|
|
61-79-list-digest Sunday, May 10 1998 Volume 02 : Number 261 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge FTE 61-79 - Axle Spacers FTE 61-79 - Re: twin piston calipers FTE 61-79 - Re: engine FTE 61-79 - Re: Sunday Breakfast RE: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars RE: FTE 61-79 - Traction Bars Re: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge FTE 61-79 - Rope seal FTE 61-79 - A Soapbox Rant on Back Pressure. FTE 61-79 - New Lincoln SUV FTE 61-79 - Steering Wheel Hub FTE 61-79 - U Joints FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? RE: FTE 61-79 - engine RE: FTE 61-79 - '69 F-250 FTE 61-79 - trans numbers Re: FTE 61-79 - trans numbers FTE 61-79 - Permission to use your pictures. FTE 61-79 - Badges for the show Re: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? Re: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? Re: FTE 61-79 - My front leaf springs ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 06:22:07 -0400 From: "Melayne Arnold" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge Ken, Sunday morning is fine by me.We're going Thurs. evening and staying till Sun. Any time others want is fine with us. Are you going to have the booth? I'd like to be able to meet everyone before the end of the show. (SWMBO sez that I'd feel pretty dumb getiing into a tug of war over a piece of chrome on Saturday and then find out it was with another list member on Sunday). Stoney = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 09:42:11 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Axle Spacers I just disassembled a Dana 60-2 (semi-floating) with a Power-Lok unit. I'm trying to figure out exactly what the little spacers between the axles do. Each one is about an inch long with one end that has a flange that butts up to end of each axle. The Power-Lok unit fits right into the full-floating (3/4 ton) axle that I am upgrading to. Does anyone know if these spacers are required for the full-floating Dana 60 Power-Lok application? If so, any idea on what kind of clearances there should be? Thanks! Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:08:59 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: twin piston calipers Hey Ox, Just went through the dual piston deal you are going through. I found it was cheaper to get the rebuilt caliper unit than to buy the piston kits and do it myself! The rebuilt units were $45 plus a $5 core....I think they call them an "unloaded" unit, meaning no brake shoes included.... Good luck, Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:09:24 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: engine Hey Eric, If you picked up the entire engine/transmission assembly out of the 77, you did good. Now, you just need to figure out the difference between the frame cross members between the two rigs. I don't know about the 4x2's, but it looks like the crossmember that the transmission bolts to in the 4x4's is interchangeable between these two years. Sounds like you'll need a new steering column as well to replace your "three on the tree" setup with the automatic selector. Since a lot of the 67's came stock with the FE/Auto setup, you should be able to pick up a set of the correct motor mounts no problem from the junkyards.... Not much help, but good luck! Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:10:19 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Sunday Breakfast Hi Ken, Count me in on the Sunday AM deal.... Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:28:55 -0500 From: "Bear" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars Thank you very much. That was a big help! E-mail : bear269 Please view my home page at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.isl.net/~bear269/home - -----Original Message----- From: owner-61-79-list [mailto:owner-61-79-list Sent: Saturday, May 09, 1998 11:25 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars > From: "Bear" > Subject: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars > Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 00:06:58 -0500 > I was looking in a catalog and I saw after market sway bars. I was > wondering: What are they supposed to do, how do they work and are > they worth the money? I was looking into getting the front and rear > ones... Ever see one of them fancy custom cars the LA gang guys build that go up and down and bounce all over............well sway bars........Ok, not really, sway bars are actually "Anti-Sway" bars and when one wheel on an axle (front or rear) moves the anti-sway bar forces the other side to move too but with some amount of lag built in to the spring rate of the sway bar. All it is is a torsion bar with arms. The primary purpose is to keep the body more level in turns. My bronco has them front and rear and it corners like a Ferrari but if I ever go to Moab, I'll carry my tools with me and take them off before I go on the trails :-) 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's 78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! - -- Gary -- = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 12:06:09 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Traction Bars FWIW, take a good estimate of what the engine makes at the