|
|
61-79-list-digest Friday, December 11 1998 Volume 02 : Number 555 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 61-79 - Ford Front Fender Freight Fun Re: FTE 61-79 - intrument cluster Re: FTE 61-79 - carb for 300 six Re: FTE 61-79 - 300 six offering FTE 61-79 - complant RE: FTE 61-79 - 300 six offering FTE 61-79 - 1970 F-250 4x4 460 swap FTE 61-79 - Ford Front Fender Freight Fun....one more chapter FTE 61-79 - Re: "Eggs" in the Radiator Re: FTE 61-79 - complant FTE 61-79 - No Mail Today FTE 61-79 - F-150 Seat covers FTE 61-79 - 70 Truck Manuals FTE 61-79 - Smog check help FTE 61-79 - instrument cluster Re: FTE 61-79 - instrument cluster FTE 61-79 - C6 Help Re: FTE 61-79 - complant Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: "Eggs" in the Radiator ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:35:49 EST From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Ford Front Fender Freight Fun Another update in the 73-79 fender saga.....I had refused two shipments from JCW (both fenders were bent each time)....I then cancelled that order and ordered a set from Mill Supply in Cleveland....(these were the exact same Taiwan brand fenders as JCW, by the way "Jui Li Enterprises"). Mill Supply did package the fenders better, but lo and behold, one of them was still buckled, while the other was in mint condition. The way they are packaged at the factory leaves the inside "corners" of the fenderwells subject to buckling. It appears that some kind of stiffener at the bottom might cure this problem. Out of six fenders I've had shipped, five were buckled. Leads me to believe that they might be getting damaged between Taiwan and the U.S. instead of between the Midwest and Colorado.... I sent a fax to Mill Supply yesterday explaining my story.....I have no reason to think that they won't replace the one buckled fender without any trouble......I'll post more as we go..... Colorado Jeff == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:04:46 -0500 From: Garr&Pam Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - intrument cluster The Freeman Family wrote: > > I've heard of this before. The oil, temp and fuel guage peg out, but the > truck runs fine. Mine did the same thing on an '97 Ranger. The ammeter did > not fluctuate nor did anything else except those three guages. My problem > was a faulty IVR. Seems to be a common problem on the '87 Ranger. I forgot > what I paid for it, but I got it directly from Ford. > > Hope this helps! > > -Ted My friends 78 did this and my 87 Escort GT did too! Seems to be one of the weak links at Ford! Chris 94 Lightning #381 The only needle that pegs in this truck is the speedo!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 08:49:48 PST From: "Jerald Merrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - carb for 300 six I would have to say if you are looking for reliability, that the best would be an autolite 1bbl carb. they not fancy but they are hard to beat, especialy when it is -20 out side. J. A. Merrick Wyoming Mr. Ranger >From owner-61-79-list >Received: (fordtruc Tue, 8 Dec 1998 17:29:03 -0500 (EST) >Received: from villa1.uno.mx (villa1.uno.mx [200.23.83.1]) by ford-trucks.com (8.8.5) id RAA03937; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 17:28:55 -0500 (EST) >Received: from alumno9.uno.mx ([200.23.83.109]) > by villa1.uno.mx (8.8.4/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA00391 > for ; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:17:03 -0700 (MST) >Message-Id: >X-Sender: gene >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Demo >Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:22:30 -0700 >To: 61-79-list >From: Gene Gardner >Subject: FTE 61-79 - carb for 300 six >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Sender: owner-61-79-list >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: 61-79-list > >Anybody got an opinion (as if I didn't know) on the best kind of carb for >my 1970 F-100? I'm looking for practicality and reliability as opposed to >horsepower. It's got a remanufactured 300 inline six (early 80's vintage), >but the carb is the original Motorcraft 1-barrel with a manual choke and >oilbath air filter. The plate at the bottom (butterfly?) is shot and the >idle is variable, sometimes surging. I'd rather switch over to a paper >element air filter with the new carb since the bracket that holds the >oilbath is broken. How much should I expect to pay, what are the >considerations, etc.? > >Thanks as usual -- Gene Gardner, Texican Teacher > Hermosillo, Mexico > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 08:54:19 PST From: "Jerald Merrick" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 300 six offering The last 240 that I can remember seeing in a pickup was in the 71 models, there wasn't very many because of the 300 push. J. A. Merrick Wyoming Mr. Ranger >From owner-61-79-list >Received: (fordtruc Tue, 8 Dec 1998 14:15:25 -0500 (EST) >Received: from trans.pscico.com (root [204.210.192.60]) by ford-trucks.com (8.8.5) id OAA03482; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 14:15:20 -0500 (EST) >X-Authentication-Warning: ford-trucks.com: Host root [204.210.192.60] claimed to be trans.pscico.com >Received: from tony (tony.pscico.com [10.0.1.7]) > by trans.pscico.