|
|
From: owner-61-79-list-digest To: 61-79-list-digest Subject: 61-79-list-digest V3 #271 Reply-To: 61-79-list Sender: owner-61-79-list-digest Errors-To: owner-61-79-list-digest Precedence: bulk 61-79-list-digest Tuesday, August 3 1999 Volume 03 : Number 271 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder FTE 61-79 - real trucks FTE 61-79 - battery explosions FTE 61-79 - R406A, was something about Freeze12 FTE 61-79 - :Re Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Bad news FTE 61-79 - Battery Exploding FTE 61-79 - AC systems and Freeze12 FTE 61-79 - AC systems and Freeze12 FTE 61-79 - hood ornaments FTE 61-79 - RE: Changing the gearing FTE 61-79 - Re: Edelbrock carb not acting right FTE 61-79 - new 390 running, some problems---- Fixed FTE 61-79 - Norman Bates drives a Chevy FTE 61-79 - Northeastern Native American Tendencies within Central Texans Re: FTE 61-79 - R406A, was something about Freeze12 FTE 61-79 - - Battery Exploding! FTE 61-79 - I have sinned FTE 61-79 - Ignition Wiring Re: FTE 61-79 - I have sinned RE: FTE 61-79 - Changing the gearing Re: FTE 61-79 - Ignition Wiring FTE 61-79 - Edlebrock carb Re: FTE 61-79 - Ignition Wiring Re: FTE 61-79 - new 390 running, some problems---- Fixed FTE 61-79 - R-12 to 134A & Exploding batteries FTE 61-79 - Be a Trojan Man, Think Safety. FTE 61-79 - Wanted: 460 parts FTE 61-79 - How to test an undercharged A/C??? FTE 61-79 - RE: HFC-134a FTE 61-79 - Shorty & Daves FTE 61-79 - vin numbers Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Re: FTE 61-79 - Be a Trojan Man, Think Safety. Re: FTE 61-79 - hood ornaments Re: FTE 61-79 - vin numbers Re: FTE 61-79 - 351C pistons in a 400M Re: FTE 61-79 - 460 into a 76 F250 Re: FTE 61-79 - Automatic choke Re: FTE 61-79 - real trucks Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder FTE 61-79 - Pistons FTE 61-79 - Genetic Mutations, or what they name GM cars after. Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder FTE 61-79 - trans question Re: FTE 61-79 - trans question Re: FTE 61-79 - Changing the gearing Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder FTE 61-79 - RE: Changing the gearing ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 07:22:57 EDT From: GMontgo930 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder In a message dated 8/3/99 12:17:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time, danger > > > > > > > Did I miss anything? > ........ > > > Bleed some more, and then bleed even more! It takes forever to get all > > the air out of the system. > > > > Jason > ......... > > "but my leg is getting tired" hehe... > > I'm very happy with the results obtained from using a power brake > bleeder system to bleed the brakes on my 69 F250's. It's kinda like a small > canister with a hand pump attached and nice long hose with fitting for the > attachments which fasten to the master cylinder. I always use a clear hose > at the wheel end so that I may see the results of my work, and it's always a > pleasure to watch the bubbles and dirty fluid comming out of the bleeder > valve. > > Danger > > I use a variation on that theme. Ive made my own vacuum bleeder out of an old brake fluid bottle and gobs of clear tubing (actually two pieces for a fluid in & vacuum out). When Im ready to bleed, I hook one up to the wheel bleeder and the other to manifold vacuum with the engine running. Then just crack the bleeder and whoosh them bubbles come flying out (along with the dirt, grunge, & other trash)! Works well. Just dont let the master cylinder run dry (my teenagers job to keep it full) or let the catch bottle get so full that it sucks fluid up the vacuum line into the engine. Whoa will she smoke for a while! My two bits worth..... George == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:06:05 -0400 From: tfreeman Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Bleed....bleed....bleed some more. Sounds like you still have air in the system. - -Ted "Brett Yerks" on 08/02/99 09:50:52 PM Please respond to 61-79-list To: 61-79-list cc: (bcc: Ted Freeman/MURPHY_FAMILY_FARMS) Subject: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Well, I replaced the master cylinder on my 76 F250 tonight but now the pedal sinks to the floor everytime. I bench blead the master cylinder just like the instructions said, put the little plugs they supplied in the output ports, then keep pushing the plunger in about 1", until it is firm and only goes about 1/8". Then I installed it and blead the brakes, now the pedal sinks right to the floor. Did I miss anything? There aren't any leaks, I'm not losing any fluid. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Brett http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.superford.org/fbird == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:50:49 -0400 From: "Serian" Subject: FTE 61-79 - real trucks > ... ford quit making real trucks in 1979, i don't want to > offend your truck, ... HEY ... a very inventive and industrious person can adapt one of those 80-86 variants into a real truck ... at least they still used mostly real parts (except for those *$^ nuts and bolts) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 08:00:16 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - battery explosions >>I know that a battery can explode, but I guess like most people, I always assumed that it couldn't happen to me. Don, Lead/acid batteries give off Hydrogen gas. Hydrogen is extremely explosive. (Remember the Hindenburg and the Challenger?) In chemistry we used to use electrolysis to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen. We would get about 2 cc of H in a test tube then light it with a match. It sounds like a small fire cracker. Dead or low batteries give off more H than a good battery. Cigarettes and batteries don't mix. this is also why you don't hook the last connection on jumper cables in the vicinity of the battery. - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 08:04:01 -0500 From: John Strauss Subject: FTE 61-79 - R406A, was something about Freeze12 >John LaGrone wrote: >> >> I...I...can't control myself any longer. I did a lot of research on >> Freeze12 and R134a before I had my system recharged with R12. > >Have you looked into R406a? http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.autofrost.com/ > > Looked to be the best substitute I found > I converted my '90 F150 from R12 to R406A about 2 months ago and it cools like crazy. A really nice "feature" of R406A is you can discuss any problems or concerns with the inventor, George Goble, and he answers his email promptly. I am looking forward to doing my '91 Bronco next. _ _| ~~. John Strauss \, *_} jstrauss \( Texas Fight! