Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 




61-79-list-digest Sunday, May 31 1998 Volume 02 : Number 323



=======================================================================
Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans
Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
majordomo ford-trucks.com
with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the
message.
=======================================================================
In this issue:

Re: FTE 61-79 - FE timing question
FTE 61-79 - 70 F100 S/B 2wd - Salty Winters
FTE 61-79 - VIN number
Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Clothespins on fuel lines
Re: FTE 61-79 - Manifolds for 460
Re: FTE 61-79 - manifold vs. ported, was FE timing
FTE 61-79 - SunPro tach
FTE 61-79 - EFI on a '73 302
Re: FTE 61-79 - Carbs
Re: FTE 61-79 - Brake light update
FTE 61-79 - Re: FE Timing
Re: FTE 61-79 - EFI
FTE 61-79 - GM parts on a Ford
Re: FTE 61-79 - EFI on a '73 302
Re: FTE 61-79 - EFI on a '73 302

=======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 07:43:30 +0000
From: "Gary, 78 BBB"
Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - FE timing question

> Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 23:14:53 -0400
> From: Ken Payne
> Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - FE timing question

> One problem with using unported vacuum at idle is that if You set
> up the carb to give a nice idle when warmed up, say with 18" of
> vacuum then when the motor is cold and there's only 14" of vacuum
> it wants to idle much to slow. I found it almost impossible to get
> a nice stable idle speed over a wide range of operating temps with
> unported vacuum.

I hate to admit it but what you say makes sense. In order for it to
idle with less advance it has to have a richer mixture and of course
a richer mixture works better when it's cold but I don't see how a
leaner mixture with more advance will produce more unburned HC's?
When the engine is running at the fastest speed it will run with the
mixture and advance as lean and advanced as it can be you should be
running very close to stoich? I say this because engine speed is a
result of gasses and heat produced, more means more so you are
getting all you can get out of the mixture at that setting IMHO?

78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's
78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's
78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long!

- -- Gary --
= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 08:58:04 -0400
From: "THE PAVIES'"
Subject: FTE 61-79 - 70 F100 S/B 2wd - Salty Winters

OK- playing digest catch-up here again. For Salty Winters Rust Control,
I spray WD-40 on the undersides of all my vehicles. You can buy it by
the gallon at places like Home Depot, etc. My vehicles get a liberal
and thorough dowsing of the stuff (except on the exhaust and brakes, of
course) every 3,000 miles at oil-change time. SWMBO accusses me of
trying to get a high from the smell of it but actually the WD-40 works
well for me here in PA for Rust
Control.
Sorry I couldn't include the original post here but I haven't figured
out how to clip out a quote yet. Jack P.
= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 09:36:34 -0400
From: "THE PAVIES'"
Subject: FTE 61-79 - VIN number

- -This VIN tag is on the firewall of my 70's-something F250. Can someone
- -please interpret for me?
- -
- - 295 F25BMDH5403 16
- - 46 33 4BR 20K 7
- -
- -What's it trying to say? I've already run the F25BMDH5403 number on the
- -VIN program so I really, really need to know what the other numbers
- -mean. This is all part of the problem that comes up when you put a
- -later year cab on an older truck in an EPA-suppressed state like PA.
- -When you go for emissions inspection, the guy takes the VIN from the
- -door post and then goes hunting for all the emissions stuff that is
- -supposed to be on the engine for that year. You FLUNK if all those
- -things aren't there. The change I made was done years ago so I never
- -thought to save the VIN tags on the door and firewall off the old cab.
- -
- -To save space on this post, I'd appreciate a private e-mail answer. If
- -there is a reference manual out there somewhere that I can find these
- -numbers myself, let me know the title and ISBN if possible.
- -Thanks! Jack P.
= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 09:51:49 +0000
From: "Gary, 78 BBB"
Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: Clothespins on fuel lines

> Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 20:43:13 -0700
> From: Pat Brown
> Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Clothespins on fuel lines

> John wrote:
> >> Another thing to do is replace the metal line with a rubber one
> >> or putting a wooden clothes pin on the fuel line. Don't ask me
> >> how this last one works but for sure it does.

> SEE! I KNEW IT! Gary, you didn't install it with the magic magnet!
> If you install it just right, the magnet will re-align to north
> everytime!