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA29349 > for ; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 14:12:25 -0500 >Message-Id: >X-Sender: tony >X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) >Date: Tue, 08 Dec 1998 14:15:27 -0500 >To: 61-79-list >From: Tony Marino >Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 300 six offering >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Sender: owner-61-79-list >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: 61-79-list > >Actually... What was the last year for the 240? > >Tony > >At 12:28 PM 12/8/98 -0500, you wrote: >>Occasionally I open my mouth and stupidity flows out... Must be the stress >>of college finals. >> >>My humblest appologies. >> >>Tony >> >>>Tony writes: >>I'm pretty sure the first 300 was available in '70 > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:09:10 PST From: "Jerald Merrick" Subject: FTE 61-79 - complant Howdy from Wyoming Well I guess it's not really a complant, but I am really but I am going to voice my opinion. I keep hearing about the FE's and how they are great engins. Well I agree with that, I love the FE's. But I am sick and tired of hearing only about 352's, 390's, and 428's. Yea they are great rodding engines that can take a lot of punishment. But what about the 360's. Every one I know always puts the 360 down, They are just as strong as any of the other FE's. I have a 71 F-100 with a 360 backed by a C4. I can Get on the thing all day long, and pull just about any thing. It's one of the best engins Ford has produced, It's so good it was the only FE not to be shared with the Ford line of cars. Just a thought J. A. Merrick Wyoming Mr. Ranger ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:31:00 -0700 From: "Miska, Richard L (Rick)" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - 300 six offering Just to ad to the info, I once had a 1974 half-ton with a 240 and three on the tree. Plenty of torque, good mileage, good engine. I rebuilt the engine, my first and only engine build so far, and it ran great. It was the original engine. I think I still have a crank and maybe a cam for a 240 around. Rick p.s. I clipped a lot of the previous messages/replies before I sent this. > ---------- > From: Jerald Merrick[SMTP:jeraldmerrick > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 1998 9:54 AM > To: 61-79-list > Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 300 six offering > > The last 240 that I can remember seeing in a pickup was in the 71 > models, there wasn't very many because of the 300 push. > J. A. Merrick > Wyoming > Mr. Ranger > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:46:35 -0800 From: "Pete and Shell" Subject: FTE 61-79 - 1970 F-250 4x4 460 swap does anyone know where or how to get the proper motor mounts and/or frame perches to swap from a 360 to a 460? Any info would be greatly appreciated,thanks == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:47:02 EST From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Ford Front Fender Freight Fun....one more chapter OK, spoke with Mill Supply today. They had already shipped me a new fender and will be having the delivery service (RPS) pick up the bent unit!....The person handling my case (Bob) was very apologetic and very professional. I was impressed. I have since discovered boot prints on the package....an indication the box was used as a step, probably in a delivery van somewhere....Bob explained that they always open all of the fender packages when they arrive there to be sure that they are in good condition before they are shipped to the customer.... I should mention that I had faxed them a letter explaining the situation. I am finding that dealing with companies via fax is VERY effective..... Now, I hope to send in the last chapter when the last fender gets here in good condition!!!!!! Colorado Jeff == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 From: Marv Miller Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: "Eggs" in the Radiator > David Wadson wrote: > I've considered that idea but > I don't think that's what it is. The rad was cradled in the box by big, > solid pieces of foam covered in plastic wrap. > Also, when I picked some of the things out, they weren't little solid > plastic bits. They were more like a translucent jelly around a slightly > harder center. The last time I saw this kind of thing was after I put ethelene glycol anti-freeze in an engine that someone had previously "egg dipped". Egg dip is a liguid that farmers used to (yes!) dip their chickens' eggs into as a preservative. It's some sodium (silicate) compound that acts very effectively as a block sealer. It masks a blown head gasket sometimes when an unscrupulous car seller needs to make a quick buck. (See article on sawdust and banana peels in howling differentials). It is soluable in water, and if you use the old alcohol-type anti-freeze, (probably not available any more) it's soluable in that, too. It is NOT compatable with glycol-type anti-freeze, and will immediately form the small beads you describe. Could this be what you're seeing? - -Marv- (Am I really getting this old?) == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:26:38 -0600 From: William S Hart Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - complant >Well I guess it's not really a complant, but I am really but I am going >to voice my opinion. I keep hearing about the FE's and how they are >great engins. Well I agree with that, I love the FE's. But I am sick Sorry, I know I've mentioned a lot of 390 stuff lately, but that's because I have the 360 and just want more torque. Its not that the 360 won't do what I'm tryin to do (drive back and forth to work mostly), just that I'm a power junkie, so I would really prefer to have more :) The 360 was great when I got it 5 years ago, and it has served me well, headers and a 4v really wake this engine up. But now it is very tired, and I would rather have more power, so for a similar price I've decided to fix up a 390. It also has the bonus of being a bolt in swap. As for 360 not being shared with the cars, this is actually a handicap. By sharing it with the cars, you've introduced a whole new after market to them. Though most things from the 390 will work on the 360, there are things that won't. All in all, as long as its an FE its a good engine right ? :) Around here I'm just happy to find a guy who knows Fords. Just my 2cents Bill Auto Links http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/cars.html '73 1/2 ton 4x4 Ford http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/Trucks/truck.html '96 Mustang GT http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish/Cars/mustang.