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:26:15 -0500 From: "Don Yerhot" Subject: FTE 61-79 - :Re Son, son, you said the "C" word here, and you called a Ford truck a pile of crap! We'll let you live this time, but the native's are up in arm's. I'm one of the nice guy's on the list, but don't let Stu get ahold of you! DonY 65F250-351W 74F100-351W of crap. This could be attributed to the fact that they guy we bought it from never took care of it, but I really don't care for the engine (300 straight six). My mom has an 89 Probe, and we've never had a single problem with it. It's starting to go now, and rust is taking over, but what can you expect for 10 years of snow driving. I'm trying to save a little money to a late 70's or early 80's Ford truck, and install a 460 in it that I think I can buy. Finally, I prefer Fords, but I believe I could live with a Chevy if I had to. >> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 06:28:48 -0700 From: Dennis Pearson Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Thanks for your message at 11:52 PM 8/2/99 EDT, JUMPINFORD message was: Twice now that one wheel lockin up on hard breaking has caused me to >go into a wild sideways slide. Thank goodness for quick reflexes, and empty >roads (aside from the idiot that made me go into the slide in the first >place). Er, uh...have you considered not waiting? I know you live in the wide open spaces of Nevada, but... Dennis Pearson in Kennewick, WA 1962 Unibody, short box, big window--351C 1966 F250 Custom Cab, 352, 4-speed 1962 short stepside (big empty space under the hood) I shortened this to only FT's http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.att.net/~dlpearson/levi.htm == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 06:45:22 -0700 From: Dennis Pearson Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Bad news Thanks for your message at 12:20 AM 8/3/99 EDT, TWL1911 message was: >hey >well i used to KEYWORD USED to drive a chevy and talk about gutless as soon >as i had my ford we never drive it anymore it collects dust now and rust to. >the only advantage to chevys because they suck so bad is parts are cheap but >what can i say its a bowtie truck. this is ford dountry >travis Well, I guess I'm going to have to buy a Ch**y......My doctor said I had to slow down... Dennis Pearson in Kennewick, WA 1962 Unibody, short box, big window--351C 1966 F250 Custom Cab, 352, 4-speed 1962 short stepside (big empty space under the hood) I shortened this to only FT's http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.att.net/~dlpearson/levi.htm == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 07:06:09 -0700 From: Tim Bowman Subject: FTE 61-79 - Battery Exploding > I wrote: > With all this talk of safety, I am reminded of my two serious > encounters. One was when I allowed metal to arc the terminals on a > battery and it exploded. Fortunately no damage to me; but the shirt > rotted away. >Don Wrote: >Can you tell us what the explosion was like? How long did it take for it to >explode when the terminals were bridged? >I'm glad to hear that you were OK, but at least you can now pass the info >on to us. I know that I have bridged terminals before to test for a dead >battery. I guess I won't be doing that anymore. It's been 30 years ago that this happened but it seemed that it happened pretty quickly. As another list member pointed out, a battery can explode from a source other than arcing the terminals. There's been many times since that event that I've hooked up battery chargers or jumper cables and created a spark and nothing untoward has happened. Tim Bowman 71 F100 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:57:32 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - AC systems and Freeze12 >>Have you looked into R406a? http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.autofrost.com/ Yep. Ox, I think you pointed me in the right direction on my research. I wound up reading all sorts of EPA rules and went to as many web sites as I could find. When I read the contents of the substitutes, I wasn't satisfied about performance in my application. The big problem that kept me with R12 was the increased heat in front of the radiator. For example, in NJ you might get 10 days of 100 degree heat. Here in TX it is not unusual to get a string of 45 days where the temp goes over 100. R406a is a good alternative, but I didn't feel like it would perform for me the way I wanted. And, again, I couldn't find anyone locally selling the stuff. I did not find any substitute that gave the equivalent performance of R12. - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 10:10:32 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - AC systems and Freeze12 >>These two statements appear to be contradictory. If 134a is putting out more heat than 12, its cooling better, right? Bryan, Sorry, that's what the papers I read all say. I know you have had success with R134a down on the TX coast, but I think that is a result of installing a new system in front of a new engine with a new radiator. See the pattern here is the word new. As I said before, if I was rebuilding a non-working system, I'd rig for R134 also. My mom recently had her Buick retrofitted when they put on a new compressor. Looks like a guinea pig to me. :-) - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 10:14:08 -0500 From: "John LaGrone" Subject: FTE 61-79 - hood ornaments >> sitting donkey. >> I know, I think they are SO cool.........actually I got a set of long horns that I am SO tempted to put as a hood ornament on my truck, but that's a lil TOO white trash LOL......wasm't it Boss Hogg from The Dukes Of Hazzard who had horns on his Caddy? LOL Careful there, Lisa. I had longhorns (real horns) on the hood of a GMC crew cab. I also owned a white Caddy convertible just like Boss Hogg's, sans the horns on the hood. Nothing with 4 wheels opens a hole in traffic like a big truck with longhorns on the hood. Of course, I'm wierd anyway. I also got a mohawk haircut back in May. And no, I'm not a kid. Go for the horns. You only live once. - -- John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom LWB Regular Cab 351M C6 (Henry) http://www.ford-trucks.com/jlagrone/henry.home.htm Dearborn iron rules!