|
|
61-79-list-digest Thursday, August 20 1998 Volume 02 : Number 410 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: re:FTE 61-79 - oil Re: FTE 61-79 - oil FTE 61-79 - no brakes Re: FTE 61-79 - Tranny Identification FTE 61-79 - 390 pistons Re: FTE 61-79 - 390 pistons FTE 61-79 - tranny cooler FTE 61-79 - Diesel in Engine oil Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Valve clatter - Diesel Fuel [none] FTE 61-79 - A/C brackets for FE FTE 61-79 - Regular, Limited Slip, and Posi "identification FTE 61-79 - 67-72 Gast tank questions FTE 61-79 - Type of tranny Re: FTE 61-79 - oil FTE 61-79 - U-Joints FTE 61-79 - RE:Mystery Solved-Disaster avoided Now Vacuum tuning. FTE 61-79 - ADMIN: Truck Driving Schools (2 of 2) Re: FTE 61-79 - oil FTE 61-79 - Re: Universal joints FTE 61-79 - Re: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Universal joints FTE 61-79 - Disk brakes for '61 F-100 2wd FTE 61-79 - 70 F-100 FTE 61-79 - 352 pistons ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 98 15:14:44 -0400 From: "Donald R. Haulsee" Subject: re:FTE 61-79 - oil My Opinion: Break it in on 10w-30 conventional oil for about 5000 miles. Then change to synthetic (Mobil 1 or Amsoil) and continue to change the oil and filter every 4-5000 miles. Don't delay the change to synthetic for more than 20,000 miles. Conventional oils build up varnish as well as swell the seals slightly. Synthetic will remove the buildup and the seals will return to original size. On high mileage engines (70,000 miles +), there is probably 30% chance that either the front or rear main will leak after a change to synthetic. Don 66 F100 SEFI 5 liter/AOD 86 Turbocoupe 5spd Intercooled 18psi 162,000 miles and going strong 87 Merkur XR4Ti C3 stock as a rock == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:32:22 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - oil From: "Bruce Washburn" Subject: FTE 61-79 - oil Date sent: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 13:46:30 -0500 > Hi! I am in the process of rebuilding my 240 that has been bored out 60 > over. It is a '67' model and I was just wondering what the best type and > brand of motor oil to put in it?(I want the engine to last a long time!) > I live in the Fort Worth, Texas region so it is usually in the 100+'s. > Any help will be appreciated! Amsoil, Redline or Mobil1. You can't beat synthetics for long life but make sure you do a good job on the seals. Amsoil and Redline are both in the $7 range per qt and Mobil1 is generally around $4/qt. Amsoil claims up to 25k miles per oil change with proper filter changes (two per oil change) and they guarantee it in writing if you strictly follow their recommendations. 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's 78 LIncoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! 9000#, in ground vehicle lift, Woooo Hoooo! - -- Gary -- == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 14:19:02 -0500 From: John LaGrone Subject: FTE 61-79 - no brakes The last time I bought a rotor it was coated in a preservative to prevent rust while it came over on the boat. The military calls this stuff cosmoline (I spelled it phonetically). At any rate, you have to remove the stuff before you install the part or it won't work right. - -John jlagrone 1979 F150 Custom 351M C6, bashed in left door, new left front fender 1988 Towncar 5.0 EFI EAOD Macintosh G3/233 minitower (The software box said Windows95 or better, so I bought a Mac.) 1979 MC under restoration (my son loves old cars, too!!!) Dearborn iron rules!!!!!! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:18:46 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Tranny Identification From: "Chad Pasma" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Tranny Identification Date sent: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:08:02 PDT > How can I tell what kind of transmissions I have? > The one on my 351M is C6 for sure but I need to > know what my other two are. Both are/were from > 302's. C-6 and E4OD both have integral housing and bell housing. Both AOD and C-4 have separate bell housing so if you have separate bell housing and there is an OD position on your shifter then you have the AOD etc.. 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's 78 LIncoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! 9000#, in ground vehicle lift, Woooo Hoooo! - -- Gary -- == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 13:44:30 -0700 From: "todd cook" Subject: FTE 61-79 - 390 pistons I'm wanting to rebuild my 1976 3/4 ton 4x4 highboy which currently has a 360 to a 390. My question is- does anybody know where I can buy pistons that will give me 9 or 9.5 compression with the stock 360 heads? thanks Todd - --- Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere! http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mailexcite.