|
|
From: owner-61-79-list-digest
To: 61-79-list-digest Subject: 61-79-list-digest V3 #336 Reply-To: 61-79-list Sender: owner-61-79-list-digest Errors-To: owner-61-79-list-digest Precedence: bulk 61-79-list-digest Sunday, September 19 1999 Volume 03 : Number 336 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: FTE 61-79 - Questions about engine choices RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Still not charging III [none] FTE 61-79 - "Secret" VIN number on frame? RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Still not charging III RE: FTE 61-79 - still not starting FTE 61-79 - Carrier bearing mount FTE 61-79 - Old (40s-50s) Wrecker boom info wanted FTE 61-79 - Re: still not starting FTE 61-79 - 360 to 390 Re: FTE 61-79 - Pressure switch. Re: FTE 61-79 - 65 F100 needs 352 engine rebuild - questions Re: FTE 61-79 - still not starting Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup FTE 61-79 - Safety Switch Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup FTE 61-79 - My New '71 f100! FTE 61-79 - Trans Questions FTE 61-79 - Pickup Box Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 06:55:29 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Questions about engine choices Unless you just want the status of owning a cleveland and saying to your buddies "I have a Cleveland in my truck" you DON'T WANT A CLEVELAND in your truck with 4v heads unless all you want to do is drag race and then you would be better served with a 460 :-) Your easiest, cheapest and most satisfying choice will be to upgrade to the 390 spec with your current parts or find a 428 in good shape to bolt in. PAW has many engine kits and may have the 428 in kit form, not sure. 460's are about $1800 in kit form. Next easiest and most satisfying is the 460 swap. Small block should be reserved for those who were brought up believing that all things are possible with a small block and nothing more is needed :-) You can make lots of HP with a small block but the same money and work applied to a big block will reap much greater rewards when you step on the gas :-) If I had a truck already set up for the FE, I would look for a 428 and if that was not possible in my area for a reasonable price I would rebuild to 390 specs. The cleveland would not even be an option (I'd take an I-6 first :-)) and the 460 would be my third choice in your case. I've had all but the 428 in a vehicle and can tell you the above is very real. If you have a 360 you may as well have a 390 and have the same economy but more power. FE's are not about economy in any case any more than the "M" blocks are. The 460 now......that's a whole nuther smoke :-))) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > Hi. New to list. Have a question. I have a '68 F100 longbed that my > Grandfather bought new. Has 2V 360/C6. The 360 could use a > rebuild. The == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 07:19:32 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Still not charging III I hate to be the perveyor of bad news but if you are only getting 12.5 v at the battery with engine running it isn't fixed. You should be able to idle up to about 2k rpm and turn every stinking accessory on in your truck and still see 14v if it's doing it's job. Lead/acid batterys have a resistance to charging of about 2v. If you don't charge with a voltage higher than the battery's threshold it will not charge. Yes, the alternator will run everything but the battery will not charge so eventually you will get in and it won't start, again :-( - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > went out. The truck still shows 12.5 volts at the battery when > running. I flipped the headlights on, and the voltage stayed around > 12.5 volts. At this point I'm going to conclude it's fixed. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 04:32:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Ballinger Subject: [none] There have been few pistons I've seen with more than 80,000 miles on them that were worth putting back in. If you take a jewelers glass and look athe ring lands of the piston after cleaning, you'll notice they are wavy, and will likely be gouged up from cleaning, or if they've been ground by a cretain type of cleaner, they will be wider than they were intended to be when new. A large part of what constitutes ring seal is the relationship of the bottom of the ring to the land on the piston. If the land is mated well to the ring, the piston will go further down in the bore in the compression stroke with out pulling away and allowing the gasses to go into the crankcase(blow-down, which is also known as part of a condition called blow-by). The concentricity of the cylinder and the mating of the ring to the cylinder is imprtant, but a wavy ring land (or carboned up) on a used piston is what will most of the time cause you to have blow by. Most modern rings (esp. moly filled)seat in 30 minutes. That's why start up is so important. $1500 isn't bad at all if you are getting good parts and machine work. You'll be lucky to get much of a 5.0 for much less. Though I did see a complet engine advertised from Ford Motorsports based on the '97 5.8 FI engine it shows it complete from throttle body to oil-pan for $2195. That's an exceptional value considering you get new injectors and everything. I'm putting everything in this one message, as I don't get a much time to write as I usually do. I'm here in Springdal AR training with JB Hunt, and will be for the next two weeks. It's tough being away from the family for three weeks, but I'll get by. As you can see I'm back on the list, but my email for now is at yahoo instead of LDD. CJ, how do those Sandersons fit around the starter? Do you still have to drop the header to get at it? There's an outstanding article on that Shelby 427 block in the Sept. 99 issue of Super Ford. And in the Oct issue they go over the Edelbrock head. The dyno results are unbelievable. The car it's in is Greg Booze's Pale Rider '62 Galaxie that runs 9.40's in the quarter. The peaks are 621 lbs. ft at 5900 rpms and 788 hp at 7200. YEAH!!! That's with a factory C8AX MR Tunnel-Wedge intake, they expect 830 hp fron a shetmetal one they are building. >>>>>> The presence of a ridge is not always an indicator that the block needs to be bored. It just depends on how worn the cylinders are. Best thing to do is mic out all of the pistons and the bore and see whether or not you will still be within specs after honing. Many times the pistons are worn and should be replaced. You really can't make an informed decision until you have all the facts and figures. There is no sense leaving it to guess work. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 07:44:15 -0400 From: "John F. Bauer III" Subject: FTE 61-79 - "Secret" VIN number on frame? Group: Anyone know off hand where the "secret" VIN number is that the BMV/Highway Patrol uses for inspecting a '79 E100 Van in order to issue VIN plates? I've heard its on the frame rails somewhere ... John == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 08:50:38 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - RE: Still not charging III I know you are an expert at this but I beg to differ, if only slightly. I agree with the main gist of your discussion but....If you turn off the engine you will never see 14v across the battery, ever. I've seen 13, 12.5 immediately after charging for a few minutes but never more than that and then only for a few minutes after which it drops back to about 12.5 if fully charged. It's all about "Wattage". The alternator has a wattage capacity and untill that is reached it will continue to pump more and more into the system. The battery has a limited flow capacity so at some point the alternator can, if rating is high enough, overcome this and begin to build voltage. (the battery may get very hot in the process though :-)) As you say, if the battery is in poor condition, electrolyte is bad, plates are shorted etc. it may not ever be able to reach 14v but with a good, but discharged battery you should see more than 12.5v pretty quickly if not immediately. If you pump full alternator wattage through the battery and the voltage does not come up you better stand away from it because it will probably blow :-( A shorted battery will boil the electrolyte out very quickly leaving hydrogen gas inside and the short may "spark" causing an explosion. If voltages don't make sense, don't get too close while it is charging, charge it for 1/2 hr and check it but not with engine running if you suspect this. In 1/2 hr you should be able to see a significant change in static voltage across the posts with engine off. If not you probably have a bad battery. I've seen discharged batterys as low as 8.5v come back up to nearly 12 in a very short time and I've seen them stay at 8.5 v after several hours too which is certainly an indication of a problem. My battery charger has very limited "Wattage" and you will see as low as 10.5v on a dead battery at first even with charger attached but it does not have the capacity the vehicle alternator has either, it is limited to 10 amps at 12v or 120 watts no matter what condition the battery is in, the alternator is not limited in this way. A small stock alternator can push 630 watts at it's rated capacity but we all know they can put out more than the rating if pushed. When I first noted this I thought my charger was bad but it did eventually come up to expected voltage, then I realized what was happening so what you say is true to a point but with enough wattage applied the voltage HAS to come up :-) Can't wait to see what kind of wattage that huge lincoln alternator will put out :-) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > the battery controls the voltage not the alternator. When > the battery gets > charged up the voltage will read higher. > current. The whole point is you will never see exactly what > voltage the > alternator is operating at you will always see battery voltage. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:00:15 -0400 From: "Peters, Gary (G.R.)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - still not starting Could be just a bad connection at the starter, depending on the engine. 460's need really good connections :-) I had a bad nut on one of my starters and the cable would bounce around so that it kept loosening. I finally tied the cable a little better, put silicone grease on the lug and put a better nut on it and it worked fine after that. Clicking could be a starter problem but more likely a connection problem. If you see smoke, replace the starter :-) - -- Michigan, Pot Hole Jumping, 78 Bronco Loving, Gary http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.thewowfactor.com/bigbroncos/detail.cfm?detailid=167 - -- > > I put on a new solinoid and cleaned all conections, and all I get is a > click. Is it time to tear down the starter? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 10:18:41 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Carrier bearing mount Hey Mike, Yes, the carrier bearing mount is offset a little to the right (towards the passenger side).......at least it was in my 69'.....I just replaced the Dana 21 transfer case with a 205, so I removed this whole mount (mine was riveted on) and went with a one-piece driveline setup like the 76-79 4x4's..... CJ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 07:54:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Vince Strazzabosco Subject: FTE 61-79 - Old (40s-50s) Wrecker boom info wanted Hi there, I'm trying to find out more info on obtaining an old, 1940s or 1050s ers wrecker boom setup, like a Holmes or something similar. I'm just wondering if anybody has any knowledge of where I might be able to find one or even just good info besides pictures. I'm in the SF Bay Area. Thanks! vince __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:09:41 -0400 From: "Serian" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: still not starting > I put on a new solinoid and cleaned all conections, > and all I get is a click. Is it time to tear down the starter? This sounds like the symptoms of a weak battery. If your battery is new, try swapping the old battery to solenoid cable and the solenoid to starter cable for new ones. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:24:14 EDT From: SMOKEY5209 Subject: FTE 61-79 - 360 to 390 After all the positive information that I have received from the other members, which I appreciate greatly, I have decided to go with the 390 rebuild. I now ask for the other members input as for cam selection. I will be having the block bored 30 over and installing an Edlebrock performer manifold with a 600 cfm carb. I want something with a little lope in the idle but not an idle that shakes you off the seat. I realize that people like different cams and I will have to make the final selection, I just need input from the more experienced. I will be patiently waiting the information. Thanks again Ed == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:51:20 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Pressure switch. Matt wrote: >Steve! > >I have been slowly working on an on board compressor between other >projects over the last few months, and I'm almost there. I've got the >pump installed, I've got a tank at my uncle's, I'll get the fittings and >air lines from work, but I'm having some difficulty with the pressure >switch. This seems like it should be simple, but I can't find one. I >went to Sears and found a pressure regulator, which I assume regulates >the pressure coming *out* of the tank, and won't shut off the pump, but >I can't find the part to kill the pump. Every compressor they make has >to have this switch, but I can't find one. Do I need to order it, or >would some other type of store carry it, or what? Uhhh, seems like it should be easy to find... Like you said, every compressor has one! Does your Sears have a service and parts department? They should be able to get you one as a replacement part for one of their compressors. or... A well pump pressure switch will work just fine. I can find pressure switches at the local hardware store in the section that deals pumps for water wells. Make sure to get one that's adjustable in the range you want. (75-150 psi?) Or find a shop that does repairs on compressors and industrial equipment. They should have them in stock. Or order one from WW Grainger or one of the other industrial supply catalogs. >Also, on my air lines, I'm thinking about routing everything directly to >the tank and then splitting air lines out from the tank. I think the >tank has 3 or 4 fittings on it, so that part won't be a problem, but >will it cause problems elsewhere? Nope, that's fine. Make sure your tank has a water drain at the bottom, and definately put a pressure relief valve on your tank if it's not already equipped. The York pumps can put out well in excess of 300 PSI, and if your pressure switch fails and the pump keeps running your tank could become a shrapnel grenade... My pressure relief is set at 150PSI. >I *will* have this compressor done someday. I just need to postpone the >roofing, the painting, expanding the garage, the new front >deck........Sometimes I wish I were still renting. Yep, never a shortage of projects.... Steve http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:51:19 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 65 F100 needs 352 engine rebuild - questions It was written: > >> I just went through this, if there is a ridge you need a bore because if >> you just re-ring you may encounter piston slap. And replied: > The presence of a ridge is not always an indicator that the block needs to >be bored. It just depends on how worn the cylinders are. Best thing to do >is mic out all of the pistons and the bore and see whether or not you will >still be within specs after honing. Many times the pistons are worn and >should be replaced. You really can't make an informed decision until you >have all the facts and figures. There is no sense leaving it to guess work. Sounds like good advice. When I got my FE390 it had 139K+ miles on it and smoked. (and was WAY oily) When I pulled it down, the rings were shot and bores looked O.K (no vertical scratches or damage), but they had a slight ridge at the top. I didn't want to spend a bunch of money on it, so I removed the ridges and carefully measured everything. Clearances were still reasonable, and bores had a slight taper but no out-of-round, so I honed it and measured again. Clearances were outside of "new assembly" limits, but still well within the service limits. I put some fresh cast iron rings on the old pistons and shoved 'em back in their holes. New bearings, oil pump, timing set, cam, and some head work and it was on the road. It's now got about 60K miles since its "rebuild" and it runs great. It uses less than a quart of oil between oil changes (3K) and doesn't have any appreciable blowby. The PCV valve has no trouble keeping up and the motor is clean and dry with no oil spewing. It has a small amount of audible piston slap under certain conditions, but it's not often enough or loud enough to be annoying or frightening. I drive it vigorously, and it gets to see 5K RPM fairly regularly. Next time I rebuild it it will get new pistons, but I don't expect that it will be necessary for quite a long time yet... If you can afford it, a good bore job and fresh pistons is the best way to go, but if you need to save some cash and you can buy/borrow the tools to measure the