|
|
From: owner-61-79-list-digest To: 61-79-list-digest Subject: 61-79-list-digest V3 #235 Reply-To: 61-79-list Sender: owner-61-79-list-digest Errors-To: owner-61-79-list-digest Precedence: bulk 61-79-list-digest Tuesday, July 6 1999 Volume 03 : Number 235 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland Re: FTE 61-79 - FE to 300 swap FTE 61-79 - Jet Size for Holley 390 cfm on 300 I-6 Re: FTE 61-79 - Daddy's Little Helper Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 Re: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 FTE 61-79 - Mild RV cam for a 352 Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland Re: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 FTE 61-79 - T-19 Re: FTE 61-79 - Mild RV cam for a 352 FTE 61-79 - Re: The Stumbler FTE 61-79 - Re: 351M/351 Cleveland FTE 61-79 - 65 transmission FTE 61-79 - Re: The Stumbler FTE 61-79 - Copper Header Gaskets Re: FTE 61-79 - Jet Size for Holley 390 cfm on 300 I-6 Re: FTE 61-79 - Copper Header Gaskets Re: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 Re: FTE 61-79 - Copper Header Gaskets ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 03:27:10 -0500 From: "Jason & Kathy Kendrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland I looked at the block tonight, and the thermostat is level with the bottom of the intake. But it has the 335/385 series bellhousing pattern. Could it still be a Cleveland? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 04:51:35 EDT From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - FE to 300 swap In a message dated 7/4/99 8:22:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time, bhabben writes: work, and does that include vans (E100's)? >> As I recall, you just put the left tower on the right side, and vice versa. Darrell Duggan 74 F-350 "Tweety" == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:47:47 -0500 From: jcarbone Subject: FTE 61-79 - Jet Size for Holley 390 cfm on 300 I-6 I am running an Offenhauser intake with a Holley 390 cfm 4 bbl. and Hedman dual outlet headers on my '78 F-100 with 300 c.i. I-6/C-6 auto/2.75 gears. What is the correct carb jet size for this set-up? I need to fabricate/buy a transmission kick-down set-up. Any suggestions? Thanks! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:51:03 EDT From: TBeeee Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Daddy's Little Helper In a message dated 7/5/99 12:17:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, JJJJJGRANT > all compliments of a darling two year old son > wanting to help daddy. Pound for pound I would take a fleet of 6 year olds over the older ones. There isn't anything they will not do for you. I will tell you that their interest fades until about the time they have to get their driving permit..... Stock Man 1967 Galaxie 500 Convertible (I need factory rims) 1967 F-250 FE 390 4wd http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.hometown.aol.com/tbeeee == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 07:32:07 -0700 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland The t-stat is level with the intake on the Ms so if it has a big block bolt pattern it's a 351M/400. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets" - -----Original Message----- From: Jason & Kathy Kendrick To: 61-79-list Date: Monday, July 05, 1999 1:33 AM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland >I looked at the block tonight, and the thermostat is level with the >bottom of the intake. But it has the 335/385 series bellhousing pattern. >Could it still be a Cleveland? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:17:50 -0700 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland I should say that the bottom of the t-stat housing is level with the bottom of the intake manifold. - -----Original Message----- From: Bill Beyer To: 61-79-list Date: Monday, July 05, 1999 7:28 AM Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland >The t-stat is level with the intake on the Ms so if it has a big block bolt >pattern it's a 351M/400. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jason & Kathy Kendrick >To: 61-79-list >Date: Monday, July 05, 1999 1:33 AM >Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland > > >>I looked at the block tonight, and the thermostat is level with the >>bottom of the intake. But it has the 335/385 series bellhousing pattern. >>Could it still be a Cleveland? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:34:20 -0600 From: "Grady M. Shock" Subject: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 Guys & Gals, I have a 78 F-150 400 & non snycro 4 on the floor. My assumption was that it was a T-18. Just looked it up on http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://.medicine.wisc.edu/~mrm/bronco/ftvin.cgi and it said I have an NP 435. So my question is what is the difference between the two trannys? Also what trannys mount to a 400 auto & manual. Thanks, - -Grady Shock == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:45:01 -0700 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 As far as autos go the C6 is the only one I know of on the big block pattern 400s. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, riddle them with bullets" - -----Original Message----- From: Grady M. Shock To: 61-79-list Date: Monday, July 05, 1999 8:37 AM Subject: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 >Guys & Gals, > I have a 78 F-150 400 & non snycro 4 on the floor. My assumption was >that it was a T-18. Just looked it up on >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://.medicine.wisc.edu/~mrm/bronco/ftvin.cgi and it said I have an NP >435. So my question is what is the difference between the two trannys? Also >what trannys mount to a 400 auto & manual. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:55:02 EDT From: TWL1911 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Mild RV cam for a 352 Hey i have never really decked outa ford motor because my buddy showed me how on a ch*v*. but anyways he was saying that if i but a mild rv cam in my 352 it should up the horse power and tourqe. im plan on getting one but i would like a few suggestions on which kind i should get. my truck spends a fair amount of time idleing so it has to have a smooth enought idle. plus i need lots of tourqe because come fall ill be pulling grain wagons. any info is apreciated thanks Travis == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:16:31 EDT From: SevnD2 Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 351M/351 Cleveland The 351cleveland uses a 335 series block . The The 385 series block is for the 429 and 460 and the bellhousing bolt pattern for them is the same as the 351M and the 400 . Here are some measurements I took on my 351 cleveland : top 2 bolts are 5 -1/16 apart , the left ( drivers side ) from top to bottom are 6 - 9/16 and then 3 - 5/8 . The right side ( Passenger side ) from top to bottom : 5 - 7/8 and then 3 - 1/8 . These are just rough measurements without bieng exact but close enough to figure out what the engine you have is or is not . Hope this helps . Rollie. 5-1/16 o o 5-7/8 6-9/16 o o 3-1/8 3-5/8 o 16" o == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 13:31:55 -0500 From: Stu Varner Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 At 08:34 AM 7/5/99 -0600, you wrote: >Guys & Gals, > I have a 78 F-150 400 & non snycro 4 on the floor. My assumption was >that it was a T-18. Just looked it up on >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://.medicine.wisc.edu/~mrm/bronco/ftvin.cgi and it said I have an NP >435. So my question is what is the difference between the two trannys? Also >what trannys mount to a 400 auto & manual. Grady, Only first gear is not synchroed in an NP 435, not sure about a T-18. Anyone?? The NP 435 should have reverse over to the right and down. T-18 should have reverse over to the left and up. I think there were a few T-18's that had the same shift pattern as an NP 435 but I have never seen one like that. I may be way off here. Anyone?? They are both bullet proof and super tuff tranny's. I prefer the NP 435 myself but would take a free T-18 in a second. Both tranny's would mount to a 400 if you have the right bell housing. Good Luck, Stu Nuke GM! http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pscico.com/stu == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:24:53 -0700 From: "Dan Duke" Subject: FTE 61-79 - T-19 Mark Flynn writes: Tranny: I'm still trying to locate a reasonably priced T19, (fully sync'd 4spd with 5:11 1st). They seem to be pretty rare. Basically; I need to fix the NP435 I now have (2nd doesn't sync); so I'd rather put the money into a more drivable manual tranny, (can't convince myself to put in an automatic). I've heard that the T19 was used in '80 to '87 F250s and F300s. Does this sound right, or does anyone know of a source on the West coast that would accept a NP435 core, for a T19? Or for that matter; has anyone done this swap before? Let me check the local Mini-Merchant because I remember seeing an ad for a guy that sold rebuilt T-18 & 19's. He did want the same back for a core though if I remember right. As for your swap, I'm not sure about. I was considering the same swap for my T-18 because it has 318k original miles. (still works and handles what I give it though) Although, after 20 years of shifting I'm starting to lean towards an auto when the time comes. Anyway if I find anything out I'll let you know. Dan Duke '70 F250 Camper Special mine now, but always "My Dad's Truck" '81 Jeep Wagoneer Ltd. Modesto CA == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 15:52:29 -0500 From: "Jason & Kathy Kendrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Mild RV cam for a 352 TWL1911 > > Hey > i have never really decked outa ford motor because my buddy showed me how on > a ch*v*. but anyways he was saying that if i but a mild rv cam in my 352 it > should up the horse power and tourqe. im plan on getting one but i would like > a few suggestions on which kind i should get. my truck spends a fair amount > of time idleing so it has to have a smooth enought idle. plus i need lots of > tourqe because come fall ill be pulling grain wagons. any info is apreciated > thanks > Travis > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html I'd try something like a Comp Cam 260H. You should be able to use new stock Ford valve springs without worrying about coil bind or not enough spring pressure. Always use new lifters with a new cam. It'll give a smooth idle, with good low to midrange torque increase. Throttle response will be good. However, with the multitude of cam manufacturers out there, you have quite a few choices to work with. Talk with other people and see what they've used and you might even call a couple cam companies and talk with their tech department. Good luck! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:26:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Lee Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: The Stumbler John, It sounds like spark to me. Check your plugs or just change them. Be sure they are gapped right. Dan Lee '53 F100 351C-4V > Subject: FTE 61-79 - The Stumbler > > 1967 F100 w/300 I-6. Had it tuned wonderfully using > vacuum guages (great > advice from this group) Ran super for a couple of > weeks. All of a sudden it > has started to stumble at acceleration, REALLY > stumble. Have rechecked > timing, plug wires, looked for loose plugs. Where do > I look first (next)? > Thanks, > John > Our Savior Lutheran Church > 1101 Old Cleburne Road > Granbury, TX 76048 > (817) 573-5011 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:38:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Lee Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: 351M/351 Cleveland They easy way to tell is to put the pedal to the metal. If you hear wheels squealing its a Cleveland. My Cleveland has a vertical bolt pattern on the fuel pump mount. I am looking for a shorty dipstick for a rear sump oil pan for a 351M/400. If you could supply a part #, or year/model #, so I can order one that will be fine. Dan Lee '53 F100 351C-4V >Hey guys, is there any way to tell the difference >between a 351M and a >Cleveland, just be looking at the outside? _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 19:02:07 -0500 From: jpit Subject: FTE 61-79 - 65 transmission My 65 F-100 has a 240 with three on the tree. I have been driving it daily > for the last year and a half without major problems. > > Most everything is original. This past weekend, a strange problem occurred. > It felt like the transmission was skipping or maybe jumping in 2nd and 3rd gear. > It was very brief and I'm pretty sure it was the transmission and not the > clutch. It did not affect the truck's mobility but it is something I want to > repair if possible. If this the beginning of a major problem? It is my understanding the transmission was rebuilt > several years ago. (Don't know for sure.) > > This has never happened during the time I have been driving, however the gear > shift has stuck in neutral between first and second a couple of times. How > can this be repaired? > > Any suggestions on either problem will be appreciated. > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 17:13:42 -0700 From: "Steven Salas" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: The Stumbler John asked about what would make his truck stumble upon acceleration. I would check the carbureter accelerator pump. To do this, (with engine not running of course) look down carb throat and actuate throttle. You should get fuel squirting out the instant you move the throttle. If this is not happening you may need to adjust or repair the accelerator pump. You didn't say if your truck was stumbling other than on acceleration so this may or may not help you. If it is only on acceleration, this would be the first thing I would check. Best Regards, Steve == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:31:14 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Copper Header Gaskets Has anyone used copper exhaust manifold gaskets for their headers? Just curious what the experience has been... CJ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:00:24 -0700 From: "Danger" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Jet Size for Holley 390 cfm on 300 I-6 > I need to fabricate/buy a transmission kick-down set-up. Any > suggestions? .......... Shouldn't you be able to buy a 'Ford AT kickdown kit' for most Holley's? Perhaps you might be able to buy an entire carb with the linkage you need from the salvage yard for about the same price as the kit. Removing the throttle plates in order to get the throttle shaft out can be a bit tricky because the phillips head screws have been peened at the tips which makes them difficult to remove. It would be a good idea to peen the tips of the screws after assembly so you don't risk them coming loose and falling into the engine. Danger == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:19:19 -0700 From: "Danger" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Copper Header Gaskets > Has anyone used copper exhaust manifold gaskets for their headers? > > Just curious what the experience has been... > > CJ ................ I've used Copper-Spray-A-Gasket on cylinder head and exhaust gaskets by adding a thin coat to the gasket and have never had a problem with them. Danger == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:28:22 -0700 From: "Danger" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - T-18 or NP 435 > Only first gear is not synchroed in an NP 435, not sure about a T-18. > Anyone?? > The NP 435 should have reverse over to the right and down. > T-18 should have reverse over to the left and up. I think there were a > few T-18's > that had the same shift pattern as an NP 435 but I have never seen one like > that. I may be way off here. Anyone?? > Stu ........... I've got a 69 F250 with T18 and 1st is not sychronized. Reverse is to the right and up. 1 3 R 2 4 Um... what is the difference between a T-19 and a NP 435? Which is the best (bullet proof) standard trans for a 460 in a mid 70's F-series?.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|