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 13:54:08 -0700 From: Marko Maryniak Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 390 pistons At 01:44 PM 19/08/98 -0700, you wrote: >I'm wanting to rebuild my 1976 3/4 ton 4x4 highboy which currently has a 360 to a 390. My question is- does anybody know where I can buy pistons that will give me 9 or 9.5 compression with the stock 360 heads? thanks Todd > Silvolite makes all kinds of em. Make sure you specify 390 pistons and not 360's as you will need the slipper skirt. Pistons for my 410 came up about 9:1. marko in vancouver marko == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:31:16 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE 61-79 - tranny cooler Drew writes: >>The instructions say that it is preferable to use it in series with the stock radiator cooler. I have two now on M*PARS that I drive daily, and this is the way they are. The return line from the radiator cooler is interrupted and routed through the aux cooler and then returns to the tranny. This is also the way the factory factory setup for M*PARS functions. Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:46:43 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Diesel in Engine oil Larry writes: >>Farmers & Machanic's used this method in the 50's & 60s to clean engines. Some farmers and a few mechanics still do. Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:53:05 -0500 From: Mike Schwall Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Valve clatter - Diesel Fuel At 08:43 AM 8/19/98 , you wrote: >> Don Yerhot wrote: >> I finally tried pouring 2 quarts of diesel fuel into >>the engine on top of the existing oil, let it idle for 15 minutes > >I don't doubt you when you say this worked, but what is this supposed to do? >Does the diesel ignite under the pressure and blow out deposits? Perhaps the >fuel+additives simply chemically clean the deposits off? Sounds really wierd, I >dont think I would have had the intestinal fortitude to have tried it. >bkirking I believe it acts as a solvent and oil thinner. Mike _____________________________________________ Email: mschwall Home Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://mschwall.home.texas.net FORD FAN PAGE: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.fordfan.org == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:54:43 -0400 From: am14 Subject: [none] == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:58:07 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE 61-79 - A/C brackets for FE Bryan writes: >>Soooo, are there any 352's out there with AC that can help me out? A part number would be great, a source with some would be great, A used one you want to get rid of would be a dream come true! Any 390/352 of approximately the same year bracket should work, whether it be car or truck. There might be some spacing differences for the pulleys to lineup, but I don't think so. Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 18:02:18 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Regular, Limited Slip, and Posi "identification Hi Michael, Well, you've run a little into my turf here on the 69 Dana 60 stuff. The limited slip will also make both wheels turn the same way when the tires are off the ground. Limited slip was definitely an option in 69, as it came in my 69 F-100 4x4 (Dana 60-2, semi-floating axles, 5-lug). I just recently rebuilt it, and stuck it in a 72 F-250 Dana 60 rear axle, along with new, 30-spline axles and amazingly, 3" drum brakes from an 80-85 Dodge Dana 60. It was awesome that all these parts interchanged! By the way, my unit is called the Dana "Power-Lok". It is the more aggressive version of the Trak Lok. It has 4 internal gears rather than 2 like the Trak Lok. I've run this unit for about 20 years now, and never had a problem.... Colorado Jeff == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 18:02:32 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - 67-72 Gast tank questions Hey Joe, If you're looking at saddle tanks, I think they are the same. I have the behind-the-seat tank plus two saddles (roughly 60 gallons total)..... Colorado Jeff == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 18:09:25 -0400 From: am14 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Type of tranny Chad writes: >>Does a double input shaft mean lockup converter? No! Lockups are ID'd by the very tip of the small shaft having a "finished" end(not splined all the way to the end - usually from 1/2" to 1" or so). C-6 is identified by the pan being "square" except for one corner having a notch in it. Does this make sense??????????? Azie Ardmore, Al. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:11:35 -0500 From: Mike Schwall Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - oil At 01:46 PM 8/19/98 , you wrote: >Hi! I am in the process of rebuilding my 240 that has been bored out 60 >over. It is a '67' model and I was just wondering what the best type and >brand of motor oil to put in it?