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 11:23:16 -0400 From: William King Subject: FTE 61-79 - RE: Changing the gearing Spike, I know this doesn't really answer your question of how much a rear gear swap will cost, but... What's your rear gears now? Your rearend should have a metal tag w/ the gear ratio stamped on it. Did you look? You can lower your effective rearend ratio by running bigger (i.e., bigger in diameter) rear tires. Finally, the following web page has an MPH-RPM convertor which is quite handy (you'll need to measure the diameter of your current rear tires). Good luck. Ohio Bill 1968 Torino GT (429 4V 4speed) 1968 F100 (360 4V 4speed) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Lee Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Edelbrock carb not acting right You can't adjust one screw at a time, because it will idle on the other side until you are way out of balance. Start with both screws out like you said, but turn in one side 1/4 turn, then the other the same. When it gets rough, back them both off the same way. Dan Lee '53 F100 351C-4V >My bother-in-law has a new edelbrock carb and intake >on his '78 F150302 >(both were bought new for this aplication). We were >trying to adjustthe >mixture screws the other day and they were not acting >right IMHO. Itseemed >to run best with one out a couple turns and one in >all the way! That >doesn't seem right to me. >Usually I start with them out 2-3 turns to get it >running and thenslowly >turn one in until it starts to run rough, then back >it out until itsmooths >out and add 1/2 - 3/4 turn out (repeat with other >side). Does thatsound >correct to you guys? >When I did that to his it wouldn't run rough until I >had one in ALL theway >and did this to the second one. But if I try to turn >them both in allthe >way it would die (but it is supposed to do that). >It reminds me of the way a Holley acts with a bad >powervalve, but thisisn't >a Holley. _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:40:32 -0500 From: JOHN E DOLSON Subject: FTE 61-79 - new 390 running, some problems---- Fixed > Isn't it a great feeling getting that thing fired up ? First thing I would do now is set the timing close to what you plan on running it ... 8-10 whatever you think is a good starting place ... then adjust the mixture and such ... part of the reason its running on is because you have the idle set up for breakin ... once that sets down it should run a bit better ... the power thing I would guess is more of a timing issue ... though someone suggested the float, that is also a possibility ... It was a timing problem, I forgot to unplug the vaccum advance when I first timed it, so my timing was about 25 degrees off. everytings fine now, runs great, lots of power. Was I supposed to set the Idle mixture for breakin? I just put the carb that was on the 360 ( that was originally in the truck) on it, with no adjust ments, seems to work fine. adjusting the timing also solved the, "running backwards" problem- it really sucks when an engine does that, especially when you have power steering--- messy. John Dolson Jefferson City, MO 1976 F150 Ranger XLT ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 11:41:33 -0400 From: "Don Haring, Jr." Subject: FTE 61-79 - Norman Bates drives a Chevy IanBoss69 >>>I believe I could live with a Chevy if I had to. > wise words from a guy that likes to play make-believe in his dead > mothers clothes,,"We all go a little crazy sometimes." Ian, It took me a second to realize you were talking about a certain fellow named Norman, and not yourself. I was a bit creeped out for a moment! :) - -don - -- Don in Philadelphia Internet Director, Keystone Chapter FCA | 66 Falcon Deluxe Club Wagon Falconaut: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://fedora.net/falconaut | 61 Falcon Futura Keystone: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://fedora.net/falconkey | classic scooters and bicycles == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 11:31:47 -0400 From: David Henderson Subject: FTE 61-79 - Northeastern Native American Tendencies within Central Texans John LaGrone wrote: >Of course, I'm weird anyway. I also got a Mohawk haircut back in May. And no, >I'm not a kid. After this comment, I think you need to put up a picture of yourself next to Henry on your web page -;^) Dave H PS I assume that this was to gain sympathy from SWMBO in order to get the AC fixed in Henry :^). I had to move to the old "quarter inch and white-walls" here in Virginia. I was starting to have flash-backs to August in College Station with the 100F temps and 90%+ humidity (with no AC in Brownie). - -- _ _| ~~. David Henderson \, _} DHenders \( Gig 'em Aggies! '93 Currently at: Interdepartmental Genetics Program 2010 Litton Reaves Hall Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540)231-4773 (540)231-5014 DHenders http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dasc.vt.edu/henderson/dhenderson.