crank, and reduce that by 10% to 20%. this is what is assumed in vehicle calculations when the true efficiency of the drivetrain is not known. an automatic will decrease shock load, but increase the torque. a manual is opposite of course. (assuming equal gear ratios, which of course may not be the case. this is because a torque converter increases torque at high relative engine to wheel speed difference.) so if your 428 makes 410 #ft torque, then at the rear wheel, about 320-370 #ft of torque may be available if the final drive ratio is 1:1 with the engine. so, if the final drive ratio is 2.75 first gear, and 2:1 transfer case (assuming 4x4 low range) and 4.10 rear gears, the final ratio is 22.55. so, torque would be 80% * 22.55 * 410(esitmated engine torque) = about 7,400 #ft at the axles. now, another factor applies, which is quite high for trucks in general. the driveline inertia. this reduces it quite a bit. how much inertia? hell, i don't know! also tire dia reduce's it. here's the actual technical equation: Ta=Fx*r+Lw*Aw=(Td-(Id*Ad)Nf where: Ta=torque on the axles Fx=tractive force at the ground (lbs) r=wheel radius Iw=inertia of wheels and axles Aw=rotation acceleration of the wheels Id=inertia of driveshaft Ad=rotational acceleration of driveshaft Nf=final drive ratio Fx=is an even more complex eqation with more "unknowns". i think you can assume about 60-80% of the rear axle wheight for this number. it changes depending upon weight transfer, center of gravity, inertia of sprung, unsprung parts, tire traction, and just about everything else! anyway, on my pull truck i have 1"od x 1/8"wall (if i remember correctly) round DOM tubing. i welded in nuts at each end one with a LH thread, one RH thread. used 3/4 thread heim jounts and connected one end to axle bottom and one end to frame. the tube is mounted so that from side of vehicle the tubes and drive shaft are in almost the same exact plane. similiar to rancho's set, but better IMHO. sleddog - ---------- From: BDIJXS[SMTP:BDIJXS Sent: Saturday, May 09, 1998 7:58 PM To: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - Traction Bars Can anyone give me good upper estimate on how much torque would be measured at the rear wheels for a good, strong-running 428? I just need an upper ballpark figure here....I think that with that number, I can calculate about how much force will be transmitted to a set of traction bars (I'm trying to eliminate wrap-up), and therefore decide on what diameter they should be and what the brackets I'm going to make need to be able to handle..... Thanks! Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 12:40:31 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge At 06:22 AM 5/10/98 -0400, you wrote: >Ken, > Sunday morning is fine by me.We're going Thurs. evening and staying till >Sun. Any time others want is fine with us. Are you going to have the booth? We'll a booth. I'm printing out the banner for it right now. Directions to the pavilion for the Sunday breakfast will be at the booth. >I'd like to be able to meet everyone before the end of the show. (SWMBO sez >that I'd feel pretty dumb getiing into a tug of war over a piece of chrome >on Saturday and then find out it was with another list member on Sunday). > >Stoney We're planning on meeting Saturday in front of the convention center around 10. Hope to see you there. Tug of war? Heck, when it comes to getting a new grill for my 67 I have no shame! Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 08:49:48 -0800 From: "Erik Marquez" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Rope seal >> Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 20:52:30 -0400 >> From: "THE PAVIES'" >> Subject: FTE 61-79 - 360 Seal Replacement > >> look-see at whats really in there. But it's hard to believe Ford >> used rope as an oil seal. Sounds like something you'd use as an >> emergency temporary fix but not as something permanent. Maybe I can >> wind some string around and stick gum on it. SNIP >The rope seals were very durable but very difficult to replace and >not too forgiving of worn bearings but were used by many manufactures >back then. I haven't seen one in so long I can't remember if there >is any rubber parts to them but there was no rod so thay can't be >driven out like the rubber ones, they have to be pulled out or the >engine has to be pulled and worked on on a stand. > >78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's >78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's >78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! > >- -- Gary -- Gary is spot on, those rope seals do/did work well when installed correctly, as with the rubber type, when replacing the seal (rubber grab with a pliers, rope insert a small sheet metal screw into the end and pull that) have a helper S L O W L Y turn the motor over in the same direction you are tring to pull the seal out. This way the crank will help "push" the seal out. BTW FELPRO still markets both types of seals, some one must still buy them. Erik Marquez 78 Bronco bronco78 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mosquitonet.com/~bronco78 = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 11:37:25 -0700 From: "Chris Samuel" Subject: FTE 61-79 - A Soapbox Rant on