|
|
61-79-list-digest Tuesday, May 5 1998 Volume 02 : Number 245 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: gauges FTE 61-79 - engine FTE 61-79 - who's going to Pigeon forge ? FTE 61-79 - Re: Thanks! FTE 61-79 - Hubs & Highboy's FTE 61-79 - 390 Rebuild Re: FTE 61-79 - engine FTE 61-79 - Re: Hard Starting Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Thanks! Re: FTE 61-79 - 390 Rebuild FTE 61-79 - Cheap Fare FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front Re: FTE 61-79 - New Server Re: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front FTE 61-79 - Wife Re: FTE 61-79 - Wife FTE 61-79 - RE: dana 60 front Re: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front Re: FTE 61-79 - who's going to Pigeon forge ? FTE 61-79 - shifter bushings Re: FTE 61-79 - RE: dana 60 front Re: FTE 61-79 - shifter bushings ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 14:47:37 -0700 From: John MacNamara Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: gauges Sleddog wrote: > i hope it was AFTER the wedding!! > > ---------- > From: sdelanty > Sent: Monday, May 04, 1998 2:02 PM > To: 61-79-list > Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: gauges > > A friend of mine had his "episode" on his wedding day. > The copper tube at the back of the gauge cracked and sprayed his new > brides feet with nice warm oil. I hear it's *very* expensive to get > dirty 10-40 out of Your wedding dress... Nope: I use Gunk engine cleaner to remove oil from my shirts when they get sprayed. It cost $1.49 at Pep Boys. Where there's a will there's a way!! Regards John 78 F250 4X4 Supercab = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 17:05:16 -0500 From: "Eric Washburn" Subject: FTE 61-79 - engine I have a 1967 F100 Custom Cab with a 240 in it. I think it threw a rod and instead of fixing it , I want to know what I have to do to put a 300 in it. I have a 3-speed manual Ford tranny (Code #C). I woul appreciate any info! = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 17:23 -0400 (EDT) From: jniolon Subject: FTE 61-79 - who's going to Pigeon forge ? did we ever get a list of who's going to the Nat's I am wondering who to look for? john = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 21:03:16 -0500 From: "Dennis K. Austin" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Thanks! Thanks Don Grossman for your help. Yes, I did go out today and paid to have 9 inch rearend from a 1974 Ranger pulled. I am getting it hub to hub, brake line and all. That will match up with the front end which is all 1974 parts too. Don, you didn't say anything about the original tranny. Is it a better street tranny than the NP435? - -=DENNIS=- = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 19:31:47 PDT From: "Dave Walbeck" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Hubs & Highboy's Hello Again Everyone, The hubs were made by Dana/Spicer, and yes they were used on D*dge & Ch*vy also (Although not as much as on the Fords) and NONE sit higher from the factory than a HIGHBOY!!!! In fact I picked up a pair from a Ch*vy for one of my trucks and just changed the knobs (Still available from Ford). I'm not exactly sure why they quit using the external hubs (Maybe they are just to strong and Ford wasn't selling trucks because they weren't breaking) or maybe when Ford changed to the reverse rotation front end they were afraid of front end problems who knows. That is one question, unfortunatly, I can't answer. As for the lift blocks, YES all Highboy's have them from the factory. They all should have the loops cast into them unless they have been changed or broken. Jeff, The only other parts that I show available are the bolts P/N 302298 and the knob retainer ( I think this is the pin but I'm not sure) P/N D2TZ-1A093-A, I can get you all the other part numbers if you want them but they are all obsolete. I even tried getting parts for these hubs from Ch*vy but they discontinued them before Ford did, although I haven't tried D*dge which gets me thinking, Hmmmmmm. Might have to call them tomorrow. Let me know if you want these other numbers. Dave Complete and Total FORDNUT, Highboy Nut, & FE Nut Too!!!!!!!! ______________________________________________________ = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 03 Sep 1956 21:45:02 +0000 From: Mark & Allison Miller Subject: FTE 61-79 - 390 Rebuild Hello I am a new subscriber to this list. My name is Mark Miller and I recentlty bought a 67 F-100 Ranger 4WD that needs some TLC. I am a novice when it comes to aouto