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 11:44:49 -0400 From: James Oxley Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - R406A, was something about Freeze12 John Strauss wrote: > > I converted my '90 F150 from R12 to R406A about 2 months ago and it cools > like crazy. A really nice "feature" of R406A is you can discuss any > problems or concerns with the inventor, George Goble, and he answers his > email promptly. I am looking forward to doing my '91 Bronco next. Is this one of the one's that will eventually be banned. They claim no CFC'c, but it has R-22 in it??? OX == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:55:11 -0500 From: JOHN E DOLSON Subject: FTE 61-79 - - Battery Exploding! I had a battery explode once in a 1995 F500, to what we think must've been an internal failure, the hood wasn't even open. it was a pretty damn powerful bast, broke one headlight, put a big dent (bump from the outside) in the hood , and also one in the fender, blew the whole top of the battery off, it was loud too. lucky that truck had dual batterys, A woman I work with also had a battery explode , but it was due mostly to her stupidity, she and one of her friends was trying to jumpstart her car in the dark, since she didn't have a flashlight handy she tried to illuminate the engine compartment with her ZIPPO lighter, I don't think I need to explain the rest John Dolson, Jefferson City, MO 1976 F150 Ranger XLT ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:02:03 +0100 From: robertwerner Subject: FTE 61-79 - I have sinned (Sarcasm) Boy am I ever glad I said what I did about "that one auto maker". I don't really LIKE C!#$%'s, but my friend has one. And after spending time fixing mine, then working on his, I see some advantages. Thing is, my problems are mostly minor, but they're real pains. His are major such as: his rear end blew...on dry pavement, he smoked his tranny, and he just ruined his engine. And I think some of the post 80's Ford's are good trucks, but I wouldn't go with the straight six in anything that big again. Maybe a Ranger or Bronc 2. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 10:58:40 -0500 From: "Mike Warren" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Ignition Wiring I've got a 66 F100 that I am having ignition problems with - I am not sure if the ignition switch is bad or if it is the wires, coil or starter. Can anybody tell me how I might connect the wires to get it to start without the key/ignition connected? Also, Does anybody know what the price would be for a new wiring harness for a 66 F100 Thanks Mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:06:45 -0700 From: "Sam Weatherby" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - I have sinned Keep in mind that a 300 inch 6 is pretty close to a 302 v-8... I'd take the big six over the little 8 in a truck.. -srw - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 9:02 AM Subject: FTE 61-79 - I have sinned > (Sarcasm) Boy am I ever glad I said what I did about "that one auto maker". I > don't really LIKE C!#$%'s, but my friend has one. And after spending time > fixing mine, then working on his, I see some advantages. Thing is, my problems > are mostly minor, but they're real pains. His are major such as: his rear end > blew...on dry pavement, he smoked his tranny, and he just ruined his engine. > And I think some of the post 80's Ford's are good trucks, but I wouldn't go with > the straight six in anything that big again. Maybe a Ranger or Bronc 2. > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:10:06 -0700 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Changing the gearing If you have a 9 inch rear end the swap can be very easy. You can simply swap the center section with one from the "auto recyclers" that has the ratio you want. The catch it that you have to get a center section from a unit that has the same number of axel splines as your current rear end. If you have a different type of rear end then the gear change requires setting up the gears properly. Not overly difficult but possibly more than you want to tackle. I have gotten a quote from one place for about $1000 to swap gears on a 9 inch. I've heard from others that it was less than $500. Shop around and see. Tom H. > ---------- > From: Spike188 > Reply To: 61-79-list > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 1:08 AM > To: 61-79-list > Subject: FTE 61-79 - Changing the gearing > > Just curious > I have a 67 F100 with a 352 and auto trans. Runs great but the gearing is > > kind of high. At freeway speed, it revs a little higher than I would > like. > What would it take to have the gearing changed so that it doesnt rev quite > as > high on the freeway. I dont need a lot of low end torque. I wouldnt be > doing it myself. Any ideas what something like that would cost? Thanks > in > advance! > Spike > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 12:10:29 EDT From: TBeeee Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Ignition Wiring == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:28:39 PDT From: "steve potratz" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Edlebrock carb Marty Wrote: My bother-in-law has a new edelbrock carb and intake on his '78 F150 302 (both were bought new for this aplication). We were trying to adjust the mixture screws the other day and they were not acting right IMHO. It seemed to run best with one out a couple turns and one in all the way! That doesn't seem right to me. Steve Wrote: Hey Marty, I have only done this a couple of times, but I think what you have going on is the set of fuel rods and or jets are impropperly sized for the application/elevation. Carter/Edelbrock sell a kit(it is called a Zip Kit) which has a multitude of jets and fuel rods to dial in the mixture. Your carb mixture at idle is out of the range of the idle adustment screws. By changing the rods and jets, you bring the mixture back in range. The equivelent proceedure in a Holly is adjusting the float level and the primary jets in the metering block. My guess is you have the standard set up, which I have seen is usually too rich. The chart provided in the zip kit instructions is very good and easy to follow. I hope this helps. Steve _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 11:41:25 -0500 From: Stu Varner Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Ignition Wiring I have never seen one offered in any obsolete catalog. My opinion would be to find a good solid donor truck and go from there. See if you can snag the whole wiring harness! Good luck! Stu Nuke GM! http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pscico.com/stu >Also, Does anybody know what the price would be for a new wiring harness for >a 66 F100 > >Thanks >Mike == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 11:31:57 -0500 From: William S Hart Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - new 390 running, some problems---- Fixed >It was a timing problem, I forgot to unplug the vaccum advance when I >first timed it, so