Back Pressure. On Soap Box. Mike Schwall wrote: "I used to have more torque, but I put on full length 1 1/2" primary headers and 2 1/4" dual exhaust with Dynomax Super Turbos. Back pressure has dropped and low end torque has suffered." No engine (gas) ever built by Ford for Automotive use ever needed "Back Pressure" for power production. In fact as an all but absolute statement: Every (all makes) engine will make more torque as the "Back Pressure" is reduced. You can not just change single system components as you will upset the total system and by doing so you can reduce the power, or unintentionally shift the RPM where the power is produced. Your 306 incher is not known for torque but it will wind up quite nicely. The modifications that you list are designed to make more power at a higher RPM, I would expect that you moved the Torque peak up 600 to 800 RPM. If you set up the Cam, Ign. and Carb. with care (and the cam is not too radical) you should be able to at least generate the same amount of Torque at the stock Torque peak, and more as the RPM's rise on up to the New peak. Ideally changing the exhaust system works like this, you improve it until you are making max power from your combination of parts. Then you adjust it to shift the power curve up or down the RPM range, if you adjust for bottom end as a rule you will loose on the top, and versa-visegrip. Really what happens is we change the system by adding headers, duals, free flowing Cat's., new muffler bearings, or what ever and then blame the system for our choices. Then we never take the time and $$$ to find out what else we should have done to the system to get it right; and, what those changes did to the other systems, and, what changes need to be made there. This approach is what started the Back Pressure myth and the only thing that perpetuates it. Back Pressure reduces air flow. Air flow is power. More air= more power/Torque. Stocker to Racer; Physics is Physics. Off my Soap Box Mike. All of this is said not to in any way offend you, or any one else for that mater. Back Pressure is just a pet peeve of mine. Chris 79 Bronco = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 15:21:28 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE 61-79 - New Lincoln SUV WWW.FordWorldNews.Com has a feature on the new Lincoln Blackwood SUV. Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 14:20:19 -0500 From: ballingr Subject: FTE 61-79 - Steering Wheel Hub I went to a truck junkyard and pulled the steering wheel from a '65 2 1/2 t dump truck and pulled the column tube, horn/turn signal switch and everything for $20. Pulled mine apart and found that my horn part of the horn/turn signal switch had been purposely broken off and discarded, all that remained was the turn signal part. The spring that provides the preload for the inner race had also been discarded, allowing the race to pop out of the bearing causing the slack in the hub. I used the spring that I got off the dump truck, and put the race back in place an viola!, good as new. I now have a replacement race and bearing for future use. The switch I bought is apparently a replacement one because it looks new, and the t*ts that c*ncel the signal are in new shape. The only fly in the ointment is that something else is missing. I don't have anything on the wheel that goes down into the hub to tickle the c*ncellers. I'm going to go back and look at the dump truck wheel to see what it uses, because they worked perfect on it. The wheel is different from mine though, I hope they used the same thing to do the job and I hope it's detatchable. Any one with an experience on this? Come on over to my Back Porch http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ldd.net/scribers/ballingr Ballinger ballingr = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 15:49:18 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - U Joints Does anyone know if the 67-72 F-100's and F-250's used the same U-joints? At least, are the bearing diameters the same? Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 19:09:02 -0400 From: "Melayne Arnold" Subject: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? Just got a '69 F-250 with a 360 (I think) and C-6. I haven't had an FE since a '68 Galaxie with a 390. Might go to 460 since I'm a lot more familiar with the 385 series. Then again it might be fun to work with this engine. I love 460's but I sure liked that 390 a lot. Can't understand arguments over which is better, FE or 385, I love them BOTH! Big block power and they're both ford blue. How about some of you FE lovers giving me some ideas on what I could do here. I like low end torque, and any big block will run a lot faster than I drive. Stoney '83 F-250 2wd, 460, c-6 (Willie) '79 F-250 2wd, 429 PI, NP 435 (Suzie) '76 F-100 2wd, 302, 3 on the tree (ol' Blue) '69 F-250 2wd, 360, c-6 (was Double Ugly, now Nellie) '73 Mustang, 351-C, looking for a toploader 4-speed '84 Gran Prix, 305, auto (swmbo) = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 20:27:46 -0400 From: "Ken Schneider" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - engine Judging form a couple of junk trucks I've stripped, you will have to re-drill the frame for the motor mounts, and you may have to move your crossmember as well. You may need to switch columns as well. Someone want to varify this for me? Ken (Goin to Pigeon Forge!) 