters for your answers and the welcome to the list. I wasn't able to get > this out the past weekend because I was a cr show, the Charlotte Auto Fair. > Well, it seems the 390 route is the way to go. I guess I'll know whether or > not I'll go 30 over. I have a few more questions now: > > 1) Since there are no 4V FE heads and it has been mentioned that "pocket > porting" is a waste of time, would it still be beneficial to polish the > bowls and port match to the intake? > 2) Which way is the best way to go with the intake: find a cast iron one or > just go with the Edelbrock performer 390? > 3) Would a 428 be that much better? I know "there's no substitute for > cubes", but does the 428 have the low end torque that atruck needs? > > I plan on using this as a work truck: hauling and towing. The thing I don't > want tho, is having to go 55mph on the interstate(70mph) when I need to go > somewhere. > Thanks again. > > Greg Fisher > '68 F150 Longbed > Rock Hill/Townville SC > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 21:14:23 -0700 From: "J.S.H." Subject: FTE 61-79 - 428/Howlin rear end/leak down test 3) Would a 428 be that much better? I know "there's no substitute for > cubes", but does the 428 have the low end torque that atruck needs? I did notice more pulling power with my 428 as opposed to my old 390, but a 390 or a 410 would be a fine truck engine also. >Not married yet, but this summer I'll be singing a different story. Is >this my nightmare waiting to happen? 8^) I picked up a Ford engine >exchange manual - I might learn something now. Yeah, I'd like to get a >428 but money always seems to put a serious dent in my plans, I think we can all relate to that one!!! You will be happier with a first class 390 than a 428 that you had to cut corners on. I got a howl coming fron the rear of my truck.(mainly when cold) How can I tell if it's the carrier bearing or the rear end? On a leakdown test how many P.S.I. do I put in the cylinder? What is a exceptable leak down rate. new paint job etc.etc. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:37:10 -0500 From: "Jason & Kathy Kendrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 428/Howlin rear end/leak down test To locate my bad wheel bearings, I used my hand to feel for excessive heat. If it's hot after a few miles, check it out. Jason J.S.H. wrote: > > I got a howl coming fron the rear of my truck.(mainly when cold) > How can I tell if it's the carrier bearing or the rear end? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:56:14 -0400 From: Ted Wnorowski Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Gasket/molding At 01:32 PM 9/20/99 -0700, you wrote: > Ok. So does anyone know where I could get a GOOD/NEW gasket? .. also I > have the original chrome molding, can it be reused? Just about every Ford Truck parts catalog I have carries these. Try these places: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.macsautoparts.com/index.html http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.auto krafters. com /welcome.html http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ford-obsolete-parts.com/ It will probably run you about $40. Most of these placed will sell you a "kit" that includes, windshield rubber, rear window rubber, door gaskets, and cowl lacing for a pretty decent price. ed Wnorowski Bellevue,OH '64 F-250 352 transplant 4 speed == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 22:46:19 PDT From: "George Litton" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup you put the second battery on the drivers side fenderwell, opposite of the starting battery. >From: Bad4dFilly >Reply-To: 61-79-list >To: 61-79-list >Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup >Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 11:10:36 EDT > >In a message dated 09/19/1999 3:03:30 PM !!!First Boot!!!, >GMontgo930 >writes: > > > battery) you can install a battery isolator. Ive seen em available in >parts > stores like Autozone. Basically they allow you to connect the batteries >in > parallel, but keeps them isolated from each other. One can provide the >truck > starting power while the other can run power accessories etc w/o fear of > running down the starting battery. No switches to flip when charging >either > as the isolator splits the alternator charging current to each battery. > Check it out. Simple to instal with some obvious bennies over plain ol > parallel wired batteries. >> > >This sounds like something I may wanna do when I get a sport bar w/ offroad >lights, but where do ya put the second battery?? >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ______________________________________________________.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|