my timing was about 25 degrees off. everytings fine >now, runs great, lots of power. Yup, we all forget that once in a while I think.... glad it was so simple to fix. > Was I supposed to set the Idle mixture >for breakin? I just put the carb that was on the 360 ( that was >originally in the truck) on it, with no adjust ments, seems to work fine. No, the idle itself should have been high, but not the mixture ... I was able to do the same thing you did, take the working carb off the 360 and just bolt it onto the new motor, it was close, needed a very fine amount of tuning then just after breakin, but then I'm picky too ... Which reminds me I need to hook up my kick-down rod ... keep forgettin to do that ... Just my 2cents wish Links http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/links.html '73 1/2 ton 4x4 Ford http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/truck.html '96 Mustang GT http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/mustang.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:39:27 PDT From: "Don Jones" Subject: FTE 61-79 - R-12 to 134A & Exploding batteries I work in a supermarket where we have quite a few commercial refrigeration units. We are in the long process of converting to newer types of refrigeration gasses. One new gas that we have used is called R-409. The best part of it is that it will work with older mineral based oils and it is slightly more efficient than R-12. The Deli counter that we put it in immediately froze everything :-) My refrigeration guy tells me that it not a transitional type of gas like freeze-12 and that its not a cfc. I dont think its available for automotive use, but a refrigeration contractor may be able to put some in for you. I hear freon is still being used in some 3rd world and former soviet countries for cleaning jet engines..they blast 200-300 lbs of the stuff at a time out of a firehose. makes you wonder how a few ounces of the stuff in your truck can hurt that much.. I once had a battery on a forklift explode. Luckily the battery cover was in place, but it was a loud BANG followed by a rush of acid all over the machine and the floor. Now i wear goggles whenever i am working on batteries, and i have a big box of baking soda next to the battery charger. Don Jones. 1970 f-250 4x4 ~Fordzilla~ ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:34:57 -0400 From: frenz.6 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Be a Trojan Man, Think Safety. I dont know about the rest of you, but Im emotionally attached to my body parts; fingers, feet, head, et el. Just use some friggin' common sense when working under vehicles. (I know its a rare commodity.) When I'm working under a vehicle, #1 I use the jackstands. #2 I also leave the jack raised up almost as high as the jack stands. #3 I also like to put an extra stand under there if room permits OR a big block of something somewhere that would gimme enough time to shimmy the hell outta there if the whole thing went squash. Auto parts stores are for buying your parts at. Their parking lots are NOT open-air mechanics' bays. You wanna put your windshield wiper blades on there, fine. Dont do something stupid like change your starter. Even if your car wasnt on a jack, some other shadetree mechanic will come blowing in there in his Duster and run over your legs sticking out. Im not preaching, because I've caught myself doing stupid things before too. You just gotta try and think everything through before you do it. A few things to remember: coolant aint cold; gas fumes like cigarettes; spinning belts, blades, and parts are not your friend; and heavy mobile objects like to mash things. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:34:55 -0400 From: frenz.6 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Wanted: 460 parts I need some parts from an Econoline 460. Oil pan, alt. mounting bracket, power steering pump bracket, etc. Ruby's 460 transplant is waiting on these parts. I'd also be interested in any other 460 goodies you might have around just takin' up space... Thanks Dale "Ruby" the '79 F-150 Supercab 4x4 Wondertruck. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:34:59 -0400 From: frenz.6 Subject: FTE 61-79 - How to test an undercharged A/C??? I have an Eaton compressor in my '79. I assume it has an internal safety switch like most that wont let it kick on when the charge is low. How would I check to see if my compressor is good and also if my air conditioning system works at all? Dale Ruby '79, I think my starter just took a dirt nap. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:23:47 -0400 From: "George W. Selby, III" Subject: FTE 61-79 - RE: HFC-134a A quote from the Vintage Air catalog I just received, "...regardless of claims to the contrary, HFC-134a is a more efficient refrigerant, heat transfer is better and exiting air temps from the HFC-134a systems is often colder than CFC-12 systems. On the other hand this efficiency can be a problem if you have a pressure-valve controlled system. Such systems include older GM, Ford, and Chrysler OE systems. Because the system is controlled by low side pressure and HFC-134a produces lower low-side pressures at a given temp, these old systems will regulate the refrigerant at CFC-12 levels and above optimal low-side pressures for HFC-134a. Higher vent temps result and this may not be acceptable at some slimate and humidity conditions." George Selby 78 F-150 400M, 4 on floor, 4x4 86 Audi 4000CS Quattro IsuzuG == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 17:02:15 -0400 From: "Brad Jones" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Shorty & Daves The address iss 588 Swedeland Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 (610) 275-4141. Last time I was there they were open Saturday 8-5 and Sunday 9-5. Admission fee was $2.00 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 17:04:52 -0400 From: "Brad Jones" Subject: FTE 61-79 - vin numbers Okay, I give up I went to the VIN decoder shown on our web page and it does not have the right years. Can someone tell me what years the following VIN's were from? f10ye833581 f35ye845654 Thank you Brad Almost complete '65 4wd shorty == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:55:09 EDT From: Bad4dFilly Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: In a message dated 08/03/1999 1:12:44 AM !!!First Boot!!!, JUMPINFORD writes: Chevy before envy came along :) >> EEEK! Hey now Darrell, there are SOME things these people DON'T need to know!!!!!! But hey, I DO own a Ford now....don't I? LOL Gettin that Chevy woulda been the biggest mistake in my life hehehe *~*~Lisa and Envy ~*~* *~*~Silly boys...trucks are for GIRLS!