This has been a lot of fun but really I've found the rubber hose
solves it most of the time since it does act as an insulator to some
extent so the outside stays hot but the inside is cooled by the
incoming fuel. Don't use clothes pins, I really don't believe they
do anything unless you use an awfull lot of them. Before we had
reliable rubber hose for fuel applications the old timers did what
they could to insulate the lines but now we have no excuse :-)

Again you could have a combination of percolation and vapor lock and
they could be caused by the same problem, too much heat getting to
the carb or it's base and affecting the temp right at the inlet. It
may not even be a line problem but still be vapor lock in that case.
I believe that was the problem with my van with cast iron EGR plate
under the carb along with the exhaust path under there as well. By
looping the rubber fuel line up about a foot over the carb and back
down again to the inlet I ensured there would be liquid at the inlet
and the problem went away. Even if it boiled, the weight of the fuel
kept some liquid at the bottom so the float bowls always had liquid
fuel rather than fumes.

When I finally get to my bronco 460 project it will have some

stainless braided line for everything including fuel. I don't
anticipate any more fuel related problems when I do that along with a
rubber base spacer of some sort.

78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's
78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's
78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long!

- -- Gary --
= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 10:01:16 +0000
From: "Gary, 78 BBB"
Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Manifolds for 460

> From: JJJJJGRANT aol.com
> Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 00:00:21 EDT
> Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Manifolds for 460

> i notched the frame on my 78 f150 4x4 when i put the 429 pi in
> it,this was done about 12 years ago,this truck gets used and
> abused,stump jumpin,muddin,sled pullin,and daily transportation and
> ihave not had any problem with the notch,in fact i was looking at it
> today.i was showing a friend what had to be done to install a 460 in
> his 78 f250 extended cab swb.

I notched my first one too and also reinforced it but the rear exit
manifold is really much more elegant and easy to work with and stock
truck exhaust systems were made to fit it perfectly so there are
several advantages to having the right manifold. I found that no
matter how I routed mine it was somewhat restricted due the the
location so you probably could get better flow with the truck
manifold as well.

Of course the headers didn't require notching and the Stan's tri-Y
sound like the best way to go since they don't get too close to the
starter. I may try them on my bronco project.

I guess if I had it to do all over again I'd get the L&L mounts and
headers that fit. In the long run you save money by eliminating all
the trial and error and wasted exhaust parts etc.. I bought and
modified two systems before going to headers and custom exhaust. I
could have done this off the bat and saved myself some work and money
as well.


78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's
78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's
78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long!

- -- Gary --
= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 10:03:47 +0000
From: "Gary, 78 BBB"
Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - manifold vs. ported, was FE timing

> Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 17:21:26 -0500
> From: John Strauss
> Subject: FTE 61-79 - manifold vs. ported, was FE timing

> No, that wouldn't work because if the throttle plates can be closed
> more then you have not backed off of the adjustment screw as much as
> possible. I am saying you already have the plates as closed as they

I guess I've never got one to idle with the throttle plate completely
closed before. I'm aware of the ones with idle bleed holes, guess I
never tried to get one down that far :-)

My solution then would be to run slighly richer and be done with it
:-)

78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's
78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's
78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long!

- -- Gary --
= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 08:39:22 -0500
From: "Dale and Donna Carmine"
Subject: FTE 61-79 - SunPro tach

Hi Dave,

I think that David hit the nail on the head in pointing to the ground.




Ahh! but it is grounded through every bulb filament.


>and then turning the panel light dimmer all the way down, and lo and
>behold, the tach comes back to life w/ the panel lights completely dimmed

This verifies that the ground is the problem. Like David said, if you are
100% sure that the external ground is good then it may be inside the tach.
Good Luck!

later,
dale c


= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 09:04:56 -0500
From: "Dale and Donna Carmine"
Subject: FTE 61-79 - EFI on a '73 302

deac,

Check out http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.windsor-fox.com/ for an EFI harness. Probably a higher
$$ approach but they will custom build a harness that will plug directly
into your existing wiring.

later,
dale c

= Ford Truck Enthusiasts ==============================================
Send posts to: 61-79-list ford-trucks.com
Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo ford-trucks.com with
"unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body.
=======================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 10:30:46 +0000
From: "Gary, 78 BBB"
Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Carbs

> From: "John Miller"
> Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Carbs
> Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 21:49:15 -0400

> Maybe I am seeing this wrong but I want everyone to know,
> especially
> Garr ford.com.whatever that I only stated "my" creed or likes as to

> someone lecturing me with statements of " my ears are closed on the....


To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are not registered, click here to register.
If you are already registered, you can login here.

If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.




Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.