repair but have a friend who is showing me the ropes. I have decided that before I do any fancy accessories or body work I will rebuild the 390 that is in it now. I am looking for advice and possibly a good source of information on rebuiling this engine. I am trying to keep the cost to a minimum but I am also not concernd with going th extra mile to make it real nice and reliable. If anyone could help[ it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Mark = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 20:17:44 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - engine At 05:05 PM 5/4/98 -0500, you wrote: >I have a 1967 F100 Custom Cab with a 240 in it. I think it threw a rod and >instead of fixing it , I want to know what I have to do to put a 300 in it. >I have a 3-speed manual Ford tranny (Code #C). >I woul appreciate any info! Unbolt the 240 and bolt in the 300. It should be a direct bolt in swap, no different than putting another 240 in. Steve http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty/ When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -- Hunter S. Thompson = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 23:54:43, -0500 From: GEGK00A Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Hard Starting In an earlier posting I mentioned that my 351C-4V was hard to crank when hot. I received several replies to that post. One suggested electrical problems including battery. Another suggested percolating fuel in the carb due to excessive heat or just an overrich mixture. I set up a test to try to determine the cause of the problem. I ran the engine at idle until it reached operating temperature. Then I removed the fuse for the electric fuel pump. When the motor stopped, I restarted it until it would not start any longer. At this time the motor cranked normally, in spite of being at operating temperature. Then I replaced the fuse and let the fuel pump operate. When the carb was filled, I tried to start again, this time the engine was hard to crank. Now I know that the problem is not electrical. The next thing I should try is to lean the idle mixture (idle is fine the way it is now) or lower the float level, or insert a carb insulator under the carb (Carter on a Edelbrock aluminum manifold.) Dan Lee '53 F100 351C-4V = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 21:46:13 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Thanks! Dennis K. Austin wrote: > Thanks Don Grossman for your help. Yes, I did go out today and paid to have 9 inch rearend from a 1974 > Ranger pulled. I am getting it hub to hub, brake line and all. That will match up with the front end > which is all 1974 parts too. > > Don, you didn't say anything about the original tranny. Is it a better street tranny than the NP435? > > -=DENNIS=- > For standard street driving it should be fine. If you do lots of heavy towing or hauling the 435 might be the better choice. You have the extra low first gear but drive it like a three speed most of the time anyway. Usage is always the key. The 74 rear end will (should) be a stronger housing than the older one. Did you happen to check the spring pad width and the distance from hub to hub. I am not sure if 74 had a wider rear frame than the earlier trucks. - -- Don Grossman duckdon http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pacific.net/~duckdon 63 F-100 4x4 with 3/4 ton running gear and most of the trimmings. = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 21:58:33 -0700 From: "Deacon" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 390 Rebuild From: Mark >I am >trying to keep the cost to a minimum but I am also not concernd with >going th extra mile to make it real nice and reliable. If anyone could >help[ it would be greatly appreciated. Just get a couple cans of Ford blue paint and spray it over the oil and dirt and you should get what your looking for! I get all my information from MAD magazine. :) Deacon's the king at twisting words! Welcome to the list Mark. Pay no attention to me. I think I'm a Comedian. :) Deacon deconblu ============================= Nuke the unborn baby whales. ============================= Deacon's http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 00:51:16 -0500 From: ballingr Subject: FTE 61-79 - Cheap Fare >Hang in there, the ride is rough but the destination is worth it. >Ken Payne, List Slave >Ford Truck Enthusiasts >http://www.ford-trucks.com Well worth it in my book. > A friend of mine had his "episode" on his wedding day. > The copper tube at the back of the