~*~* == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:58:07 EDT From: Bad4dFilly Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: In a message dated 08/03/1999 5:11:47 AM !!!First Boot!!!, JJJJJGRANT writes: offend your truck, but you already have by calling it a piece of crap. stick with a pre 80's ford in your search for a real truck >> Hey now! In a way I agree w/ ya, but that's just cuz my baby is a '77 LOL But ya gotta admit those '99 super dutys are BAD ASS! =) *~*~Lisa~*~* == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:01:29 EDT From: Bad4dFilly Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Be a Trojan Man, Think Safety. In a message dated 08/03/1999 6:32:34 PM !!!First Boot!!!, frenz.6 writes: cigarettes; spinning belts, blades, and parts are not your friend; and heavy mobile objects like to mash things. >> HaHaHaHaHaHa..........thanks for the advice! =) That's funny! *~*~Lisa~*~* == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:10:08 EDT From: Bad4dFilly Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - hood ornaments In a message dated 08/03/1999 3:26:34 PM !!!First Boot!!!, jlagrone cab. >> Seriously....would people be low enough to steal them off my truck?? I mean c'mon y'all....stealin' rims and stuff is "acceptable" but ya gotta be PRETTY desperate To steal long horns hehehe truck with longhorns on the hood>> Tell me about it!!! My truck already gets "Oh sh*t" looks from those lil rice rockets that are so common here and it doesn't even have horns on it....YET! It's such a trip! Hmm....I already have a PA system, I am considering getting big rig horns that make ya deaf *evil grin* *~*~Lisa and Envy~*~* *~*~SIlly boys...trucks are for girls!~*~* == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:58:51 EDT From: TBeeee Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - vin numbers In a message dated 8/3/99 4:18:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, bjones writes: > > f10ye833581 > f35ye845654 Both VIN Nos. correspond to 1966 model year trucks; one is an F-100, the other F-350. The Y in the vin is troubling, however; for that model year, the engine code should be either an A, B or D (240, 300 or 352 cid). The E in the VIN translates to these trucks both being built in the Mahwah, NJ assembly plant. I hope this helps. Stock Man 1967 Galaxie 500 Convertible (HELP!---I need 15 x5 factory rims) 1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:36:01 -0600 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351C pistons in a 400M >From: Brent Cole >Subject: FTE 61-79 - 351C pistons in a 400M > >I remember reading this a while back about >having to bush the connecting rod to accept >the smaller wrist pin of the 351C piston. I would >like to know more about the size, shape, >material and fit of this bushing. Is it made or >can you buy them off the shelf? Yo Brent: The bushings are made of a bronze or bronze-silicon alloy. It is basically the same type of material used for cylinder head valve guides. The bushings come in several "standard" outside and inside diameters. Usually, a machine shop buys the bushings slightly oversized on the outside and undersized on the inside. The bushings are an interference fit w/ your connecting rods (i.e., pressed in). After the bushings are pressed into the rods, the machinist custom sizes the inside diameter (where the wrist pin goes) for the correct fit. Unless you are a competent machinist w/ access to the proper tools, this is not a DIY procedure. Most any competent automotive engine machine shop can do this for you, but some stock-type engine rebuilders shy away from this, as it is considered a high-performance modification. Dave R. (M-block devotee) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:38:48 -0600 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 460 into a 76 F250 >From: SHill48337 >Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 460 into a 76 F250 > > > truck and work with the current transmission? >> >First the only transmissions that it will bolt up with >are those that had been connected to a 351C, >351M, 429, 400, or 460. Yo Burt: Slight correction. The 351C uses the small block bell housing bolt pattern (same as 302/351W). All the other engines you mentioned have the so-called big block bell housing bolt pattern. Dave R. (M-block devotee) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:21:45 -0600 From: "Dave Resch" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Automatic choke >From: 3granch >Subject: FTE 61-79 - Automatic choke > >My automatic choke does not work and I want to >put it back to original working order. I have a >stock 351M with a rebuilt 2V carb (what ever the >standard issue was for this motor, 2150 rings a >bell). The linkages on the passanger side flop >in the breeze, the choke heater tube is rusted >and fell off and the vacuum deal which activate >the linkage by the choke heater tube(I think it the >choke pulldown). Yo Ronnie: The original carb on your engine was the Motorcraft 2150 2V. Any decent rebuild kit will have a decent diagram showing how the choke linkages should be connected. I might be able to send you a fax w/ the diagram, if you have a fax number. According to my parts dept. sources, the part number for the heater tube is D5AZ-9819-B and it is still available. If you can't get one from your local Ford dealer, you can try the PartsVoice web site at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.partsvoice.com/ Alternatively, you could fabricate one from a short piece of 1/4" steel tubing w/ a flared end. The choke pull-down simply backs off the choke when you drive w/ the engine not fully warmed up (or maybe in extreme cold weather). Carb rebuild kit instructions give a spec for setting this at the choke plate. >The tube which