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:42:11, -0500 From: BBMZ31A Subject: FTE 61-79 - No Mail Today Has the list gone down? Have not received any mail today. Mike Bigby == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 19:47:13 EST From: FORDTRKNUT Subject: FTE 61-79 - F-150 Seat covers I have been looking for a new seat cover for my 1979 F-350 4x4. I have found an awesome place that makes them. It is called "PETE'S SEATS" in Roanoke Rapids, NC. His mailing address is: PETE'S SEATS.......PO Box 2004........Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 The phone number is: 1-800-25-SEATS I live in New Jersey and he comes to the Englishtown's Raceway Parks Swap Meet. His covers are top notch....just remove factory ripped junk and install new one. Give him a call!!!! Wayne Grabley == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:07:40 -0500 From: "The Freeman Family" Subject: FTE 61-79 - 70 Truck Manuals I've been seeing a lot of truck manuals at ebay fairly cheap. I bought a set for my '68 for $25. I paid nearly $100 for my old fairlane manuals. Hope some one here gets a deal. I've included a link if anyone is intrested. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=47676144 PS- In no way am I affiliated with ebay or the owner of the manuals. - -Ted == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:13:54 -0800 From: gpark Subject: FTE 61-79 - Smog check help Well, after 7 years of absolutly faithful service, I'm passing the keys of my '77 351M F150 onto a friend. I'm getting 2 grand from him, and he's getting a truck with 91,000 original miles on it. I've put a TON of money into this truck, but I enjoyed every minute of it. I'm sick like that I guess. You guys have helped me through a bunch of puzzles over the last year or so. Azie, Dave R are two who come to my mind right off, but there are more of you, and you know who you are. Special thanks to our esteemed list-master, also. I'm going to be on the Injected-plastic list (the new truck guys) since I'm getting a 95 F250 with 114,000 miles on it. I know a lot of you think that's crazy in itself, and I won't argue too much. The price is right, though, at $7,200. gonna have to learn about Mass air, and TPS, and all that other crazy stuff, God help me. I am going to maintain my sub here though, cause I've learned a heck of a lot, and am loath to give that up just yet. Anyway, to get the point, the last ride, so to speak, will be to get a smog check. The Calif. smog police now require a dyno test, and I'm worried that it's going to make her flunk. It's pretty scary out here, to tell you the truth. I'm half expecting the inspectors to start wearing arm bands with black eagles on them. She's got all her stock smog stuff on it. The timing is at spec (12 btdc). I want to do every little thing I can to help her put best foot forward, so to speak, so any tips are most appreciated. Take care. Gregg == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:14:55 -0600 From: "ben" Subject: FTE 61-79 - instrument cluster Does anybody know where the voltage regulator is for the gauges on a '79 F-150? I Called the dealership and they told me $30 for a new one. They couldn't tell me where it is. And the only thing I could see that looks somthing like one is a little metal box on the back of the gauge cluster. I find it hard to believe that little box thing on the back of the gauge cluster cost that much. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 98 19:34:23 -0700 From: "Manuel Costa" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - instrument cluster Sirs: I am looking for information about tires and wheels for a '67 Ford pickup. I currently have a set of 30x9.50R15 (on stock wheels), but I would like to put "fatter" mud and snow tires on it. Am I looking at getting new wheels? I want the same diameter tires, or slightly bigger (like 31"), but just with a wider cross-section. Anyone here have any suggestions? Thanks, M.C. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:29:20 -0800 From: Vogt Family Subject: FTE 61-79 - C6 Help Well, I was trying to button up my C6 tonight and I got hung up at the low/reverse clutch piston springs. Seems I am missing some sort of piece that went between the stamped piece that holds down the springs and the roller clutch inner race. Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for? It has been weeks since I took it apart so I can't remember. I won't be able to get paperwork until Tuesday. Help me please! Birken == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 23:41:30 -0800 From: "Deacon" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - complant From: William S Hart >As for 360 not being shared with the cars, this is actually a handicap. By >sharing it with the cars, you've introduced a whole new after market to >them. Though most things from the 390 will work on the 360, there are >things that won't. What wouldn't work on an FE360 that would work on an FE390? I thought the only difference between the two were the connecting rods and the crank. I also thought these were bolt-in for changing a 360 to a 390. Best thing about knowledge is, you can never know it all! :) Deacon Blues deconblu deconblu http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.earthlink.net/~deconblu/ - ------------------------ Some like them Fast. Some like them custom. I like mine Paid For! '73 F100 Oh, Give me a home, An Internet to roam, And my wife will not see me all day! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:10:17 -0800 From: "Deacon" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: "Eggs" in the Radiator >-Marv- >(Am I really getting this old?) Well Marv, your making me feel like a kid again. According to my mail reader you sent this message Dec. 31, 1969. That makes me 14 and the summer of love was a few months ago. :} I missed the Jefferson Airplane concert again. But there's still plenty of parties! Yo, Dennis & Steve. Lets get the bus painted and head out for the bay! ;>L Deacon Blues deconblu To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|