68 F-100 Ranger, 360, C6 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-61-79-list > [mailto:owner-61-79-list > Sent: Saturday, May 09, 1998 9:11 PM > To: 61-79-list > Subject: FTE 61-79 - engine > > > I have a 1967 F-100 Custom Cab with a long bed and a 240 mated with a Ford > 3-speed transmission. I was wondering if anyone knew what I need to do to > put a 1977 390 with a C6 that was in a F250 Ranger that also had > a long bed, > in my truck. > > > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== > Send posts to: 61-79-list > Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo > "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. > ======================================================================= > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 20:39:13 -0400 From: "Ken Schneider" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - '69 F-250 F25 F-250 2WD Y 360 V8 L Assembeled in Michigan 7500 lb Gross Vehicle Weight The D19536 in my book registers as an April of 1968 Truck. So you may have a 69 titled as a 69. The 69's I believe were introduced in September of 68 if my memory serves me correctly. Ken 68 F-100 Ranger 360, C6(titled as a 69) > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-61-79-list > [mailto:owner-61-79-list > Sent: Friday, May 08, 1998 6:54 PM > To: 61-79-list > Subject: FTE 61-79 - '69 F-250 > > > Could someone please decode this VIN for me. We picked up this truck today > and have no idea what we have. > > F25YLVD19536 > > Thanks, > Stoney > > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== > Send posts to: 61-79-list > Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo > "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. > ======================================================================= > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 21:56:14 EDT From: GMPACHECO Subject: FTE 61-79 - trans numbers can some tell me something about this tranny ? Its suppose to be a toploader.... Here's all the numbers... on the casing ORION 2630366 3D7DR78040 AA2803885-C on the main casing stamped in.. RUGCLBK9 D8UREA0090 ALSO C LL 01 2 OR DOES SOMEONE KNOW WHAT SITE WILL BREAK IT DOWN FOR ME?? MIKE IN SEATTLE = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 22:00:30 EDT From: GMPACHECO Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - trans numbers OPPS That should have read 2603606 = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 22:13:03 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE 61-79 - Permission to use your pictures. Tonight Peggy and I were scanning in several pictures mailed to us for the pictorial and t-shirt. We have an idea for the booth at the Pigeon Forge show. We want to display these trucks on a bulletin board to let people know what type of trucks our members drive. We're also going to print out several from the pictorial. If you have any objection to your truck being displayed let us know and we won't show it. Email us privately about this (kpayne Pictures will be displayed at the show and not given out to anyone. Also, if your truck from the pictorial doesn't show up, its probably because the image didn't print out too well, not because we didn't like it. Ink jet printers can be picky about what prints out good. Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 22:18:31 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE 61-79 - Badges for the show jniolon at the Pigeon Forge show to identify yourself as a Ford Truck Enthusiast member: http://www.ford-trucks.com/badge.gif Feel free to download and print it. Thanks to John Niolon for this design! Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 22:36:42 EDT From: JJJJJGRANT Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? punch the 390 .060 over install 428 cj heads,and a good aluminum intake with a decent cam.or a favorite is to put a 428 engine in it ( fairly expensive,but a lot of torque) 427 is nice also but very expensive unless you just get lucky. my personal opinion,460 makes more power with fewer mods and parts are more plentiful. i have a toploader out of a 69 mach 1 for sale. jeff grant 78 f150 4x4 68 m715 military jeep truck 69 mach1 mustang 84 gt mustang and oops 92 gmc suburban 2500 w/454, belongs to the wife,has a ford racing tag on the front. = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 22:57:07 EDT From: GMPACHECO Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? whats the price... just want to know if i paid too much for mine.. Mike in Seattle = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:05:24 -0000 From: "Kevin" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - My front leaf springs I have sent this post twice, it looks like you do not want to give a person an answer (Ken, Sledddog). Oh-well good by again! - -----Original Message----- From: Kevin To: 61-79-list Date: Sunday, May 10, 1998 6:17 AM Subject: FTE 61-79 - My front leaf springs >My front leaf springs on my 64 Ford have just about seen there last bounce. >Any advice on what to do? I don't want to go through the trouble of.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|