comes out of the manifold around >to the back of the carb and attached to the carb >with a rubber hose. One day I noticed air leaking >from the whole which this tube goes into the >manifold. I sealed it with Black RTV Silicone and >the next thing I know it melted the rubber hose and >the choke pulldown. I have a new pulldown but I >do not know what I need to do fix this. Can I buy >a new choke heater tube specifically made for >this setup or do I have to get this universal part >and make that work? Once I do that how do I >proceed from there to get this choke to work? The piece that the tubes go into attaches to the top of the manifold w/ two bolts. It should have a coiled section of tubing between the two holes that the other (external) tubes connect to. The coiled tubing is heated by the exhaust gas in the intake manifold exhaust crossover passage. The part number for that piece is D5AZ-9C869-A and it is also still available. If there are any leaks in the coiled tubing, your carb will suck exhaust gas through the tube that connects to the choke (if it doesn't have any leaks). The other tube should attach via rubber hose to the bottom of the carb air horn. It simply supplies fresh air from inside the air cleaner to be heated and passed through the choke's bi-metallic thermostat. If that tube is getting too hot, it indicates that you have a leak in the coiled tubing and pressurized exhaust gas is pushing back up the tube and into the air horn. It might further indicate that the vacuum passage inside the carb that normally sucks air through the choke is plugged. BTW, the bi-metallic thermostat housing should have an electrical spade connector that attaches to the alternator to supply current to warm the thermostat electrically, so it should be an "electric" choke. >I also have an electic device on the drivers side >of the carb which looks like, if activated, would >hit the throttle linkage to increase RPM's. Its >temorarily not hooked up. What is this for and >can I check to see if its good? How can I adjust >it to function properly? That is a throttle position solenoid. You can test it by applying a +12V source to it. If it moves, it works. These can be used in either of two ways: as an anti-dieseling device or to bump up the idle for the AC. If you wire it so it has constant +12V when the ignition is on, it will act as an anti-dieseling solenoid so that when the engine is turned off, it closes the throttle plates further than they are at idle. You could also wire it so that the +12V is supplied only when the AC is on so it bumps up the idle to compensate for the AC compressor load. You should be able to adjust the position of the solenoid w/ a screw somewhere on its base where it attaches to the carb. Good luck w/ your truck. Dave R. (M-block devotee) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:42:59 EDT From: TWL1911 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - real trucks Hey well i would say that the good ol 6.9 navistar diesel was quite a addition to the ford truck line. i have a friend that has about 1/2 million miles on theres and its still running like a champ Travis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 20:07:07 EDT From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder In a message dated 8/3/99 6:32:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, dpearson writes: > Yes, but I am a starving college student, so unless it keeps me from goin somewhere, it can wait. :) Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 20:23:30 EDT From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: In a message dated 8/3/99 2:00:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Bad4dFilly > You have seen the light child, now go, and spread the word. Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 20:31:49 -0500 From: "Brett Yerks" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder Ok, so I bled and bled and bled tonight. Used 1 1/2 of those big bottles worth of brake fluid. Got some bubbles, but the last at least 6 pushes of the pedal got no bubbles on each bleeder. The pedal still goes to the floor. Could it possibly be the proportioning valve? I replaced the master cylinder because I had to pump the pedal to get any brakes. The first push would be to the floor, second a little farther up and then the third push would be normal. I get a little bit of brakes now when the pedal reaches the floor, not enough to really stop me though. I may try replacing the proporioning valve tomorrow unless maybe I got a bad master cylinder? Brett http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.superford.org/fbird >> >> In a message dated 8/2/99 9:51:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >> byerks >> >> > Did I miss anything? > >Bleed some more, and then bleed even more! It takes forever to get all >the air out of the system. > >Jason == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 20:49:43 -0500 From: "Larry Brown" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder I really doubt that the problem is the proportioning valve. The breaks work by transmitting the force applied to the pedal to the wheels, if there is no air and no leak in the system the pedal will get hard no matter what the proportioning valve is doing. I would look for a leak somewhere or check the master cylinder to see if its pistons are sealing properly. If the seals are not holding in the M/C the pedal will go to the floor Good Luck, Freewheelin' in LA. Larry - ----- Original Message ----- From: Brett Yerks To: Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 8:31 PM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder > Ok, so I bled and bled and bled tonight. Used 1 1/2 of those big bottles > worth of brake fluid. Got some bubbles, but the last at least 6 pushes of > the pedal got no bubbles on each bleeder. The pedal still goes to the > floor. Could it possibly be the proportioning valve? I replaced the master > cylinder because I had to pump the pedal to get any brakes. The first push > would be to the floor, second a little farther up and then the third push > would be normal. I get a little bit of brakes now when the pedal reaches > the floor, not enough to really stop me though. I may try replacing