gauge cracked and sprayed his new > brides feet with nice warm oil. I hear it's *very* expensive to get > dirty 10-40 out of Your wedding dress... Don't you know that got things off on the wrong "foot". I have a story that's probably worse than that. I suckered my wife(a week before the wedding) into helping me change a set of valve guide seals in her dad's '74 F250. Did it in chassis, with compressed air. The spring compressor broke about half way through, and she was afraid she'd drop the keepers. So she compressed the springs by hand. Gave me a little pause on where I let her grab me when she's mad. And she probably gets mad everytime she looks at the wedding pictures, because she doesn't have any fingernails! R-E-S-P-E-C-T, she gets ALL she wants. Ballinger ballingr = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 08:43:04 -0700 From: james oxley Subject: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front Hey all Picked up my dana 60 front yesterday. Guy did real sweet job on the radius arm mounts. Just for kicks, I started mesuring stuff. I found out Dana 60 front is 3 inches wider than dana 44 from wheel flange to wheel flange. I measured the extra dana 60 rear I have and it's the same as the dana 44 front. If I remember right, the dana 60 rear was wider than the 9", drum to drum. Is that normal for the front track to be wider than the rear?? OX = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 09:44:47 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - New Server At 03:29 AM 5/4/98 -0500, you wrote: >Congratulations Ken. > > >Ballinger >ballingr > Thanks, Now that its working (still have to getting the posting person's email address in the digest headers) I can set up other lists for the members without increasing costs. This is a huge plus. And our server archives the digests temporarily so I can resend anything if something does go wrong, an option I didn't have with the old list server. Ken = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 07:05:15 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front james oxley wrote: > Hey all > > Picked up my dana 60 front yesterday. Guy did real sweet job on the > radius arm mounts. Just for kicks, I started mesuring stuff. I found out > Dana 60 front is 3 inches wider than dana 44 from wheel flange to wheel > flange. I measured the extra dana 60 rear I have and it's the same as the > dana 44 front. If I remember right, the dana 60 rear was wider than the > 9", drum to drum. Is that normal for the front track to be wider than > the rear?? > > OX > Yep, also depending on what year trucks the parts are off of. As the trucks get newer they also go wider. The 78Dana 44 I put under my truck is about 4" wider than the origional 63 Dana 44. It looks alot wider compared with the 60's Dana 60 rear. I am going to measure some 73 and later Dana 60 rears to see if they come closer to the Dana 44. That's gona be trick, coil spring Dana 60. - -- Don Grossman duckdon http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pacific.net/~duckdon 63 F-100 4x4 with 3/4 ton running gear and most of the trimmings. = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 12:39:11 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Wife Stu varner wrote: >>I want her to move in with me.....wanna work out a trade?? :) very big grin!! I might could come up with a 427 block!!???? Are you wired for 2 wives?????????? Bet they wouldn't share!!!!! I agree that it would be great to have a wife to share in our hobbies, but it probably wouldn't work to have two of them. Azie Ardmore, Al. = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 12:42:07 -0600 (CST) From: Stu Varner Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Wife At 12:39 PM 5/5/98 -0400, you wrote: >Stu varner wrote: >>I want her to move in with me.....wanna work out a >trade?? >:) very big grin!! I might could come up with a 427 block!!???? > >Are you wired for 2 wives?????????? Bet they wouldn't share!!!!! >I agree that it would be great to have a wife to share in our hobbies, >but it probably wouldn't work to have two of them. > > I am not a bigamist! Just wanted to work out a trade! :) My wife is supportive I guess, Just doesn';t want an older Bronco as a daily driver .......she wants one of those spensive Expeditions! OUCH! You must be catching up on long lost mail. This was weeks old! Stu Nuke GM! check out the homepage! www.pscico.com/stu = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 13:14:44 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: FTE 61-79 - RE: dana 60 front i have a dana 60 front that may find it's way into my pull truck, using the radius arms, if my 1./2 ton suspension doesn't hold up this year. can you send info on how you are doing this swap? how was the mounts made for the axle/arms? i have a old 44 with welded on mounts. is this the way to go to cut them off and put on to the 60? sleddog - ---------- From: james oxley[SMTP:luxjo Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 1998 11:43 AM To: bigbroncos com Cc: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front Hey all Picked up my dana 60 front yesterday. Guy did real sweet job on the radius arm mounts. Just for kicks, I started mesuring stuff. I found out Dana 60 front is 3 inches wider than dana 44 from wheel flange to wheel flange. I measured the extra dana 60 rear I have and it's the same as the dana 44 front. If I remember right, the dana 60 rear was wider than the 9", drum to drum. Is that normal for the front track to be wider than the rear?? OX = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 14:19:11 -0700 From: james oxley Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front Don Grossman wrote: > > james oxley wrote: > > Yep, also depending on what year trucks the parts are off of. As the trucks > get newer they also go wider. The 78Dana 44 I put under my truck is about > 4" wider than the origional 63 Dana 44. It looks alot wider compared with > the 60's Dana 60 rear. I am going to measure some 73 and later Dana 60 > rears to see if they come closer to the Dana 44. > Well, the dana 60 front (not sure what year), seems identical to 78, F-250, HD option, front I have for parts (cept locking mech). The locking mech on the older modded 60 front has plastic wheels you grab on the outside vs the newer dana 60 fronts that have larger versions of chrome ring/red plastic twist thing. Anyway, the modded 60 front is 70 inches disc to disc (talking wheel mating surface here). The dana 60 rear I have (1979) is 67 inches, disc to disc (I have rear disc). The dana 44, 5 lug is 67 inches disc to disc. If I remember, the 9" was not as wide as the dana 60, hence less than 67 inches. I also have one side of a dana 44 HD upgrade. At least .75 inches of the extra 1.5 inches from each side comes from the different brake setups. Dana 44 HD (78-79 vintage) is .75 wider from knuckle to wheel mating than std dana 44 (78-79 vintage). I was planning on running 15" tires (35's) for boat pulling. This would require caliper grinding and 1/4 inch spacers up front, making front track even wider, Uggh!!. Guess I'll definately go with 16.5's for offroad to avoid spacer use. I also thought maybe dana 60 front was from an older truck, possibly being wider, but your sayin it's just the opposite ;-). I guess the dana 60 rears did not change with the fronts, as I have a 78 and a 79 and they are both 67 inches drum to drum. >Thats gonna be trick, coil spring Dana 60. I just saw in 4 Wheeler a guy with a 77 F-150 that had 9" lift, coil front, dana 60 front and dana 70 rear. It will be pretty cool though and I guess it works, cause this guy had detroits and 44 boggers, probably the biggest/heaviest street legal tire made. OX = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 13:28:14 -0600 (CST) From: Stu Varner Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - who's going to Pigeon forge ? At 05:23 PM 5/4/98 -0400, you wrote: > > did we ever get a list of who's going to the Nat's > > I am wondering who to look for? Ken Payne, list dad Clare Waterman-Storer (2) Keith Srb Ted Freeman and wife Barry Price and spouse Jon Purut and Chelley his bride John Miller and wife.....semper fi John and Peggy Niolon Dan and Marsha Herman...he claims to be the tallest and ugliest there. Charles and his F-250...no last name? Colorado Jeff Kristen marcellus all the way from canada Gary Bowling Yours truely.....Stu varner Feel free to add your name to the list so we can figure it all out by the 15th!! Enjoy and I look forward to seeing everyone there! = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 14:33 -0400 (EDT) From: craig001 Subject: FTE 61-79 - shifter bushings Played around with my toy (70 F100, 300 ci, 4speed) yesterday and as usual found more questions than answers. Has anyone changed the shifter bushings on a 4-speed? I pulled the cover off the cab floor to gain access to the gearbox. It looks like I have to either pry off the cap at the base of the shifter OR remove the top cover of the gearbox to get at the bushings. I didn't pry off the