(I want the engine to last a long time!) I >live in the Fort Worth, Texas region so it is usually in the 100+'s. Any >help will be appreciated! In my opinion (disclaimer), break it in with Castrol, Pennzoil, or whatever straight 30 weight (or 10W-30 if you are doing it in the winter). Change the oil and filter after cam breakin, then again at 100 miles, then again at 500, then again at 1000, then every 3000 miles until the thing has at least 6 to 9000 miles on it, then switch to full synthetic such as Mobil 1 (if you call Mobil 1 a true full synthetic oil). Then change it at every 3 to 6000 (change the filter at 3000 regardless). Mike San Antonio, TX _____________________________________________ Email: mschwall Home Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://mschwall.home.texas.net FORD FAN PAGE: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.fordfan.org == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:50:39 -0700 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: FTE 61-79 - U-Joints For what it's worth (not much but hey I gotta say it anyway), I didn't fully understand how U-joints worked till I had to replace a set myself. I always thought that the needle bearings made a complete trip around the spider. When I got the old ones apart and saw the wear pattern I realized they couldn't be doing that. So what was up? The wear pattern was little notches in the spider that the needles fit into. Then I looked at the motion of the U-joint in the drive line. If the drive shaft was straight then there would be absolutely no movement of the needle bearings and consequently no wear on the U-joint. (except for maybe shock load driving the needles into the spider). As the drive line angle increases then the distance the needles move increases but there is no point where the needles would make a continuous and complete circuit around the spider like a normal bearing in rotational motion. The motion that the U-joint sees is as if it was stationary and the drive shaft was moving up and down in an oscillating motion. Where is this going? Nowhere except there MIGHT be some applications for permanently lubbed U-Joints in stock applications where the drive shaft angle is not too great. Lets face it the manufacturer is not going to put something on the vehicle that they know is not going to outlast the warantee. In some of our applications (4X4, lifted etc) the drive shaft angles become greater and the motion of the U-Joint is increased so more lubrication is needed. An application where a greasable U-Joint is definitely required. Don't get me wrong I will always install a greasable U-Joint if there is an option. These are just some thoughts. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:03:20 -0700 From: "Hogan, Tom" Subject: FTE 61-79 - RE:Mystery Solved-Disaster avoided Now Vacuum tuning. - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 08:04:53 -0500 From: William S Hart Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Mystery Solved-Disaster avoided The gauge is not rock steady, it will sit in one spot, then drop for a second and come back, then maybe rise for a second and come back ... its really weird, you can hear it in the idle too, so I know its been doing it for a while. Its not just one cylinder I don't think, its too slow and irregular to be based on one cylinder, unless its suddenly firing or not firing after so many revs. Bill =========================== Is the needle motion on the guage kind of a slow rolling motion or is it a little more abrupt. If it is slow and it seems that your engine is "hunting" for the correct idle speed it could be time for a rebuild on your carburator. If the carb gaskets are worn and it is not metering properly the engine will be seeing a continuous shift from rich to normal to lean to normal etc. and the idle speed will change accordingly. If the needle is moving more rapidly is sudden "jerky" motions then it could be bad intake valves or possibly a cam shaft with a lot of overlap. If it is the carb and you have smog nazis in your neighborhood then you may have trouble passing the E-check. Tom H. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:31:11 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE 61-79 - ADMIN: Truck Driving Schools (2 of 2) Dear Ford Truck Enthusiasts list members: We have a new advertiser on our web site. Since the beginning, our practice with web site advertisers has been to make a brief announcement for 2 days (this is day 2 of 2). Please show your appreciation to them for helping to support the web site and the lists by checking out their site: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.webspawner.com/users/easyhaul/index.html Easy Haul is a personalized service by Alan DeBoer Sr., who has extensive experience as both a professional truck driver and a certified instructor. If you've considered a career driving a big rig, Alan offers a locating service of recognized and approved truck driving schools in the United States or Canada. Check it out. We would like to you to let Alan know you heard about his service via the Ford Truck Enthusiasts group. Now returning you to our regularly scheduled program... (thanks Keith, didn't mean to intrude!) Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:49:28 EDT From: JUMPINFORD Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - oil I'd say break it in on Valvoline for the first 5000, then switch over to Mobil 1 synthetic. This is without a doubt the best oil on the market. Without it I would be on the 4th engine in my F-600. JUMPINFORD 73 F-250 RangerXLT Camper Special == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 18:55:49 -0700 From: "Jim Cron" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Universal joints Another 2c worth. The u-joint body can be made two ways, by forging as one piece or by taking a round "puck" and spin welding on four legs. You can tell the difference at a glance. The spin welded ones IMHO are cheep junk, don't waste your time with them. If it has a forged body and a lube fitting, and a name I have heard of (for drive train parts, not air fresheners) on the box, I pay what they ask. U-joints are too much work to save a few dollars on. "Lubed for life" should be added to the list that starts with "check is in the mail" and includes "will go out tomorrow". If you read the fine print that comes with most greaseable u-joints, it will say that the "grease" in them is a preservative. It is not what you want in there so you must grease them. I agree w. Marko about not greasing them until installed, but if you put a c-clamp across each set of caps (loosely) you can pre-grease them. Jim somewhere near Seattle == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 19:05:39 -0700 From: Blaine Strong Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Cam and Wilma Kenny wrote: > > I have a 1977 F 250 3/4 ton 4x4 standard trany with bo low and soon to be > powered with a 390... everything is stock except for the 390. do i need a > pilot bearing for it? some people i have talked to say yes, some say no. > Any input would be a great help. > thanks. > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html If you have a standard transmission, you better have a pilot bearing or bushing for the input shaft of the transmission to locate in, or the clutch disk will wobble, causing poor operation. It probably won't do the transmission any good either! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:59:56 -0500 From: Mike Schwall Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Universal joints At 08:55 PM 8/19/98 , you wrote: >Another 2c worth. The u-joint body can be made two ways, by forging as one >piece or by taking a round "puck" and spin welding on four legs. You can >tell the difference at a glance. The spin welded ones IMHO are cheep junk, >don't waste your time with them. If it has a forged body and a lube >fitting, and a name I have heard of (for drive train parts, not air >fresheners) on the box, I pay what they ask. U-joints are too much work to >save a few dollars on. "Lubed for life" should be added to the list that >starts with "check is in the mail" and includes "will go out tomorrow". I agree with not using the "greased for life" ujoints. Last year during a fishing trip at Rockport, TX, I broke the ujoint near the transmission (broke an ear clean off). There was only one parts store in town and all they had was the non-greasable ujoints. Given the situation I went ahead and bought it. I just replaced that same ujoint this last weekend because it was wore out and was causing a vibration. BTW, the ujoint wasn't the only thing that broke. The transmission yoke also broke. Somehow the grooves that hold the ujoint cup retaining clips broke off. It's amazing what a little bailing wire and JB Weld will do in emergencies. Mike _____________________________________________ Email: mschwall Home Page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://mschwall.home.texas.net FORD FAN PAGE: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.fordfan.org == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 20:58:24 -0700 From: Blaine Strong Subject: FTE 61-79 - Disk brakes for '61 F-100 2wd Was it you who said that you were working on a disk brake conversion for the '61 pickup? Blaine Strong Steve & Rockette wrote: > > >NO, I have no idea what AFAIK means. > > As Far As I Know it means as far as I know... > > I gotta stop drinkin SWMBO's home brew.... > > Steve & Rockette...Lifes a beach > '63 F100 Longbox > '94 Taurus SHO - SWMBO's new car!! > and since most are listing all thier cars: > '72 Capri - Rockette's Toy, aka - SWMBO > '73 Capri - My Toy / Daily Driver > '73 MGB-GT Our Toy > '70 Torino GT My "New" Car > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 23:52:35 EDT From: GMPACHECO Subject: FTE 61-79 - 70 F-100 What do you think about a 70 f-100 for 950.00 its an automatic with a c-6 also the engine was supposedly rebuilt about 50k ago... pretty clean, missing a few chrome pieces but other than that clean, needs the reg. paint, interior etc..?? Mike in Seattle == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 03:18:41 -0400 From: "Timothy R. Anderson" Subject: FTE 61-79 - 352 pistons Hi there, My name is Tim and I'm new to the list. My favorite toy is my '67 f-100 with 352/NP435. I live in Anchorage Alaska where =.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|