the > proporioning valve tomorrow unless maybe I got a bad master cylinder? > > Brett > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.superford.org/fbird > > > > >> > >> In a message dated 8/2/99 9:51:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > >> byerks > >> > >> > Did I miss anything? > > > >Bleed some more, and then bleed even more! It takes forever to get all > >the air out of the system. > > > >Jason > > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:08:22 -0500 From: ballingr Subject: FTE 61-79 - Pistons > > William, > What brands of pistons can you get through AZ? > Just curious, because I'm shopping for 300 pistons once I get the same > answers you're looking for. They sell Badger pistons primarily. I guess Badger is made by Manley, because they come in the same vendor catalog. I've not seen another vendor on our listings. I found out something else recently. Wolverine cams are made by Melling. You can get the same cam in many cases cheaper if you buy the Melling. (same part #) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:12:29 -0500 From: ballingr Subject: FTE 61-79 - Genetic Mutations, or what they name GM cars after. > Watch that nuclear humor...Actually 7 fingers could come in really handy... > when working on my Ford Truck. Just think of the possibilities... Cool in traffic too, I could use the middle one with impunity and still eat my fries. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:13:11 EDT From: TBeeee Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder In a message dated 8/3/99 9:31:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time, byerks > The pedal still goes to the > floor. Could it possibly be the proportioning valve? I don't think so. The propertioning valve is designed to equalize the operating pressures between the front and rear because disc brakes operate at a different pressure than the standard drum brakes on the rear. Do you have power brakes? If so I would check the adjustment of the actuating rod between the master cylinder and the power booster. If you have manual then you should check the free travel of the pedal. The other possible issues are improperly adjusted rear-shoes and/or over-extension of the calipers due to rotors or the pads being below acceptable minimum thickness. The system is designed to work only if each link in the chain is functioning. If everything else checks out it is quite possible that the master cylinder itself is defective. You wouldn't be the first person that received a defective rebuilt unit. I hope you find something here helpful. Stock Man 1967 Galaxie 500 Convertible (HELP!---I need 15 x5 factory rims) 1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:13:31 -0500 From: "Larry Brown" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder One other area you might want to check is the gasket in the M/C lid if it is not seated correctly or if it is torn it will allow the pedal to sink to the floor. Larry - ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Brown To: Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 8:49 PM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - master cylinder > I really doubt that the problem is the proportioning valve. The breaks work > by transmitting the force applied to the pedal to the wheels, if there is no > air and no leak in the system the pedal will get hard no matter what the > proportioning valve is doing. > > I would look for a leak somewhere or check the master cylinder to see if its > pistons are sealing properly. If the seals are not holding in the M/C the > pedal will go to the floor > > Good Luck, > > Freewheelin' in LA. > > Larry > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:35:44 -0500 From: "Phil / Debi" Subject: FTE 61-79 - trans question I just bought a 70 F100, it has a 300 six and three speed trans. I want to change it over to a 4 speed. does anyone know if the driveshaft and bell housing from the 3 speed will work with the 4 speed. I cant seem to get an answer from anyone. id rather find out before hand, rather than after it is all apart. Phil Beattie 66 F100 390 C6 66 F100 parts truck 69 F250 parts truck 70 F100 300 3 speed 79 F250 4x4 400 C6 (for sale) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:48:34 -0500 From: "Jason & Kathy Kendrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - trans question Phil / Debi wrote: . does anyone know if the driveshaft and bell > housing from the 3 speed will work with the 4 speed. The bell housing will work, but I don't know about the driveshaft. Jason == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:49:59 -0500 From: "Shane" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Changing the gearing I just got done having my 9 inch Third Member, (AKA Center Section, AKA Pumpkin) swaped because I stripped the splines off the yoke. I bought a good used rear end from a place called "Automotive Recyclers". The cost of the Third Member $133.13. Then I took it to a Ford dealership and had them put it in and that cost $54.00 for misc. parts Washers seals and a U-Joint (the old one was a different size) $12.60 for 7LBS. of grease $148.00 for labor (4.9 hours +tax 222.43 Dealership +133.13 Junk Yard - ---------- =355.56 TOTAL When you get it done or do it yourself, be sure that they\you check the axle seals so that you don't have to pull the axle again to change them. Shane P.S. I just happened to have the bill in front of me. - ----- Original Message ----- From: Hogan, Tom > If you have a 9 inch rear end the swap can be very easy. You can simply > swap the center section with one from the "auto recyclers" that has the > ratio you want. The catch it that you have to get a center section from a > unit that has the same number of axel splines as your current rear end. If > you have a different type of rear end then the gear change requires setting > up the gears properly. Not overly difficult but possibly more than you want > to tackle. I have gotten a quote from one place for about $1000 to swap > gears on a 9 inch. I've heard from others that it was less than $500. Shop > around and see. > > Tom H. > > > ---------- > > From: Spike188 > > Reply To: 61-79-list.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|