cap because I thought I might mangle it and I ran out of light before I had enough gunk cleaned off the gearbox to remove the cover. How should I proceed? If I remove the top cover, would this be a good time to change the gear oil (assuming there is any in there)? Any suggestions on oil type/weight? The parts guy at the local Ford dealer said I should take the old bushings down there and he would have new ones in stock. Does this sound reasonable? I'd rather not disassemble a running truck and then have it all in pieces and find out I can't get the new parts any time soon. I found some numbers on the gearbox cover: A27 2 and then under it in bigger type T18-148D. Also on a little tag on one of the cover bolts: AS69-T18 and C9T3 N-1 Do these tell me anything? There is also a labelmaker label stuck to the driver's side door jamb that reads AF 23095. Is this maybe a chassis number from a tag that has been removed? BTW, I also found out this weekend that the P.O. bought the truck with over 300K miles on it. He didn't turn over the odometer, but I just did, so I'm at the 400K mark! Thanks in advance to these newbie questions. Damian Craig = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 15:17:34 -0700 From: james oxley Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - RE: dana 60 front Sleddog wrote: > > can you send info on how you are doing this swap? how was the mounts >made for the axle/arms? i have a old 44 with welded on mounts. The idea was mine (prob not original though), but not the execution. I did use a 78, dana 44, 1/2 ton front for a donor. The tubes were cut off on either end of each mount. Mounts were then bored down the middle to match dana 60 axle tube size. There is no way I could have done that part myself. After boring, mounts were cut in half on top and bottom. Leaf spring mount and steering stab mounts were cut off on pass side. Mount halfs were welded to D60 axle tubes in approprate spots. I haven't bolted it in yet, but 1/2 ton steering is supposed to bolt right up to knuckles. I have a D60 front for parts and am using knuckle cap from non-steering side to replace steering side that I don't need anymore. Adjustable drag link may be needed. Superlift sells this for 130$. Track bar mounts just like it did as pass mount contains the track bar. Let everyone know more as conversion progresses. OX is this the way to go > to cut them off and put on to the 60? > > sleddog > > ---------- > From: james oxley[SMTP:luxjo > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 1998 11:43 AM > To: bigbroncos com > Cc: 61-79-list > Subject: FTE 61-79 - dana 60 front > > Hey all > > Picked up my dana 60 front yesterday. Guy did real sweet job on the > radius arm mounts. Just for kicks, I started mesuring stuff. I found out > Dana 60 front is 3 inches wider than dana 44 from wheel flange to wheel > flange. I measured the extra dana 60 rear I have and it's the same as the > dana 44 front. If I remember right, the dana 60 rear was wider than the > 9", drum to drum. Is that normal for the front track to be wider than > the rear?? > > OX > > = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== > Send posts to: 61-79-list > Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo > "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. > ======================================================================= = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 14:27:23 -0600 (CST) From: Stu Varner Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - shifter bushings At 02:33 PM 5/5/98 -0400, you wrote: > Played around with my toy (70 F100, 300 ci, 4speed) yesterday and > as usual found more questions than answers. Has anyone changed > the shifter bushings on a 4-speed? I pulled the cover off the cab > floor to gain access to the gearbox. It looks like I have to > either pry off the cap at the base of the shifter OR remove the > top cover of the gearbox to get at the bushings. I didn't pry off > the cap because I thought I might mangle it and I ran out of > light before I had enough gunk cleaned off the gearbox to remove > the cover. How should I proceed? When you take the black cover off the floor, take a large pair of channel locks and press down on the hemispherical cover and turn counter clockwise. There are 2 pins which are located at 3 and 9 oclock that hold the hemi shaped cover in place. The shifter shaft should come out with the hemispherical part ......at least this is how the NP 435 is. Correct me if.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|