bores and pistons, it's certainly worth checking it out to see if you can get by with a hone and ring job. I know of several FE's that got just that and lived/are living long happy lives. FE blocks and pistons seem to be able to log a hell of a lot of miles with minimal wear if they are cared for and get regular oil changes. I expect to get 100K+ miles out of mine and I'm pretty intolerant of sloppy, oil burning/leaking motors. Like Stock Man said, the only way to know for sure is to examine and measure first... Steve http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 10:14:49 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - still not starting Grant wrote: >I put on a new solinoid and cleaned all conections, and all I get is a >click. Is it time to tear down the starter? Check the voltage right at the big lug on the starter while someone turns the key. If you've got around 12 volts right at the starter but it doesn't crank, then it's time to open up the starter. If you've got low/no volts at the starter lug, then the problem is somewhere upstream.... If you open the starter and find the engagement fork bent or popped out of place (a not so uncommon problem), then go here for a look at how to fix it to make it stronger: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty/truck/starterfix/ Steve http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 14:52:09 EDT From: TWL1911 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Hey all i was wondering. how hard is it to setup a 2 battery jobby in a truck or a car. kind of like a diesel truck. do i have to fiddle with altenator settings or can i just splice into the cables and make a platform for te second one? thanks for hte help Travis "ol Blue" 66 F-250 4spd 2wd == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:08:59 -0800 From: "Erik Marquez" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup - -----Original Message----- From: TWL1911 To: 61-79-list Date: Saturday, September 18, 1999 10:58 AM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup >Hey all >i was wondering. how hard is it to setup a 2 battery jobby in a truck or a >car. kind of like a diesel truck. do i have to fiddle with altenator >settings or can i just splice into the cables and make a platform for te >second one? thanks for hte help >Travis >"ol Blue" What you reference, is the easiest of all dual battery setups. make up some custom cables, connect the bat in series (pos to pos, neg to neg) your alt will charge both, and the vehicle will draw power from both. The down side is you can not "keep" one bat in reserve and draw from the other. But you WILL still get the advantage of overall more reserve AmpHrs and higher amps available for cold weather starts. Erik Marquez bronco78 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mosquitonet.com/~bronco78 Home of the BB decal == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 15:19:44 EDT From: TWL1911 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup In a message dated 9/18/99 2:16:12 PM Central Daylight Time, bronco78 custom cables, connect the bat in series (pos to pos, neg to neg) your alt will charge both, and the vehicle will draw power from both. The down side is you can not "keep" one bat in reserve and draw from the other. But you WILL still get the advantage of overall more reserve AmpHrs and higher amps available for cold weather starts. >> Ok but i seen like on the fire departments trucks they have 2 batterys but positive is connected to negetive. wouldnt that jack the voltage up to 24? or is it the same? thanks Travis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:29:48 -0800 From: "Erik Marquez" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup ok, two things, I wrote series in my first post, but ment parallel. Two 12v bat in series (like the fire truck you mentioned, + to -) will yield 24v. Two 12v bat in parallel (like I described in my first post, + to +, - to -) You want the parallel setup, gives you the amp hour reserve and cold cranking amps of both batteries. Basically acts as one BIG battery. Ok, clear as mud now? Erik Marquez bronco78 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mosquitonet.com/~bronco78 Home of the BB decal - -----Original Message----- From: TWL1911 To: 61-79-list Date: Saturday, September 18, 1999 11:24 AM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup >In a message dated 9/18/99 2:16:12 PM Central Daylight Time, >bronco78 > > some > custom cables, connect the bat in series (pos to pos, neg to neg) your alt > will charge both, and the vehicle will draw power from both. The down side > is you can not "keep" one bat in reserve and draw from the other. But you > WILL still get the advantage of overall more reserve AmpHrs and higher amps > available for cold weather starts. >> > >Ok but i seen like on the fire departments trucks they have 2 batterys but >positive is connected to negetive. wouldnt that jack the voltage up to 24? or >is it the same? >thanks >Travis >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 13:18:01 -0700 From: "J.S.H." Subject: FTE 61-79 - Safety Switch >if I could find the neutral safety switch and route the wires past I >could get it started enough to move it into my garage. Anyone have any >ideas where this switch is at. I think it is on top of the steering column,pointing straight up. There is a pin that slides back an forth in a channel.There are holes in either side of the channel and on in the pin.Line up all the holes and stick a small wire through them and the truck should start. >32 hours??? yeah, rite... I have worked 27 hours straight plowing snow myself.It was in a 75 f-600 with a 330.This truck has been subjected to that kind of treatment since new and it still kicks butt all winter long. We now have enough personel that we split in to two crews working 12 hours each,running the trucks 24 hours a day.That seperates the Fords from the off brands in a hurry. A lot of guys like the ch*vys because they can hang out around the shop drinkin'coffee while the mechanic works on the ch*vy. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:41:15 EDT From: TWL1911 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Ok i got ya i wasnt sure as to what you ment there. but the standard joe altenator will charge them both with out a prob right? thanks again Travis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 13:47:56 -0800 From: "Erik Marquez" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup well, ya but keep in mind, batteries are just storage devices. Your OEM Alt was designed to "fill" one bat, you ask it to recharge 2 and it will do so, but not as quickly. You probable have a 40~70 amp alt. It will do the job, just dont expect it to "fill" both drained bat in the same time it will recharge your one stock one. Erik Marquez bronco78 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mosquitonet.com/~bronco78 Home of the BB decal - -----Original Message----- From: TWL1911 To: 61-79-list Date: Saturday, September 18, 1999 1:45 PM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup >Ok > i got ya i wasnt sure as to what you ment there. but the standard joe >altenator will charge them both with out a prob right? >thanks again >Travis >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:58:38 EDT From: TWL1911 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup ok cool thanks for all the help Travis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 19:36:15 -0500 From: "Daniel R. Olinick" Subject: FTE 61-79 - My New '71 f100! HI, I recently purchased a 1971 Ford F100. It is white. It is a longbed. It has a three speed manual transmission and a v8 engine I believe to be a 360. It is in excellent condition and I plan to improve it as best I can. I hope this is the right place for me to ask my questions because I am a newbie owner of a classic ford truck. I am 26 years old and live in San Antonio, TX. My father owned a 71 blue ford truck(or possibly newer). I am confused because I was 11 years old when I last saw the blue ford and my ford seems a lot different. For example my dad's truck didn't have the piece of trim attached to the front of the hood I don't think. Anyway I can't remember. What I need now is a few lessons on the history of the ford pick up truck. My truck needs a lot of work and I don't know how to fix the things myself. So I figure I need to learn or take it to a shop or one of my uncles or a freind of a freind. Brakes are bad. It might be the master cylinder. One rear tire will always lock up if I hit the brake hard enough. I have been told the front end ball joints and stuff are worn out not to mention the play in the steering wheel. I don't like the way the truck is riding. I need to find out if the springs and or shocks are worn out. Well, I need to get another seat or fix/replace springs in the seat. I bought the truck after seeing it at a small used car lot. I have been sort of looking for another truck for a while now. I hadn't been too serious but I had to stop and take a closer look. The body has quite a lot of rust spots which I am worried about. There are some small rusted through places in the bottom of the doors and one on the right fender. I can tell the truck had some minor body work and a paint job but I don't know how long ago. The truck bed is mostly brown with rust. I want to clean up the bed and put a rust blocker or paint on bedliner if it will help stop the rust. I believe the engine is good. I haven't been able to contact the previous owner/owners to find out about any replacement or overhauls. It cruises at 50 or 60 or 70 (maybe 80) very well. It has a lot of pick up. I believe I would have no trouble cranking her up to 100 or more If I wanted to but that's with no load(just me(264) and the spare tire. It idles rough when cold and the engine will die if I don't give it some gas. Anyway, I would appreciate any info on. I will put up some scans on my website soon. Daniel R. Olinick (dolinick == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:58:28 -0700 From: "Chris Samuel" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Trans Questions What 5 speed Trans (5th. overdrive) was used behind a late model 460 in a 2WD truck? What kind of linkage was used for the clutch; Manual ,or Hydraulic? Would it have a bolt on flange or a slip yoke for the output? What would the Torque rating for this 5 spd. Trans be? TIA. MUEL 79 Bronco 400, 4spd. 75 F250 4x4 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 21:33:46 -0500 From: "Lorin Missall" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Pickup Box I am looking for a pickup box for my 1976 f100. I live in Wisconsin and = figured the best place to find a clean one is down south. I'm not sure = where to start and was hoping someone may know of place to start. Any = information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Lorin lorin == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:36:06 PDT From: "George Litton" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Dual battery setup Travis, The dual battery set-up is pretty cool. I have not done it because I was able to fit a group 31 battery into my stock tray with very little modification. Are all you 73-79 guys listening? All you do is remove said tray from truck, notch tray so that you can bend the lip next to the core support flat, and re-install. I do not know if earlier models will support this mod. I used to work for Interstate Batteries, so I had access to a bunck of neat stuff for my charging system. 2/0 battery cables and the like. While I was at it, I put in a plug in the grille for jumper cables..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|